Navigation-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery Deformity Correction

Role of Robotics in Adult Spinal Deformity

Robotic-assisted adult deformity surgery has played a rapidly expanding role since its introduction. As robotic spine technologies improve, the potential to limit complications and morbidity is vast. The improvements in instrumentation accuracy combined with the ability to maintain that accuracy in multiple positions allow creative surgical approaches and techniques that can limit operative time, blood loss, and improve outcomes. In the years to come, robotic-assisted spine surgery and navigation will likely play an expanding role that continues to be defined. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5, expert opinion.

Novel Applications of Spinal Navigation in Deformity and Oncology Surgery-Beyond Screw Placement

Computer-assisted navigation has made a major impact on spine surgery, providing surgeons with technological tools to safely place instrumentation anywhere in the spinal column. With advances in intraoperative image acquisition, registration, and processing, many surgeons are now using navigation in their practices. The incorporation of navigation into the workflow of surgeons continues to expand with the evolution of minimally invasive techniques and robotic surgery. While numerous investigators have demonstrated the benefit of navigation for improving the accuracy of instrumentation, few have reported applying this technology to other aspects of spine surgery. Surgeries to correct spinal deformities and resect spinal tumors are technically demanding, incorporating a wide range of techniques not only for instrumentation placement but also for osteotomy planning and executing the goals of surgery. Although these subspecialties vary in their objectives, they share similar challenges with potentially high complications, invasiveness, and consequences of failed execution. Herein, we highlight the utility of using spinal navigation for applications beyond screw placement: specifically, for planning and executing osteotomies and guiding the extent of tumor resection. A narrative review of the work that has been done is supplemented with illustrative cases demonstrating these applications.

Errors according to the number of registered markers used in navigation-assisted surgery of the mandible

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of navigation according to the number of markers in terms of target registration errors (TREs) at each anatomical location during the registration process of the navigation system for the mandible.

Methods

The TREs were measured in five different experiments, varying only in the number of registration reference markers, which ranged from three to seven. To measure the TREs according to the number of registration reference markers, two experimental navigation devices were used: 1) Cbyon navigation surgery equipment 2) Polaris optical tracker. Both experiments were conducted to obtain the TREs at the anatomical locations of the mandible according to the number of registration markers during the navigation process. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS 23.0 software.

Results

At all anatomical locations, errors were 2 mm or less. Further, significant differences in the target errors measured by the Cbyon system were found according to the number of registration markers. Significant differences in the target errors measured by the Polaris optical tracker were found according to the registration markers at the posterior border only. In both groups, the target errors did not decrease as the number of registration markers increased.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that an increase in the number of registration markers is not associated with a decrease in the TRE, and that a specific number of registration markers could reduce the TREs at each anatomical site. It is important to determine the minimum number of image registration markers at which the smallest TRE would be observed for different surgical sites.