|
1
|
Evaluation of Temozolomide Treatment for Glioblastoma Using Amide Proton Transfer Imaging and Diffusion MRI. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14081907. [PMID: 35454814 PMCID: PMC9031574 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14081907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Glioblastoma (GBM), the most frequent and malignant histological type of glioma, is associated with a very high mortality rate. MRI is a useful method for the evaluation of tumor growth. However, there are few studies that have quantitatively evaluated the changes in disease state after TMZ treatment against GBM, and it is not fully understood how the effects of treatment are reflected in the quantitative values measured on MRI. We used the C6 glioma rat model to evaluate the tumor changes due to chemotherapy at different doses of TMZ in terms of quantitative values measured by neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) and amide proton transfer (APT) imaging using 7T-MRI. These methods can evaluate the microstructural changes caused by TMZ-induced tumor growth inhibition. Abstract This study aimed to evaluate tumor changes due to chemotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ) in terms of quantitative values measured by APT imaging and NODDI. We performed TMZ treatment (administered orally by gavage to the TMZ-40 mg and TMZ-60 mg groups) on 7-week-old male Wistar rats with rat glioma C6 implanted in the right brain. T2WI, APT imaging, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and NODDI were performed on days 7 and 14 after implantation using 7T-MRI, and the calculated quantitative values were statistically compared. Then, HE staining was performed on brain tissue at day 7 and day 14 for each group to compare the results with the MR images. TMZ treatment inhibited tumor growth and necrotic area formation. The necrotic areas observed upon hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining were consistent with the MTR low-signal areas observed upon APT imaging. The intracellular volume fraction (ICVF) map of the NODDI could best show the microstructure of the tumor, and its value could significantly highlight the difference in treatment effects at different TMZ doses. APT imaging and NODDI can be used to detect the microstructural changes caused by TMZ-induced tumor growth inhibition. The ICVF may be useful as a parameter for determining the effect of TMZ.
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Sindeeva OA, Verkhovskii RA, Sarimollaoglu M, Afanaseva GA, Fedonnikov AS, Osintsev EY, Kurochkina EN, Gorin DA, Deyev SM, Zharov VP, Galanzha EI. New Frontiers in Diagnosis and Therapy of Circulating Tumor Markers in Cerebrospinal Fluid In Vitro and In Vivo. Cells 2019; 8:E1195. [PMID: 31581745 PMCID: PMC6830088 DOI: 10.3390/cells8101195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2019] [Revised: 09/21/2019] [Accepted: 09/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
One of the greatest challenges in neuro-oncology is diagnosis and therapy (theranostics) of leptomeningeal metastasis (LM), brain metastasis (BM) and brain tumors (BT), which are associated with poor prognosis in patients. Retrospective analyses suggest that cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is one of the promising diagnostic targets because CSF passes through central nervous system, harvests tumor-related markers from brain tissue and, then, delivers them into peripheral parts of the human body where CSF can be sampled using minimally invasive and routine clinical procedure. However, limited sensitivity of the established clinical diagnostic cytology in vitro and MRI in vivo together with minimal therapeutic options do not provide patient care at early, potentially treatable, stages of LM, BM and BT. Novel technologies are in demand. This review outlines the advantages, limitations and clinical utility of emerging liquid biopsy in vitro and photoacoustic flow cytometry (PAFC) in vivo for assessment of CSF markers including circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), microRNA (miRNA), proteins, exosomes and emboli. The integration of in vitro and in vivo methods, PAFC-guided theranostics of single CTCs and targeted drug delivery are discussed as future perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga A. Sindeeva
- Laboratory of Biomedical Photoacoustics, Saratov State University, 83 Astrakhanskaya St, 410012 Saratov, Russia; (O.A.S.); (R.A.V.); (G.A.A.); (A.S.F.); (E.Y.O.); (E.N.K.); (V.P.Z.)
| | - Roman A. Verkhovskii
- Laboratory of Biomedical Photoacoustics, Saratov State University, 83 Astrakhanskaya St, 410012 Saratov, Russia; (O.A.S.); (R.A.V.); (G.A.A.); (A.S.F.); (E.Y.O.); (E.N.K.); (V.P.Z.)
| | - Mustafa Sarimollaoglu
- Arkansas Nanomedicine Center & Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA;
| | - Galina A. Afanaseva
- Laboratory of Biomedical Photoacoustics, Saratov State University, 83 Astrakhanskaya St, 410012 Saratov, Russia; (O.A.S.); (R.A.V.); (G.A.A.); (A.S.F.); (E.Y.O.); (E.N.K.); (V.P.Z.)
- Saratov State Medical University, 112 Bolshaya Kazachia St., 410012 Saratov, Russia
| | - Alexander S. Fedonnikov
- Laboratory of Biomedical Photoacoustics, Saratov State University, 83 Astrakhanskaya St, 410012 Saratov, Russia; (O.A.S.); (R.A.V.); (G.A.A.); (A.S.F.); (E.Y.O.); (E.N.K.); (V.P.Z.)
- Saratov State Medical University, 112 Bolshaya Kazachia St., 410012 Saratov, Russia
| | - Evgeny Yu. Osintsev
- Laboratory of Biomedical Photoacoustics, Saratov State University, 83 Astrakhanskaya St, 410012 Saratov, Russia; (O.A.S.); (R.A.V.); (G.A.A.); (A.S.F.); (E.Y.O.); (E.N.K.); (V.P.Z.)
- Saratov State Medical University, 112 Bolshaya Kazachia St., 410012 Saratov, Russia
| | - Elena N. Kurochkina
- Laboratory of Biomedical Photoacoustics, Saratov State University, 83 Astrakhanskaya St, 410012 Saratov, Russia; (O.A.S.); (R.A.V.); (G.A.A.); (A.S.F.); (E.Y.O.); (E.N.K.); (V.P.Z.)
- Saratov State Medical University, 112 Bolshaya Kazachia St., 410012 Saratov, Russia
| | - Dmitry A. Gorin
- Laboratory of Biophotonics, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, 3 Nobelya Str., 121205 Moscow, Russia;
| | - Sergey M. Deyev
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Miklukho-Maklaya St., 16/10, Moscow 117997, Russia;
| | - Vladimir P. Zharov
- Laboratory of Biomedical Photoacoustics, Saratov State University, 83 Astrakhanskaya St, 410012 Saratov, Russia; (O.A.S.); (R.A.V.); (G.A.A.); (A.S.F.); (E.Y.O.); (E.N.K.); (V.P.Z.)
- Arkansas Nanomedicine Center & Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA;
| | - Ekaterina I. Galanzha
- Laboratory of Biomedical Photoacoustics, Saratov State University, 83 Astrakhanskaya St, 410012 Saratov, Russia; (O.A.S.); (R.A.V.); (G.A.A.); (A.S.F.); (E.Y.O.); (E.N.K.); (V.P.Z.)
- Laboratory of Lymphatic Research, Diagnosis and Therapy (LDT), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| |
Collapse
|