Advanced MR Imaging Techniques for Pancreas Imaging

T1 and T2-mapping in pancreatic MRI: Current evidence and future perspectives

Conventional T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pancreas can vary significantly due to factors such as scanner differences and pulse sequence variations. This review explores T1 and T2 mapping techniques, modern MRI methods providing quantitative information about tissue relaxation times. Various T1 and T2 mapping pulse sequences are currently under investigation. Clinical and research applications of T1 and T2 mapping in the pancreas include their correlation with fibrosis, inflammation, and neoplasms. In chronic pancreatitis, T1 mapping and extracellular volume (ECV) quantification demonstrate potential as biomarkers, aiding in early diagnosis and classification. T1 mapping also shows promise in evaluating pancreatic exocrine function and detecting glucose metabolism disorders. T2* mapping is valuable in quantifying pancreatic iron, offering insights into conditions like thalassemia major. However, challenges persist, such as the lack of consensus on optimal sequences and normal values for healthy pancreas relaxometry. Large-scale studies are needed for validation, and improvements in mapping sequences are essential for widespread clinical integration. The future holds potential for mixed qualitative and quantitative models, extending the applications of relaxometry techniques to various pancreatic lesions and enhancing routine MRI protocols for pancreatic pathology diagnosis and prognosis.

Quantitative MR imaging biomarkers for distinguishing inflammatory pancreatic mass and pancreatic cancer-a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of quantitative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging biomarkers in distinguishing between inflammatory pancreatic masses (IPM) and pancreatic cancer (PC).

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science through August 2023. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) was used to evaluate the risk of bias and applicability of the studies. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were calculated using the DerSimonian-Laird method. Univariate meta-regression analysis was used to identify the potential factors of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies were included in this meta-analysis. The two main types of IPM, mass-forming pancreatitis (MFP) and autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), differ in their apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. Compared with PC, the ADC value was higher in MFP but lower in AIP. The pooled sensitivity/specificity of ADC were 0.80/0.85 for distinguishing MFP from PC and 0.82/0.84 for distinguishing AIP from PC. The pooled sensitivity/specificity for the maximal diameter of the upstream main pancreatic duct (dMPD) was 0.86/0.74, with a cutoff of dMPD ≤ 4 mm, and 0.97/0.52, with a cutoff of dMPD ≤ 5 mm. The pooled sensitivity/specificity for perfusion fraction (f) was 0.82/0.68, and 0.82/0.77 for mass stiffness values.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative MR imaging biomarkers are useful in distinguishing between IPM and PC. ADC values differ between MFP and AIP, and they should be separated for consideration in future studies.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Quantitative MR parameters could serve as non-invasive imaging biomarkers for differentiating malignant pancreatic neoplasms from inflammatory masses of the pancreas, and hence help to avoid unnecessary surgery.

KEY POINTS

• Several quantitative MR imaging biomarkers performed well in differential diagnosis between inflammatory pancreatic mass and pancreatic cancer. • The ADC value could discern pancreatic cancer from mass-forming pancreatitis or autoimmune pancreatitis, if the two inflammatory mass types are not combined. • The diameter of main pancreatic duct had the highest specificity for differentiating autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic Cancer and Its Mimics

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most common primary pancreatic malignancy, ranking fourth in cancer-related mortality in the United States. Typically, PDAC appears on images as a hypovascular mass with upstream pancreatic duct dilatation and abrupt duct cutoff, distal pancreatic atrophy, and vascular encasement, with metastatic involvement including lymphadenopathy. However, atypical manifestations that may limit detection of the underlying PDAC may also occur. Atypical PDAC features include findings related to associated conditions such as acute or chronic pancreatitis, a mass that is isointense to the parenchyma, multiplicity, diffuse tumor infiltration, associated calcifications, and cystic components. Several neoplastic and inflammatory conditions can mimic PDAC, such as paraduodenal "groove" pancreatitis, autoimmune pancreatitis, focal acute and chronic pancreatitis, neuroendocrine tumors, solid pseudopapillary neoplasms, metastases, and lymphoma. Differentiation of these conditions from PDAC can be challenging due to overlapping CT and MRI features; however, certain findings can help in differentiation. Diffusion-weighted MRI can be helpful but also can be nonspecific. Accurate diagnosis is pivotal for guiding therapeutic planning and potential outcomes in PDAC and avoiding biopsy or surgical treatment of some of these mimics. Biopsy may still be required for diagnosis in some cases. The authors describe the typical and atypical imaging findings of PDAC and features that may help to differentiate PDAC from its mimics. ©RSNA, 2023 Online supplemental material is available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center. See the invited commentary by Zins in this issue.

Approach to Pancreatic Head Mass in the Background of Chronic Pancreatitis

Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a known risk factor for pancreatic cancer. CP may present with an inflammatory mass, and differentiation from pancreatic cancer is often difficult. Clinical suspicion of malignancy dictates a need for further evaluation for underlying pancreatic cancer. Imaging modalities remain the mainstay of evaluation for a mass in background CP; however, they have their shortcomings. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has become the go-to investigation. Adjunct modalities such as contrast-harmonic EUS and EUS elastography, as well as EUS-guided sampling using newer-generation needles are useful in differentiating inflammatory from malignant masses in the pancreas. Paraduodenal pancreatitis and autoimmune pancreatitis often masquerade as pancreatic cancer. In this narrative review, we discuss the various modalities used to differentiate inflammatory from malignant masses of the pancreas.

Pancreaticoduodenal Groove: Spectrum of Disease and Imaging Features

The pancreaticoduodenal groove (PDG) is a small space between the pancreatic head and duodenum where vital interactions between multiple organs and physiologic processes take place. Muscles, nerves, and hormones perform a coordinated dance, allowing bile and pancreatic enzymes to aid in digestion and absorption of critical nutrition. Given the multitude of organs and cells working together, a variety of benign and malignant entities can arise in or adjacent to this space. Management of lesions in this region is also complex and can involve observation, endoscopic resection, or challenging surgeries such as the Whipple procedure. The radiologist plays an important role in evaluation of abnormalities involving the PDG. While CT is usually the first-line examination for evaluation of this complex region, MRI offers complementary information. Although features of abnormalities involving the PDG can often overlap, understanding the characteristic imaging and pathologic features generally allows categorization of disease entities based on the suspected organ of origin and the presence of ancillary features. The goal of the authors is to provide radiologists with a conceptual approach to entities implicating the PDG to increase the accuracy of diagnosis and assist in appropriate management or presurgical planning. They briefly discuss the anatomy of the PDG, followed by a more in-depth presentation of the features of disease categories. A table summarizing the entities that occur in this region by underlying cause and anatomic location is provided. ^©RSNA, 2022.

Signal intensity patterns in health and disease: basics of abdominal magnetic resonance imaging in children

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is playing an increasing role in pediatric abdominal imaging, especially in the evaluation of diffuse parenchymal disease where other imaging modalities might be less sensitive. While quantitative imaging is slowly being incorporated into clinical imaging, qualitative assessment of visceral signal intensity should be part of the routine clinical workflow of all radiologists. Based on their T1 and T2 weighting, the liver, spleen, kidneys and pancreas have characteristic signal intensity patterns with respect to one another and to skeletal muscle. It is important to recognize normal signal intensity patterns of viscera and their evolution with patient age to be able to identify age-related variations and accurately identify diffuse parenchymal disease. Knowledge of normal signal intensity patterns can also help identify ectopic locations of normal tissue such as splenic rests and splenosis. In this review, we discuss normal signal intensity patterns of upper abdominal viscera and their variations on commonly used sequences in pediatric abdominal MRI. We also review normal variations in the perinatal period. Knowledge of these patterns can help pediatric radiologists become more astute in their interpretation of diffuse parenchymal disease in the abdomen.

Main Duct Thresholds for Malignancy Are Different in Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreatic Head and Body-Tail

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The risk of malignancy is uncertain for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) with main pancreatic duct (MPD) of 5-9 mm. No study has correlated MPD size and malignancy considering the anatomic site of the gland (head versus body-tail). Our aim was to analyze the significance of MPD in pancreatic head/body-tail as a predictor of malignancy in main-duct/mixed IPMNs.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of resected patients between 2009-2018 was performed. Malignancy was defined as high-grade dysplasia and invasive carcinoma. MPD diameter was measured with magnetic resonance imaging. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was utilized to identify optimal MPD cut-off for malignancy. Independent predictors of malignancy were searched.

RESULTS

Malignancy was detected in 74% of 312 identified patients. 213 patients (68.3%) had IPMNs of the pancreatic head and 99 (31.7%) of the body-tail. ROC analysis identified 9 and 7 mm as the optimal MPD cut-offs for malignancy in IPMNs of head and body-tail of the pancreas, respectively. Multivariate analysis confirmed that MPD ≥9 mm (pancreatic head) and ≥7 mm (body-tail) were independent predictors of malignancy along with macroscopic solid components, positive cytology and elevated CA 19-9. The risk of malignancy was low for IPMNs with MPD ≤8 mm (pancreatic head) or ≤6 mm (pancreatic body-tail) unless high-risk stigmata or multiple worrisome features were present.

CONCLUSIONS

Different thresholds of MPD dilation are associated with malignancy in IPMNs of the head and body-tail of the pancreas. The risk of malignancy for IPMNs with MPD ≤8 mm (pancreatic head) or ≤6 mm (pancreatic body-tail) lacking high-risk stigmata or multiple worrisome features is low.

T1 relaxation times and MR elastography-derived stiffness: new potential imaging biomarkers for the assessment of chronic pancreatitis

PURPOSE

Non-invasive imaging methods to detect morphological changes of the pancreas in patients with mild chronic pancreatitis (CP) are needed. This study aimed to compare magnetic resonance imaging-based parameters, pancreatic volume, T1 mapping, magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), and proton density fat fraction between CP patients and controls, and determine the diagnostic performance for diagnosing different stages of CP.

METHODS

Nineteen patients with mild CP (Cambridge grade 2 or less or recurring acute pancreatitis; n = 19), 30 with moderate/severe CP (Cambridge grade 3 and 4), and 35 healthy controls underwent pancreatic magnetic resonance imaging to assess the above mentioned magnetic resonance imaging-based parameters. The diagnostic performance of each parameter for detecting any mild and moderate/severe CP was determined using receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

Pancreatic volume, T1 relaxation times, MRE-derived stiffness, and proton density fat fraction differed significantly between patients with mild CP, moderate/severe CP, and healthy controls (all p < 0.05). T1 mapping and MRE showed a very high diagnostic performance for distinguishing the mild CP group from the control group (T1 mapping: receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC-AUC): 0.94; sensitivity: 84%; specificity: 91%, MRE: ROC-AUC: 0.93; sensitivity: 89%; specificity: 94%). T1 mapping and MRE also had the highest performance for diagnosing the presence of any CP from the control group (ROC-AUCs of 0.98 and 0.97, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Quantitative assessments of T1 relaxation time and MRE-derived stiffness had high performance in detecting mild CP and could probably reflect the early fibrotic changes in CP.

Practical and clinical applications of pancreatic magnetic resonance elastography: a systematic review

Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is a non-invasive technique suitable for assessing mechanical properties of tissues, i.e., stiffness. MRE of the pancreas is relatively new, but recently an increasing number of studies have successfully assessed pancreas diseases with MRE aiming to differentiate healthy from pathological pancreatic tissue with or without fibrosis. This review will systematically describe the practical and clinical applications of pancreatic MRE. We conducted a systematic literature search with a pre-specified search strategy using PubMed and Embase according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. English peer-reviewed articles applying MRE of the pancreas were included. Two independent reviewers assessed the studies. The literature search yielded 14 studies. The pancreatic stiffness for healthy volunteers ranged from 1.11. to 1.21 kPa at a driver frequency of 40 Hz. In benign tumors, the stiffness values were slightly higher or sometimes even lower (range 0.78 to 2.00 kPa), compared to the healthy pancreas parenchyma whereas, in malignant tumors, the stiffness values tended to be higher (1.42 to 6.06 kPa). The pancreatic stiffness was increased in both acute (median: 1.99 kPa) and chronic pancreatitis (> 1.50 kPa). MRE is a promising technique for detecting and quantifying pancreatic stiffness. It is related to fibrosis and seems to be useful in assessing treatment response and clinical follow-up of pancreatic diseases. However, most of the described practical settings were characterized by a lack of uniformity and inconsistency in reporting standards across studies. Harmonization between centers is necessary to achieve more consensus and optimization of pancreatic MRE protocols.

Nonalcoholic fatty pancreas disease: An emerging clinical challenge

Nonalcoholic fatty pancreas disease (NAFPD) is an emerging disease that has gained an increasing amount of attention in recent years. It describes fat accumulation in the pancreas with insignificant alcohol consumption, but the pathogenesis is largely unknown. A wide range of terms have been used to describe the phenomenon of pancreatic fat accumulation, but NAFPD remains an under-recognized and non-independent disorder. Obesity, age, sex, race, and unhealthy lifestyle are established independent risk factors for NAFPD, which is strongly associated with metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, pancreatitis, pancreatic fistula, pancreatic cancer, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. At present, imaging techniques are common diagnostic aids, but uniform criteria and consensus are lacking. Therapeutically, healthy diet, weight loss, and exercise are the mainstays to reduce pancreatic fat accumulation. It can be seen that there is a limited understanding of NAFPD at this stage and further exploration is needed. Previous studies have revealed that NAFPD may directly affect diagnosis and clinical decision-making. Therefore, exploring the pathophysiological mechanism and clinical associations of NAFPD is a major challenge for researchers and clinicians.

Post-pancreatitis diabetes mellitus and excess intra-pancreatic fat deposition as harbingers of pancreatic cancer

Progress in the fight against pancreatic cancer has been hampered by many factors. One of them is the inability to detect the disease early in overwhelming majority of patients. The present paper outlines a novel way in which progress could be accelerated. This includes a focus on two harbingers—post-pancreatitis diabetes mellitus and excess intra-pancreatic fat deposition—that converge at affecting the tumor macroenvironment and microenvironment specifically in the pancreas, not other organs. The two entities have the potential to be incorporated into future screening strategies with a view to early detecting of pancreatic cancer.

Advanced MR Imaging of the Pancreas

MR imaging can be optimized to evaluate a spectrum of pancreatic disorders with advanced sequences aimed to provide quantitative results and increase MR diagnostic capabilities. The pancreas remains a challenging organ to image because of its small size and location deep within the body. Besides its anatomic limitations, pancreatic pathology can be difficult to identify in the early stages. For example, subtle changes in ductal anatomy and parenchymal composition seen in early chronic pancreatitis are imperceptible with other modalities, such as computed tomography. This article reviews the application of MR imaging techniques and emerging MR sequences used in pancreas imaging.

Imaging guidelines for acute pancreatitis: when and when not to image

In patients with acute pancreatitis (AP), diagnostic imaging is performed for various reasons, including the detection of the etiology (e.g., biliary obstruction caused by gallstones), diagnosis of pancreatitis in an unclear clinical setting, assessment of the severity of the process, and evaluation of its complications. In spite of the potential benefits of these imaging studies in the setting of AP, especially economic consequences but also medical risks are associated with diagnostic imaging, including increase of the effective radiation dose received by patients with AP and rising health care costs, frequently without impact on management. The rising incidence of acute pancreatitis in the Western world is escalating its financial burden with national health care expenses of over 2.5 billion dollars annually. Despite evidence-based national recommendations on utilization of diagnostic imaging in patients with AP, unnecessary imaging studies are still frequently performed, especially in the early hospital course. The purpose of this article is, therefore, to review the imaging guidelines for acute pancreatitis with regards to when and when not to image, with the aim to minimize inappropriate utilization.

Emerging imaging techniques for acute pancreatitis

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is caused by acute inflammation of the pancreas and adjacent tissue and is a common source of abdominal pain. The current CT and MRI evaluation of AP is mostly based on morphologic features. Recent advances in image acquisition and analysis offer the opportunity to go beyond morphologic features. Advanced MR techniques such as diffusion-weighted imaging, as well as T1 and T2 mapping, can potentially quantify signal changes reflective of underlying tissue abnormalities. Advanced analytic techniques such as radiomics and artificial neural networks (ANNs) offer the promise of uncovering imaging biomarkers that can provide additional classification and prognostic information. The purpose of this article is to review recent advances in imaging acquisition and analytic techniques in the evaluation of AP.

Cross-sectional imaging-based severity scoring of chronic pancreatitis: why it is necessary and how it can be done

Chronic pancreatitis (CP) remains a diagnostic challenge as clinical symptoms are non-specific, histopathological appearances are varied and pathogenesis remains incompletely understood. Multiple classifications and grading systems have been proposed for CP, but none leverage the full capabilities of cross-sectional imaging modalities and are not widely accepted or validated. CT and MRI/MRCP are useful in identifying a wide spectrum of histopathological changes in CP and can also assess exocrine reserve of pancreas. Advanced MRI techniques such as T1 mapping and extracellular volume fraction can potentially identify early CP. Cross-sectional imaging-based severity scoring can quantify CP disease burden and may have positive implications for clinicians and researchers. In this review, we discuss the need for cross-sectional imaging-based severity scoring for CP, role of CT, and MRI/MRCP in assessment of CP and how these modalities can be used to obtain severity scoring for CP. We summarize relevant information from recently published CT and MRI/MRCP reporting standards for CP, and from international guidelines for cross-sectional imaging and severity scoring for CP.

Progression of parenchymal and ductal findings in patients with chronic pancreatitis: A 4-year follow-up MRI study

PURPOSE

Knowledge of the underlying mechanisms behind progression of chronic pancreatitis (CP) is needed to identify targets for new mechanism-based treatments. There is an urgent need for imaging biomarkers that can detect early morphological and functional pancreatic damage in order to initiate intervention and reduce the progression of CP at an early stage. The aim of our study was to assess and explore the potential role of structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers for characterisation of disease progression in a CP patient cohort over a 4-year period.

METHODS

This longitudinal MRI study included twenty-five patients with definitive CP. Assessments of morphological imaging parameters at baseline and after 4 years included pancreatic gland volume, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, fat signal fraction (FSF) and main pancreatic duct (MPD) diameter. Patients were classified according to the modified Cambridge classification.

RESULTS

CP patients developed significantly reduced pancreatic gland volume, which decreased from mean 50.3 ± 19.6 ml at baseline to 43.5 ± 20.8 ml at follow-up (P < 0.001), decreased ADC values, meaning a higher degree of fibrosis (P < 0.001), increased FSF, meaning more fat infiltration (P < 0.001) and higher Cambridge classification scores (P = 0.033). The MPD diameter in the pancreatic head, body and tail did not change significantly over time (all P > 0.05). Only few, but no clear and systematic, associations were found between the progressions of the individual MRI measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Morphological progression in patients with established CP seems to be primarily parenchymal-related. The different parenchymal changes were mostly unrelated and probably reflect diverse pathophysiological processes.

Pitfalls in the MDCT of pancreatic cancer: strategies for minimizing errors

Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is a widely used cross-sectional imaging modality for initial evaluation of patients with suspected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, diagnosis of PDAC can be challenging due to numerous pitfalls associated with image acquisition and interpretation, including technical factors, imaging features, and cognitive errors. Accurate diagnosis requires familiarity with these pitfalls, as these can be minimized using systematic strategies. Suboptimal acquisition protocols and other technical errors such as motion artifacts and incomplete anatomical coverage increase the risk of misdiagnosis. Interpretation of images can be challenging due to intrinsic tumor features (including small and isoenhancing masses, exophytic masses, subtle pancreatic duct irregularities, and diffuse tumor infiltration), presence of coexisting pathology (including chronic pancreatitis and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm), mimickers of PDAC (including focal fatty infiltration and focal pancreatitis), distracting findings, and satisfaction of search. Awareness of pitfalls associated with the diagnosis of PDAC along with the strategies to avoid them will help radiologists to minimize technical and interpretation errors. Cognizance and mitigation of these errors can lead to earlier PDAC diagnosis and ultimately improve patient prognosis.

Pancreatic Steatosis: An Emerging Clinical Entity

Pancreatic steatosis is an emerging clinical entity whose pathophysiology, natural history, and long-term complications are poorly characterized in the current literature. Epidemiological and prospective studies have described prevalence rates between 16% and 35%. Although the natural history is not well known, there are strong associations with obesity, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Ectopic fat accumulation of the pancreas can cause chronic, low-grade inflammation from adipocytokine imbalances that involve beta cells and acinar cells. This mechanism can lead to pancreatic endocrine and exocrine dysfunction and initiate carcinogenesis. Although it is associated with morbid conditions, pancreatic steatosis may be amendable to treatment with a healthy diet, less meat consumption, exercise, and smoking cessation. Pancreatic steatosis should factor into clinical decision-making and prognostication of patients with pancreatic and systemic disease. This review seeks to describe the pathophysiology, natural history, diagnosis, and complications of this emerging clinically relevant entity.

Chronic Pancreatitis or Pancreatic Tumor? A Problem-solving Approach

Certain inflammatory pancreatic abnormalities may mimic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma at imaging, which precludes accurate preoperative diagnosis and may lead to unnecessary surgery. Inflammatory conditions that may appear masslike include mass-forming chronic pancreatitis, focal autoimmune pancreatitis, and paraduodenal pancreatitis or "groove pancreatitis." In addition, obstructive chronic pancreatitis can mimic an obstructing ampullary mass or main duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm. Secondary imaging features such as the duct-penetrating sign, biliary or main pancreatic duct skip strictures, a capsulelike rim, the pancreatic duct-to-parenchyma ratio, displaced calcifications in patients with chronic calcific pancreatitis, the "double duct" sign, and vessel encasement or displacement can help to suggest the possibility of an inflammatory mass or a neoplastic process. An awareness of the secondary signs that favor a diagnosis of malignant or inflammatory lesions in the pancreas can help the radiologist to perform the differential diagnosis and determine the degree of suspicion for malignancy. Repeat biopsy or surgical resection may be necessary to achieve an accurate diagnosis and prevent unnecessary surgery for inflammatory conditions. Online supplemental material and DICOM image stacks are available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2019.

Pancreatic steatosis: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pancreatic steatosis is a clinical entity with emerging significance and impacts patient health in a multitude of ways. It has a high prevalence in the global population with predilections for different demographics by age, sex and ethnicity. Understanding the pathophysiology, clinical features and complications of this entity may be important to understanding the consequences of the ongoing obesity global epidemic.

RECENT FINDINGS

Obesity and metabolic syndrome contribute to metabolic derangements that result in lipid mishandling by adipocytes. Adipocytokine imbalances in circulation and in the pancreatic microenvironment cause chronic, low-grade inflammation. The resulting beta cell and acinar cell apoptosis leads to pancreatic endocrine and exocrine dysfunction. Furthermore, these adipocytokines regulate cell growth, differentiation, as well as angiogenesis and lymphatic spread. These consequences of adipocyte infiltration are thought to initiate carcinogenesis, leading to pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

SUMMARY

Obesity will lead to millions of deaths each year and pancreatic steatosis may be the key intermediate entity that leads to obesity-related complications. Enhancing our understanding may reveal strategies for preventing mortality and morbidity related to the global epidemic of obesity. Further research is needed to determine the pathophysiology, long-term complications and effective treatment strategies for this condition.

Interobserver agreement of computed tomography reporting standards for chronic pancreatitis

AIM

To assess the interobserver agreement of computed tomography (CT) reporting standards for chronic pancreatitis (CP).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of CT of 47 patients (33 males and 11 females, age range 36 to 56 years) with CP who presented with abdominal pain (n = 41), steatorrhea (n = 37), and glucose intolerance (n = 31). The patients underwent CT study using a 16-multidetector CT scanner with a pancreatic protocol including a nonenhanced scan followed by pancreatic phase at 35 s and portal venous phase at 65 s after intravenous injection of nonionic contrast medium. Image analysis was performed by two radiologists according to reporting standards for CP.

RESULTS

There was excellent interobserver agreement (84.8 %) between the two reviewers in CT reporting standards for CP (K = 0.80, 95 % CI 0.75-0.85, P = 0.001). There was good interobserver agreement for pancreatic duct (PD) caliber (K = 0.71, 95 % CI 0.56-0.87, P = 0.001), PD contour (K = 0.76, 95 % CI 0.61-0.91, P = 0.001), PD stricture (K = 0.070, 95 % CI 0.53-0.88, P = 0.001), and distribution of findings (K = 0.69, 95 % CI 0.51-0.86, P = 0.001). There was excellent interobserver agreement for intraductal calculi (K = 0.84, 95 % CI 0.68-0.98, P = 0.001), pancreatic calcifications (K = 0.86, 95 % CI 0.84-0.98, P = 0.001), and pancreatic diameter (K = 0.87, 95 % CI 0.75-0.99, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

CT reporting standards for CP is a reliable method for diagnosis of patients with CP.