1
|
Brakenridge CL, Smits EJ, Gane EM, Andrews NE, Williams G, Johnston V. Effectiveness of Interventions on Work Outcomes After Road Traffic Crash-Related Musculoskeletal Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION 2024:10.1007/s10926-024-10185-z. [PMID: 38578601 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-024-10185-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Musculoskeletal injuries are common after road traffic crash (RTC) and can lead to poor work-related outcomes. This review evaluated the impact of interventions on work-related (e.g. sick leave), health, and functional outcomes in individuals with a RTC-related musculoskeletal injury, and explored what factors were associated with work-related outcomes. METHODS Searches of seven databases were conducted up until 9/03/2023. Eligible interventions included adults with RTC-related musculoskeletal injuries, a comparison group, and a work-related outcome, and were in English. Meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan and meta-regressions in Stata. RESULTS Studies (n = 27) were predominantly conducted in countries with third-party liability schemes (n = 26), by physiotherapists (n = 17), and in participants with whiplash injuries (94%). Pooled effects in favour of the intervention group were seen overall (SMD = - 0.14, 95% CI: - 0.29, 0.00), for time to return to work (- 17.84 days, 95% CI: - 24.94, - 10.74), likelihood of returning to full duties vs. partial duties (RR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.36), decreased pain intensity (- 6.17 units, 95% CI: - 11.96, - 0.39, 100-point scale), and neck disability (- 1.77 units, 95% CI: - 3.24, - 0.30, 50-point scale). DISCUSSION Interventions after RTC can reduce time to return to work and increase the likelihood of returning to normal duties, but the results for these outcomes were based on a small number of studies with low-quality evidence. Further research is needed to evaluate a broader range of interventions, musculoskeletal injury types, and to include better quality work-related outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte L Brakenridge
- RECOVER Injury Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
- School of Human Movements and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
| | - Esther J Smits
- RECOVER Injury Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Elise M Gane
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Physiotherapy Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Centre for Functioning and Health Research, Metro South Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Nicole E Andrews
- RECOVER Injury Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Occupational Therapy Department, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, The Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia
- Tess Cramond Pain and Research Centre, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, The Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia
- Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS) Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Gina Williams
- Tess Cramond Pain and Research Centre, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, The Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia
- Physiotherapy Department, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, The Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Venerina Johnston
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Ipswich, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Riley SP, Swanson BT, Shaffer SM, Somma MJ, Flowers DW, Sawyer SF. Is the quality of systematic reviews influenced by prospective registration: a methods review of systematic musculoskeletal physical therapy reviews. J Man Manip Ther 2023; 31:184-197. [PMID: 35942578 PMCID: PMC10288892 DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2022.2110419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION It is unknown if verified prospective registration of systematic reviews (SRs) and the randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that they use affect an SR's methodological quality on A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2). METHODS Data originated from interventional SRs published in International Society of Physiotherapy Journals Editors (ISPJE) member journals, indexed in MEDLINE, between 1 January 2018 and 18 August 2021. Blinded reviewers identified the SRs and extracted the data for the variables of interest for the SRs and the RCTs. RESULTS Two of 14 ISPJE member journals required prospective SR registration. Twenty SRs were identified, and 169 unique, retrievable RCTs were included within those SRs. One (5.0%) of the 20 SRs and 15 of the 169 (8.9%) RCTs were prospectively registered and published consistent with this intent. Nineteen (95.0%) of the 20 identified SRs was categorized as 'critically low' on the AMSTAR 2. DISCUSSION SRs and the RCTs identified within them were infrequently prospectively registered, prospectively verifiable, or prospectively verified based on the established research record. CONCLUSIONS Ensuring that SRs and RCTs have fidelity with the research record from conception to publication may help rule out low-value interventions, decrease variability in physical therapy practice, and solidify evidence-based physical therapy practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean P. Riley
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Hartford, West Hartford, CT, USA
| | - Brian T. Swanson
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Hartford, West Hartford, CT, USA
| | - Stephen M. Shaffer
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Hartford, West Hartford, CT, USA
| | - Matthew J. Somma
- Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, University of New England, Portland, ME, USA
| | - Daniel W. Flowers
- Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Steven F. Sawyer
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Center for Rehabilitation Research, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|