A novel spectrally selective fat saturation pulse design with robustness to B0 and B1 inhomogeneities: A demonstration on 3D T1-weighted breast MRI at 3 T

Update on state-of-the-art for arterial spin labeling (ASL) human perfusion imaging outside of the brain

This review article provides an overview of developments for arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion imaging in the body (i.e., outside of the brain). It is part of a series of review/recommendation papers from the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM) Perfusion Study Group. In this review, we focus on specific challenges and developments tailored for ASL in a variety of body locations. After presenting common challenges, organ-specific reviews of challenges and developments are presented, including kidneys, lungs, heart (myocardium), placenta, eye (retina), liver, pancreas, and muscle, which are regions that have seen the most developments outside of the brain. Summaries and recommendations of acquisition parameters (when appropriate) are provided for each organ. We then explore the possibilities for wider adoption of body ASL based on large standardization efforts, as well as the potential opportunities based on recent advances in high/low-field systems and machine-learning. This review seeks to provide an overview of the current state-of-the-art of ASL for applications in the body, highlighting ongoing challenges and solutions that aim to enable more widespread use of the technique in clinical practice.

Ultrafast B1 mapping with RF-prepared 3D FLASH acquisition: Correcting the bias due to T1 -induced k-space filtering effect

Purpose

The traditional radiofrequency (RF)‐prepared B₁ mapping technique consists of one scan with an RF preparation module for flip angle‐encoding and a second scan without this module for normalizing. To reduce the T₁‐induced k‐space filtering effect, this method is limited to 2D FLASH acquisition with a two‐parameter method. A novel 3D RF‐prepared three‐parameter method for ultrafast B₁‐mapping is proposed to correct the T₁‐induced quantification bias.

Theory

The point spread function analysis of FLASH shows that the prepared longitudinal magnetization before the FLASH acquisition and the image signal obeys a linear (not proportional) relationship. The intercept of the linear function causes the quantification bias and can be captured by a third saturated scan.

Methods

Using the 2D double‐angle method (DAM) as the reference, a 3D RF‐prepared three‐parameter protocol with 9 s duration was compared with the two‐parameter method, as well as the saturated DAM (SDAM) method, the dual refocusing echo acquisition mode (DREAM) method, and the actual flip‐angle imaging (AFI) method, for B₁ mapping of brain, breast, and abdomen with different orientations and shim settings at 3T.

Results

The 3D RF‐prepared three‐parameter method with complex‐subtraction delivered consistently lower RMS error, error mean, error standard deviation, and higher concordance correlation coefficients values than the two‐parameter method, the three‐parameter method with magnitude‐subtraction, the multi‐slice DREAM and the 3D AFI, and were close to the results of 2D or multi‐slice SDAM.

Conclusion

The proposed ultrafast 3D RF‐prepared three‐parameter method with complex‐subtraction was demonstrated with high accuracy for B₁ mapping of brain, breast, and abdomen.

A revisit of the k-space filtering effects of magnetization-prepared 3D FLASH and balanced SSFP acquisitions: Analytical characterization of the point spread functions

PURPOSE

3D FLASH and balanced SSFP (bSSFP) are increasingly used in quantitative MRI after contrast preparation. The acquired k-space data are modulated by T₁ relaxation (or additional T₂ for bSSFP). Three separate sequence parameters including the number of phase-encoding steps per shot (N), flip angle (FA), and TR have made the transient state of rapid gradient echo (GRE) imaging difficult for analysis and optimization. Here we aim to analytically characterize the k-space filtering effect of magnetization-prepared FLASH and bSSFP with the point spread functions (PSF).

METHODS

The amplitude effect is characterized with the peak magnitude of the PSF, i.e. PSF(0), which, due to their approaching from transient state to steady-state for the GRE acquisitions, obeys a linear (with a slope and an intercept, not proportional) relationship with the prepared longitudinal magnetization (M_prep). The blurring effect is characterized by the FWHM of the PSF. The magnetization-prepared acquisition-dependent image contrast efficiency is characterized with the relative contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) per unit time (ruCNR).

RESULTS

The slope of PSF(0) characterizes the relative contrast between different M_prep levels. The intercept of PSF(0) could lead to quantification bias for magnetization-prepared imaging. FLASH and bSSFP experience very little blurring effect, which is to the contrary of conventional fast spin echo (FSE). Analytical selections of N, FA, and TR are provided to optimize ruCNR for different scenarios.

CONCLUSIONS

PSFs of the FLASH and bSSFP acquisitions are analytically derived and numerically validated, and compared with the FSE acquisition, thus providing a useful tool for optimizing magnetization-prepared GRE acquisitions.