AI in MRI: A case for grassroots deep learning

Use of machine learning to improve the estimation of conductivity and permittivity based on longitudinal relaxation time T1 in magnetic resonance at 7 T

Electrical property tomography (EPT) is a noninvasive method that uses magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to estimate the conductivity and permittivity of tissues, and hence, can be used as a biomarker. One branch of EPT is based on the correlation of water and relaxation time T1 with the conductivity and permittivity of tissues. This correlation was applied to a curve-fitting function to estimate electrical properties, it was found to have a high correlation between permittivity and T1 however the computation of conductivity based on T1 requires to estimate the water content. In this study, we developed multiple phantoms with several ingredients that modify the conductivity and permittivity and explored the use of machine learning algorithms to have a direct estimation of conductivity and permittivity based on MR images and the relaxation time T1. To train the algorithms, each phantom was measured using a dielectric measurement device to acquire the true conductivity and permittivity. MR images were taken for each phantom, and the T1 values were measured. Then, the acquired data were tested using curve fitting, regression learning, and neural fit models to estimate the conductivity and permittivity values based on the T1 values. In particular, the regression learning algorithm based on Gaussian process regression showed high accuracy with a coefficient of determination R² of 0.96 and 0.99 for permittivity and conductivity, respectively. The estimation of permittivity using regression learning demonstrated a lower mean error of 0.66% compared to the curve fitting method, which resulted in a mean error of 3.6%. The estimation of conductivity also showed that the regression learning approach had a lower mean error of 0.49%, whereas the curve fitting method resulted in a mean error of 6%. The findings suggest that utilizing regression learning models, specifically Gaussian process regression, can result in more accurate estimations for both permittivity and conductivity compared to other methods.

Accelerated Diffusion-Weighted MR Image Reconstruction Using Deep Neural Networks

Under-sampling in diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) decreases the scan time that helps to reduce off-resonance effects, geometric distortions, and susceptibility artifacts; however, it leads to under-sampling artifacts. In this paper, diffusion-weighted MR image (DWI-MR) reconstruction using deep learning (DWI U-Net) is proposed to recover artifact-free DW images from variable density highly under-sampled k-space data. Additionally, different optimizers, i.e., RMSProp, Adam, Adagrad, and Adadelta, have been investigated to choose the best optimizers for DWI U-Net. The reconstruction results are compared with the conventional Compressed Sensing (CS) reconstruction. The quality of the recovered images is assessed using mean artifact power (AP), mean root mean square error (RMSE), mean structural similarity index measure (SSIM), and mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). The proposed method provides up to 61.1%, 60.0%, 30.4%, and 28.7% improvements in the mean AP value of the reconstructed images in our experiments with different optimizers, i.e., RMSProp, Adam, Adagrad, and Adadelta, respectively, as compared to the conventional CS at an acceleration factor of 6 (i.e., AF = 6). The results of DWI U-Net with the RMSProp, Adam, Adagrad, and Adadelta optimizers show 13.6%, 10.0%, 8.7%, and 8.74% improvements, respectively, in terms of mean SSIM with respect to the conventional CS at AF = 6. Also, the proposed technique shows 51.4%, 29.5%, 24.04%, and 18.0% improvements in terms of mean RMSE using the RMSProp, Adam, Adagrad, and Adadelta optimizers, respectively, with reference to the conventional CS at AF = 6. The results confirm that DWI U-Net performs better than the conventional CS reconstruction. Also, when comparing the different optimizers in DWI U-Net, RMSProp provides better results than the other optimizers.

Artificial intelligence assists precision medicine in cancer treatment

Cancer is a major medical problem worldwide. Due to its high heterogeneity, the use of the same drugs or surgical methods in patients with the same tumor may have different curative effects, leading to the need for more accurate treatment methods for tumors and personalized treatments for patients. The precise treatment of tumors is essential, which renders obtaining an in-depth understanding of the changes that tumors undergo urgent, including changes in their genes, proteins and cancer cell phenotypes, in order to develop targeted treatment strategies for patients. Artificial intelligence (AI) based on big data can extract the hidden patterns, important information, and corresponding knowledge behind the enormous amount of data. For example, the ML and deep learning of subsets of AI can be used to mine the deep-level information in genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, radiomics, digital pathological images, and other data, which can make clinicians synthetically and comprehensively understand tumors. In addition, AI can find new biomarkers from data to assist tumor screening, detection, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis prediction, so as to providing the best treatment for individual patients and improving their clinical outcomes.

MRI-based machine learning for determining quantitative and qualitative characteristics affecting the survival of glioblastoma multiforme

PURPOSE

Our current study aims to consider the image biomarkers extracted from the MRI images for exploring their effects on glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients' survival. Determining its biomarker helps better manage the disease and evaluate treatments. It has been proven that imaging features could be used as a biomarker. The purpose of this study is to investigate the features in MRI and clinical features as the biomarker association of survival of GBM.

METHODS

55 patients were considered with five clinical features, 10 qualities pre-operative MRI image features, and six quantitative features obtained using BraTumIA software. It was run ANN, C5, Bayesian, and Cox models in two phases for determining important variables. In the first phase, we selected the quality features that occur at least in three models and quantitative in two models. In the second phase, models were run with the extracted features, and then the probability value of variables in each model was calculated.

RESULTS

The mean of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under curve (AUC) after running four machine learning techniques were 80.47, 82.54, 79.78, and 0.85, respectively. In the second step, the mean of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 79.55, 78.71, 79.83, and 0.87, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We found the largest size of the width, the largest size of length, radiotherapy, volume of enhancement, volume of nCET, satellites, enhancing margin, and age feature are important features.

Artificial intelligence in medical imaging

The medical specialty radiology has experienced a number of extremely important and influential technical developments in the past that have affected how medical imaging is deployed. Artificial intelligence (AI) is potentially another such development that will introduce fundamental changes into the practice of radiology. In this commentary the historical evolution of some major changes in radiology are traced as background to how AI may also be embraced into practice. Potential new capabilities provided by AI offer exciting prospects for more efficient and effective use of medical images.