Surgical Techniques for Sinonasal Malignancies

Surgical Management of Sinonasal Cancers: A Comprehensive Review

Surgery plays an important role in the treatment of sinonasal cancer. Many surgical approaches have been described, including open, endoscopic, or combined approaches. The choice is based on several criteria: general criteria related to the oncological results and morbidity of each technique, specific criteria related to the tumor (tumor extensions, tumor pathology), the patient, or the surgeon himself. The aims of this review are (i) to provide a complete overview of the surgical techniques available for the management of sinonasal malignant tumors, with a special focus on recent developments in the field of transnasal endoscopic surgery; (ii) to summarize the criteria that lead to the choice of one technique over another. In particular, the oncological outcomes, the morbidity of the different techniques, and the specificities of each histologic subtype will be discussed based on a comprehensive literature review.

Comparative outcome of surgical and nonsurgical therapy for T4bN0M0 sinonasal squamous cell carcinomas

PURPOSE

Definitive radiotherapy (RT) is recommended by NCCN guidelines for T4b tumors of sinonasal squamous cell carcinomas (SNSCC). However, no multi-institutional clinical studies have proved its advantage over surgery-based modalities. The aim of this study was to assess the survival of T4bN0M0 SNSCC patients who received surgery plus postoperative radiation (S + PORT) compared with those who received RT.

METHODS

This study extracted 220 patients from the SEER database from 2004 to 2015. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to eliminate the baseline variations.

RESULTS

In SEER database, 43.6% of patients received S + PORT, and subsequently followed by RT (36.4%). Five-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival rates (CSS) in S + PORT were 42.5% and 46.9%, respectively, significantly better than for RT (21.7% and 26.7%). Multivariate analysis showed that therapy of RT had higher cancer-specific mortality risk than S + PORT [hazard ratio (HR) 1.578, p = 0.032]. After PSM, 57 pairs of patients were selected. There was still a significant difference noted with regard to 5-year OS or 5-year CSS between patients receiving S + PORT and RT (43% vs 22.5%, p = 0.012; 45.8% vs 27.7%, p = 0.025). The univariate and multivariate analyses of factors predictive of CSS showed that therapy of RT (HR 1.877, p = 0.018) and primary subsite of maxillary sinus (HR 2.629, p = 0.001) were significantly correlated with adverse outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Combination of surgery and postoperative radiotherapy may contribute to prolonged survival in T4bN0M0 SNSCC. Invasion of the sites of T4b tumors is not an absolute contraindication for surgery.

[Tumors of the paranasal sinus invading the orbit]

Invasion of the orbit by tumors of the paranasal sinus represents an advanced state of disease. Prognosis has hardly improved in recent decades, despite multimodal therapeutic approaches. Complete resection of the tumor still remains the most promising therapy. Orbital exenteration implies a dramatic event for the patient's psyche and quality of life. If the eye that would have to be exenterated is the only one remaining with sufficient vision, exenteration should be abandoned in consensus with the patient. Aesthetic improvements following exenteration can be achieved by surgical and prosthetic techniques. The method of prosthesis fixation needs to be determined with respect to the patients' individual expectations and manual abilities. The main aspects of functional rehabilitation are good local cleanability and sufficient nasal breathing without encrusted mucus, which can be achieved by restoring the natural laminar airflow. Tumors of the paranasal sinus with orbital invasion represent a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. The information regarding prognosis, therapeutic approaches, post-therapeutic quality of life, and rehabilitation options should be thoroughly discussed by patients and therapists prior to treatment.

Initial experience with image-guided surgical navigation in transoral surgery

BACKGROUND

Surgical navigation using image guidance may improve the safety and efficacy of transoral surgery (TOS); however, preoperative imaging cannot be accurately registered to the intraoperative state due to deformations resulting from placement of the laryngoscope or retractor. This proof of concept study explores feasibility and registration accuracy of surgical navigation for TOS by utilizing intraoperative imaging.

METHODS

Four patients undergoing TOS were recruited. Suspension laryngoscopy was performed with a CT-compatible laryngoscope. An intraoperative contrast enhanced CT scan was obtained and registered to fiducials placed on the neck, face, and laryngoscope.

RESULTS

All patients were successfully scanned and registered. Registration accuracy within the pharynx and larynx was 1 mm or less. Target registration was confirmed by localizing endoscopic and surface structures to the CT images. Successful tracking was performed in all 4 patients.

CONCLUSION

For surgical navigation during TOS, although a high level of registration accuracy can be achieved by utilizing intraoperative imaging, significant limitations of the existing technology have been identified. These limitations, as well as areas for future investigation, are discussed.

Impact of Dural Resection on Sinonasal Malignancies with Skull Base Encroachment or Erosion

Objectives  (1) To determine the occult rate of dural invasion in patients with tumors extending to and/or eroding the bony anterior skull base but without evidence of dural invasion on preoperative imaging. (2) To determine the impact of dural resection and of skull base erosion on survival outcomes in this group of patients (without evidence of dural invasion upon preoperative imaging). Study Design  Retrospective study. Setting  Tertiary care academic center. Participants  Patients with sinonasal malignancies with anterior skull base encroachment/erosion without dural invasion on preoperative imaging treated surgically. Main Outcome Measures  (1) Histopathologic disease in the dura in patients who had dural resection and (2) Oncologic outcomes (5-year local recurrence, dural recurrence, disease-specific survival, and overall survival) in patients with and without dural resection, and patients with and without skull base erosion. Results  Thirty-seven patients were included. The occult rate of dural invasion was 54%. Patients with dural resection had improved margin control versus those without dural resection (90% vs 56%, p  = 0.02). Dural resection improved 5-year overall survival only in patients with esthesioneuroblastoma compared with bony skull base resection alone (100% vs 75%, p  = 0.03). Patients with skull base erosion had reduced local control versus those without erosion (63% vs 93%, p  = 0.047). Conclusion  This study suggests a substantial rate of occult dural invasion despite no overt imaging findings. Dural resection may be associated with improved margin control, but no oncologic benefit except for esthesioneuroblastomas, although treatment heterogeneity and small sample size may limit conclusions.

Quantifying Anatomic Deformations During Laryngoscopy

For a variety of head and neck cancers, specifically those of the oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx, minimally invasive trans-oral approaches have been developed to reduce perioperative and long-term morbidity. However, in trans-oral surgical approaches anatomical deformation due to instrumentation, specifically placement of laryngoscopes and retractors, present a significant challenge for surgeons relying on preoperative imaging to resect tumors to negative margins. Quantifying the deformation due to instrumentation is needed in order to develop predictive models of operative deformation. In order to study this deformation, we used a CT/MR-compatible laryngoscopy system in concert with intraoperative CT imaging. 3D models of preoperative and intraoperative anatomy were generated. Mandible and hyoid displacements as well as tongue deformations were quantified for eight patients undergoing diagnostic laryngoscopy. Across patients, we found on average 1.3 cm of displacement for these anatomic structures due to laryngoscope insertion. On average, the maximum displacement for certain tongue regions exceeded 4 cm. The anatomical deformations quantified here can serve as a reference for describing how the upper aerodigestive tract anatomy changes during instrumentation and may be helpful in developing predictive models of intraoperative upper aerodigestive tract deformation.