1
|
Murphy MC, Mkumbuzi N, Keightley J, Gibson W, Vallance P, Riel H, Plinsinga M, Rio EK. Conditioned Pain Modulation Does Not Differ Between People With Lower-Limb Tendinopathy and Nontendinopathy Controls: A Systematic Review With Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024; 54:50-59. [PMID: 37854011 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2023.11940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore whether people with lower-limb tendinopathy have reduced relative conditioned pain modulation (CPM) when compared to nontendinopathy controls. DESIGN: Systematic review with individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis. LITERATURE SEARCH: Eight databases were searched until August 29, 2022. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Cross-sectional studies comparing the magnitude of the CPM effect in people with lower-limb tendinopathy to nontendinopathy controls in a case-control design. DATA SYNTHESIS: Included studies provided IPD, which was reported using descriptive statistics. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) determined between-group differences in the relative CPM effect, when adjusting for co-variables. Study quality was assessed using a Joanna Briggs Institute checklist, and certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluations. RESULTS: Five records were included, IPD were provided for 4 studies (n = 219 with tendinopathy, n = 226 controls). The principal GEE (model 1) found no significant relative CPM effects for tendinopathy versus controls (B = -1.73, P = .481). Sex (B = 4.11, P = .160), age (B = -0.20, P = .109), and body mass index (B = 0.28, P = .442) did not influence relative CPM effect. The Achilles region had a reduced CPM effect (B = -22.01, P = .009). In model 2 (adjusting for temperature), temperature (B = -2.86, P = .035) and female sex (B = 21.01, P = .047) were associated with the size of the relative CPM effect. All studies were low-quality, and the certainty of the evidence was moderate. CONCLUSION: There were no between-group differences in the magnitude of the CPM effect, suggesting clinicians should manage lower-limb tendinopathy using interventions appropriate for peripherally dominant pain (eg, tendon loading exercises such as heavy slow resistance). Based on the "moderate"-certainty evidence, future studies are unlikely to substantially change these findings. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;54(1):1-10. Epub 19 October 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11940.
Collapse
|
2
|
Escriche-Escuder A, Nijs J, Silbernagel KG, van Wilgen CP, Plinsinga ML, Casaña J, Cuesta-Vargas AI. Pain neuroscience education in persistent painful tendinopathies: A scoping review from the Tendon PNE Network. Phys Ther Sport 2023; 63:38-49. [PMID: 37499463 DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2023.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE to conduct and report a scoping review of the available evidence of the effects and content of pain neuroscience education for patients with persistent painful tendinopathies. METHODS PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and grey literature databases were searched from database inception to May 2022. Randomised and non-randomised controlled trials, non-controlled clinical trials, cohort studies, case series, case studies including people with persistent painful tendinopathy aged ≥18 years, a pain education intervention, and in English were included. Studies were excluded if they were cross-sectional studies, reviews, editorials, abstracts, or full-text not available or if included heterogeneous study cohorts, patients with tendon rupture, or patients with systemic diseases. RESULTS five studies (n = 164) were included. Pain neuroscience education entailed face-to-face discussion sessions or educational materials including videos, brochures, paper drawings, and review questions. All studies used pain neuroscience education in conjunction with other interventions, obtaining significant benefits in outcomes related to pain, physical performance, or self-reported function, among others. CONCLUSIONS The application of pain neuroscience education in conjunction with other interventions seemed to improve several outcomes. However, considering the current knowledge about tendon pain and the scarcity of well-designed trials studying pain neuroscience education in tendinopathy, additional research is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian Escriche-Escuder
- Department of Physiotherapy, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Malaga, Spain
| | - Jo Nijs
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium; Chronic Pain Rehabilitation, Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Belgium; Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Unit of Physiotherapy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | - C Paul van Wilgen
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium; Transcare Transdisciplinary Pain Management Center, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Melanie L Plinsinga
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
| | - José Casaña
- Exercise Intervention for Health Research Group (EXINH-RG), Department of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas
- Department of Physiotherapy, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Malaga, Spain; School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bułdyś K, Górnicki T, Kałka D, Szuster E, Biernikiewicz M, Markuszewski L, Sobieszczańska M. What Do We Know about Nociplastic Pain? Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:1794. [PMID: 37372912 PMCID: PMC10298569 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11121794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Nociplastic pain is a recently distinguished type of pain, distinct from neuropathic and nociceptive pain, and is well described in the literature. It is often mistaken for central sensitization. Pathophysiology has not been clearly established with regard to alteration of the concentration of spinal fluid elements, the structure of the white and gray matter of the brain, and psychological aspects. Many different diagnostic tools, i.e., the painDETECT and Douleur Neuropathique 4 questionnaires, have been developed to diagnose neuropathic pain, but they can also be applied for nociplastic pain; however, more standardized instruments are still needed in order to assess its occurrence and clinical presentation. Numerous studies have shown that nociplastic pain is present in many different diseases such as fibromyalgia, complex regional pain syndrome type 1, and irritable bowel syndrome. Current pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments for nociceptive and neuropathic pain are not entirely suitable for treating nociplastic pain. There is an ongoing effort to establish the most efficient way to manage it. The significance of this field has led to several clinical trials being carried out in a short time. The aim of this narrative review was to discuss the currently available evidence on pathophysiology, associated diseases, treatment possibilities, and clinical trials. It is important that physicians widely discuss and acknowledge this relatively new concept in order to provide optimized pain control for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kacper Bułdyś
- Faculty of Medical Sciences and Health Sciences, Kazimierz Pulaski University of Technology and Humanities in Radom, 26-600 Radom, Poland
| | - Tomasz Górnicki
- Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Dariusz Kałka
- Faculty of Physiotherapy, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, 51-612 Wroclaw, Poland
- Men’s Health Centre in Wrocław, 53-151 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Ewa Szuster
- Cardiosexology Students Club, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-368 Wroclaw, Poland
| | | | - Leszek Markuszewski
- Faculty of Medical Sciences and Health Sciences, Kazimierz Pulaski University of Technology and Humanities in Radom, 26-600 Radom, Poland
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Plaza-Manzano G, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Cleland JA, Arias-Buría JL, Jayaseelan DJ, Navarro-Santana MJ. A Closer Look at Localized and Distant Pressure Pain Hypersensitivity in People With Lower Extremity Overuse Soft-Tissue Painful Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Phys Ther 2022; 102:pzac119. [PMID: 36124704 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzac119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The nociceptive pain processing of soft-tissue overuse conditions is under debate because no consensus currently exists. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) in symptomatic and distant pain-free areas in 2 groups: participants with symptomatic lower extremity overuse soft-tissue conditions and controls who were pain free. METHODS Five databases were searched from inception to December 1, 2021, for case-control studies comparing PPTs between individuals presenting with symptomatic lower extremity tendinopathy/overuse injury and controls who were pain free. Data extraction included population, diagnosis, sample size, outcome, type of algometer, and results. The methodological quality (Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale) and evidence level (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) were assessed. Meta-analyses of symptomatic, segmental related, and distant pain-free areas were compared. RESULTS After screening 730 titles and abstracts, a total of 19 studies evaluating lower extremity overuse conditions (Achilles or patellar tendinopathy, greater trochanteric pain syndrome, plantar fasciitis, and iliotibial band syndrome) were included. The methodological quality ranged from fair (32%) to good (68%). Participants with lower extremity overuse injury had lower PPTs in both the painful and nonpainful areas, mirrored test-site, compared with controls (affected side: mean difference [MD] = -262.92 kPa, 95% CI = 323.78 to -202.05 kPa; nonaffected side: MD = -216.47 kPa, 95% CI = -304.99 to -127.95 kPa). Furthermore, people with plantar fasciitis showed reduced PPTs in the affected and nonaffected sides at segmental-related (MD = -176.39 kPa, 95% CI = -306.11 to -46.68 kPa) and distant pain-free (MD = -97.27 kPa, 95% CI = 133.21 to -61.33 kPa) areas compared with controls. CONCLUSION Low- to moderate-quality evidence suggests a reduction of PPTs at the symptomatic area and a contralateral/mirror side in lower extremity tendinopathies and overuse conditions compared with pain-free controls, particularly in plantar fasciitis and greater trochanteric pain syndrome. Participants with plantar fasciitis showed a reduction of PPTs on the affected and non-affected sides at a segmental-related area (very low-quality evidence) and at a remote asymptomatic area (moderate-quality evidence). IMPACT Some overuse peripheral pain conditions may be more associated with pressure pain sensitivity than others. Accordingly, examination and identification of conditions more peripherally, centrally, or mixed mediated could potentially lead to more specific and different treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo Plaza-Manzano
- Radiology, Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy Department, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas
- Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (URJC), Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
- Cátedra Institucionalen Docencia, Clínica e Investigaciónen Fisioterapia: Terapia Manual, Punción Seca y Ejercicio Terapéutico, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Joshua A Cleland
- Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - José L Arias-Buría
- Radiology, Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy Department, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Dhinu J Jayaseelan
- Department of Health, Human Function and Rehabilitation Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Marcos J Navarro-Santana
- Faculty of Health, Universidad Católica de Ávila (UCAV), Calle Canteros s/n, Ávila, Spain
- VALTRADOFI Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health, Universidad Camilo José Cela, Villanueva de la Cañada, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Previtali D, Mameli A, Zaffagnini S, Marchettini P, Candrian C, Filardo G. Tendinopathies and Pain Sensitisation: A Meta-Analysis with Meta-Regression. Biomedicines 2022; 10:1749. [PMID: 35885054 PMCID: PMC9313266 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10071749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Revised: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
The presence of pain sensitisation has been documented and reported as being a possible cause of treatment failure and pain chronicity in several musculoskeletal conditions, such as tendinopathies. The aim of the present study is to analyse existing evidence on pain sensitisation in tendinopathies comparing the local and distant pain thresholds of healthy and affected subjects with distinct analysis for different tendinopathies. PubMed, Cochrane Central Register, Scopus, and Web Of Science were systematically searched after registration on PROSPERO (CRD42020164124). Level I to level IV studies evaluating the presence of pain sensitisation in patients with symptomatic tendinopathies, documented through a validated method, were included. A meta-analysis was performed to compare local, contralateral, and distant pain thresholds between patients and healthy controls with sub-analyses for different tendinopathies. Meta-regressions were conducted to evaluate the influence of age, activity level, and duration of symptoms on results. Thirty-four studies out of 2868 were included. The overall meta-analysis of local pressure pain thresholds (PPT) documented an increased sensitivity in affected subjects (p < 0.001). The analyses on contralateral PPTs (p < 0.001) and distant PPTs (p = 0.009) documented increased sensitivity in the affected group. The results of the sub-analyses on different tendinopathies were conflicting, except for those on lateral epicondylalgia. Patients’ activity level (p = 0.02) and age (p = 0.05) significantly influenced local PPT results. Tendinopathies are characterized by pain sensitisation, but, while features of both central and peripheral sensitisation can be constantly detected in lateral epicondylalgia, results on other tendinopathies were more conflicting. Patients’ characteristics are possible confounders that should be taken into account when addressing pain sensitisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Previtali
- Service of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Surgery, EOC, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland; (A.M.); (C.C.); (G.F.)
| | - Alberto Mameli
- Service of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Surgery, EOC, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland; (A.M.); (C.C.); (G.F.)
| | - Stefano Zaffagnini
- II Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Paolo Marchettini
- Fisiopatologia e Terapia del Dolore, Dipartimento di Farmacologia, Careggi Università di Firenze, 50134 Firenze, Italy;
- Terapia del Dolore, Centro Diagnostico Italiano, 20147 Milan, Italy
| | - Christian Candrian
- Service of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Surgery, EOC, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland; (A.M.); (C.C.); (G.F.)
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Giuseppe Filardo
- Service of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Surgery, EOC, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland; (A.M.); (C.C.); (G.F.)
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
- Applied and Translational Research Center, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Grävare Silbernagel K, Malliaras P, de Vos RJ, Hanlon S, Molenaar M, Alfredson H, van den Akker-Scheek I, Antflick J, van Ark M, Färnqvist K, Haleem Z, Kaux JF, Kirwan P, Kumar B, Lewis T, Mallows A, Masci L, Morrissey D, Murphy M, Newsham-West R, Norris R, O'Neill S, Peers K, Sancho I, Seymore K, Vallance P, van der Vlist A, Vicenzino B. ICON 2020-International Scientific Tendinopathy Symposium Consensus: A Systematic Review of Outcome Measures Reported in Clinical Trials of Achilles Tendinopathy. Sports Med 2022; 52:613-641. [PMID: 34797533 PMCID: PMC8891092 DOI: 10.1007/s40279-021-01588-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nine core domains for tendinopathy have been identified. For Achilles tendinopathy there is large variation in outcome measures used, and how these fit into the core domains has not been investigated. OBJECTIVE To identify all available outcome measures outcome measures used to assess the clinical phenotype of Achilles tendinopathy in prospective studies and to map the outcomes measures into predefined health-related core domains. DESIGN Systematic review. DATA SOURCES Embase, MEDLINE (Ovid), Web of Science, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, SPORTDiscus and Google Scholar. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES Clinical diagnosis of Achilles tendinopathy, sample size ≥ ten participants, age ≥ 16 years, and the study design was a randomized or non-randomized clinical trial, observational cohort, single-arm intervention, or case series. RESULTS 9376 studies were initially screened and 307 studies were finally included, totaling 13,248 participants. There were 233 (177 core domain) different outcome measures identified across all domains. For each core domain outcome measures were identified, with a range between 8 and 35 unique outcome measures utilized for each domain. The proportion of studies that included outcomes for predefined core domains ranged from 4% for the psychological factors domain to 72% for the disability domain. CONCLUSION 233 unique outcome measures for Achilles tendinopathy were identified. Most frequently, outcome measures were used within the disability domain. Outcome measures assessing psychological factors were scarcely used. The next step in developing a core outcome set for Achilles tendinopathy is to engage patients, clinicians and researchers to reach consensus on key outcomes measures. PROSPERO REGISTRATION CRD42020156763.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Grävare Silbernagel
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, 540 South College Avenue, Newark, DE, 19713, USA.
| | - Peter Malliaras
- Physiotherapy Department, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Robert-Jan de Vos
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Shawn Hanlon
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, 540 South College Avenue, Newark, DE, 19713, USA
| | - Mitchel Molenaar
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Håkan Alfredson
- Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Inge van den Akker-Scheek
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jarrod Antflick
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Mathijs van Ark
- Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Care Studies, Hanze University of Applied Sciences and Peescentrum, Centre of Expertise Primary Care Groningen (ECEZG), Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Zubair Haleem
- Sports and Exercise Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Arsenal Football Club, London, UK
| | - Jean-Francois Kaux
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine and Sports Traumatology, University and University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Paul Kirwan
- School of Physiotherapy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Bhavesh Kumar
- Institute of Sport Exercise and Health (ISEH), University College London, London, UK
| | - Trevor Lewis
- Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Adrian Mallows
- School of Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, UK
| | - Lorenzo Masci
- Institute of Sport Exercise and Health (ISEH), University College London, London, UK
| | - Dylan Morrissey
- Sports and Exercise Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Myles Murphy
- National School of Nursing, Midwifery, Health Sciences and Physiotherapy, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, WA, Australia
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
| | - Richard Newsham-West
- School of Allied Health, Department of Physiotherapy, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Richard Norris
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
- Liverpool University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Seth O'Neill
- School of Allied Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Koen Peers
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Igor Sancho
- Sports and Exercise Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Physiotherapy Department, University of Deusto, San Sebastian, Spain
| | - Kayla Seymore
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, 540 South College Avenue, Newark, DE, 19713, USA
| | - Patrick Vallance
- Physiotherapy Department, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Arco van der Vlist
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bill Vicenzino
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences: Physiotherapy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|