Utility of a brief assessment tool developed from the Dizziness Handicap Inventory to screen for Cervicogenic dizziness: A case control study

Psychometric Properties of the Persian Dizziness Handicap Inventory - Screening Version

OBJECTIVES

The Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) is the most popular and widely used questionnaire in evaluating patients with vertigo. This questionnaire has a screening version with a high correlation with DHI. This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Persian DHI - Screening version (DHI-S).

METHODS

This cross-sectional and methodological study was conducted on 300 patients at the central vestibular clinic in Mashhad, Iran, from 2020 to 2021. First, the DHI-S was translated into Persian using the backward-forward translation method. Subsequently, the following types of validity and reliability were examined: content validity based on content validity index and content validity ratio, face validity based on impact score, construct validity based on confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency based on Cronbach's α and Ω, and test-retest stability based on intraclass correlation coefficient and smallest detectable change.

RESULTS

The DHI-S had high content and face validity. Score 8 was selected for the cutoff point between patients and the normal group with a sensitivity of 63.67% and specificity of 96.08%. The construct validity indicated that the questionnaire is one-dimensional. The Cronbach's α and Ω for internal consistency were 0.855 and 0.851, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.981 and the smallest detectable change was 5.521.

CONCLUSIONS

The DHI-S in the Persian language has high and acceptable psychometric properties. This questionnaire can be used in research and clinical settings.

Proprioceptive Cervicogenic Dizziness Care Trajectories in Patient Subpopulations: A Scoping Review

Proprioceptive cervicogenic dizziness (PCGD) is the most prevalent subcategory of cervicogenic dizziness. There is considerable confusion regarding this clinical syndrome's differential diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment strategy. Our objectives were to conduct a systematic search to map out characteristics of the literature and of potential subpopulations of PCGD, and to classify accordingly the knowledge contained in the literature regarding interventions, outcomes and diagnosis. A Joanna Briggs Institute methodology-informed scoping review of the French, English, Spanish, Portuguese and Italian literature from January 2000 to June 2021 was undertaken on PsycInfo, Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), All EBM Reviews (Ovid), CINAHL (Ebsco), Web of Science and Scopus databases. All pertinent randomized control trials, case studies, literature reviews, meta-analyses, and observational studies were retrieved. Evidence-charting methods were executed by two independent researchers at each stage of the scoping review. The search yielded 156 articles. Based on the potential etiology of the clinical syndrome, the analysis identified four main subpopulations of PCGD: chronic cervicalgia, traumatic, degenerative cervical disease, and occupational. The three most commonly occurring differential diagnosis categories are central causes, benign paroxysmal positional vertigo and otologic pathologies. The four most cited measures of change were the dizziness handicap inventory, visual analog scale for neck pain, cervical range of motion, and posturography. Across subpopulations, exercise therapy and manual therapy are the most commonly encountered interventions in the literature. PCGD patients have heterogeneous etiologies which can impact their care trajectory. Adapted care trajectories should be used for the different subpopulations by optimizing differential diagnosis, treatment, and evaluation of outcomes.

The efficacy of self-exercise in a patient with cervicogenic dizziness: A randomized controlled trial

Background

Cervicogenic dizziness is a clinical syndrome characterized by neck pain and dizziness. Recent evidence suggested that self-exercise could improve a patient's symptoms. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of self-exercise as an add-on therapy in patients with non-traumatic cervicogenic dizziness.

Methods

Patients with non-traumatic cervicogenic dizziness were randomly assigned to the self-exercise and control groups. The self-exercise group was instructed to perform muscle, mobilization, and oculomotor training at home while there was no specific training given to the control group. The neck pain, dizziness symptoms, and their impact on daily life were evaluated by the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) scale, the Neck Disability Index (NDI) scale, and the visual analog scale (VAS). The objective outcomes included the range of motion test of the neck and the posturography test. All outcomes were evaluated at 2 weeks after the initial treatment.

Results

A total of 32 patients participated in this study. The average age of the participants was 48 years. The DHI score of the self-exercise group after the treatment was significantly lower when compared to the control group [mean difference (MD) 25.92 points, 95% CI 4.21-47.63, p = 0.021]. The NDI score after treatment was also significantly lower in the self-exercise group (MD 6.16 points, 95% CI 0.42-11.88, p = 0.036). However, there was no statistical difference in the VAS score, the range of motion test, and the posturography test between the two groups (p > 0.05). No significant side effects were noted in either of the groups.

Conclusion

Self-exercise is effective in reducing dizziness symptoms and its impact on daily life in patients with non-traumatic cervicogenic dizziness.

Clinical characteristics and diagnostic aspects of cervicogenic dizziness in patients with chronic dizziness: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Chronic dizziness can significantly affect quality of life, but identifying the underlying cause remains challenging. This study focuses on proprioceptive cervicogenic dizziness (CGD) and aims: (1) to compare clinical test results between patients with CGD, dizzy patients without CGD, and healthy controls; and (2) to evaluate the diagnostic value of the clinical tests for CGD in patients with chronic dizziness.

METHODS

Sixty patients with chronic dizziness (18 with CGD and 42 without CGD), and 43 healthy controls underwent clinical tests evaluating neck function (mobility, proprioception, muscle function and disability), balance control, and the presence of visually induced dizziness. Data were analysed through one-way ANOVA, chi-square, independent samples t-test, and logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Patients with CGD had significantly more neck pain-related disability (Neck Bournemouth questionnaire (NBQ), p = 0.006), but better static (Static Balance, p = 0.001) and dynamic balance (Tandem Gait, p = 0.049), compared to dizzy patients without CGD. Univariable analyses revealed that increased NBQ (OR 1.05 [1.01; 1.09], p = 0.017), Joint Position Error (JPE) _{after extension} (OR 1.52 [1.00; 2.32], p = 0.050), and Tandem Gait scores (OR 1.09 [1.01; 1.18], p = 0.046) were individually associated with higher odds of having CGD. Their optimal cut-off level (based on the maximum Youden index) had high sensitivity but low specificity for CGD. The multivariable model, including NBQ and Tandem Gait, had fair discriminative ability (AUC = 0.74, 95% CI [0.61; 0.87]).

CONCLUSION

The combined use of the NBQ and Tandem Gait tests had the highest discriminative ability to detect CGD in patients with chronic dizziness.

Combination of Two Manipulative Techniques for the Treatment of Cervicogenic Dizziness: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Cervicogenic dizziness is clinically associated with upper cervical spine dysfunctions. It seems that manual therapy decreases the intensity of dizziness in these subjects, but what happens to pain measured by pressure pain threshold (PPT) has not been studied. Purpose: analyze the short-term effects of combination two manipulation techniques protocol in worst dizziness intensity (wVAS), dizziness and cervical disability, upper cervical spine mobility and mechanosensivity of cervical tissue. Methods: Assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial was developed. A total of 40 patients with cervicogenic dizziness were randomly divided into two groups. The experimental group received three treatments consisting of a functional massage and a manipulation technique, and compared with a control group. The wVAS, dizziness handicap inventory (DHI), neck disability index (NDI), UCS mobility, and PPTs were measured. Measurements were made at the baseline, first follow-up 48 h after intervention and second follow-up 1 month after the intervention. Results: at second follow-up wVAS (p < 0.001), NDI (p < 0.001), DHI (p < 0.001), and upper right trapezius (p < 0.022) and right suboccipital (p < 0.043) PPTs showed a difference between groups in favor of the experimental group. Conclusions: apparently, the proposed intervention protocol decreases the intensity of dizziness and the mechanosensitivity of the cervical tissue and improves the feeling of disability due to neck pain and dizziness.

Cervicogenic dizziness alleviation after coblation discoplasty: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

Little is known about the therapeutic relationship between coblation discoplasty and cervicogenic dizziness (CGD). CGD can be caused by abnormal proprioceptive inputs from compressed nerve roots, intradiscal mechanoreceptors and nociceptors to the vestibulospinal nucleus in the degenerative cervical disc. The aim was to analyze the efficacy of coblation discoplasty in CGD through intradiscal nerve ablation and disc decompression in a 12-month follow-up retrospective study.

METHODS

From 2015 to 2019, 42 CGD patients who received coblation discolplasty were recruited as the surgery group, and 22 CGD patients who rejected surgery were recruited as the conservative group. Using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis, we retrospectively analyzed the CGD visual analogue scale (VAS), neck pain VAS, CGD frequency score, and the CGD alleviation rating throughout a 12-month follow-up period.

RESULTS

Compared with conservative intervention, coblation discoplasty revealed a better recovery trend with effect sizes of 1.76, 2.15, 0.92, 0.78 and 0.81 in CGD VAS, and effect sizes of 1.32, 1.54, 0.93, 0.86 and 0.76in neck pain VAS at post-operative 1 week, and 1, 3, 6, 12 months, respectively. The lower CGD frequency score indicated fewer attacks of dizziness until postoperative 3 months (p < 0.01). At post-operative 12 months, the coblation procedure showed increased satisfactory outcomes of CGD alleviation rating (p < .001, -1.00 of effect size).

CONCLUSIONS

Coblation discoplasty significantly improves the severity and frequency of CGD, which is important inbridging unresponsive conservative intervention and open surgery.Key messagesThere is a correlation between the degenerative cervical disc and cervicogenic dizziness (CGD).CGD can be caused by abnormal proprioceptive inputs from a compressed nerve root and intradiscal mechanoreceptors and nociceptors to the vestibulospinal nucleus in the degenerative cervical disc.Cervical coblation discoplasty can alleviate CGD through ablating intradiscal nerve endings and decompressing the nerve root.

An upper cervical spine treatment protocol for cervicogenic dizziness: a randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Physiotherapy is a common treatment used for cervicogenic dizziness (CD). Treatment of the cervical spine using manual therapy techniques shows moderate evidence in favor of its use. International criteria for the treatment of the cervical spine have been described. Detecting patients' contraindications is the most important safety consideration. International criteria and recommendations for treatment of the cervical spine have been described, as well as safety criteria. A safe traction-manipulation intervention protocol is therefore possible. However, the effects of this protocol on dizziness intensity and dizziness-related disability have not been studied.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effects of a traction-manipulation protocol in patients with CD.

METHODS

The patients were referred by an otoneurologist, and after inclusion were randomly divided into a control group and an intervention group. The intervention was based on the application of a traction-manipulation protocol in the resting position. Dizziness intensity, self-reported disability, and cervical range of motion with and without a fixed gaze were assessed. All data were collected beforehand and at two days and four weeks after intervention.

RESULTS

At the two-days follow-up, statistically significant differences in favor of the intervention were observed between groups in the primary outcomes of dizziness intensity (p < .001) and Dizziness Handicap Inventory (p < .001), and at the four-week follow-up in dizziness intensity (p < .001) and Dizziness Handicap Inventory (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The traction-manipulation protocol reduces the intensity of dizziness, the patient's self-perceived disability, and improves cervical mobility with and without fixed gaze.

Short-term effects of the traction-manipulation protocol in dizziness intensity and disability in cervicogenic dizziness: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

Analyse the short-term effects of traction-manipulation protocol in dizziness and pain intensity and disability, cervical mobility and postural instability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Randomized controlled assessor-blind clinical trial. The traction-manipulation protocol was carried out in the intervention group and compared with a control group where the subjects were kept supine. The intervention protocol follows the IFOMPT safety recommendations. Dizziness and pain intensity, Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), cervical mobility and balance were measured after 48 h and a one-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Forty subjects with cervicogenic dizziness were randomly assigned to an intervention or control group. Significant differences were found in favour of the intervention protocol group in: dizziness intensity (p < 0.001; d = 1.31), DHI (p < 0.001; d = 0.76) pain intensity (p < 0.007; d = 0.92), upper cervical flexion (p < 0.032; d = 0.30) and extension (p < 0.012; d = 0.80) at 48 h follow up. At one-month follow up there were significant differences in favour of the intervention group in: dizziness intensity (p < 0.001; d = 0.95), DHI (p < 0.001; d = 0.0.92) pain intensity (p < 0.001; d = 1.38) and upper cervical extension (p < 0.005; d = 0.92). Postural instability improved in mediolateral displacement static with eyes closed (p < 0.032; d = 0.79) and in dynamic with eyes open (p = 0.003; d = 0.55) at one-month follow-up in the intervention group.

CONCLUSION

The traction-manipulation protocol reduces the dizziness and pain intensity, ameliorates disability and improves upper cervical mobility and postural instability.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe intervention protocol reduces the dizziness and pain intensity, and improves self-perceived disability in patients with cervicogenic dizziness.Manual therapy improves the cervical range of motion and the postural instability in the cervicogenic dizziness.The intervention protocol follows the safety recommendations of the International Federation of Orthopaedic Manipulative Physical Therapists.

Upper cervical spine dysfunction and dizziness

Although various causes of dizziness have been identified, many patients suffer from dizziness of unknown etiology and continue to visit hospitals to resolve their symptoms. Problems that occur in the ligaments or muscles of the upper cervical spine can cause confusion in proprioception. These changes can convey misinformation to the vestibular nucleus, resulting in abnormal reactions that can lead to cervicogenic dizziness (CGD). Though CGD remains controversial, it should be considered while diagnosing patients with dizziness. Understanding CGD can help create treatment strategies for them. This article suggested a relationship between the structure and function of the upper cervical spine and dizziness, and presented evaluations and treatments for the same.

Clinical characteristics in patients with cervicogenic dizziness: A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Cervicogenic dizziness (CD) is a clinical syndrome of dizziness associated with neck dysfunction. CD represents a considerable diagnostic challenge since dizziness and neck pain are common symptoms with complex and multifactorial etiologies. Both research and clinical work on CD is limited by the lack of accepted diagnostic criteria. The aim of this study was to review clinical studies on CD and to assess current evidence regarding the clinical characteristics of this syndrome.

METHODS

A comprehensive PubMed and MEDLINE search was conducted from the date of inception of the database, with the last search conducted in September 2018. Included studies had to contain operable diagnostic criteria as well as a comparison between patients considered to have CD and a clinical comparison group. Data extracted were clinical outcomes, diagnostic criteria, age, sex, and sample size. Studies were assessed for methodological quality using the Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool.

RESULTS

Out of 2161 screened studies, eight studies comprising 225 patients met the inclusion criteria. Studies were of low to acceptable methodological quality. The most frequent and consistent clinical characteristic in patients classified as having CD, compared with other populations, was reduced posturographic stability. The most consistent diagnostic criteria were based on the concurrence of neck pain with dizziness after exclusion of other possible reasons for dizziness.

CONCLUSION

There are few studies examining clinical characteristics in patients with cervicogenic dizziness. Altered posturography appeared to be the only consistent characteristic used when distinguishing CD from other populations. Diagnostic criteria currently used in research are likely to have low specificity, since they rest on the exclusion of other causes rather than on positive distinctive features. More studies are needed to better understand the clinical interrelations between dizziness and neck pain.

Concussion - Part I: The need for a multifaceted assessment

INTRODUCTION

Concussion is among the most commonly occurring sport and recreation injuries in today's society. An understanding of the heterogenous nature of concussion will assist in directing a multifaceted and comprehensive interdisciplinary assessment following injury.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this masterclass article is to summarize the current state of the evidence in the area of concussion, describe typical symptom presentations and assessment techniques that may assist in directing appropriate management following concussion.

IMPLICATIONS

A comprehensive assessment including a thoughtful differential diagnosis will assist the clinician to direct care appropriately and efficiently in individuals who have suffered a concussion.

Symptoms in cervical vertigo

OBJECTIVE

To use a unique, 41-question survey to identify patient features distinguishing cervical vertigo from vestibular causes of vertigo and vestibular migraine.

METHODS

In this study, a unique, 41-question survey was administered to 48 patients diagnosed with cervical vertigo (n = 16), migraine (n = 16), and vestibular vertigo (eg, unilateral vestibular paresis, Meniere's disease) (n = 16) to test the hypothesis that a set of distinct symptoms can characterize cervical vertigo. Responses between the three diagnostic groups were compared to identify questions which differentiated patients based on their symptoms.

RESULTS

Eight questions were successful in differentiating vestibular vertigo from migraine and cervical vertigo. Symptoms endorsed by subjects with cervical vertigo overlapped substantially with subjects with well-established vestibular disturbances as well as symptoms of subjects with migraine. Twenty-seven percent of cervical vertigo subjects reported having true vertigo, 50% having headache, and 94% having neck pain.

CONCLUSION

Lacking knowledge of neck disturbance, the symptoms we elicited in our questionnaire suggest that cervical vertigo subjects may resemble migraine subjects who also have evidence of neck injury. Whether or not subjects with "cervical vertigo" also overlap with other diagnoses defined by a combination of symptoms and exclusion of objective findings such as chronic subjective dizziness and other variants of psychogenic dizziness remain to be established.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.