Alemtuzumab induced hemodynamic change in relapsing multiple sclerosis occurs independent of corticosteroid premedication – a retrospective multicentre study

Alemtuzumab treatment for multiple sclerosis in Austria: An observational long-term outcome study

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Observational real-world study to analyze the clinical effects of alemtuzumab (ALEM) and subsequent disease-modifying therapy (DMT) usage in multiple sclerosis (MS).

METHODS

Data retrieved from the Austrian MS treatment registry (AMSTR) included baseline (BL) characteristics (at ALEM start), annualized relapse rate (ARR), 6-month confirmed progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA; ≥ 0.5-point Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score increase), 6-month confirmed disability improvement (CDI; ≥ 0.5-point EDSS decrease), and safety outcomes until initiation of a subsequent DMT. The EDSS was re-baselined at 30 days from ALEM start (BL EDSS).

RESULTS

Eighty-seven ALEM-treated patients (median age: 32 years, 72% female, 14% treatment-naïve) were followed for a median of 55 (interquartile range 31-68) months. We found significant reductions in the ARR from 1.16 before ALEM to 0.15 throughout Years 1-9 (p < 0.001). Subsequent DMTs were initiated in 19 patients (22%, 74% anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies). At Year 5 (n = 53), more patients achieved CDI (58%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 45%-71%) than had experienced PIRA (14%, CI 7.5%-24%), and 58% remained relapse-free. Shorter MS duration (p < 0.001, hazard ratio (HR) 0.86 (CI 0.80-0.93)) and no previous high-efficacy treatment (p < 0.001, HR 5.16 (CI 2.66-10.0)) were the best predictors of CDI, while PIRA was associated with a higher number of previous DMTs (p = 0.04, HR 3.06, CI 1.05-8.89). We found no new safety signals.

INTERPRETATION

ALEM had long-lasting beneficial effects on the ARR and disability improvement, especially when initiated early in the course of the disease. Only a subset of patients received subsequent DMTs.

Alemtuzumab infusion-associated reactions and laboratory changes in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis at baseline and first-year follow-up

Background

Alemtuzumab (ATZ) is an anti-CD52 humanized monoclonal antibody indicated for treating highly active relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). It alters the regulation of the immune system by depleting circulating lymphocytes. Changes in blood cell count, infusion-related reactions, and changes in vital parameters can be seen in the early period with ATZ.

Aim

Changes in blood tests, serum tests, vital parameters, and characteristics of infusion-associated reactions (IARs) observed during the first course of ATZ treatment and thereafter were evaluated.

Materials and methods

The systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), fever, heart rate (HR), changes in blood and serum tests, and IARs developed after the first course of 23 patients with RRMS who received ATZ treatment were evaluated by comparing the results of 26 patients with RRMS who received only intravenous methylprednisolone.

Results

Mean age was 36.60 ± 8.98, 73.9% female (n = 17), diagnosis time was 8.52 ± 3.64 years, pre-EDSS: 3.93 ± 1.80. No significant difference was found in vital parameters except for sub-febrile fever that developed on the first day. The number of white blood cells increased significantly after the first day. The hemoglobin level did not change. Lymphocyte (very high) and platelet (mild) counts decreased starting from the first days, and eosinophil (very high) and monocyte (moderate) counts decreased from the third day. There were no significant changes in liver enzymes, thyroid function tests, serum urea, creatinine, and lipid profile during 1-year follow-up. The IAR rate was 95.6% and occurred most frequently on the second and third days. The most common are dermatological findings (52%), headache (20%), pain (10%) and fatigue (8%).

Conclusion

Alemtuzumab has no appreciable effect on vital parameters during infusion. However, these changes are not clinically correlated, even if there is. Headache in the first days, dermatological (most common) findings, pain, and fatigue are seen in the following days. Most IARs can be resolved with symptomatic treatment and close follow-up. Lymphocytes, eosinophils, and monocytes are significantly reduced and return to baseline levels towards the end of the first year. The first year does not cause significant pathologies in other serum parameters. However, after the first year, watch out for associated autoimmune pathologies, especially thyroid involvement.

[Assessment of the efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab in patients with highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Russian population]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the severity and frequency of infusion reactions (IR) in patients with highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) In Russian population receiving alemtuzumab therapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In retrospective study, we analyzed data from 50 patients with highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) from six Regional MS Centers in the Russian Federation who received two courses of alemtuzumab between 2018 and 2022.

RESULTS

Among all IRs, the most frequently reported were hives-like rashes, which were registered in 27 people, mostly of mild severity (70.6%). Headaches were the second most common IR, observed in 17 patients (34%). When comparing the group of patients who underwent music therapy (MT) with those who received alemtuzumab therapy without MT, no statistically significant difference was found in the frequency and severity of IRs.

CONCLUSION

All patients experienced IRs of varying degrees of severity. A decrease in the score on the EDSS disability scale was noted. MT did not affect the occurrence or severity of IRs.

Acute infusion effects in relapsing multiple sclerosis patients receiving alemtuzumab under a modified prophylaxis regimen

BACKGROUND

Use of alemtuzumab in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) is limited by safety concerns, notably risk of rare, serious vascular events. Along with other vital sign (VS) changes, acute increase in systolic blood pressure (SBP) is monitored as a marker of vascular risk. Peri-infusion prophylaxis is used to manage clinical risk by moderating cytokine release; protocols are not fully specified and vary across sites. Here, we report a modified prophylaxis regimen developed at Maritime Neurology. This single-center observational cohort study (NCT04633967) aimed to examine acute responses (VS events and infusion-associated reactions) in RMS patients receiving alemtuzumab infusion under this regimen. In a post hoc analysis, we examined incidence of acute SBP increase at this clinic versus the Bayshore network of Canadian infusion centers, where a standard prophylaxis regimen is used.

METHODS

Alemtuzumab was infused on 5 consecutive days (Course 1; n = 29) and 3 consecutive days one year later (Course 2; n = 28). In addition to intravenous methylprednisolone 500mg on each infusion day, patients received daily prophylactic treatment with oral prednisone 50mg from 5 days before to 5 days after treatment (infusion days excepted) and oral H1 and H2 antihistaminics from 7 days before to 7 days after treatment. Excursions in SBP and other VS were relative to prespecified ranges; persistent excursions were those for which two sequential measurements were outside these ranges. In comparing VS events at Maritime Neurology and the Bayshore centers, acute SBP increase was defined as ≥20 mmHg increase in mean SBP, or any SBP reading ≥20% over patient's pre-course baseline.

RESULTS

Mean (SD) VS were within range at pre-course and all other daily baselines. VS changes, including persistent excursions, were generally subclinical; all infusion-associated reactions were mild. One patient discontinued treatment after Course 1 due to immune thrombocytopenia purpura. Acute SBP increase occurred in 11/28 (39%) Maritime Neurology versus 367/610 (60%) Bayshore (p = 0.028).

CONCLUSION

The modified peri-infusion prophylaxis regimen was well tolerated and may reduce incidence of acute SBP increase.

FUNDING

This project was funded by Sanofi, Canada.