Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of cervicothoracic differentiation testing and regional unloading for identifying improvement after thoracic manipulation in individuals with neck pain

Immediate effects of cervicothoracic junction mobilization versus thoracic manipulation on the range of motion and pain in mechanical neck pain with cervicothoracic junction dysfunction: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Background

Cervicothoracic (CT) junction hypomobility has been proposed as a contributing factor for neck pain. However, there are limited studies that compared the effect of CT junction mobilization against an effective intervention in neck pain. Thoracic spine manipulation is a nonspecific intervention for neck pain where remote spinal segments are treated based on the concept of regional interdependence. The effectiveness of segment-specific spinal mobilization in the cervical spine has been researched in the last few years, and no definite conclusions could be made from the previous studies. The above reasons warrant the investigation of the effects of a specific CT junction mobilization against a nonspecific thoracic manipulation intervention in neck pain. The present study aims to compare the immediate effects of C7-T1 Maitland mobilization with thoracic manipulation in individuals with mechanical neck pain presenting with CT junction dysfunction specifically.

Methods

A randomized clinical trial is conducted where participants with complaints of mechanical neck pain and CT junction dysfunction randomly assigned to either C7-T1 level Maitland mobilization group or mid-thoracic (T3-T6) manipulation group (active control group). In both the groups, the post graduate student (SJ) pursuing Master’s in orthopedic physiotherapy delivered the intervention. The outcomes of cervical flexion, extension, side flexion & rotation range of motion (ROM) were measured before & after the intervention with a cervical range of motion (CROM) device. Self-reported pain intensity was measured with the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS). The post-intervention between-group comparison was performed using a one-way ANCOVA test.

Results

Forty-two participants with mean age CT junction group: 35.14 ± 10.13 and Thoracic manipulation group: 38.47 ± 11.47 were recruited for the study. No significant differences in the post-intervention baseline adjusted outcomes of cervical ROM & self-reported pain intensity were identified between the groups after the treatment (p = 0.08, 0.95, 0.01, 0.39, 0.29, 0.27for flexion, extension, bilateral lateral flexion & rotations respectively) & neck pain intensity (p = 0.68). However, within-group, pre, and post comparison showed significant improvements in cervical ROM and pain in both groups.

Conclusion

This preliminary study identified that CT junction mobilization is not superior to thoracic manipulation on the outcomes of cervical ROM and neck pain when level-specific CT junction mobilization was compared with remote mid-thoracic manipulation in individuals with mechanical neck pain and CT junction dysfunction.

Trial registration

CTRI: 2018/04/013088, Registered 6 April 2018, http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?trialid=24418

Cervicothoracic Manipulation Techniques Reviewed Utilizing Three-Dimensional Spine Model

Currently, there is a paucity of studies that describe prone cervicothoracic joint high-velocity low-amplitude (HVLA) thrust techniques using an anatomically accurate, biomimetic three-dimensional (3D) spine model for educational demonstration. The purpose of this technical report was to present a learning model for two prone cervicothoracic HVLA thrust techniques using a 3D model, review intersegmental mobility observed on a 3D spine model with application of the techniques, and lastly discuss potential applications of this learning model.

Force transmission between thoracic and cervical segments of the spine during prone-lying high-velocity low-amplitude spinal manipulation: A proof of principle for the concept of regional interdependence

BACKGROUND

Regional interdependence is conceptually based on observations that applying manual therapy to a remote anatomical region has an effect in the area of the patient's primary complaint. The current model for regional interdependence depends on force transmissibility within the body. This investigation sought to determine transmissibility between forces applied to the thoracic spine during prone-lying high-velocity low-amplitude spinal manipulative therapy and the cervical spine.

METHODS

A chiropractic treatment table was modified to allow (or disallow) translation of the headrest in the caudal-cephalad direction when unlocked (or locked). Prone-lying high-velocity low-amplitude spinal manipulative therapy was applied to the thoracic region of 9 healthy participants with the headrest in both configurations. Head and thorax kinematics and kinetics were measured at interfaces between participant and the external environment, which included the clinician's hands. Compressive forces at the cervicothoracic junction and angular kinematics of the cervical spine were derived. Ratios between the clinician-applied forces (input) and the cervical compressive force (output) were also determined.

FINDINGS

The cervical spine extended during all high-velocity low-amplitude spinal manipulative therapy trials. Force input-to-output ratios exceeded 1 for high-velocity low-amplitude spinal manipulative therapy trials performed with the headrest in the locked configuration, which was greater than ratios for the unlocked configuration.

INTERPRETATION

Forces imparted to thoracic spine during high-velocity low-amplitude spinal manipulative therapy were transmitted to the cervical spine, which provided a precursor for the regional interdependence model for manual therapy. Friction between the participant's face and the treatment table's head rest likely amplified cervical compressive forces.