1
|
Bivehed E, Söderberg O, Hellman B. Flash-comet: Significantly improved speed and sensitivity of the comet assay through the introduction of lithium-based solutions and a more gentle lysis. MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS 2020; 858-860:503240. [PMID: 33198930 DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2020.503240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 08/12/2020] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Evaluation of primary DNA-damage is one way to identify potential genotoxic agents and for this purpose the Comet assay has, for the last decades, been used to monitor DNA single strand and double strand breaks in individual cells. Various attempts have been made to modify the different steps in the in vitro protocol for the Comet assay in order to improve its sensitivity. However, to the best of our knowledge, nobody has tried to replace the traditionally used NaOH-based electrophoresis solution (pH > 13), with another type of solution. In the present paper, using TK-6 cells exposed to different concentrations of H2O2 or ionizing radiation, we present evidence clearly showing that a low-conductive LiOH-based electrophoresis solution at pH 12.5, and a more gentle lysis procedure, significantly improved both the speed and sensitivity of the assay. The new approach, which we call the Flash-comet, is based on a lysis buffer at pH 8.5, an unwinding time of 2.5 min in a LiOH solution without EDTA at pH 12.5, and an electrophoresis time of 1 min at 150 V (5 V/cm) using the same solution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Bivehed
- Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences/Drug Safety and Toxicology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Uppsala, SE, 751 24, Sweden.
| | - Ola Söderberg
- Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences/Pharmaceutical Cell Biology & Biotechnology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Uppsala, SE, 751 24, Sweden
| | - Björn Hellman
- Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences/Drug Safety and Toxicology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Uppsala, SE, 751 24, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Technical recommendations to perform the alkaline standard and enzyme-modified comet assay in human biomonitoring studies. Mutat Res 2019; 843:24-32. [PMID: 31421734 DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2018] [Revised: 04/10/2019] [Accepted: 04/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
The comet assay (single cell gel electrophoresis) is widely used as a biomonitoring tool to assess DNA damage - strand breaks, as well as oxidised bases; it can also be adapted to measure DNA repair. It is based on the ability of breaks in the DNA to relax supercoiling, allowing DNA loops to extend from the nuclear core (nucleoid) under an electric field to form a comet-like tail. Most commonly, it is applied to white blood cells. The range of detection is between a few hundred breaks per cell and a few thousand, encompassing levels of damage that can be repaired and tolerated by human cells. Its applications include monitoring various diseases, studying the influence of nutrition on DNA stability, and investigating effects of environmental and occupational mutagens. Here we address the issue of inter-laboratory variation in comet assay results. This variation is largely due to differences in methods. Imposing a standard protocol is not practical, but users should be aware of the crucial parameters that affect performance of the assay. These include the concentration of agarose in which the cells are embedded; the duration of cell lysis, and of enzyme incubation when oxidised bases are being measured; the duration of alkaline unwinding; the duration of electrophoresis and the voltage gradient applied; and the method used to score the comets. Including reference standards in each experiment allows experimental variability to be monitored - and if variation is not extreme, results can be normalised using reference standard values. Reference standards are also essential for inter-laboratory comparison. Finally, we offer recommendations which, we believe, will limit variability and increase the usefulness of this assay in molecular epidemiology.
Collapse
|
3
|
Enciso JM, Gutzkow KB, Brunborg G, Olsen AK, López de Cerain A, Azqueta A. Standardisation of the in vitro comet assay: influence of lysis time and lysis solution composition on the detection of DNA damage induced by X-rays. Mutagenesis 2018; 33:25-30. [DOI: 10.1093/mutage/gex039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2017] [Accepted: 11/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- José M Enciso
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Navarra, and IdiSNA, Navarra Institute for Health Research, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Kristine B Gutzkow
- Department of Molecular Biology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Environmental Radioactivity (CoE CERAD), Norway
| | - Gunnar Brunborg
- Department of Molecular Biology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Environmental Radioactivity (CoE CERAD), Norway
| | - Ann-Karin Olsen
- Department of Molecular Biology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Environmental Radioactivity (CoE CERAD), Norway
| | - Adela López de Cerain
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Navarra, and IdiSNA, Navarra Institute for Health Research, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Amaya Azqueta
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Navarra, and IdiSNA, Navarra Institute for Health Research, Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sestili P, Calcabrini C, Diaz AR, Fimognari C, Stocchi V. The Fast-Halo Assay for the Detection of DNA Damage. Methods Mol Biol 2017; 1644:75-93. [PMID: 28710754 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7187-9_6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
The need for express screening of the DNA damaging potential of chemicals has progressively increased over the past 20 years due to the wide number of new synthetic molecules to be evaluated, as well as the adoption of more stringent chemical regulations such as the EU REACH and risk reduction politics. In this regard, DNA diffusion assays such as the microelectrophoretic comet assay paved the way for rapid genotoxicity testing. A more significant simplification and speeding up of the experimental processes was achieved with the fast halo assay (FHA) described in the present chapter. FHA operates at the single cell level and relies on radial dispersion of the fragments of damaged DNA from intact nuclear DNA. The fragmented DNA is separated by diffusion in an alkaline solvent and is stained, visualized, and finally quantified using computer-assisted image analysis programs. This permits the rapid assessment of the extent of DNA breakage caused by different types of DNA lesions. FHA has proven to be sensitive, reliable, and flexible. This is currently one of the simplest, cheapest, and quickest assays for studying DNA damage and repair in living cells. It does not need expensive reagents or electrophoretic equipment and requires only 40 min to prepare samples for computer-based quantification. This technique can be particularly useful in rapid genotoxicity assessments and in high-throughput genotoxicity screenings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piero Sestili
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomolecolari, Università degli Studi di Urbino "Carlo Bo", Via Saffi, 2, 61029, Urbino, Italy.
| | - Cinzia Calcabrini
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomolecolari, Università degli Studi di Urbino "Carlo Bo", Via Saffi, 2, 61029, Urbino, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze per la Qualità della Vita, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, Corso D'Augusto 237, 47921, Rimini, Italy
| | - Anna Rita Diaz
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomolecolari, Università degli Studi di Urbino "Carlo Bo", Via Saffi, 2, 61029, Urbino, Italy
| | - Carmela Fimognari
- Dipartimento di Scienze per la Qualità della Vita, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, Corso D'Augusto 237, 47921, Rimini, Italy
| | - Vilberto Stocchi
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomolecolari, Università degli Studi di Urbino "Carlo Bo", Via Saffi, 2, 61029, Urbino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sestili P, Fimognari C. Alkaline nuclear dispersion assays for the determination of DNA damage at the single cell level. Methods Mol Biol 2014; 1094:49-70. [PMID: 24162979 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-62703-706-8_5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Over the past three decades the development of methods for visualizing at the cell level the extent of DNA breakage significantly contributed to genotoxicity testing: their availability greatly improved the knowledge in the field of genetic toxicology. These procedures are based on the separation and visualization of DNA fragments resulting from cleavage of nuclear DNA. The separation process can be obtained either electrically (comet assay, linear migration of DNA fragments) or chemically (alkaline dispersion assays, radial diffusion of DNA fragments). Once separated and stained, intact and fragmented DNA can be observed with fluorescence or light microscope. Appropriate computer-assisted image analysis allows quantitative determination of the extent of DNA breakage. These procedures have been proven to be sensitive, flexible, and reliable, and, as compared to former methods, they are simpler, are less time and money consuming, and have the unique capability of detecting DNA damage at the single cell level. This last feature has the additional advantage of allowing the identification of cellular subpopulations characterized by different sensitivity to the damaging agent. The fast halo assay (FHA) is currently the simplest and quickest nuclear dispersion assay; recent modifications of FHA have further improved the assay and pave the way to a full exploitation of its analytical potential. In this chapter the development, procedures, applications, and limits of these dispersion assays, with a particular focus on FHA, will be illustrated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piero Sestili
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomolecolari, Università degli Studi di Urbino "Carlo Bo", Urbino, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Saghizadeh M, Winkler MA, Kramerov AA, Hemmati DM, Ghiam CA, Dimitrijevich SD, Sareen D, Ornelas L, Ghiasi H, Brunken WJ, Maguen E, Rabinowitz YS, Svendsen CN, Jirsova K, Ljubimov AV. A simple alkaline method for decellularizing human amniotic membrane for cell culture. PLoS One 2013; 8:e79632. [PMID: 24236148 PMCID: PMC3827346 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2013] [Accepted: 10/03/2013] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Human amniotic membrane is a standard substratum used to culture limbal epithelial stem cells for transplantation to patients with limbal stem cell deficiency. Various methods were developed to decellularize amniotic membrane, because denuded membrane is poorly immunogenic and better supports repopulation by dissociated limbal epithelial cells. Amniotic membrane denuding usually involves treatment with EDTA and/or proteolytic enzymes; in many cases additional mechanical scraping is required. Although ensuring limbal cell proliferation, these methods are not standardized, require relatively long treatment times and can result in membrane damage. We propose to use 0.5 M NaOH to reliably remove amniotic cells from the membrane. This method was used before to lyse cells for DNA isolation and radioactivity counting. Gently rubbing a cotton swab soaked in NaOH over the epithelial side of amniotic membrane leads to nearly complete and easy removal of adherent cells in less than a minute. The denuded membrane is subsequently washed in a neutral buffer. Cell removal was more thorough and uniform than with EDTA, or EDTA plus mechanical scraping with an electric toothbrush, or n-heptanol plus EDTA treatment. NaOH-denuded amniotic membrane did not show any perforations compared with mechanical or thermolysin denuding, and showed excellent preservation of immunoreactivity for major basement membrane components including laminin α2, γ1-γ3 chains, α1/α2 and α6 type IV collagen chains, fibronectin, nidogen-2, and perlecan. Sodium hydroxide treatment was efficient with fresh or cryopreserved (10% dimethyl sulfoxide or 50% glycerol) amniotic membrane. The latter method is a common way of membrane storage for subsequent grafting in the European Union. NaOH-denuded amniotic membrane supported growth of human limbal epithelial cells, immortalized corneal epithelial cells, and induced pluripotent stem cells. This simple, fast and reliable method can be used to standardize decellularized amniotic membrane preparations for expansion of limbal stem cells in vitro before transplantation to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehrnoosh Saghizadeh
- Eye Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Regenerative Medicine Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences, Surgery, and Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Michael A. Winkler
- Eye Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Regenerative Medicine Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences, Surgery, and Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Andrei A. Kramerov
- Eye Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Regenerative Medicine Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences, Surgery, and Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - David M. Hemmati
- Eye Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Chantelle A. Ghiam
- Eye Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Slobodan D. Dimitrijevich
- Department of Integrative Physiology, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, United States of America
| | - Dhruv Sareen
- Regenerative Medicine Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Loren Ornelas
- Regenerative Medicine Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Homayon Ghiasi
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences, Surgery, and Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - William J. Brunken
- Departments of Ophthalmology and Cell Biology, State University of New York, Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Ezra Maguen
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences, Surgery, and Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- American Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Yaron S. Rabinowitz
- Eye Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Regenerative Medicine Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences, Surgery, and Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Clive N. Svendsen
- Regenerative Medicine Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences, Surgery, and Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Katerina Jirsova
- Laboratory of the Biology and Pathology of the Eye, Institute of Inherited Metabolic Disorders, 1 Faculty of Medicine and General Teaching Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Alexander V. Ljubimov
- Eye Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Regenerative Medicine Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences, Surgery, and Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|