Deep brain stimulation for multiple sclerosis tremor: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Brain stimulation for patients with multiple sclerosis: an umbrella review of therapeutic efficacy

Multiple sclerosis patients often experience various symptoms that can greatly impact their quality of life. There are various brain stimulation techniques that have been evaluated for their ability to reduce the symptoms of multiple sclerosis. However, there is inconsistency in the specific stimulation methods used and the symptoms targeted in the existing research. This umbrella review conducted in order to evaluate the effectiveness of brain stimulation and identify limitations and gaps for further research. In this umbrella review, we conducted a searched on Web of Knowledge, PubMed, and Scopus database. We specifically looked for reviews, with or without meta-analyses, that have investigated the effects of brain stimulation methods on symptoms of multiple sclerosis. All articles were examined by AMSTAR 2 (A Measure Tool to Assess Systematic Review 2). We identified 155 articles, of which 14 were eligible for inclusion. Of those, five were qualitative studies and nine were meta-analyses. Among the included studies, four examined the use of deep brain stimulation, while ten investigated the therapeutic potential of noninvasive brain stimulation. Considering the heterogeneity of studies, the current evidence suggests that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation may be effective in treating pain and improving motor function, while transcranial direct current stimulation may be useful in alleviating fatigue and enhancing certain aspects of cognitive performance. Deep brain stimulation, on the other hand, appears to be effective in reducing tremors. However, further research is warranted to validate these findings and address the existing limitations in the field.

Managing multiple sclerosis in individuals aged 55 and above: a comprehensive review

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) management in individuals aged 55 and above presents unique challenges due to the complex interaction between aging, comorbidities, immunosenescence, and MS pathophysiology. This comprehensive review explores the evolving landscape of MS in older adults, including the increased incidence and prevalence of MS in this age group, the shift in disease phenotypes from relapsing-remitting to progressive forms, and the presence of multimorbidity and polypharmacy. We aim to provide an updated review of the available evidence of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) in older patients, including the efficacy and safety of existing therapies, emerging treatments such as Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTKs) inhibitors and those targeting remyelination and neuroprotection, and the critical decisions surrounding the initiation, de-escalation, and discontinuation of DMTs. Non-pharmacologic approaches, including physical therapy, neuromodulation therapies, cognitive rehabilitation, and psychotherapy, are also examined for their role in holistic care. The importance of MS Care Units and advance care planning are explored as a cornerstone in providing patient-centric care, ensuring alignment with patient preferences in the disease trajectory. Finally, the review emphasizes the need for personalized management and continuous monitoring of MS patients, alongside advocating for inclusive study designs in clinical research to improve the management of this growing patient demographic.

Patient selection and outcome of deep brain stimulation for multiple sclerosis-associated tremor

INTRODUCTION

Tremor is a disabling symptom of multiple sclerosis (MS), with limited treatment modalities. Thalamic ventral-intermediate-nucleus (VIM) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a method of neuromodulation. We describe the long-term outcomes of our carefully selected patients who underwent VIM DBS for their MS-associated tremor.

METHODS

Patients were referred from the regional neurology units. Pre-operative assessments included suitability for anesthesia, tremor quantification by the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin scores, and quality-of-life (EQ5D) measures. Exclusion criteria included prominent cerebellar symptoms such as ataxia and dysmetria, intracranial pathology such as ventriculomegaly, cerebellar plaques and thalamic abnormality, and comorbid psychiatric symptoms. Seven patients (3M:4F) underwent DBS for MS-associated tremor between September 2013 and February 2019. Mean age was 42 years (±SD 8 years). DBS was performed at a mean of 13 years (±SD 9 years) after diagnosis of MS.

RESULTS

There were no postoperative surgical complications. All patients showed improvement in FTM tremor scores, by up to 61% at 6 months postoperatively. There was an improvement of 30-175% in quality-of-life scores at 6 months. Improvement of tremor and quality of life, over baseline, was sustained over a long period of follow-up (mean 26.6 months ± SD 20.7 months), including our longest duration at 72 months.

CONCLUSION

With careful selection, DBS is a safe, efficacious intervention for MS-tremor and can positively impact on tremor and quality of life, with effects over a long period. As patients live longer with MS and the advent of new therapies, DBS should be considered for selected patients.

Deep brain stimulation use in treating multiple sclerosis tremor: A practical approach for meta-analyses

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been introduced as a treatment option for multiple sclerosis (MS) related tremor. Recent emerging studies have investigated its efficacy and safety, yet no study has systematically assessed the evidence on this topic. Zali and colleagues have conducted the first systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of DBS in MS tremor patients. In this letter, we highlight some points in their meta-analysis regarding high heterogeneity levels that reflect some methodological concerns related to pooling studies with considerable variability. We also suggest some approaches to address this problem.