Should we rebrand multiple sclerosis a dementia?

The BrainLat project, a multimodal neuroimaging dataset of neurodegeneration from underrepresented backgrounds

The Latin American Brain Health Institute (BrainLat) has released a unique multimodal neuroimaging dataset of 780 participants from Latin American. The dataset includes 530 patients with neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), multiple sclerosis (MS), Parkinson's disease (PD), and 250 healthy controls (HCs). This dataset (62.7 ± 9.5 years, age range 21-89 years) was collected through a multicentric effort across five Latin American countries to address the need for affordable, scalable, and available biomarkers in regions with larger inequities. The BrainLat is the first regional collection of clinical and cognitive assessments, anatomical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), resting-state functional MRI (fMRI), diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI), and high density resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) in dementia patients. In addition, it includes demographic information about harmonized recruitment and assessment protocols. The dataset is publicly available to encourage further research and development of tools and health applications for neurodegeneration based on multimodal neuroimaging, promoting the assessment of regional variability and inclusion of underrepresented participants in research.

Disease associations of excessive daytime sleepiness in multiple sclerosis: A prospective study

Background

Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in multiple sclerosis (MS) can be a significant source of disability. Despite this, its prevalence as a patient-reported outcome in this condition has not been well established, and its causes are not well understood.

Methods

We prospectively assessed EDS as part of an observational study for patients referred for diagnostic neuro-ophthalmological testing. EDS was evaluated by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and visual data were also collected as part of a research protocol. Analysis with patient data was performed following the exclusion of patients with known primary sleep disorders.

Results

A total of 69 patients with MS were included in the analysis. The mean ESS was 6.5 with a SD of 4.3. ESS ≥ 10 was present in 23% of the cohort even in the presence of minimal mean neurological disability (Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) = 1.5). The ESS score was not associated with age, sex, disease-related disability, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), or optic neuritis (ON), but displayed an association with visual dysfunction.

Conclusions

There is an increased prevalence of EDS in MS. The increased values of the ESS are not explained by other sleep disorders, suggesting separate mechanisms. Further study of the underlying mechanisms is warranted.

Application of the International Interocular Difference Thresholds into Practice: Localising the Patient Experience

Demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system (CNS) often have neuro-ophthalmological manifestations, and retinal examination can be helpful in making the diagnosis. The latest iteration of optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based criteria for optic neuritis in multiple sclerosis has been developed in the research realm, but its application to clinical practice, and to the more uncommon demyelinating diseases requires further study. The ability to use OCT data to distinguish between various CNS demyelinating disorders could provide additional paraclinical tools to accurately diagnose patients. Furthermore, neuro-ophthalmological testing can define the extent of inflammatory damage in the CNS, independent of patient-reported history. New referrals for OCT at a tertiary multiple sclerosis and neuro-immunology referral centre (n = 167) were analysed retrospectively for the self-reporting of optic neuritis, serological test results, and diagnosis. Only approximately 30% of patients with a clinical history of unilateral optic neuritis solely had a unilateral optic neuropathy, nearly 40% of those subjects actually having evidence of bilateral optic neuropathies. Roughly 30% of patients reporting a history of bilateral optic neuritis did not have any evidence of structural disease, with 20% of these patients having a separate, intervenable diagnosis noted on macular scans. OCT is a useful adjunct diagnostic tool in the evaluation of demyelinating disease and has the ability to aid in a more accurate diagnosis for patients. Application of the international interocular difference thresholds to a clinical patient population generally reproduces the original results, emphasising their appropriateness. The analysis distinguishing the demyelinating diseases needs to be replicated in a blinded, multi-centre setting.

Cognitive Decline in Older People with Multiple Sclerosis—A Narrative Review of the Literature

Several important questions regarding cognitive aging and dementia in older people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) are the focus of this narrative review: Do older PwMS have worse cognitive decline compared to older people without MS? Can older PwMS develop dementia or other neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD) that may be accelerated due to MS? Are there any potential biomarkers that can help to determine the etiology of cognitive decline in older PwMS? What are the neural and cellular bases of cognitive aging and neurodegeneration in MS? Current evidence suggests that cognitive impairment in MS is distinguishable from that due to other neurodegenerative diseases, although older PwMS may present with accelerated cognitive decline. While dementia is prevalent in PwMS, there is currently no consensus on defining it. Cerebrospinal fluid and imaging biomarkers have the potential to identify disease processes linked to MS and other comorbidities—such as AD and vascular disease—in older PwMS, although more research is required. In conclusion, one should be aware that multiple underlying pathologies can coexist in older PwMS and cause cognitive decline. Future basic and clinical research will need to consider these complex factors to better understand the underlying pathophysiology, and to improve diagnostic accuracy.

Comparing diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis of neurocognitive disorders in multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

People with multiple sclerosis (MS) commonly experience cognitive impairment associated with the disease, but there is currently no agreed-upon operational definition for identifying the presence of that impairment, in either research or clinic contexts. The International MS Cognition Society (IMSCOGS) established a task force to begin to examine this issue and this paper represents the results of an initial pilot investigation. The aim of this paper was to compare two criterion sets to determine how to identify cognitive impairment among people with MS: the general Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-5) Criteria for neurocognitive disorders and criteria derived from existing MS research (scores in two domains fall 1.5 standard deviations below normative controls).

METHODS

Two hundred and ten people with MS presented for a brief cognitive evaluation in an MS Multidisciplinary Clinic at a midwestern academic medical center in the United States. Participants were generally middle aged (average 51.5 years), female (73.8%), and white (93.3%). McNemar's test was computed to compare the number of individuals whose cognitive test score performance was deemed cognitively normal, mildly impaired, or more significantly impaired.

RESULTS

DSM-5 criteria classified 87.2% of the sample as cognitively impaired, where 66.7% were more mildly impaired and 20.5% more significantly impaired. By contrast, research-based criteria classified 63.3% of the sample as cognitively impaired, with 49.5% as mildly impaired and 13.8% as more significantly impaired.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that compared to research criteria, the DSM-5 criteria classified far more people with MS as having cognitive impairment secondary to the disease. The paper discusses the potential benefits and drawbacks of the two diagnostic methods, highlighting that more work will be needed in order to establish a standardized and validated method for characterizing these impairments.

Comorbidities in multiple sclerosis-a plea for interdisciplinary collaboration to improve the quality of life of MS patients

The negative influence of comorbidities on the quality of life of people with multiple sclerosis is evident and the problem is increasingly acknowledged by numerous international studies in long-term care. One therapeutic option would be an add-on therapy with vitamin D (VD), with the aim of achieving a therapeutically effective dose. The individually required VD dose must be tested, since the response to a certain dose is subject to variations between individuals. A possible toxicity with increased 1.25(OH)D3 (active VD metabolite) is largely prevented by increased activity of 24-hydroxylase (CYP24A1). Monitoring of serum VD levels as well as serum calcium and phosphate levels (optional Ca excretion in 24-hour urine, Ca creatinine ratio in urine) provides safety and is necessary because possible mutations on the (catabolic) CYP24A1 gene can lead to a partial or total loss of 24-hydroxylase activity and provoke hypercalcemia/hyperphosphatemia. The main therapeutic objective is to maintain functional and social independence by using drugs with a high safety profile. The prevention and optimal management of comorbidities can influence the quality of life of patients with MS (PwMS) when included in patient care. Adequate measures can reduce the burden of MS only if the risk of comorbidity is reduced through targeted monitoring, early detection and diagnosis. Such a strategy will contribute to influencing the premature mortality of patients with MS. If VD is recognized as a "multipurpose steroid hormone", it could also be used to maintain cognitive function and prevent premature possible dementia, especially as there is evidence that VD deficiency correlates with brain atrophy (hippocampus). At present, MS therapy is still a balancing act between therapeutically efficient action and the management of unexpected side effects, with VD add-on therapy being almost unproblematic and most likely to be accepted by PwMS.