The influence of disease-modifying therapy on hidden disability burden in people with newly diagnosed relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

Identification and management of subclinical disease activity in early multiple sclerosis: a review

IMPORTANCE

Early treatment initiation in multiple sclerosis (MS) is crucial in preventing irreversible neurological damage and disability progression. The current assessment of disease activity relies on relapse rates and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesion activity, but inclusion of other early, often "hidden," indicators of disease activity may describe a more comprehensive picture of MS.

OBSERVATIONS

Early indicators of MS disease activity other than relapses and MRI activity, such as cognitive impairment, brain atrophy, and fatigue, are not typically captured by routine disease monitoring. Furthermore, silent progression (neurological decline not clearly captured by standard methods) may occur undetected by relapse and MRI lesion activity monitoring. Consequently, patients considered to have no disease activity actually may have worsening disease, suggesting a need to revise MS management strategies with respect to timely initiation and escalation of disease-modifying therapy (DMT). Traditionally, first-line MS treatment starts with low- or moderate-efficacy therapies, before escalating to high-efficacy therapies (HETs) after evidence of breakthrough disease activity. However, multiple observational studies have shown that early initiation of HETs can prevent or reduce disability progression. Ongoing randomized clinical trials are comparing escalation and early HET approaches.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

There is an urgent need to reassess how MS disease activity and worsening are measured. A greater awareness of "hidden" indicators, potentially combined with biomarkers to reveal silent disease activity and neurodegeneration underlying MS, would provide a more complete picture of MS and allow for timely therapeutic intervention with HET or switching DMTs to address suboptimal treatment responses.

"No association between disease modifying treatment and fatigue in multiple sclerosis"

BACKGROUND

Fatigue affects 60-90% of people with multiple sclerosis (MS). It reduces quality of life and the ability to work. The cause of fatigue in MS remains unknown. Several disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) slow the disease process in relapsing MS by suppressing neuroinflammation. We aimed to investigate if treatment with a DMT is associated with lower rates of fatigue.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study of the MS population in three counties in Norway, we used the Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions (FSMC) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to assess patient-reported fatigue, anxiety and depression. Clinical data were retrieved from the electronic patient record system. We categorized DMTs as high-efficacy therapy or moderate-efficacy therapy. High-efficacy drugs included fingolimod, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, rituximab, alemtuzumab, daclizumab, and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Moderate-efficacy drugs included interferons, glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate, and teriflunomide. We included persons with relapsing MS only.

RESULTS

Of 1142 patients, 80% had fatigue. Fifty-six percent of the patients were on DMTs (25% on moderate-efficacy treatment and 30% on high-efficacy treatment), 18% had discontinued treatment and 26% had never received any DMT. Sex, level of disability as measured by the Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score, anxiety and depression were independently associated with fatigue. Moderate-efficacy treatment was associated with less fatigue, but not after adjustment for other variables. There was no association between high-efficacy treatment and fatigue.

CONCLUSION

We found no independent relationship between the use of disease-modifying treatment and fatigue in MS.

Current Status of Oral Disease-Modifying Treatment Effects on Cognitive Outcomes in Multiple Sclerosis: A Scoping Review

INTRODUCTION

Cognitive impairment represents one of the most hidden and disabling clinical aspects of multiple sclerosis (MS). In this regard, the major challenges are represented by the need for a comprehensive and standardised cognitive evaluation of each patient, both at disease onset and during follow-up, and by the lack of clear-cut data on the effects of treatments. In the present review, we summarize the current evidence on the effects of the available oral disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) on cognitive outcome measures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this systematised review, we extract all the studies that reported longitudinally acquired cognitive outcome data on oral DMTs in MS patients.

RESULTS

We found 29 studies that evaluated at least one oral DMT, including observational studies, randomised controlled trials, and their extension studies. Most of the studies (n = 20) evaluated sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) modulators, while we found seven studies on dimethyl fumarate, six on teriflunomide, and one on cladribine. The most frequently used cognitive outcome measures were SDMT and PASAT. Most of the studies reported substantial stability or mild improvement in cognitive outcomes in a short-time follow-up (duration of most studies ≤2 years). A few studies also reported MRI measures of brain atrophy.

CONCLUSION

Cognitive outcomes were evaluated only in a minority of prospective studies on oral DMTs in MS patients with variable findings. More solid and numerous data are present for the S1P modulators. A standardised cognitive evaluation remains a yet unmet need to better clarify the possible positive effect of oral DMTs on cognition.

Sleep counts! Role and impact of sleep in the multimodal management of multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

In the last years, research on pharmacotherapy and non-pharmacological approaches to Multiple Sclerosis (MS) has significantly increased, along with a greater attention to sleep as a clinical outcome measure. This review aims to update the state of the art on the effects of MS treatments on sleep, but above all to evaluate the role of sleep and its management within the current and future therapeutic perspectives for MS patients.

METHOD

A comprehensive MEDLINE (PubMed)-based bibliographic search was conducted. This review includes the 34 papers that met the selection criteria.

RESULTS

First-line disease modifying therapies (especially the interferon-beta) seem to have a negative impact on sleep, assessed subjectively or objectively, while second-line treatments (in particular, natalizumab) do not seem to lead to the onset of daytime sleepiness (also evaluated objectively) and, in some cases, an improvement in sleep quality has been observed as well. Management of sleep is considered a major factor in modifying disease progression in pediatric MS; however, probably because only fingolimod has recently been approved in children, information is still scarce in this group of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies on the effect of drugs and non-pharmacological treatments for MS on sleep are still insufficient and there is a lack of investigations on the most recent therapies. However, there is preliminary evidence that melatonin, chronotherapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and non-invasive brain stimulation techniques might be further assessed as adjuvant therapies, thus representing a promising field of research.