Nouvelle classification clinique des onychomycoses

Onychomycosis

Onychomycosis is a fungal infection of the nail, and the most common nail infection worldwide, causing discoloration and thickening of the nail plate. It is predominantly caused by dermatophytes. Clinical presentation is polymorphous. Diagnosis must be confirmed by mycological examination before initiating any therapy. Management is an ongoing challenge, often requiring several months' treatment, with a high risk of recurrence. Treatment must be adapted to clinical presentation and severity and to the patient's history and wishes. Debridement of all infected keratin is the first step, reducing fungal load. Systemic treatments are more effective than topical treatments, and combining the two increases the cure rate. Terbinafine is the drug of choice for dermatophyte onychomycosis, due to low drug interaction and good cost-effectiveness. Itraconazole and fluconazole are broad-spectrum antifungals that are effective against dermatophytes, yeasts, and some non-dermatophytic molds. Recurrence rates for onychomycosis are high. Prophylactic application of topicals and avoiding walking barefoot in public places may help prevent recurence.

Predisposing factors, clinical features and treatment outcomes of Fusarium onychomycosis and comparison of its characteristics with Neoscytalidium onychomycosis

BACKGROUND

Fusarium spp. are common organisms causing onychomycosis. Research on the clinical presentations and treatment of this condition is limited.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the demographic data, clinical characteristics, and treatment outcomes of Fusarium onychomycosis.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted at Siriraj Hospital, Thailand. Patients with onychomycosis, at least 2 repeated positive mycological cultures for Fusarium spp., and a photo at diagnosis (January 2014-December 2019) were included. Demographic data and clinical characteristics of Fusarium onychomycosis were analyzed and compared with those of Neoscytalidium onychomycosis, the other common nondermatophytes onychomycosis in tropical countries.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients with twenty-four nails were analyzed. Fusarium onychomycosis was significantly related to a history of pedicure (p = 0.04). Predominant lateral involvements of subungual hyperkeratosis onychomycosis, but without concurrent foot infections, were significantly found in Fusarium onychomycosis (p < 0.001 for each). Among the treatments, urea was 80% effective. Topical amphotericin B was 75% effective. Both amorolfine 5% nail lacquer and long-pulsed 1064-nm neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser were 66.7% effective. Lastly a combination of long-pulsed 1064-nm neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser and amorolfine 5% nail lacquer was 50% effective.

CONCLUSIONS

Important predisposing factors and clinical manifestations of Fusarium onychomycosis were a history of pedicure and predominant lateral-nail involvement, but no concomitant fungal foot infections. Topical treatment (urea cream, amphotericin B, or amorolfine nail lacquer) showed excellent outcomes.

A Week of Oral Terbinafine Pulse Regimen Every Three Months to Treat all Dermatophyte Onychomycosis

Terbinafine has proved to treat numerous fungal infections, including onychomycosis, successfully. Due to its liver metabolization and dependency on the cytochrome P450 enzyme complex, undesirable drug interaction are highly probable. Additionally to drug interactions, the treatment is long, rising the chances of the appearance of side effects and abandonment. Pharmacokinetic data suggest that terbinafine maintains a fungicidal effect within the nail up to 30 weeks after its last administration, which has aroused the possibility of a pulse therapy to reduce the side effects while treating onychomycosis. This study's goal was to evaluate the effectiveness of three different oral terbinafine regimens in treating onychomycosis due to dermatophytes. Sixty-three patients with onychomycosis were sorted by convenience in three different groups. Patients from group 1 received the conventional terbinafine dose (250 mg per day for 3 months). Group 2 received a monthly week-long pulse-therapy dose (500 mg per day for 7 days a month, for 4 months) and group 3 received a 500 mg/day dose for 7 days every 3 months, totaling four treatments. There were no statistical differences regarding the effectiveness or side effects between the groups. Conclusion: A quarterly terbinafine pulse regimen can be a possible alternative for treating onychomycosis caused by dermatophytes.

Daily Application of an Aqueous, Acidifying, Peelable Nail Polish versus Weekly Amorolfine for Topical Onychomycosis Treatment: A Prospective, Randomized, Blinded Trial

Introduction

Onychomycosis is a fungal nail infection, frequently caused by dermatophytes, which occurs in 2–14% of Western adults. The present study was set up to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a water-based, peelable nail polish (daily application), which acidifies the nail environment, versus a 5% amorolfine nail lacquer (weekly application) for topical treatment of mild-to-moderate onychomycosis.

Methods

One hundred two adults were randomized in this open, prospective, blinded trial. Clinical efficacy was evaluated at baseline and days 30, 60, 120, and 180, respectively. All patients underwent microbiological testing (at baseline and study end). The primary objective of this trial was the change in the percentage of healthy nail surface at day 180.

Results

The percentage of healthy surface between baseline and day 180 increased with 11.8% in the test product group and 13.2% in the amorolfine group, which were statistically comparable. Other onychomycosis-related parameters (dystrophy, discolouration, thickening, and healthy aspect, respectively) showed significant (p < 0.05) improvement after 180 days (versus baseline) with both treatments. Clinical performance was further confirmed by the frequency of patients showing onychomycosis improvement or success at the end of the study: 96.0% (test product) versus 79.6% (amorolfine). Microbiological results and improved quality of life confirmed clinical performance. Both treatments were well tolerated and appreciated for their properties and efficacy.

Conclusion

The present trial confirmed the clinical performance of daily acidification of the nail, as reflected by (1) a comparable increase of percentage of healthy nail surface following treatment with the test product versus amorolfine, (2) the overall improvement of other onychomycosis-related parameters, (3) user convenience, and (4) absence of side effects. These data indicate that daily application of an aqueous, acetic acid-based, peelable solution can be a convenient, safe, and equally effective alternative for the topical management of onychomycosis.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier; NCT03382717

Funding

Oystershell Laboratories.

Patient-reported outcomes from two randomised studies comparing once-weekly application of amorolfine 5% nail lacquer to other methods of topical treatment in distal and lateral subungual onychomycosis

Patient adherence is a key consideration in the choice of a topical regimen for the treatment of onychomycosis. The objective of this study was to investigate patient-reported outcomes (treatment utilisation, adherence and satisfaction) in onychomycosis treated with once-weekly amorolfine 5% nail lacquer versus once-daily ciclopirox 8% nail lacquer (Study A) or once-daily urea 40% ointment/bifonazole 1% cream combination regimen (Study B). Study A: Subjects received amorolfine and ciclopirox on opposite feet for 12 weeks. Study B: Subjects received amorolfine and urea/bifonazole on opposite feet for 6-7 weeks. Assessments included subject adherence as per label, treatment preference and questionnaire. Study A: More subjects adhered to amorolfine (85%) than to ciclopirox (60%) (P = .025). Overall, subjects were satisfied (95% vs 100%, respectively) and the treatments were balanced in terms of preference (50% vs 45%) at week 12. Study B: More subjects adhered to amorolfine dosage (81.8%) than to the dosage of the urea/bifonazole combination regimen (59.1%) (P = .096). At the end of study, 85.7% of subjects preferred amorolfine versus 14.3% for urea/bifonazole. Fewer subjects experienced local side effects with amorolfine (4.5%) compared to urea (27.3%) and bifonazole (15%). Amorolfine 5% nail lacquer offers a simple and convenient treatment option, which may result in improved patient adherence and consequently lead to improved efficacy and patient satisfaction.