Evaluation of Coagulation in the Neurosurgery Patient

Preoperative evaluation of coagulation status in neuromodulation patients

OBJECTIVE

The incidence of hemorrhage in patients who undergo deep brain stimulation (DBS) and spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is between 0.5% and 2.5%. Coagulation status is one of the factors that can predispose patients to the development of these complications. As a routine part of preoperative assessment, the authors obtain prothrombin time (PT), partial thromboplastin time (PTT), and platelet count. However, insurers often cover only PT/PTT laboratory tests if the patient is receiving warfarin/heparin. The authors aimed to examine their experience with abnormal coagulation parameters in patients who underwent neuromodulation.

METHODS

Patients who underwent neuromodulation (SCS, DBS, or intrathecal pump implantation) over a 9-year period and had preoperative laboratory values available were included. The authors determined abnormal values on the basis of a clinical protocol utilized at their practice, which combined the normal ranges of the laboratory tests and clinical relevance. This protocol had cutoff values of 12 seconds and 39 seconds for PT and PTT, respectively, and < 120,000 platelets/μl. The authors identified risk factors for these abnormalities and described interventions.

RESULTS

Of the 1767 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 136 had abnormal preoperative laboratory values. Five of these 136 patients had values that were misclassified as abnormal because they were within the normal ranges at the outside facility where they were tested. Fifty-one patients had laboratory values outside the ranges of our protocol, but the surgeons reviewed and approved these patients without further intervention. Of the remaining 80 patients, 8 had known coagulopathies and 24 were receiving warfarin/heparin. The remaining 48 patients were receiving other anticoagulant/antiplatelet medications. These included apixaban/rivaroxaban/dabigatran anticoagulants (n = 22; mean ± SD PT 13.7 ± 2.5 seconds) and aspirin/clopidogrel/other antiplatelet medications (n = 26; mean ± SD PT 14.4 ± 5.8 seconds). Eight new coagulopathies were identified and further investigated with hematological analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

New anticoagulants and antiplatelet medications are not monitored with PT/PTT, but they affect coagulation status and laboratory values. Although platelet function tests aid in a subset of medications, it is more difficult to assess the coagulation status of patients receiving novel anticoagulants. PT/PTT may provide value preoperatively.

[Congenital coagulation disorders in neurosurgical patients. Literature review and case series]

Congenital coagulation disorders account about 1-2% and can pose a serious risk for neurosurgical patients. Indeed, coagulation management in these patients is essential to ensure normal hemostasis. Analysis of available literature devoted to this issue and case series of neurosurgical patients with congenital coagulation disorders. Literature data were obtained from the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline and Google Scholar databases for the period from 2019 to 2020. Over 200 reports devoted to our scientific issue were selected. We determined the key features of perioperative management of neurosurgical patients with congenital coagulation disorders. We have also analyzed 10 similar patients for the period from 2008 to 2020. Comprehensive analysis of anamnesis, adequate diagnosis, perioperative planning and multidisciplinary approach are essential for successful elective surgery in patients with congenital coagulation disorders.

Platelet Dysfunction after Traumatic Brain Injury: A Review

Coagulopathy is a known sequela of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Platelet dysfunction has been identified as one of several etiologies of coagulopathy following TBI and has been associated with poor outcomes. Regardless of whether the platelet dysfunction occurs as a direct consequence of the injury or because of pre-existing medical comorbidities or medication use, accurate detection and monitoring of response to therapy is key to optimal patient care. Platelet transfusion has been proposed as a potential therapeutic intervention to treat platelet dysfunction, with several studies using platelet function assays to monitor response. The development of increasingly precise diagnostic testing is providing enhanced understanding of the specific derangement in the hemostatic process, allowing clinicians to provide patient-specific treatment plans. There is wide variability in the currently available literature on the incidence and clinical significance of platelet dysfunction following TBI, which creates challenges with developing evidence-based management guidelines. The relatively high prevalence of platelet inhibitor therapy serves as an additional confounding factor. In addition, the data are largely retrospective in nature. We performed a literature review to provide clarity on this clinical issue. We reviewed 348 abstracts, and included 97 manuscripts in our final literature review. Based on the currently available research, platelet dysfunction has been consistently demonstrated in patients with moderate-severe TBI. We recommend the use of platelet functional assays to evaluate patients with TBI. Platelet transfusion directed at platelet dysfunction may lead to improved clinical outcome. A randomized trial guided by implementation science could improve the applicability of these practices.