Protein biomarkers for in vitro testing of toxicology

Influence of chemical dose and exposure duration on protein synthesis in green sea turtle primary cells

Understanding the impacts of chemical exposure in marine wildlife is challenging, due to practical and ethical constraints that preclude traditional toxicology research on these animals. This study addressed some of these limitations by presenting an ethical and high throughput cell-based approach to elucidate molecular-level effects of contaminants on sea turtles. The experimental design addressed basic questions of cell-based toxicology, including chemical dose and exposure time. Primary green turtle skin cells were exposed to polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) 153 and perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) for 24 and 48 h, at three sub-lethal, environmentally relevant concentrations (1, 10 and 100 μg/L). Sequential window acquisition of all theoretical mass spectra (SWATH-MS) identified over 1000 differentially abundant proteins within the 1% false discovery rate (FDR) threshold. The 24 h exposure resulted in a greater number of differentially abundant proteins, compared to 48 h exposure, for both contaminants. However, there were no statistically significant dose-response relationships for the number of differentially synthesised proteins, nor differences in the proportion of increased vs decreased proteins between or within exposure times. Known in vivo markers of contaminant exposure, superoxide dismutase and glutathione S-transferase, were differentially abundant following exposure to PCB153 and PFNA. SIGNIFICANCE: Cell-based (in vitro) proteomics provides an ethical and high throughput approach to understanding the impacts of chemical contamination on sea turtles. Through investigating effects of chemical dose and exposure duration on unique protein abundance in vitro, this study provides an optimised framework for conducting cell-based studies in wildlife proteomics, and highlights that proteins detected in vitro could act as biomarkers of chemical exposure and effect in vivo.

Charting a path towards non-destructive biomarkers in threatened wildlife: A systematic quantitative literature review

Threatened species are susceptible to irreversible population decline caused by adverse sub-lethal effects of chemical contaminant exposure. It is therefore vital to develop the necessary tools to predict and detect these effects as early as possible. Biomarkers of contaminant exposure and effect are widely applied to this end, and a significant amount of research has focused on development and validation of sensitive and diagnostic biomarkers. However, progress in the use biomarkers that can be measured using non-destructive techniques has been relatively slow and there are still many difficulties to overcome in the development of sound methods. This paper systematically quantifies and reviews studies that have aimed to develop or validate non-destructive biomarkers in wildlife, and provides an analysis of the successes of these methods based on the invasiveness of the methods, the potential for universal application, cost, and the potential for new biomarker discovery. These data are then used to infer what methods and approaches appear the most effective for successful development of non-destructive biomarkers of contaminant exposure in wildlife. This review highlights that research on non-destructive biomarkers in wildlife is severely lacking, and suggests further exploration of in vitro methods in future studies.

Approaches and perspectives to toxicogenetics and toxicogenomics

Toxicology is one of the scientific disciplines that has most<br />evolved in recent years due to scientific and technological<br />advances that have created a deeper understanding of the<br />genetic and molecular basis for appreciative variability in<br />toxic response from one person to another. The application<br />of this knowledge in toxicology is known as toxicogenetics<br />and toxicogenomics. The latter is the discipline that studies<br />the genomic response of organisms exposed to chemical<br />agents, including drugs, environmental pollutants, food<br />additives, and other commonly used chemical products.<br />The use of emerging omic technologies, such as genomics,<br />transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics and bioinformatics<br />techniques, permits the analysis of many variants of genes<br />simultaneously in an organism exposed to toxic agents in order<br />to search for genes susceptible to damage, to detect patterns<br />and mechanisms of toxicity, and determine specific profiles<br />of gene expression that give origin to biomarkers of exposure<br />and risk. This constitutes predictive toxicology.

Impacts of endocrine disrupting chemicals on reproduction in wildlife

The European Environment Agency (The Weybridge + 15 (1996-2011) report. EEA Technical report, vol 2. Copenhagen, 2012) and the United Nations Environment programme together with the World Health Organisation (State of the science of endocrine disrupting chemicals-2012. Geneva, Switzerland) both recently published major and highly authoritative reviews of endocrine disrupting chemicals in the natural environment and their effects on reproduction and health in both humans and wildlife. One surprising conclusion to emerge from these reviews was that there are relatively few well documented reports of endocrine disruption (ED) in wild mammals, mainly because much of the available evidence is correlative and does not conclusively demonstrate that the chemicals in question cause the physiological and phenotypic problems attributed to them. However, based on strong evidence from studies of wild birds, reptiles, invertebrates, and laboratory animals, it is difficult to imagine that wild mammals would be the exception. This chapter is therefore included to emphasize the point that the role of reproductive science within wildlife conservation is much broader than a narrow focus on artificial breeding technologies.