Browne RFJ, Tuite DJ. Imaging of the renal transplant: comparison of MRI with duplex sonography.
ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2007;
31:461-82. [PMID:
16447085 DOI:
10.1007/s00261-005-0394-5]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Renal transplantation is an established treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. Many causes of graft dysfunction are treatable, making prompt detection and diagnosis of complications essential. Sensitive, noninvasive imaging procedures, which do not use iodinated contrast media, are therefore highly desirable to evaluate graft function. Duplex sonography (US) has traditionally been the initial investigation of graft dysfunction. US offers many advantages, particularly during the postoperative period, when it can be performed portably regardless of renal function and can guide percutaneous procedures. However, US lacks specificity in assessing hydronephrosis, cannot differentiate parenchymal causes of dysfunction, and may have difficulty assessing transplant vessels. Recently comprehensive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols including MR urography, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography, and MR renography have evolved as a "one-stop" diagnostic technique in the evaluation of the entire graft and peritransplant region. Multiplanar capabilities enable MRI to identify the site of urinary obstruction and assess renal vessels in their entirety. The evolving technique of MR renography may also differentiate parenchymal causes of dysfunction. By combining these three components into a single examination, further information may be obtained regarding the graft when compared with US and other conventional studies, with improved patient convenience, less morbidity, and a potential cost saving.
Collapse