Neuromonitoring during surgery for metastatic tumors to the spine: intraoperative interpretation and management strategies

The role of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery

Intramedullary tumors are a class of central nervous system tumors with an incidence of 2 to 4%. As they are located very deep and frequently cause postoperative neurological complications, surgical resection is difficult. In recent years, many surgeons have performed electrophysiological monitoring to effectively reduce the occurrence of postoperative neurological complications. Modern electrophysiological monitoring technology has advanced considerably, leading to the development of many monitoring methods, such as SSEPs, MEPs, DCM, and EMG, to monitor intramedullary tumors. However, electrophysiological monitoring in tumor resection is still being studied. In this article, we discussed the different monitoring methods and their role in monitoring intramedullary tumors by reviewing previous studies. Intratumorally tumors need to be monitored for a summary of the condition of the patient. Only by using various monitoring methods flexibly and through clear communication between surgeons and neurophysiological experts can good decisions be made during surgery and positive surgical results be achieved.

Three-Dimensionally Printed Surgical Simulation Tool for Brain Mapping Training and Preoperative Planning

BACKGROUND

Brain mapping is the most reliable intraoperative tool for identifying surrounding functional cortical and subcortical brain parenchyma. Brain mapping procedures are nuanced and require a multidisciplinary team and a well-trained neurosurgeon. Current training methodology involves real-time observation and operation, without widely available surgical simulation.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a patient-specific, anatomically accurate, and electrically responsive biomimetic 3D-printed model for simulating brain mapping.

METHODS

Imaging data were converted into a 2-piece inverse 3D-rendered polyvinyl acetate shell forming an anatomically accurate brain mold. Functional and diffusion tensor imaging data were used to guide wire placement to approximate the projection fibers from the arm and leg areas in the motor homunculus. Electrical parameters were generated, and data were collected and processed to differentiate between the 2 tracts. For validation, the relationship between the electrical signal and the distance between the probe and the tract was quantified. Neurosurgeons and trainees were interviewed to assess the validity of the model.

RESULTS

Material testing of the brain component showed an elasticity modulus of 55 kPa (compared to 140 kPa of cadaveric brain), closely resembling the tactile feedback a live brain. The simulator's electrical properties approximated that of a live brain with a voltage-to-distance correlation coefficient of r2 = 0.86. Following 32 neurosurgeon interviews, ∼96% considered the model to be useful for training.

CONCLUSION

The realistic neural properties of the simulator greatly improve representation of a live surgical environment. This proof-of-concept model can be further developed to contain more complicated tractography, blood and cerebrospinal fluid circulation, and more in-depth feedback mechanisms.

Intraoperative Neuromonitoring (IONM): Is There a Role in Metastatic Spine Tumor Surgery?

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective design.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to report our experience with multimodal intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) in metastatic spine tumor surgery (MSTS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

IONM is considered as standard of care in spinal deformity surgeries. However, limited data exist about its role in MSTS.

METHODS

A total of 135 patients from 2010 to 2017, who underwent MSTS with IONM at our institute, were studied retrospectively. After excluding seven with no baseline signals, 128 patients were analyzed. The data collected comprised of demographics, pre and postoperative American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grades and neurological status, indications for surgery, type of surgical approach. Multimodal IONM included somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs), transcranial electric motor-evoked potentials (tcMEP), and free running electromyography (EMG).

RESULTS

The 128 patients included 61 males and 67 females with a mean age of 61 years. One hundred sixteen underwent posterior procedures; nine anterior and three both. The frequency of preoperative ASIA Grades were A = 0, B = 0, C = 10, D = 44, and E = 74 patients. In total, 54 underwent MSTS for neurological deficit, 66 for instability pain, and 8 for intractable pain.Of 128 patients, 13 (10.2%) had significant IONM alerts, representing true positives; 114 true negatives, one false negative, and no false positives. Among the 13 true positives, four (30%) underwent minimally invasive and nine (70%) open procedures. Eight (69.2%) patients had posterior approach. Seven (53.84%) true positive alerts were during decompression, which resolved to baseline upon completion of decompression, while five (38.46%) were during instrumentation, which recovered to baseline after adjusting/downsizing the instrumentation, and one (8.3%) during lateral approach, which reversed after changing the plane of dissection. Of the seven patients without baseline, five were ASIA-A and two were ASIA-C. The sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values were 99.1%, 100%, 100%, and 92.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Multimodal IONM in MSTS helped in preventing postoperative neurological deficit in 9.4% of patients. Its high sensitivity and specificity to detect intraoperative neurological events envisage its use in ASIA-grade D/E patients requiring instrumented decompression.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Utility of Intraoperative Monitoring in the Resection of Spinal Cord Tumors: An Analysis by Tumor Location and Anatomical Region

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of institutional data.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the utility of somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP) and transcranial electric motor-evoked potentials (MEP) in the resection of spine tumors and evaluate the ability of both single and multi-modal monitoring to predict postoperative neurological deficits.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although the utility of intraoperative monitoring (IOM) is well established in scoliosis and degenerative surgery, studies in spine tumor patients have been limited.

METHODS

A series of consecutive patients who underwent resection with the use of IOM at a single institution between August 2009 and March 2013 was identified. Demographic, clinical, and neuromonitoring data were collected preoperatively, during surgery, at the moment of discharge, and at a 6-month follow-up visit. Three cohorts were established based on the anatomical location of the tumor: intramedullary, intradural extramedullary, and extradural. Additional groupings were formed based on spinal region. Patients with significant changes in SSEPs or MEPs during surgery were identified and the rate of neurological deficits was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 52 patients were analyzed. A change in SSEPs or MEPs was detected in 11 (21.2%) cases whereas 14 patients (26.9%) developed permanent postoperative deficits. SSEPs predicted deficits in the resection of intramedullary tumors (P = 0.015) (area under cover, AUC = 0.83), and intradural extramedullary tumors (P = 0.048; AUC = 0.70). MEP monitoring did not predict postoperative deficits in the resection of intramedullary (P = 0.21; AUC = 0.69) or intradural extramedullary tumors (P = 0.31; AUC = 0.63). Neither SSEPs nor MEPs predicted deficits for extradural tumors.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of IOM in spine tumor resection is dependent on tumor location relative to the spinal cord and dura. The accuracy of SSEPs and their ability to predict postoperative deficits was greatest for intramedullary lesions. For this series, MEP and multi-modal monitoring did not confer a benefit in predicting permanent neurological deficits.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Transcranial Motor Evoked Potential Alarm Criteria to Predict Foot Drop Injury During Lumbosacral Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort analysis.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate whether waveform alterations in transcranial motor evoked potentials (TCMEPs) can reliably predict postoperative foot drop.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Nerve injury leading to foot drop is a potential complication of lumbosacral surgery. Very limited data exist on the use of intraoperative TCMEPs to identify iatrogenic foot drop.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed neuromonitoring data from 130 consecutive spine surgeries with instrumentation involving L4-S1. TCMEP waveform analysis included amplitude (A), area under the curve (AUC), latency (L), and duration (D). Patient outcomes were correlated with neuromonitoring results. Intraoperative alert criteria were established on the basis of observed intraoperative changes.

RESULTS

Three patients developed severe foot drop with a muscle weakness functional grade ranging from 0/5 to 3/5. Two patients developed a mild foot drop with functional grade 4/5. Twenty-three patients had preoperative weakness in an L5 distribution. One-hundred two patients who had neither preoperative nor postoperative neurological complications served as a control group. Amplitude significantly decreased in patients with a severe postoperative deficit (P = 0.005) as did AUC and duration (P < 0.05). Intraoperative alert criteria defined as a >65% decrease in AUC resulted in a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 100%, 91.4%, 12%, and 100%, respectively. When defining an alert criteria as a >50% decrease in amplitude, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 100%, 87.9%, 8.8%, and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Reduction of TCMEP waveform associated with postoperative severe foot drop can be detected during lumbar surgery. Other waveform parameters such as AUC may predict foot drop better than the amplitude. Additional examinations in larger samples of foot drops are needed to validate these alert threshold findings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Multimodal Neuromonitoring During Safe Surgical Dislocation of the Hip for Joint Preservation: Feasibility, Safety, and Intraoperative Observations

Introduction:

Nerve injuries can occur from major hip surgeries, and some may be significant. Our goal was to assess the feasibility and safety of neuromonitoring during hip preservation surgery and the incidence of alerting events during such monitoring.

Methods:

Twenty-five adult patients underwent surgical hip dislocation for femoroacetabular impingement. Upper and lower extremity somatosensory evoked potentials, lower extremity transcranial motor evoked potentials, and lower extremity electromyography were recorded.

Results:

We observed a temporary reduction of the monitored parameters in twelve patients (48%) during surgery. There were no clinically significant neurological deficits postoperatively in any cases.

Discussion:

Neuromonitoring did demonstrate events during hip surgery in our case series. Although it may not be practical to use neuromonitoring in all major hip surgeries, it may be prudent from the perspective of patient safety to use it in high-risk cases, including those requiring prolonged surgical time; in patients with high body mass index, excessive deformity correction, and preexisting neuropathy; and in revision cases, among others.

Intraoperative neurophysiological mapping and monitoring in spinal tumor surgery: sirens or indispensable tools?

Spinal tumor (ST) surgery carries the risk of new neurological deficits in the postoperative period. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring and mapping (IONM) represents an effective method of identifying and monitoring in real time the functional integrity of both the spinal cord (SC) and the nerve roots (NRs). Despite consensus favoring the use of IONM in ST surgery, in this era of evidence-based medicine, there is still a need to demonstrate the effective role of IONM in ST surgery in achieving an oncological cure, optimizing patient safety, and considering medicolegal aspects. Thus, neurosurgeons are asked to establish which techniques are considered indispensable. In the present study, the authors focused on the rationale for and the accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values) of IONM in ST surgery in light of more recent evidence in the literature, with specific emphasis on the role of IONM in reducing the incidence of postoperative neurological deficits. This review confirms the role of IONM as a useful tool in the workup for ST surgery. Individual monitoring and mapping techniques are clearly not sufficient to account for the complex function of the SC and NRs. Conversely, multimodal IONM is highly sensitive and specific for anticipating neurological injury during ST surgery and represents an important tool for preserving neuronal structures and achieving an optimal postoperative functional outcome.

Outcomes of malignant CNS ependymomas: an examination of 2408 cases through the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1973-2005)

BACKGROUND

Determine the role of surgery and radiation therapy for patients with malignant CNS ependymomas.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1973-2005) was queried.

RESULTS

Overall, a total of 2408 cases of malignant ependymomas were identified. Of these, 2132 cases (88.5%) were identified as WHO grade II ependymomas and 276 cases (11.5%) as WHO grade III (anaplastic) ependymomas. The annual incidence of ependymomas was approximately 1.97 cases per million in 2005. Overall median survival for all patients was 230 mo, with a significant difference between women and men (262 mo versus196 mo, respectively) (P=0.004). Median age at diagnosis was 37 y among females and 34 y in males. Patients who successfully underwent surgical resection had a considerably longer median survival (237 mo versus 215 mo, P<0.001) as well as a significantly improved five-year survival (72.4% versus 52.6%, P<0.001). Univariate analysis demonstrated that age, gender, ethnicity, primary tumor site, WHO grade and surgical resection were significant predictors of improved survival for ependymoma patients. Multivariate analysis identified that a WHO grade III tumor, male gender, patient age, intracranial tumor locations and failure to undergo surgical resection were independent predictors of poorer outcomes. Multivariate analysis of partially resection cases revealed that lack of radiation was a sign of poor prognosis (HR 1.748, P=0.024).

CONCLUSION

Surgical extirpation of ependymomas is associated with significantly improved patient survival. For partially resected tumors, radiation therapy provides significant survival benefit.

Lumbar tumor resections and management

More than one-third of patients with cancer have vertebral metastases found at autopsy. Primary and metastatic tumors to the spinal column can lead to pain, instability, and neurologic deficit. Symptomatic lesions are most prevalent in the thoracic spine (70%), followed by the lumbar spine (20%) and cervical spine (10%). Lesions in larger vertebral bodies tend to be asymptomatic given the increased ratio between the diameter of the spinal canal and the traversing nerve roots.

Predictive value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during cervical spine surgery: a prospective analysis of 1055 consecutive patients

Object

Despite the growing use of multimodal intraoperative monitoring (IOM) in cervical spinal surgery, limited data exist regarding the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of such a technique in detecting new neurological deficits in this setting. The authors sought to define the incidence of significant intraoperative electrophysiological changes and new postoperative neurological deficits in a cohort of patients undergoing cervical surgery.

Methods

The authors conducted a prospective analysis of a consecutive series of patients who had undergone cervical surgery during a 5-year period at a university-based neurosurgical unit, in which multimodal IOM was recorded. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPVs), and negative predictive values (NPVs) were determined using standard Bayesian techniques. The study population included 1055 patients (614 male and 441 female) with a mean age of 55 years.

Results

The IOM modalities performed included somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) recording in 1055 patients, motor evoked potential (MEP) recording in 26, and electromyography (EMG) in 427. Twenty-six patients (2.5%) had significant SSEP changes. Electromyographic activity was transient in 212 patients (49.6%), and 115 patients (26.9%) had sustained burst or train activity. New postoperative neurological deficits occurred in 34 patients (3.2%): 6 had combined sensory and motor deficits, 7 had new sensory deficits, 9 had increased motor weakness, and 12 had new root deficits. Of these 34 patients, 12 had spinal tumors, of which 7 were intramedullary. Overall, of the 34 new postoperative deficits, 21 completely resolved, 9 partially resolved, and 4 had no improvement. The deficits that completely resolved did so on average 3.3 months after surgery. Patients with deficits that did not fully resolve (partial or no improvement) were followed up for an average of 1.8 years after surgery.

Somatosensory evoked potentials had a sensitivity of 52%, a specificity of 100%, a PPV of 100%, and an NPV of 97%. Motor evoked potential sensitivity was 100%, specificity 96%, PPV 96%, and NPV 100%. Electromyography had a sensitivity of 46%, specificity of 73%, PPV of 3%, and an NPV of 97%.

Conclusions

Combined neurophysiological IOM with EMG and SSEP recording and the selective use of MEPs is helpful for predicting and possibly preventing neurological injury during cervical spine surgery.

Modified paramedian transpedicular approach and spinal reconstruction for intradural tumors of the cervical and cervicothoracic spine: clinical experience

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of the medical, radiographic, surgical, and postoperative records of patients who underwent resection of multilevel intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumors of the ventral cervical and cervicothoracic spine via a modified paramedian transpedicular approach at the University of California, San Francisco, between 2003 and 2005.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the surgical, clinical, and radiographic outcomes of using the modified paramedian transpedicular approach to resect ventral intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumors of the ventral cervical and cervicothoracic spine.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

A common theme of skull-base surgery for many years has been to remove the bone rather than retract neural elements. In this report, we demonstrate some possible advantages of taking a "spine-base" approach for resecting intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumors of the ventral cervical and cervicothoracic spinal canal, and present our clinical experience.

METHODS

All medical, surgical, and radiologic records were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical outcome was assessed for disability via the Neck Disability Index and for pain via the visual analog scale.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients (4 males and 10 females, average age 39.6 years, range 20-62) with intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumors involving multiple levels of the anterior cervical and cervicothoracic spine were identified. All patients presented with pain and/or radiculomyelopathy attributed to a ventral intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumor of the cervical or cervicothoracic spine that was resected via the modified paramedian transpedicular approach with partial dorsal corpectomy and posterior spinal reconstruction. The average follow-up period was 14.6 months (range 5-30). Gross total resection was achieved in all cases, and no patient required additional surgery via an anterior approach for residual tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified paramedian transpedicular approach with partial dorsal corpectomy we describe here is a variation of traditional thoracic posterolateral transpedicular extracavitary approaches and offers direct access to lesions of the ventral cervicothoracic spinal canal. This approach avoids the morbidity of anterior transcervical, transoral, or transthoracic procedures, while providing a view of the entire ventral cervicothoracic canal, and can be performed safely and effectively in select patients.