Protective Alzheimer's disease-associated APP A673T variant predominantly decreases sAPPβ levels in cerebrospinal fluid and 2D/3D cell culture models

The impact of rare genetic variants on Alzheimer disease

Alzheimer disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease with a strong genetic component. Although autosomal dominant mutations and common risk variants in AD risk have been extensively studied, the genetic underpinning of polygenic AD remains incompletely understood. Rare variants could elucidate part of the missing heritability in AD. Rare variant research gained momentum with the discovery of a rare variant in TREM2, along with loss-of-function variants in ABCA7 and SORL1, and has come into full bloom in recent years. Not only has the number of rare variant discoveries increased through large-scale whole-exome and genome sequencing studies, improved imputation in genome-wide association studies and increased focus on understudied populations, the number of studies mapping the functional effects of several of these rare variants has also significantly increased, leading to insights in the pathogenesis of AD and drug development. Here we provide a comprehensive overview of the known and novel rare variants implicated in AD risk, highlighting how they shine new light on AD pathophysiology and provide new inroads for drug development. We will review their impact on individual, familial and population levels, and discuss the potential and challenges of rare variants in genetic risk prediction.

Evaluating pathogenicity of variants of unknown significance in APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2

Autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease (ADAD) is driven by rare variants in APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2. Although more than 200 pathogenic variants in these genes are known to cause ADAD, other variants are benign, may act as risk factors, or may even reduce Alzheimer's disease risk (e.g. protective). Classifying novel variants in APP, PSEN1, or PSEN2 as pathogenic, risk, benign, or protective is a critical step in evaluating disease risk profiles which further impacts eligibility for clinical trials focused on the ADAD population. Here, we classify 53 novel variants in APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2 based on bioinformatic data and cell-based assays. We identified 6 benign variants, 2 risk variants, and 32 likely pathogenic variants. Thirteen variants were associated with reduced Aβ levels in cell-based assays, consistent with a potential protective effect. Together, this study highlights the complexities associated with classification of rare variants in ADAD genes.

The Icelandic Mutation (APP-A673T) Is Protective against Amyloid Pathology In Vivo

A previous epidemiological study in Northern Europe showed that the A673T mutation (Icelandic mutation) in the amyloid precursor protein gene (APP) can protect against Alzheimer's disease (AD). While the effect of the A673T mutation on APP processing has been investigated primarily in vitro, its in vivo impact has not been evaluated. This is mainly because most existing AD mouse models carry the Swedish mutation. The Swedish and Icelandic mutations are both located near the β-cleavage site, and each mutation is presumed to have the opposite effect on β-cleavage. Therefore, in the AD mouse models with the Swedish mutation, its effects could compete with the effects of the Icelandic mutation. Here, we introduced the A673T mutation into App knock-in mice devoid of the Swedish mutation (AppG-F mice) to avoid potential deleterious effects of the Swedish mutation and generated AppG-F-A673T mice. APP-A673T significantly downregulated β-cleavage and attenuated the production of Aβ and amyloid pathology in the brains of these animals. The Icelandic mutation also reduced neuroinflammation and neuritic alterations. Both sexes were studied. This is the first successful demonstration of the protective effect of the Icelandic mutation on amyloid pathology in vivo. Our findings indicate that specific inhibition of the APP-BACE1 interaction could be a promising therapeutic approach. Alternatively, the introduction of the disease-protective mutation such as APP-A673T using in vivo genome editing technology could be a novel treatment for individuals at high risk for AD, such as familial AD gene mutation carriers and APOE ε4 carriers.

Haploinsufficiency and Alzheimer's Disease: The Possible Pathogenic and Protective Genetic Factors

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a complex neurodegenerative disorder influenced by various genetic factors. In addition to the well-established amyloid precursor protein (APP), Presenilin-1 (PSEN1), Presenilin-2 (PSEN2), and apolipoprotein E (APOE), several other genes such as Sortilin-related receptor 1 (SORL1), Phospholipid-transporting ATPase ABCA7 (ABCA7), Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells 2 (TREM2), Phosphatidylinositol-binding clathrin assembly protein (PICALM), and clusterin (CLU) were implicated. These genes contribute to neurodegeneration through both gain-of-function and loss-of-function mechanisms. While it was traditionally thought that heterozygosity in autosomal recessive mutations does not lead to disease, haploinsufficiency was linked to several conditions, including cancer, autism, and intellectual disabilities, indicating that a single functional gene copy may be insufficient for normal cellular functions. In AD, the haploinsufficiency of genes such as ABCA7 and SORL1 may play significant yet under-explored roles. Paradoxically, heterozygous knockouts of PSEN1 or PSEN2 can impair synaptic plasticity and alter the expression of genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation and cell adhesion. Animal studies examining haploinsufficient AD risk genes, such as vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 35 (VPS35), sirtuin-3 (SIRT3), and PICALM, have shown that their knockout can exacerbate neurodegenerative processes by promoting amyloid production, accumulation, and inflammation. Conversely, haploinsufficiency in APOE, beta-secretase 1 (BACE1), and transmembrane protein 59 (TMEM59) was reported to confer neuroprotection by potentially slowing amyloid deposition and reducing microglial activation. Given its implications for other neurodegenerative diseases, the role of haploinsufficiency in AD requires further exploration. Modeling the mechanisms of gene knockout and monitoring their expression patterns is a promising approach to uncover AD-related pathways. However, challenges such as identifying susceptible genes, gene-environment interactions, phenotypic variability, and biomarker analysis must be addressed. Enhancing model systems through humanized animal or cell models, utilizing advanced research technologies, and integrating multi-omics data will be crucial for understanding disease pathways and developing new therapeutic strategies.

Electrophysiological features of cortical 3D networks are deeply modulated by scaffold properties

Three-dimensionality (3D) was proven essential for developing reliable models for different anatomical compartments and many diseases. However, the neuronal compartment still poses a great challenge as we still do not understand precisely how the brain computes information and how the complex chain of neuronal events can generate conscious behavior. Therefore, a comprehensive model of neuronal tissue has not yet been found. The present work was conceived in this framework: we aimed to contribute to what must be a collective effort by filling in some information on possible 3D strategies to pursue. We compared directly different kinds of scaffolds (i.e., PDMS sponges, thermally crosslinked hydrogels, and glass microbeads) in their effect on neuronal network activity recorded using micro-electrode arrays. While the overall rate of spiking activity remained consistent, the type of scaffold had a notable impact on bursting dynamics. The frequency, density of bursts, and occurrence of random spikes were all affected. The examination of inter-burst intervals revealed distinct burst generation patterns unique to different scaffold types. Network burst propagation unveiled divergent trends among configurations. Notably, it showed the most differences, underlying that functional variations may arise from a different 3D spatial organization. This evidence suggests that not all 3D neuronal constructs can sustain the same level of richness of activity. Furthermore, we commented on the reproducibility, efficacy, and scalability of the methods, where the beads still offer superior performances. By comparing different 3D scaffolds, our results move toward understanding the best strategies to develop functional 3D neuronal units for reliable pre-clinical studies.

Saponin components in Polygala tenuifolia as potential candidate drugs for treating dementia

Objective

This study aims to elucidate the intervention effects of saponin components from Polygala tenuifolia Willd (Polygalaceae) on dementia, providing experimental evidence and new insights for the research and application of saponins in the field of dementia.

Materials and Methods

This review is based on a search of the PubMed, NCBI, and Google Scholar databases from their inception to 13 May 2024, using terms such as "P. tenuifolia," "P. tenuifolia and saponins," "toxicity," "dementia," "Alzheimer's disease," "Parkinson's disease dementia," and "vascular dementia." The article summarizes the saponin components of P. tenuifolia, including tenuigenin, tenuifolin, polygalasaponins XXXII, and onjisaponin B, as well as the pathophysiological mechanisms of dementia. Importantly, it highlights the potential mechanisms by which the active components of P. tenuifolia prevent and treat diseases and relevant clinical studies.

Results

The saponin components of P. tenuifolia can reduce β-amyloid accumulation, exhibit antioxidant effects, regulate neurotransmitters, improve synaptic function, possess anti-inflammatory properties, inhibit neuronal apoptosis, and modulate autophagy. Therefore, P. tenuifolia may play a role in the prevention and treatment of dementia.

Conclusion

The saponin components of P. tenuifolia have shown certain therapeutic effects on dementia. They can prevent and treat dementia through various mechanisms.

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled ascending dose study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of Posiphen in subjects with early Alzheimer's Disease

BACKGROUND

Amyloid beta protein (Aβ) is a treatment target in Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Lowering production of its parent protein, APP, has benefits in preclinical models. Posiphen, an orally administered small molecule, binds to an iron-responsive element in APP mRNA and decreases translation of APP and Aβ. To augment human data for Posiphen, we evaluated safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PD) effects on Aβ metabolism using Stable Isotope Labeling Kinetic (SILK) analysis.

METHODS

Double-blind phase 1b randomized ascending dose clinical trial, at five sites, under an IRB-approved protocol. Participants with mild cognitive impairment or mild AD (Early AD) confirmed by low CSF Aβ42/40 were randomized (within each dose arm) to Posiphen or placebo. Pretreatment assessment included lumbar puncture for CSF. Participants took Posiphen or placebo for 21-23 days, then underwent CSF catheter placement, intravenous infusion of 13C6-leucine, and CSF sampling for 36 h. Safety and tolerability were assessed through participant reports, EKG and laboratory tests. CSF SILK analysis measured Aβ40, 38 and 42 with immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry. Baseline and day 21 CSF APP, Aβ and other biomarkers were measured with immunoassays. The Mini-Mental State Exam and ADAS-cog12 were given at baseline and day 21.

RESULTS

From June 2017 to December 2021, 19 participants were enrolled, randomized within dose cohorts (5 active: 3 placebo) of 60 mg once/day and 60 mg twice/day; 1 participant was enrolled and completed 60 mg three times/day. 10 active drug and 5 placebo participants completed all study procedures. Posiphen was safe and well-tolerated. 8 participants had headaches related to CSF catheterization; 5 needed blood patches. Prespecified SILK analyses of Fractional Synthesis Rate (FSR) for CSF Aβ40 showed no significant overall or dose-dependent effects of Posiphen vs. placebo. Comprehensive multiparameter modeling of APP kinetics supported dose-dependent lowering of APP production by Posiphen. Cognitive measures and CSF biomarkers did not change significantly from baseline to 21 days in Posiphen vs. placebo groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Posiphen was safe and well-tolerated in Early AD. A multicenter SILK study was feasible. Findings are limited by small sample size but provide additional supportive safety and PK data. Comprehensive modeling of biomarker dynamics using SILK data may reveal subtle drug effects.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02925650 on clinicaltrials.gov (registered on 10-24-2016).

Natural polyphenol: Their pathogenesis-targeting therapeutic potential in Alzheimer's disease

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a detrimental neurodegenerative disease affecting the elderly. Clinically, it is characterized by progressive memory decline and subsequent loss of broader cognitive functions. Current drugs provide only symptomatic relief but do not have profound disease-modifying effects. There is an unmet need to identify novel pharmacological agents for AD therapy. Neuropathologically, the characteristic hallmarks of the disease are extracellular senile plaques containing amyloid β-peptides and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles containing hyperphosphorylated microtubule-associated protein tau. Simultaneously, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation and mitochondrial dysfunction in specific brain regions are early events during the process of AD pathologic changes and are associated with Aβ/tau toxicity. Here, we first summarized probable pathogenic mechanisms leading to neurodegeneration and hopefully identify pathways that serve as specific targets to improve therapy for AD. We then reviewed the mechanisms that underlie disease-modifying effects of natural polyphenols, with a focus on nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 activators for AD treatment. Lastly, we discussed challenges in the preclinical to clinical translation of natural polyphenols. In conclusion, there is evidence that natural polyphenols can be therapeutically useful in AD through their multifaceted mechanism of action. However, more clinical studies are needed to confirm these effects.

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled ascending dose study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of Posiphen in subjects with Early Alzheimer's Disease

Background

Amyloid beta protein (Aβ) is a treatment target in Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Lowering production of its parent protein, APP, has benefits in preclinical models. Posiphen binds to an iron-responsive element in APP mRNA and decreases translation of APP and Aβ. To augment human data for Posiphen, we evaluated safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PD) effects on Aβ metabolism using Stable Isotope Labeling Kinetic (SILK) analysis.

Methods

Double-blind phase 1b randomized ascending dose clinical trial, at five sites, under an IRB-approved protocol. Participants with mild cognitive impairment or mild AD (Early AD) with positive CSF biomarkers were randomized (within each dose arm) to Posiphen or placebo. Pretreatment assessment included lumbar puncture for CSF. Participants took Posiphen or placebo for 21-23 days, then underwent CSF catheter placement, intravenous infusion of 13C6-leucine, and CSF sampling for 36 hours. Safety and tolerability were assessed through participant reports, EKG and laboratory tests. CSF SILK analysis measured Aβ40, 38 and 42 with immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry. Baseline and day 21 CSF APP, Aβ and other biomarkers were measured with immunoassays. The Mini-Mental State Exam and ADAS-cog12 were given at baseline and day 21.

Results

From June 2017 to December 2021, 19 participants were enrolled, in dose cohorts (6 active: 2 placebo) of 60 mg once/day and 60 mg twice/day; 1 participant was enrolled and completed 60 mg three times/day. 10 active drug and 5 placebo participants completed all study procedures. Posiphen was safe and well-tolerated. 8 participants had headaches related to CSF catheterization; 5 needed blood patches. Prespecified SILK analyses of Fractional Synthesis Rate (FSR) for CSF Aβ40 showed no significant overall or dose-dependent effects of Posiphen vs. placebo. Comprehensive multiparameter modeling of APP kinetics supported dose-dependent lowering of APP production by Posiphen. Cognitive measures and CSF biomarkers did not change significantly from baseline to 21 days in Posiphen vs placebo groups.

Conclusions

Posiphen was safe and well-tolerated in Early AD. A multicenter SILK study was feasible. Findings are limited by small sample size but provide additional supportive safety and PK data. Comprehensive modeling of biomarker dynamics using SILK data may reveal subtle drug effects.

Trial registration

NCT02925650 on clinicaltrials.gov.