Characterization of Ni-Cr alloys using different casting techniques and molds

The effect of repeated baking of porcelain on its bonding strength to a Co-Cr alloy 3D-printed by selective laser melting

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of multiple baking cycles of porcelain on its shear bond strength to a cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) alloy that is three-dimensionally printed using Selective Laser Melting (SLM) technique.

Materials and methods

The research sample comprised forty-eight discs measuring 5 mm × 3 mm, divided into four groups according to: the manufacturing method (SLM, casting) and the number of porcelain baking cycles (1, 3) as follows: Group A: Co-Cr alloy by SLM with one baking cycle; Group B: Co-Cr alloy by SLM with three baking cycles; Group C: Ni-Cr alloy by casting with one baking cycle; Group D: Ni-Cr alloy by casting with three baking cycles. Then, porcelain was melted on disks, shear testing was performed and the values of the Shear Bond Strength (SBS) in MegaPascals (MPa) were calculated.

Results

The mean SBS values for each group were (A: 25.69 - B: 19.51 - C: 35.72 - D: 28.67 MPa). Statistical analysis showed that the manufacturing method and the number of porcelain baking cycles had a significant influence on shear bond durability (P > 0.05): the strength of this bond decreased when baking cycles increased. The Co-Cr samples manufactured by SLM also showed a decrease in binding strength compared to the Ni-Cr samples made by casting.

Conclusion

Repeated baking of porcelain reduces the strength of the porcelain bond with the Co-Cr alloy made by Selective Laser Melting (SLM) technique.

Correlation between microhardness and wear resistance of dental alloys against monolithic zirconia

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to compare the hardness according to the conditions of metal alloys. Moreover, the correlation between the cast crown hardness before and after wear testing and the degree of wear for each dental alloy was assessed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cast crowns of three metal alloys (Co-Cr, gold, and Ni-Cr alloys) opposing smooth-surface monolithic zirconia were used. The Vickers microhardness of the ingot (which did not undergo wear testing) and the cast crown before and after wear testing were measured for each alloy. Two-way ANOVA and Scheffé tests were used to compare the measured hardness values. Moreover, the Pearson correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the relationship between the surface hardness and the wear of the cast crown (α=.05).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the hardness before and after wear testing for the gold alloy (P>.05); however, the hardness of the worn surface of the cast crown increased compared to that of the cast crown before the wear tests of Ni-Cr and Co-Cr alloys (P<.05). Furthermore, there was no correlation between the wear and hardness of the cast crown before and after wear testing for all three metal alloys (P>.05).

CONCLUSION

There was a significant difference in hardness between dental alloys under the same conditions. No correlation existed between the surface hardness of the cast crown before and after wear testing and the wear of the cast crown.

Influence of Manufacturing Methods of Implant-Supported Crowns on External and Internal Marginal Fit: A Micro-CT Analysis

Aim

To evaluate the influence of different manufacturing methods of single implant-supported metallic crowns on the internal and external marginal fit through computed microtomography.

Methods

Forty external hexagon implants were divided into 4 groups (n = 8), according to the manufacturing method: GC, conventional casting; GI, induction casting; GP, plasma casting; and GCAD, CAD/CAM machining. The crowns were attached to the implants with insertion torque of 30 N·cm. The external (vertical and horizontal) marginal fit and internal fit were assessed through computed microtomography. Internal and external marginal fit data (μm) were submitted to a one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = .05). Qualitative evaluation of the images was conducted by using micro-CT.

Results

The statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between the groups for vertical misfit (P = 0.721). There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) for the internal and horizontal marginal misfit in the groups GC, GI, and GP, but it was found for the group GCAD (P ≤ 0.05). Qualitative analysis revealed that most of the samples of cast groups exhibited crowns underextension while the group GCAD showed overextension.

Conclusions

The manufacturing method of the crowns influenced the accuracy of marginal fit between the prosthesis and implant. The best results were found for the crowns fabricated through CAD/CAM machining.

Metal-ceramic bond strength between a feldspathic porcelain and a Co-Cr alloy fabricated with Direct Metal Laser Sintering technique

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to record the metal-ceramic bond strength of a feldspathic dental porcelain and a Co-Cr alloy, using the Direct Metal Laser Sintering technique (DMLS) for the fabrication of metal substrates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten metal substrates were fabricated with powder of a dental Co-Cr alloy using DMLS technique (test group) in dimensions according to ISO 9693. Another ten substrates were fabricated with a casing dental Co-Cr alloy using classic casting technique (control group) for comparison. Another three substrates were fabricated using each technique to record the Modulus of Elasticity (E) of the used alloys. All substrates were examined to record external and internal porosity. Feldspathic porcelain was applied on the substrates. Specimens were tested using the three-point bending test. The failure mode was determined using optical and scanning electron microscopy. The statistical analysis was performed using t-test.

RESULTS

Substrates prepared using DMLS technique did not show internal porosity as compared to those produced using the casting technique. The E of control and test group was 222 ± 5.13 GPa and 227 ± 3 GPa, respectively. The bond strength was 51.87 ± 7.50 MPa for test group and 54.60 ± 6.20 MPa for control group. No statistically significant differences between the two groups were recorded. The mode of failure was mainly cohesive for all specimens.

CONCLUSION

Specimens produced by the DMLS technique cover the lowest acceptable metal-ceramic bond strength of 25 MPa specified in ISO 9693 and present satisfactory bond strength for clinical use.