In vitro studies of MRI-related heating of neurostimulation systems

Technical challenges and safety of magnetic resonance imaging with in situ neuromodulation from spine to brain

PURPOSE

This review summarises the need for MRI with in situ neuromodulation, the key safety challenges and how they may be mitigated, and surveys the current status of MRI safety for the main categories of neuro-stimulation device, including deep brain stimulation, vagus nerve stimulation, sacral neuromodulation, spinal cord stimulation systems, and cochlear implants.

REVIEW SUMMARY

When neuro-stimulator systems are introduced into the MRI environment a number of hazards arise with potential for patient harm, in particular the risk of thermal injury due to MRI-induced heating. For many devices however, safe MRI conditions can be determined, and MRI safely performed, albeit with possible compromise in anatomical coverage, image quality or extended acquisition time.

CONCLUSIONS

The increasing availability of devices conditional for 3 T MRI, whole-body transmit imaging, and imaging in the on-stimulation condition, will be of significant benefit to the growing population of patients benefitting from neuromodulation therapy, and open up new opportunities for functional imaging research.

Clinical safety of brain magnetic resonance imaging with implanted deep brain stimulation hardware: large case series and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Over 75,000 patients have undergone deep brain stimulation (DBS) procedures worldwide. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important clinical and research tool in analyzing electrode location, documenting postoperative complications, and investigating novel symptoms in DBS patients. Functional MRI may shed light on the mechanism of action of DBS. MRI safety in DBS patients is therefore an important consideration.

METHODS

We report our experience with MRI in patients with implanted DBS hardware and examine the literature for clinical reports on MRI safety with implanted DBS hardware.

RESULTS

A total of 262 MRI examinations were performed in 223 patients with intracranial DBS hardware, including 45 in patients with an implanted pulse generator. Only 1 temporary adverse event occurred related to patient agitation and movement during immediate postoperative MR imaging. Agitation resolved after a few hours, and an MRI obtained before implanted pulse generator implantation revealed edema around both electrodes. Over 4000 MRI examinations in patients with implanted DBS hardware have been reported in the literature. Only 4 led to adverse events, including 2 hardware failures, 1 temporary and 1 permanent neurological deficit. Adverse neurological events occurred in a unique set of circumstances where appropriate safety protocols were not followed. MRI guidelines provided by DBS hardware manufacturers are inconsistent and vary among devices.

CONCLUSIONS

The importance of MRI in modern medicine places pressure on industry to develop fully MRI-compatible DBS devices. Until then, the literature suggests that, when observing certain precautions, cranial MR images can be obtained with an extremely low risk in patients with implanted DBS hardware.