Immune reconstitution therapy in NMOSD

The genealogy, methodology, similarities and differences of immune reconstitution therapies for multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica

Immune reconstitution therapies (IRTs) are a type of short course procedure or pharmaceutical agent within the MS pharmacopeia. They emanate from oncology and induce transient incomplete lympho-ablation with or without myelo-ablation, resulting in potential prolonged immunomodulation. Thus, they provide significant prophylaxis from disease activity without retreatment. Modern IRT for autoimmunity encompasses a heterogeneous group of pulsed lympho- and non-myelo-ablative treatments designed to re-boot the adaptive immune system in a quasi-permanent manner - a re-induction of ontogeny. IRT is the extensive debulking of an auto-aggressive immune system to attempt to reach the Holy Grail of immune tolerance. This incomplete yet significant lympho-ablation induces lymphoproliferation, reduces pathogenic clonal cells, causes thymopoiesis and results in the induction of immune tolerance. Lympho-ablation with immune reconstitution can result in minimal residual autoimmunity. There is a resetting of the immune thermostat - i.e., the immunostat. IRTs have the potential to provide prolonged periods of disease inactivity without retreatment in part through the immunological results of their pulsatile lymphocyte depletion. It is vital to increase our understanding of how IRTs alter a patient's immune response to the antigenic target of the disease so that we can devise newer, more durable and safer forms of such agents. What common features do extant IRTs (i.e., stem cell transplant, alemtuzumab and oral cladribine) have to produce the durable therapeutic response without long term treatment in neuroimmunological diseases such as MS (multiple sclerosis) and NMOSD (neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders)? Can we learn from these critical features to predict what other maneuvers or agents might effect similar clinical results with equal or greater efficacy and safety?

Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews the cardinal clinical features, distinct immunopathology, current diagnostic criteria, relapse-related risk factors, emerging biomarkers, and evolving treatment strategies pertaining to neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD).

RECENT FINDINGS

The discovery of the pathogenic aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-IgG autoantibody and characterization of NMOSD as an autoimmune astrocytopathy have spearheaded the identification of key immunologic therapeutic targets in this disease, including but not limited to the complement system, the interleukin 6 (IL-6) receptor, and B cells. Accordingly, four recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of three new NMOSD therapies, namely eculizumab, satralizumab, and inebilizumab.

SUMMARY

Currently, NMOSD poses both diagnostic and treatment challenges. It is debated whether individuals who are seropositive for myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-IgG belong within the neuromyelitis optica spectrum. This discussion is fueled by disparities in treatment responses between patients who are AQP4-IgG seropositive and seronegative, suggesting different immunopathologic mechanisms may govern these conditions. As our understanding regarding the immune pathophysiology of NMOSD expands, emerging biomarkers, including serum neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), may facilitate earlier relapse detection and inform long-term treatment decisions. Future research focal points should include strategies to optimize relapse management, restorative treatments that augment neurologic recovery, and practical solutions that promote equitable access to approved therapies for all patients with NMOSD.

Contemporary management challenges in seropositive NMOSD

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) is an inflammatory disorder of the central nervous system that presents unique management challenges. Neurologic disability in NMOSD is directly linked to acute attacks, therefore, relapse prevention is an overarching goal of care. To this end, identifying effective biomarkers that predict relapse onset and severity is of critical importance. As treatment becomes more precision-based and patient-centred, clinicians will need to be familiar with managing circumstances of particular vulnerability for patients with NMOSD, including infection, pregnancy, and the post-partum phase. The discovery of the pathogenic aquaporin-4 Immunoglobulin G (AQP4 IgG) autoantibody almost 20 years ago ultimately distinguished NMOSD as an autoimmune astrocytopathy and helped spearhead recent therapeutic advancements. Targeted therapies, including eculizumab, satralizumab, and inebilizumab, approved for use in aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G (AQP4 IgG) seropositive patients with NMOSD will likely improve outcomes, but there are formidable costs involved. Importantly, seronegative patients continue to have limited therapeutic options. Moving forward, areas of research exploration should include relapse prevention, restorative therapies, and initiatives that promote equitable access to approved therapies for all people living with NMOSD.