Expert opinion: Criteria for second-line treatment failure in patients with multiple sclerosis

Clinical Pathway for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A First Proposal for the Peruvian Population

Background: Relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is a subtype of degenerative inflammatory demyelinating disease of multifactorial origin that affects the central nervous system and leads to multifocal neurological impairment.

Objectives: To develop a clinical pathway (CP) for the management of Peruvian patients with RRMS.

Methods: First, we performed a literature review using Medline, Embase, Cochrane, ProQuest, and Science direct. Then, we structured the information as an ordered and logical series of five topics in a defined timeline: (1) How should MS be diagnosed? (2) How should a relapse be treated? (3) How should a DMT be initiated? (4) How should each DMT be used? and (5) How should the patients be followed?

Results: The personnel involved in the care of patients with RRMS can use a series of flowcharts and diagrams that summarize the topics in paper or electronic format.

Conclusions: We propose the first CP for RRMS in Peru that shows the essential steps for diagnosing, treating, and monitoring RRMS patients based on an evidence-based medicine method and local expert opinions. This CP will allow directing relevant clinical actions to strengthen the multidisciplinary management of RRMS in Peru.

Factors determining the treatment ineffectiveness in multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

In patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), the suboptimal response should be well evaluated at every step of treatment.

REVIEW SUMMARY

Determining patients with moderate or high activity and suboptimal response to treatment (clinical variables, MRI activity, perception of the patient and physician, side effects, serious risks, etc.) and timely intervention in the treatment are very important in achieving the desired effectiveness in the long term. Within the early stages, there is a limited time interval for effective treatment of MS patients. During this time, intervention is critical to achieve long-term positive results. After diagnosis, an early and individualized specific treatment for MS, depending on the severity of the disease, can prevent radiological and physical disability in the medium/long term.

CONCLUSIONS

With the emergence of a number of new treatments each with their own benefits and risks, a change in the nature of interactions between patients and MS physicians has been anticipated and will be required in the patient-related clinical decision-making process in the developing MS landscape.