Demographics and baseline disease characteristics of Black and Hispanic patients with multiple sclerosis in the open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase IV CHIMES trial

Real-world evidence of ocrelizumab in Chilean patients with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Real-world studies are needed to expand our knowledge concerning populations underrepresented in clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ocrelizumab in Hispanic/Latino people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS).

METHODS

Prospective longitudinal observational study including pwMS who received at least one dose of ocrelizumab between June 2018 and October 2023.

RESULTS

A total of 305 pwMS (223 relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), 29 secondary progressive MS (SPMS), and 53 primary progressive MS (PPMS)), 67% female, mean age 38.7, mean disease duration 7 years, and median Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) 2.0 (range 0-7). Median follow-up under ocrelizumab 29.5 (range 6-65) months. Only 1 patient had a relapse, 12-week-confirmed disability worsening was observed in 12.4% of the full cohort. Survival analysis showed higher risk of 12-week-confirmed disability worsening in SPMS compared with RRMS and PPMS (p = 0.0009). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity was significantly reduced from baseline across all disease phenotypes. Serious infections were observed in 4.6%, and two patients died during follow-up (one serious COVID-19 and one metastatic cancer). Notably, 22 pregnancies were reported, with 11 newborns and 6 pregnancies still on course.

CONCLUSION

This study supports the effectiveness of ocrelizumab in a real-world cohort of individuals from traditionally underrepresented groups, such as the Latin American population, with a consistent safety profile in patients receiving care at a specialized MS Unit.

Understanding Multiple Sclerosis Pathophysiology and Current Disease-Modifying Therapies: A Review of Unaddressed Aspects

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex autoimmune disorder of the central nervous system (CNS) with an unknown etiology and pathophysiology that is not completely understood. Although great strides have been made in developing disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) that have significantly improved the quality of life for MS patients, these treatments do not entirely prevent disease progression or relapse. Identifying the unaddressed pathophysiological aspects of MS and developing targeted therapies to fill in these gaps are essential in providing long-term relief for patients. Recent research has uncovered some aspects of MS that remain outside the scope of available DMTs, and as such, yield only limited benefits. Despite most MS pathophysiology being targeted by DMTs, many patients still experience disease progression or relapse, indicating that a more detailed understanding is necessary. Thus, this literature review seeks to explore the known aspects of MS pathophysiology, identify the gaps in present DMTs, and explain why current treatments cannot entirely arrest MS progression.

Race and ethnicity in multiple sclerosis phase 3 clinical trials: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Distinctive differences in multiple sclerosis (MS) have been observed by race and ethnicity. We aim to (1) assess how often race and ethnicity were reported in clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, (2) evaluate whether the population was diverse enough, and (3) compare with publications.

METHODS

We included phase 3 clinical trials registered with results on ClinicalTrials.gov between 2007 and 2023. When race and/or ethnicity were reported, we searched for the corresponding publications.

RESULTS

Out of the 99 included studies, 56% reported race and/or ethnicity, of which only 26% of those primarily completed before 2017. Studies reporting race or ethnicity contributed to a total of 33,891 participants, mainly enrolled in Eastern Europe. Most were White (93%), and the median percentage of White participants was 93% (interquartile range (IQR) = 86%-98%), compared to 3% for Black (IQR = 1%-12%) and 0.2% for Asian (IQR = 0%-1%). Four trials omitted race and ethnicity in publications and even when information was reported, some discrepancies in terminology were identified and categories with fewer participants were often collapsed.

CONCLUSION

More efforts should be done to improve transparency, accuracy, and representativeness, in publications and at a design phase, by addressing social determinants of health that historically limit the enrollment of underrepresented population.

Current opinion: Racial and ethnic health disparities in multiple sclerosis: considering the social determinants of health

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We discuss racial and ethnic disparities in multiple sclerosis (MS), outcomes, and social determinants of health (SDoH). We also provide essential considerations needed to bridge the gap in inequalities, including broader representation of racial and ethnic people in clinical trials and research in general and the inclusion of better measures of living conditions.

RECENT FINDINGS

The incidence and prevalence of MS have become more diverse in the USA. There is increased recognition that racial and ethnic health disparities and inequities exist due to adverse social conditions. Clinical trials have failed to be inclusive and diverse. Training in health disparity is an essential priority of funding sources, and designing clinical trials that consider the barriers these populations face can close significant gaps.

SUMMARY

The incidence, prevalence, and awareness of MS have seen an incline in diverse racial and ethnic populations. Health disparities exist in MS with Black, Hispanic, and indigenous populations appearing to have worse outcomes. SDoH play a significant role in causing these health disparities. Accessibility to clinical trials and treatment are barriers these populations face. Strategic and earnest interventions considering SDoH are critically needed to develop solutions that collectively improve health and MS care for all.