An empirical characterization of the quality of DTI data and the efficacy of dyadic sorting

The effect of elimination of gibbs ringing, noise and systematic errors on the DTI metrics and tractography in a rat brain

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics and tractography can be biased due to low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and systematic errors resulting from image artifacts and imperfections in magnetic field gradients. The imperfections include non-uniformity and nonlinearity, effects caused by eddy currents, and the influence of background and imaging gradients. We investigated the impact of systematic errors on DTI metrics of an isotropic phantom and DTI metrics and tractography of a rat brain measured at high resolution. We tested denoising and Gibbs ringing removal methods combined with the B matrix spatial distribution (BSD) method for magnetic field gradient calibration. The results showed that the performance of the BSD method depends on whether Gibbs ringing is removed and the effectiveness of stochastic error removal. Region of interest (ROI)-based analysis of the DTI metrics showed that, depending on the size of the ROI and its location in space, correction methods can remove systematic bias to varying degrees. The preprocessing pipeline proposed and dedicated to this type of data together with the BSD method resulted in an even - 90% decrease in fractional anisotropy (FA) (globally and locally) in the isotropic phantom and - 45% in the rat brain. The largest global changes in the rat brain tractogram compared to the standard method without preprocessing (sDTI) were noticed after denoising. The direction of the first eigenvector obtained from DTI after denoising, Gibbs ringing removal and BSD differed by an average of 56 and 10 degrees in the ROI from sDTI and from sDTI after denoising and Gibbs ringing removal, respectively. The latter can be identified with the amount of improvement in tractography due to the elimination of systematic errors related to imperfect magnetic field gradients. Based on the results, the systematic bias for high resolution data mainly depended on SNR, but the influence of non-uniform gradients could also be seen. After denoising, the BSD method was able to further correct both the metrics and tractography of the diffusion tensor in the rat brain by taking into account the actual distribution of magnetic field gradients independent of the examined object and uniquely dependent on the scanner and sequence. This means that in vivo studies are also subject to this type of errors, which should be taken into account when processing such data.

Comparison of Glass Capillary Plates and Polyethylene Fiber Bundles as Phantoms to Assess the Quality of Diffusion Tensor Imaging

Purpose:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the suitability of two phantoms, one made of capillary plates and the other polyethylene fibers, for assessing the quality of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI).

Methods:

The first phantom was a stack of glass capillary plates with many parallel micropores (CP). The second phantom was a bundle of polyethylene fiber Dyneema held together with a thermal shrinkage tube (Dy). High resolution multi-shot echo planar imaging (EPI) DTI acquisitions were performed at b-values of 0 and 1000 s/mm² and diffusion-times (T_diff) of 37.7 and 97.7 ms on a preclinical 7T MRI scanner. Thirty diffusion-encoding directions were used. The data were used to calculate the fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), and angular dispersion (AD). Further acquisitions were performed at b-values from 0 to 8000 s/mm² in 14 steps with the diffusion gradient applied parallel (axial) and perpendicular (radial) to the Z direction. On the other hand, the data acquired with a 3T MRI scanner were used to confirm that measurements on a clinical machine are consistent with the 7T MRI results.

Results:

The dependence of FA, MD and AD on T_diff was smaller for the Dy than for the CPs. The b-value-dependent signal attenuations in the axial direction at T_diff = 37.7 and 97.7 ms were similar for both phantoms. In the radial direction, Dy demonstrated similar b-value attenuation to that of in vivo tissue for both T_diffs, but the attenuation for the CPs was affected by the change in T_diff. Parameter estimates were similar for 3T and 7T MRI.

Conclusion:

The characteristics of the CP indicate that it can be used as a restricted-diffusion dominant phantom, while the characteristics of the Dy suggest that it can be used as a hindered-diffusion dominant phantom. Dy may be more suitable than CP for DTI quality control.

Multicentre imaging measurements for oncology and in the brain

Multicentre imaging studies of brain tumours (and other tumour and brain studies) can enable a large group of patients to be studied, yet they present challenging technical problems. Differences between centres can be characterised, understood and minimised by use of phantoms (test objects) and normal control subjects. Normal white matter forms an excellent standard for some MRI parameters (e.g. diffusion or magnetisation transfer) because the normal biological range is low (<2-3%) and the measurements will reflect this, provided the acquisition sequence is controlled. MR phantoms have benefits and they are necessary for some parameters (e.g. tumour volume). Techniques for temperature monitoring and control are given. In a multicentre study or treatment trial, between-centre variation should be minimised. In a cross-sectional study, all groups should be represented at each centre and the effect of centre added as a covariate in the statistical analysis. In a serial study of disease progression or treatment effect, individual patients should receive all of their scans at the same centre; the power is then limited by the within-subject reproducibility. Sources of variation that are generic to any imaging method and analysis parameters include MR sequence mismatch, B(1) errors, CT effective tube potential, region of interest generation and segmentation procedure. Specific tissue parameters are analysed in detail to identify the major sources of variation and the most appropriate phantoms or normal studies. These include dynamic contrast-enhanced and dynamic susceptibility contrast gadolinium imaging, T(1), diffusion, magnetisation transfer, spectroscopy, tumour volume, arterial spin labelling and CT perfusion.

Quantification of accuracy and precision of multi-center DTI measurements: a diffusion phantom and human brain study

The inter-site and intra-site variability of system performance of MRI scanners (due to site-dependent and time-variant variations) can have significant adverse effects on the integration of multi-center DTI data. Measurement errors in accuracy and precision of each acquisition determine both the inter-site and intra-site variability. In this study, multiple scans of an identical isotropic diffusion phantom and of the brain of a traveling human volunteer were acquired at MRI scanners from the same vendor and with similar configurations at three sites. We assessed the feasibility of multi-center DTI studies by direct quantification of accuracy and precision of each dataset. Accuracy was quantified via comparison to carefully constructed gold standard datasets while precision (the within-scan variability) was estimated by wild bootstrap analysis. The results from both the phantom and human data suggest that the inter-site variation in system performance, although relatively small among scanners of the same vendor, significantly affects DTI measurement accuracy and precision and therefore the effectiveness for the integration of multi-center DTI measurements. Our results also highlight the value of a DTI-specific phantom in identifying and quantifying measurement errors due to site-dependent variations in the system performance, and its usefulness for quality assurance/quality control in multi-center DTI studies. In addition, we observed that the within-scan variability of each data acquisition, as assessed by wild bootstrap analysis, is of the same magnitude as the inter-site and intra-site variability. We propose that by weighing datasets based on their variability, as evaluated by wild bootstrap analysis, one can improve the quality of the dataset. This approach will provide a more effective integration of datasets from multi-center DTI studies.