Uncovering patterns of real-world psychological support seeking and the patient experience in Multiple Sclerosis

Can the group effect dominate the influence of the child on the parent's decision to care for type 1 diabetes?

AIM

To understand how the interaction of peer parents in disease-specific social media groups influences their daily treatment decisions.

DESIGN AND METHODS

We examined the content of the largest Hungarian Facebook group for parents of children with type 1 diabetes mellitus, analyzing 28 days of activity using netnography. In addition, we undertook an online quantitative questionnaire to identify group members' (n = 267) attitudes.

RESULTS

In exploring the influence of the community on the decisions of peer-parents, we found that the respondents could be divided into two clusters. The main difference between the clusters was that committed parents sought the online community for advice and asked questions more frequently, and the peer-support community was a more important part of their self-image. Comparing the influence of online communities and children on the parents' decisions, we observed that the community had the most significant impact on attending diabetes-specific events, while children had the greatest influence on meals and leisure time and were often in conflict with parents.

CONCLUSIONS

Social media strongly support the integration of prescribed therapy into daily routine. The influence of the child with diabetes on parental decisions shows that diabetes education needs to become child-centered and that the parent-child relationship should be considered as a crucial element for therapy effectiveness.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Online parenting groups provide mental support in coping with diabetes and would serve as a primary non-medical information source; the healthcare staff must be supportive or even encouraging when parents join such groups.

Psychosocial Difficulties Experienced by MS Patients in their Quality of Life: A Comparative Study of Two Countries

BACKGROUND

MS is deeply impacted by social factors, such as access to health services, support from official and unofficial sources, and social welfare, which are also thought to contribute to the quality of life of MS patients. The purpose of this study is to examine the quality of life and to analyse the psychosocial challenges of MS patients in North Cyprus and Germany.

METHODS

This study was designed with a cross-sectional and comparative research method. The personal information form and the WHO Quality of Life Scale Short Form were used. A total sixty-eight participants joined the study: 35 German patients and 33 Turkish Cypriot patients. Researchers collected the data by face-to-face interviews between December 2021 and March 2022. The majority of MS patients were females average age was 49.48 years old.

RESULTS

In general, the two populations had comparable total sub-dimension scores of quality of life. However, only environment sub-dimension score has significant difference between Germany (x̄ =70.04) and North Cyprus (x̄ =55.87). Perceived opportunities for accessing medication, physiotherapy, and psychological support, as well as the opportunity to receive psychological support after the time of diagnosis were considered greater in the German group compared to the Turkish Cypriot one.

CONCLUSION

Findings from this cross-sectional research demonstrate significant differences in services provided, particularly in the psychosocial domain, between those in Germany and those in Cyprus. Consequently, all parties in both countries (governments, families, health workers, social workers and people with MS) should cooperate to improve social support mechanisms. Moreover, it is needed better access to health services in Northern Cyprus.

Psychotherapy and professional psychological support in multiple sclerosis: Uncovering patients' patterns of access and preferences

BACKGROUND

Whilst there is research on psychotherapy and professional psychological support (PPS) in people with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS) in discrete randomised controlled trials, little is known about the different types of PPS pwMS access throughout the trajectory of their illness and their perceived helpfulness. Additionally, research on what pwMS's preferences are with regard to PPS is lacking.

METHOD

In an online cross-sectional survey study with 565 pwMS, we asked about the types of PPS pwMS had accessed and their preferences.

RESULTS

Although 88% of the sample wanted PPS, only 53% of the sample had managed to access PPS. 40% of the entire sample currently wanted PPS but did not access it previously. The most common reason for this was because they were happy with the support they received from other sources (51%) and/or they were unaware of what was available to them (33%). 59% of those who had accessed PPS had accessed more than one type. The perceived level of helpfulness from PPS was rated as higher amongst those who had accessed more types of PPS. The most common combination of PPS accessed was a mixture of counselling with either cognitive behavioural therapy and/or mindfulness-based therapies. Counselling was the single-most accessed type of PPS. Most pwMS wanted PPS as a proactive means to either preserve and boost psychological well-being (37%) or learn skills to manage future difficulties as and when they arise (23%), rather than as a reaction to immediate pressing concerns (18%). The majority of pwMS showed a broad range of preferences regarding PPS and selected more than 5 types, with high interest in programmes with a self-management component, counselling and mindfulness-based interventions in particular.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient preferences for PPS highlight the need to take a proactive and preventative approach to preserve psychological wellbeing rather than only being provided in response to mental health crises. Psychological support should be made more readily available early on to fulfil this presently unmet need.