Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Rectal Cancer

Roles of MRI evaluation of pelvic recurrence in patients with rectal cancer

Developments in the multidisciplinary treatment of rectal cancer with advances in preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), surgical techniques, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and adjuvant chemotherapy have had a significant impact on patient outcomes, increasing the rates of curative surgeries and reducing pelvic recurrence. Patients with pelvic recurrence have worse prognoses, with an impact on morbidity and mortality. Although local recurrence is more frequent within 2 years of surgical resection of the primary tumor, late recurrence may occur. Clinical manifestations can vary from asymptomatic, nonspecific symptoms, to pelvic pain, bleeding, and fistulas. Synchronous metastatic disease occurs in approximately 50% of patients diagnosed with local recurrence. MRI plays a crucial role in posttreatment follow-up, whether by identifying viable neoplastic tissues or acting as a tool for therapeutic planning and assessing the resectability of these lesions. Locally recurrent tissues usually have a higher signal intensity than muscle on T2-weighted imaging. Thus, attention is required for focal heterogeneous lesions, marked contrast enhancement, early invasive behavior, and asymmetric appearance, which are suspicious for local recurrence. However, postsurgical inflammatory changes related to radiotherapy and fibrosis make it difficult to detect initial lesions. This study therefore aimed to review the main imaging patterns of pelvic recurrence and their implications for the surgical decision-making process. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: MRI plays a crucial role in the posttreatment follow-up of rectal cancer, whether by identifying viable neoplastic tissues or by acting as a tool for therapeutic planning. This study reviewed the main imaging patterns of pelvic recurrence. KEY POINTS: MRI aids in surgical planning and the detection of pelvic recurrence and postoperative complications. Being familiar with surgical techniques enables radiologists to identify expected MRI findings. Patterns of rectal cancer recurrence have been categorized by pelvic compartments. Neoplastic tissue may mimic postsurgical and postradiotherapy changes. Resectability of pelvic recurrence is highly related to lesion location.

Advances in MRI-Based Assessment of Rectal Cancer Post-Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Comprehensive Review

Rectal cancer presents significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, with neoadjuvant therapy playing a pivotal role in improving resectability and patient outcomes. MRI serves as a critical tool in assessing treatment response. However, differentiating viable tumor tissue from therapy-induced changes on MRI remains a complex task. In this comprehensive review, we explore treatment options for rectal cancer based on resectability status, focusing on the role of MRI in guiding therapeutic decisions. We delve into the nuances of MRI-based evaluation of treatment response following neoadjuvant therapy, paying particular attention to emerging techniques like radiomics. Drawing from our insights based on the literature, we provide essential recommendations for post-neoadjuvant therapy management of rectal cancer, all within the context of MRI-based findings.

The optimized rectal cancer MRI protocol: choosing the right sequences, sequence parameters, and preparatory strategies

Pelvic MRI plays a critical role in rectal cancer staging and treatment response assessment. Despite a consensus regarding the essential protocol components of a rectal cancer MRI, substantial differences in image quality persist across institutions and vendor software/hardware platforms. In this review, we present image optimization strategies for rectal cancer MRI examinations, including but not limited to preparation strategies, high-resolution T2-weighted imaging, and diffusion-weighted imaging. Our specific recommendations are supported by case studies from multiple institutions. Finally, we describe an ongoing initiative by the Society of Abdominal Radiology's Disease-Focused Panel (DFP) on Rectal and Anal Cancer to create standardized rectal cancer MRI protocols across scanner platforms.

Impact of preoperative chemoradiation with higher dose intensity modulated radiotherapy on pathological complete response for locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision is the current standard-of-care for locally advanced UICC II-III stage rectal cancer (LARC). A pathological complete response (pCR) correlates with survival. Improvements of pCR, including dose escalation, should be explored. The aim of this explorative analysis is to assess the impact on pCR of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB).

AREAS COVERED

A literature search via PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) in MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE and a systematic review according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Metanalysis) methodology were performed. Studies that reported pCR rate in patients with LARC in clinical stage T2N+M0 or cT3/4 N0/+M0 treated with preoperative CRT with SIB-IMRT/VMAT (Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy) were included. Sixty-two studies were identified, but only eight clinical trials with a total of 311 patients were included . Median follow-up was 16-61 months. pCR reached the value of 38%. Good survival outcomes were observed with a mild toxicity profile.

EXPERT OPINION

Radiotherapy dose intensification in LARC showed a slight increase of pCR compared to historical studies. Prospective evaluations are necessary to define which patients would benefit most.

How do they measure up: Assessing the height of rectal cancer with digital rectal exam, endoscopy, and MRI,

Background

Outcomes in rectal cancer are dependent on tumor height. Modalities for assessing tumor height include MRI, endoscopy, and digital rectal exam (DRE). We seek to identify correlations between these modalities.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of 120 rectal cancer patients at a single institution. Correlation coefficients and distance of the tumor to anal verge between MRI, endoscopy, and DRE were compared by region.

Results

The distances of tumor (cm) from anal verge were: MRI: 6.2 ± 3.0, endoscopy: 5.9 ± 2.9, DRE: 5.4 ± 2.4 (p = 0.238). Endoscopy and DRE strongly correlated with MRI (spearman coefficient 0.899 and 0.842, respectively). Endoscopy and DRE also strongly correlated (spearman coefficient 0.876). Correlation coefficients were highest in the middle rectum, weak in the low rectum, and non-correlated in the upper rectum.

Conclusions

MRI, endoscopy, and DRE strongly correlated overall. DRE demonstrated the lowest average distance. Correlations differed by region, suggesting high or low rectal tumors are difficult to characterize.

Comparison of tumor regression grade and clinical stage based on MRI image as a selection criterion for non-radical management after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter, retrospective, cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

There has been no comparative study on the clinical value of magnetic resonance tumor regression grade (mrTRG)1-2 and ycT0-1N0 for the prediction of ypT0-1N0 after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for rectal cancer. We compared the diagnostic performance between mrTRG1-2 and ycT0-1N0 for predicting ypT0-1N0 as a selection criterion for non-radical management after CCRT in locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 291 patients from three referral hospitals between January 2018 and March 2020. The diagnostic performance of ycT0-1N0 and mrTRG1-2 for the prediction of ypT0-1N0 was compared in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value, negative-predictive value, and area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients (23.4%) achieved ypT0-1N0. Nineteen patients (6.5%) had ycT0-1N0, and 91 patients (31.2%) had mrTRG1-2. For predicting ypT0-1N0, ycT0-1N0 had a sensitivity of 16.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.36‒27.10) and positive-predictive value of 57.9% (95% CI: 36.57‒76.63), while mrTRG1-2 had a sensitivity of 58.8% (95% CI: 46.23‒70.63) and positive-predictive value of 44.0% (95% CI: 36.46‒51.74). When predicting ypT0-1N0, mrTRG1-2 showed a higher AUC (0.680, 95% CI: 0.604‒0.756) than ycT0-1N0 (0.563, 95% CI: 0.481‒0.645) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

mrTRG1-2 might be a better indicator than ycT0-1N0 for the selection of non-radical management of advanced rectal cancer post-CCRT. However, additional diagnostic tools are required for predicting ypT0-1N0 because mrTRG1-2 or yc stage on MRI has insufficient evidence for diagnosing ypT0-1N0.

MRI for Rectal Cancer: Staging, mrCRM, EMVI, Lymph Node Staging and Post-Treatment Response

Rectal cancer is a relatively common malignancy in the United States. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of rectal cancer has evolved tremendously in recent years, and has become a key component of baseline staging and treatment planning. In addition to assessing the primary tumor and locoregional lymph nodes, rectal MRI can be used to help with risk stratification by identifying high-risk features such as extramural vascular invasion and can assess treatment response for patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy. As the practice of rectal MRI continues to expand further into academic centers and private practices, standard MRI protocols, and reporting are critical. In addition, it is imperative that the radiologists reading these cases work closely with surgeons, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and pathologists to ensure we are providing the best possible care to patients. This review aims to provide a broad overview of the role of MRI for rectal cancer.

How to accurately measure the distance from the anal verge to rectal cancer on MRI: a prospective study using anal verge markers

PURPOSE

To determine an accurate method for localizing rectal cancer using the distance from the anal verge on preoperative MRI.

METHODS

This prospective study included 50 patients scheduled for MRI evaluation of rectal cancer. After rectal filling with gel, MRI was performed with two markers attached at the anal verge. The distance between the tumor and the anal verge on a sagittal T2-weighted image (T2WI) was measured independently by two radiologists using six methods divided into three groups of similar measurement approaches, and compared to those obtained on rigid sigmoidoscopy. The anal verge location relative to the external anal sphincter was assessed on oblique coronal T2WI in reference to the markers. Correlation analysis was performed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for verification, and a paired t test was used to evaluate the mean differences.

RESULTS

The highest correlation (ICC 0.797-0.815) and the least mean difference (0.74-0.85 cm) with rigid sigmoidoscopy, and the least standard deviation (3.12-3.17 cm) were obtained in the direct methods group using a straight line from the anal verge to the tumor. The anal verge was localized within a range of - 1.4 to 1.5 cm (mean - 0.31 cm and - 0.22 cm) from the lower end of the external anal sphincter.

CONCLUSION

The direct methods group provided the most accurate tumor distance among the groups. Among the direct methods, we recommend the direct mass method for its simplicity. Despite minor differences in location, the lower end of the external anal sphincter was a reliable anatomical landmark for the anal verge.

Dual-energy CT parameters in correlation to MRI-based apparent diffusion coefficient: evaluation in rectal cancer after radiochemotherapy

Background

Rectal cancer (RC) is a frequent malignancy for which magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most common and accurate imaging. Iodine concentration (IC) can be quantified with spectral dual-layer computed tomography CT (DL-CT), which could improve imaging of RC, especially for evaluation of response to radiochemotherapy (RCT).

Purpose

To compare a DL-CT system to MRI as the non-invasive imaging gold standard for imaging of RC to evaluate the possibility of a response evaluation with DL-CT.

Material and Methods

Eleven patients who received DL-CT as well as MRI before and after RCT of RC were retrospectively included into this study. For each examination, a region of interest (ROI) was placed within the tumor. For MRI, the mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was assessed. For DL-CT, IC, z-effective, and Hounsfield Units (HU) were measured. IC, z-effective, and HU were normalized to the aorta. ADC was correlated to absolute and relative normalized IC, z-effective, and HU with Spearman’s ρ. Differences before and after treatment were tested with Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results

HU, IC, and Z-effective values in DL-CT images decreased significantly after RCT (P<0.01 for each comparison). The mean ADC increased significantly after RCT. Spearman’s ρ of the absolute IC difference and the absolute ADC (both before and after RCT) is high and significant (ρ = 0.73; P = 0.01), whereas the ρ-value for z-effective (ρ = 0.56) or HU (ρ = 0.45) to ADC was lower and non-significant.

Conclusion

Response evaluation of RC after RCT could be possible with DL-CT via the measurement of IC.

Comparison Between Size and Stage of Preoperative Tumor Defined by Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Postoperative Specimens After Radical Resection of Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Our objective is to explore the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in determining the preoperative T and N staging, pathological stage, and the length of esophageal tumor in patients with esophageal cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 57 patients admitted to the Department of Thoracic Surgery of The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University between January 2015 and December 2016. Postoperative pathological results were used as the reference to verify the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating tumor T and N staging, pathological stage, and tumor length. The correlation between tumor lengths-measured using magnetic resonance imaging and the surgical specimen measurements-was evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 64.6 ± 7.2 years, with a range of 47 to 77 years. The overall accuracy rate of magnetic resonance imaging in T staging of esophageal cancer was 63.2%; magnetic resonance imaging was generally consistent in the N staging of esophageal cancer. Magnetic resonance imaging and surgical evaluation of tumor length were in excellent agreement (κ = .82, P < .001), while that of gastroscopy and postoperative pathology was moderate (κ = .63, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Magnetic resonance imaging is highly accurate in determining the preoperative T and N staging, pathologic stage, and tumor length in patients with esophageal cancer, which is important in deciding the choice of preoperative treatment and the surgical approach.

Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Staging Rectal Cancer with Multidisciplinary Team: A Single-Center Experience

Purpose: To investigate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in preoperative staging diagnosis for rectal cancer with multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion. Methods: The retrospective study included 377 patients of rectal cancer with preoperative MRI staging from February 2015 to April 2018, in which 137 patients (36 received MDT discussion) received neoadjuvant therapy, 240 did not (97 received MDT discussion) and direct surgery was given. With postoperative pathological stage as the standard, the accuracy of MRI in preoperative staging for rectal cancer with MDT discussion was compared with non-MDT. Results: For direct surgery group, 21 out 97 (21.6%) patients changed their therapy strategy due to the change of the stage assessment after MDT. The accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis of preoperative N stage with MDT was significantly higher than those without MDT (56.2% vs. 42.1%, P=0.021). And for those without lymph node metastasis, the accuracy of MRI was higher after MDT (61.2% vs. 37.8%, P=0.009). For neoadjuvant therapy group, 7 out of 36 (19.4%) patients altered their therapy after MDT because of the changed stage. MDT improved the accuracy of restaging N stage with MRI (70.0% vs. 33.3%, P=0.003). The accuracy of MRI in staging T stage seemed not improved after MDT in both groups. Conclusions: In conclusion, MDT discussion increased the accuracy of MRI in preoperative staging diagnosis for rectal cancer. This mode could give a more accurate clinical stage of patients, which was in favor of choosing a preferable therapy strategy.

MRI of Rectal Cancer: Tumor Staging, Imaging Techniques, and Management

Rectal cancer is prone to local recurrence and systemic metastasis. However, owing to improvements in TNM staging and treatment, including a more widespread use of rectal MRI and increased radiologist awareness of the key rectal cancer TNM staging features, the mortality rate of rectal cancer has been declining over the past few decades in adults over 50 years of age. Currently, rectal MRI plays a key role in the pre- and posttreatment evaluation of rectal cancer, assisting the multidisciplinary team in tailoring the most appropriate treatment option. The benefits achieved with rectal MRI are strictly dependent on obtaining good-quality images, which is important for the characterization of the main anatomic structures and their relationship with the tumor. In primary staging, rectal MRI helps the radiologist (a) describe the tumor location and morphology, (b) provide its T and N categories, (c) detect the presence of extramural vascular invasion, and (d) identify its relationship with surrounding structures, including the sphincter complex and involvement of the mesorectal fascia. These features help diagnose locally advanced rectal tumors (categories T3c-d, T4, N1, and N2), for which neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is indicated. In restaging after neoadjuvant CRT, in addition to reassessing the features noted during primary staging, rectal MRI can help in the assessment of treatment response, especially with the emergence of nonsurgical approaches such as "watch and wait." ^©RSNA, 2019.

A structured approach to reporting rectal cancer with magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVE

Rectal cancers are the second most common GI carcinoma. Prognosis and therapeutic decisions hinge on the extent of disease. We present a comprehensive structured approach for staging rectal cancer using MRI to ensure the clear, concise, and standardized communication of disease extent to guide optimal treatment planning.

CONCLUSION

MRI is crucial for local staging of rectal cancer. A standardized approach to reporting of rectal MRI focused on communication of essential treatment planning and prognostic indicators ensures maximal added value to referring physicians to guide appropriate management.

JOURNAL CLUB: Preoperative MRI Evaluation of Primary Rectal Cancer: Intrasubject Comparison With and Without Rectal Distention

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine whether rectal distention influences the accuracy of MRI for tumor staging and for measuring of maximal extramural depth of tumor spread and distance between tumor and mesorectal fascia (MRF).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Fifty patients with rectal carcinoma underwent MRI before and after rectal distention. Both sets of MR images were reviewed by two radiologists. The scores for depiction of the mass (1-4 scale), T and N category, distance from normal rectal wall to MRF, maximal extramural depth of tumor spread, and distance between tumor and MRF were evaluated.

RESULTS

The visualization scores on MR images obtained with the rectum distended were significantly higher than those on images obtained without distention (90% vs 58% for score 4, p < 0.001). The accuracy of T category assessed on distended images was slightly higher than the accuracy on nondistended images (88.6% vs 84.1% for observer 1, 84.1% vs 81.8% for observer 2), but the accuracy of N category was stable. The distance between normal rectal wall and MRF was significantly less on distended images than on nondistended images (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between nondistended and distended images for maximal extramural depth and distance between tumor and MRF (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Rectal distention significantly improved visualization of tumors on MR images. It also improved T category assessment to some extent. Although the distance between normal rectal wall and MRF was significantly less with rectal distention than without rectal distention, maximal extramural depth and the distance between tumor and MRF did not vary significantly with or without rectal distention.

The anthropometric definition of the rectum is highly variable

PURPOSE

The precise definition of the rectum is essential for localizing colorectal pathology, yet current definitions are nebulous. The objective of this study is to determine the anthropometric definition of common pelvic landmarks in relation to patient characteristics.

METHODS

Seventy-one patients underwent open proctectomy with intra-operative measurements from the anal verge to various pelvic landmarks, and patient characteristics were evaluated. Analyses were performed using Spearman correlation and Wilcoxon rank sum.

RESULTS

The mean landmark distance was dentate line = 1.7 cm (range 0.8-4.0 cm), puborectalis muscle = 4.2 cm (range 2.0-8.0 cm), anterior peritoneal reflection = 13.2 cm (range 8.5-21.0 cm), sacral promontory = 17.9 cm (range 13.0-26.0 cm), and confluence of the taenia = 25.5 cm (range 16.0-44.0 cm). Men had longer mean distances to the dentate line (p = 0.0003), puborectalis muscle (p = 0.03), and anterior peritoneal reflection (p = 0.02). Patient weight significantly correlated with distance to all landmarks except for the confluence of the taenia, which did not correlate with any patient factor.

CONCLUSIONS

The location of common pelvic landmarks is highly variable. The use of predefined absolute measurements from the anal verge to localize rectal pathology is inaccurate and fails to account for patient variability.

MRI of Rectal Cancer: An Overview and Update on Recent Advances

OBJECTIVE

MRI is the modality of choice for rectal cancer staging. The high soft-tissue contrast of MRI accurately assesses the extramural tumor spread and relation to mesorectal fascia and the sphincter complex. This article reviews the role of MRI in the staging and treatment of rectal cancer. The relevant anatomy, MRI techniques, preoperative staging, post-chemoradiation therapy (CRT) imaging, and tumor recurrence are discussed with special attention to recent advances in knowledge.

CONCLUSION

MRI is the modality of choice for staging rectal cancer to assist surgeons in obtaining negative surgical margins. MRI facilitates the accurate assessment of mesorectal fascia and the sphincter complex for surgical planning. Multiparametric MRI may also help in the prediction and estimation of response to treatment and in the detection of recurrent disease.

Rectal cancer: a review

Rectal cancer is the second most common cancer in large intestine. The prevalence and the number of young patients diagnosed with rectal cancer have made it as one of the major health problems in the world. With regard to the improved access to and use of modern screening tools, a number of new cases are diagnosed each year. Considering the location of the rectum and its adjacent organs, management and treatment of rectal tumor is different from tumors located in other parts of the gastrointestinal tract or even the colon. In this article, we will review the current updates on rectal cancer including epidemiology, risk factors, clinical presentations, screening, and staging. Diagnostic methods and latest treatment modalities and approaches will also be discussed in detail.

Factors affecting the restaging accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging after preoperative chemoradiation in patients with rectal cancer

PURPOSES

We evaluated patient or tumor factors associated with the preoperative restaging accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for determining T and N stages as well as circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement after chemoradiation (CRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS

Seventy-seven patients with rectal cancer that were treated with preoperative CRT (50.4 Gy) followed by radical resection were included. Post-CRT MRI was performed approximately 4 weeks after preoperative CRT.

RESULTS

The median tumor distance from the anal verge was 6 cm, 48 (62%) of which were anterior and 29 (38%) posterior. The median tumor diameter was 3 cm. A stage-by-stage comparison showed that correct staging occurred in 62%, 43%, and 86% of patients for T staging, N staging, and CRM prediction, respectively. Shorter distance to the anal verge (<5 cm), smaller tumor diameter (<1 cm), and anterior tumor location were associated with incorrect T staging. There were no significant variables in terms of N staging accuracy. Shorter tumor distance and anterior tumor location were associated with incorrect CRM prediction.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that specific tumor factors such as small, distal, or anterior rectal tumors are closely associated with the accuracy of MRI after preoperative CRT.