Strategy for purification of aggregation prone β-glucosidases from the cell wall of yeast: a preparative scale approach

Marginal stability drives irreversible unfolding of large multi-domain family 3 glycosylhydrolases from thermo-tolerant yeast

Protein folding is an extremely complex and fast, yet perfectly defined process, involving interplay of many intra and inter-molecular forces. In vitro, these molecular interactions are reversible for many proteins e.g., smaller and monomeric, organized into single domains. However, refolding of larger multi-domain/multimeric proteins is much more complicated, proceeds in a hierarchal way and is often irreversible. In a comparative study on two large, multi-domain and multimeric isozymes, β-glucosidase I (BGLI) and β-glucosidase II (BGLII) from Pichia etchellsii, we studied spontaneous and assisted refolding under three denaturing conditions viz. GdnHCl, alkaline pH and heat. During refolding, higher refolding yields were obtained for BGLII in case of pH induced unfolding (13.89%±0.25) than BGLI (6%±0.85) while for GdnHCl induced unfolding, refolding was marginal (BGLI=5%±0.5; BGLII=6%±0.69). Thermal unfolding was irreversible while assisted refolding also showed little structural gain for both proteins. When the apparent free energies of unfolding (ΔG_U^app) were calculated from GdnHCl unfolding data, their values were strikingly found to be lower (BGLI ΔG_U^app=3.02kcal/mol; BGLII ΔG_U^app=2.99kcal/mol) than reported for globular (ΔG_U=5-15kcal/mol)/multimeric proteins (ΔG_U=23-29kcal/mol) indicating marginal stability results in low refolding.

Purification of α-glucosidase from mouse intestine by countercurrent chromatography coupled with a reverse micelle solvent system

Countercurrent chromatography coupled with a reverse micelle solvent was applied to separate α-glucosidase, which is stable at pH 6.0-8.8, 15-50°C. The separation conditions are as follows: stationary phase: pH 4.0 Tris-HCl buffer phase containing 50 mM Tris-HCl and 50 mM KCl; mobile phase A: isooctane containing 50 mM anionic surfactant sodium di(2-ethylhexyl)sulfosuccinate; mobile phase B: 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer containing 500 mM KCl (pH 8.0); In total, 25 mL (23.9 mg) crude enzyme was injected through the injection valve, the enzymatic reaction and sodium dodecylsulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis results imply that the activity of purified α-glucosidase is 6.63-fold higher than that of the crude enzyme. Therefore, countercurrent chromatography coupled with a reverse micelle solvent is capable for protein separation and enrichment.

Cellulosic ethanol production using a yeast consortium displaying a minicellulosome and β-glucosidase

Background

Cellulosic biomass is considered as a promising alternative to fossil fuels, but its recalcitrant nature and high cost of cellulase are the major obstacles to utilize this material. Consolidated bioprocessing (CBP), combining cellulase production, saccharification, and fermentation into one step, has been proposed as the most efficient way to reduce the production cost of cellulosic bioethanol. In this study, we developed a cellulolytic yeast consortium for CBP, based on the surface display of cellulosome structure, mimicking the cellulolytic bacterium, Clostridium thermocellum.

Results

We designed a cellulolytic yeast consortium composed of four different yeast strains capable of either displaying a scaffoldin (mini CipA) containing three cohesin domains derived from C. thermocellum, or secreting one of the three types of cellulases, C. thermocellum CelA (endoglucanase) containing its own dockerin, Trichoderma reesei CBHII (exoglucanase) fused with an exogenous dockerin from C. thermocellum, or Aspergillus aculeatus BGLI (β-glucosidase). The secreted dockerin-containing enzymes, CelA and CBHI, were randomly assembled to the surface-displayed mini CipA via cohesin-dockerin interactions. On the other hand, BGLI was independently assembled to the cell surface since we newly found that it already has a cell adhesion characteristic. We optimized the cellulosome activity and ethanol production by controlling the combination ratio among the four yeast strains. A mixture of cells with the optimized mini CipA:CelA:CBHII:BGLI ratio of 2:3:3:0.53 produced 1.80 g/l ethanol after 94 h, indicating about 20% increase compared with a consortium composed of an equal amount of each cell type (1.48 g/l).

Conclusions

We produced cellulosic ethanol using a cellulolytic yeast consortium, which is composed of cells displaying mini cellulosomes generated via random assembly of CelA and CBHII to a mini CipA, and cells displaying BGLI independently. One of the advantages of this system is that ethanol production can be easily optimized by simply changing the combination ratio of the different populations. In addition, there is no limitation on the number of enzymes to be incorporated into this cellulosome structure. Not only cellulases used in this study, but also any other enzymes, including cellulases and hemicellulases, could be applied just by fusing dockerin domains to the enzymes.