Rethinking the importance of paroxysmal and unusual symptoms as first clinical manifestation of multiple sclerosis: They do matter

Multiple Sclerosis: An Emergency Medicine-Focused Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a rare but serious condition associated with significant morbidity.

OBJECTIVE

This review provides a focused assessment of MS for emergency clinicians, including the presentation, evaluation, and emergency department (ED) management based on current evidence.

DISCUSSION

MS is an autoimmune disorder targeting the central nervous system (CNS), characterized by clinical relapses and radiological lesions disseminated in time and location. Patients with MS most commonly present with long tract signs (e.g., myelopathy, asymmetric spastic paraplegia, urinary dysfunction, Lhermitte's sign), optic neuritis, or brainstem syndromes (bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia). Cortical syndromes or multifocal presentations are less common. Radiologically isolated syndrome and clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) may or may not progress to chronic forms of MS, including relapsing remitting MS, primary progressive MS, and secondary progressive MS. The foundation of outpatient management involves disease-modifying therapy, which is typically initiated with the first signs of disease onset. Management of CIS and acute flares of MS in the ED includes corticosteroid therapy, ideally after diagnostic testing with imaging and lumbar puncture for cerebrospinal fluid analysis. Emergency clinicians should evaluate whether patients with MS are presenting with new-onset debilitating neurological symptoms to avoid unnecessary testing and admissions, but failure to appropriately diagnose CIS or MS flare is associated with increased morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

An understanding of MS can assist emergency clinicians in better diagnosing and managing this neurologically devastating disease.

Chronic pruritus in multiple sclerosis and clinical correlates

BACKGROUND

To date, little is known about the prevalence of itch in multiple sclerosis (MS) and its characteristics.

OBJECTIVES

In this cross-sectional study, we assessed the prevalence, intensity and characteristics of chronic pruritus in MS patients and its effect on quality-of-life and association with MS symptoms, clinical signs, comorbidities and MRI findings.

METHODS

MS patients presenting to an outpatient neurology clinic were asked about their current symptoms. Those who experienced chronic pruritus were administered the Standardized Itch Questionnaire and Itch Quality of Life forms. All patients' medical records were reviewed. Patients with any medical conditions associated with chronic itch were excluded.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven total MS patients were included, and 27 (35%) reported pruritus. The average itch NRS severity was 5.42 (range 0-10). The most affected body parts were the extremities, face or scalp, and trunk. Itch was characterized as acute (74%), paroxysmal (59%) and tingling (55%). Heat (52%) was the most common aggravating factor, while cold temperatures had no effect. Compared with MS patients without itch, itch patients reported more fatigue (77% vs 44%, p = 0.004), heat sensitivity (48% vs 20%, p = 0.0177), cognitive impairment (62% vs 26%, p = 0.0029) and depression or anxiety (48% vs 16%, p = 0.0063). Additionally, itch patients had more T2 hyperintensities in the posterior cervical cord and anterior pons/ventromedial medulla (74.1% vs 46.0%, p = 0.018 and 29.6% vs 8.0%, p = 0.020, respectively). Finally, T2 hyperintensities in the anterior pons/ventromedial medulla were strongly associated with itch localized to the face or scalp (OR 11.3, 95% CI 1.6-78.6, p = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

MS patients experience paroxysmal neuropathic pruritus that is most frequently localized to the extremities, face or scalp. Patients with itch were more likely to have MS-related comorbidities and demyelinating lesions in the spinal cord or brainstem.

Movement Disorders in Multiple Sclerosis: An Update

Background:

Multiple sclerosis (MS), a subset of chronic primary inflammatory demyelinating disorders of the central nervous system, is closely associated with various movement disorders. These disorders may be due to MS pathophysiology or be coincidental. This review describes the full spectrum of movement disorders in MS with their possible mechanistic pathways and therapeutic modalities.

Methods:

The authors conducted a narrative literature review by searching for ‘multiple sclerosis’ and the specific movement disorder on PubMed until October 2021. Relevant articles were screened, selected, and included in the review according to groups of movement disorders.

Results:

The most prevalent movement disorders described in MS include restless leg syndrome, tremor, ataxia, parkinsonism, paroxysmal dyskinesias, chorea and ballism, facial myokymia, including hemifacial spasm and spastic paretic hemifacial contracture, tics, and tourettism. The anatomical basis of some of these disorders is poorly understood; however, the link between them and MS is supported by clinical and neuroimaging evidence. Treatment options are disorder-specific and often multidisciplinary, including pharmacological, surgical, and physical therapies.

Discussion:

Movements disorders in MS involve multiple pathophysiological processes and anatomical pathways. Since these disorders can be the presenting symptoms, they may aid in early diagnosis and managing the patient, including monitoring disease progression. Treatment of these disorders is a challenge. Further work needs to be done to understand the prevalence and the pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for movement disorders in MS.

Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis Relapses

Minimizing the risk of relapse is essential in multiple sclerosis (MS). As none of the treatments currently available are capable of completely preventing relapses, treatment of these episodes remains a cornerstone of MS care. The objective of this manuscript is to reduce uncertainty and improve quality of care of this neurological process. This article addresses definitions of key concepts, recommendations for clinical examination, classification criteria, magnetic resonance imaging, biomarkers, and specific therapeutic counsels including special populations such as pregnant and breastfeeding women, and children. An algorithm for treating MS relapses is also provided.

Paroxysmal Symptoms in Multiple Sclerosis-A Review of the Literature

Paroxysmal symptoms are well-recognized manifestations of multiple sclerosis (MS). These are characterized by multiple, brief, sudden onset, and stereotyped episodes. They manifest as motor, sensory, visual, brainstem, and autonomic symptoms. When occurring in the setting of an established MS, the diagnosis is relatively straightforward. Conversely, the diagnosis is significantly more challenging when they occur as the initial manifestation of MS. The aim of this review is to summarize the various forms of paroxysmal symptoms reported in MS, with emphasis on the clinical features, radiological findings and treatment options.

Paroxysmal Symptoms As the First Manifestation of Multiple Sclerosis Mimicking a Transient Ischemic Attack: A Report of Two Cases

Paroxysmal symptoms are unusual manifestations of multiple sclerosis (MS). When presented as the first clinical manifestation, paroxysmal symptoms may easily be mistaken for transient ischemic attack (TIA). Previously, several cases of MS that reported with paroxysmal symptoms were misdiagnosed as TIA. Here, we report two additional cases, focusing on the clinical characteristics of paroxysmal symptoms in MS. Both cases had paroxysmal symptoms as their first manifestation; one presented with transient dizziness, left face numbness, and right limb weakness, and the other presented with episodic lightheadedness, blurred vision, nausea, palpitations, and tremulousness upon standing. Both of the patients' symptoms were mistaken for TIA at first, based on microembolic signals recorded by transcranial Doppler, but were later correctly diagnosed with MS based on neuroimaging and lumbar puncture. The paroxysmal symptoms responded to carbamazepine and were relieved completely after administration of intravenous methylprednisolone and interferon. Herein, we aim to summarize the differences between paroxysmal symptoms seen in MS and TIA, to facilitate a timely differential diagnosis and recommend an early appropriate treatment.

Paroxysmal and unusual symptoms as first clinical manifestation of multiple sclerosis do not indicate benign prognosis-The PaSiMS II study

BACKGROUND

Paroxysmal (PS) and unusual symptoms (US) account for approximately 1.6% of initial manifestations of multiple sclerosis (MS) and have comparable conversion rates to clinically definite MS (CDMS) as classical bout onset symptoms (CS). However, long-term prognosis and clinical outcome of patients experiencing PS or US as first clinical manifestation are unclear.

METHODS

Clinical, MRI and cerebrospinal fluid data were obtained retrospectively and patients presenting with PS or US were compared to patients with CS presentation.

RESULTS

In a cohort of 532 relapsing onset MS patients followed for a mean period of 11.4 years (SD 3.6), 10 (1.9%) patients initially presented with PS/US. PS/US patients received disease modifying treatment (DMT) in a significantly smaller proportion immediately after the first clinical symptom (30% vs. 61.7%; p = 0.021) and during the observation period (60% vs. 83.5%; p = 0.033). In multivariate models correcting for sex, age at initial symptoms, complete remission of initial symptoms, total number of T2 and contrast-enhancing lesions, presence of oligoclonal bands and DMT exposure, PS/US were not associated with lower annualized relapse rate or lower EDSS over time.

CONCLUSION

In addition to a similar conversion rate to CDMS, patients presenting with PS/US at disease onset display very similar relapse and disability rates as patients with CS onset. Consequently, initial presentation with PS/US does not indicate benign or atypical MS, but requires DMT initiation based on the same criteria as in CS patients.