Development and validation of Dutch version of Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric in hospital practice: An instrument design study

Evaluating a Shared Reflective Practice to Develop Nursing Student Clinical Judgment

BACKGROUND

Self-reflection is a valuable method that nurse educators can use to develop clinical judgment skills among prelicensure nursing students. Little research exists on improving clinical judgment in second-degree nursing students in the clinical setting.

PURPOSE

To determine the implications of increasing clinical judgment skills in prelicensure nursing students using a shared structured reflection teaching innovation within a required baccalaureate clinical course.

METHODS

This educational innovation used qualitative descriptive methods to evaluate its effectiveness in the clinical setting among students in the final semester of an accelerated prelicensure nursing program.

RESULTS

Students reported increased accountability for their learning, a sense of intentionality with their nursing practice, and a deeper sense of community with their peers.

CONCLUSIONS

Shared reflective practices in the clinical setting show promise for increasing clinical judgment and supporting a competency-based curriculum.

The Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric: 17 Years Later

BACKGROUND

Nearly 17 years ago, the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) was published to provide a common language and trajectory of students' development to think like a nurse.

METHOD

This article traces the uses of the LCJR from creation to the present and cites lessons learned from its use.

RESULTS

During the intervening years, the LCJR has been used effectively as a debriefing guide in simulation and as a research instrument, as well as for formative assessment. The LCJR has been translated or is in process in 19 languages besides English.

CONCLUSION

This article provides evidence of the efficacy of the LCJR and discusses important lessons learned. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(3):149-155.].

[Development of Nursing Clinical Judgment Scale]

PURPOSE

This study aimed to develop a nursing clinical judgment scale (NCJS) and verify its validity and reliability in assessing the clinical judgment of nurses.

METHODS

A preliminary instrument of the NCJS comprising 38 items was first developed from attributes and indicators derived from a literature review and an in-depth/focus interview with 12 clinical nurses. The preliminary tool was finalized after 7 experts conducted a content validity test based on a data from a preliminary survey of 30 hospital nurses in Korea. Data were collected from 443 ward, intensive care unit, emergency room nurses who voluntarily participated in the survey through offline and online for the verification of the construct validity and reliability of the scale.

RESULTS

The final scale comprised 23 items scored on a 5-point Likert scale. Six factors- integrated data analysis, evaluation and reflection on interventions, evidence on interventions, collaboration among health professionals, patient-centered nursing, and collaboration among nurse colleagues - accounted for 64.9% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the fit of the measurement model, comprising six factors (root mean square error of approximation = .07, standardized root mean square residual = .04, comparative fit index = .90). Cronbach's α for all the items was .92.

CONCLUSION

The NCJS is a valid and reliable tool that fully reflects the characteristics of clinical practice, and it can be used effectively to evaluate the clinical judgment of Korean nurses. Future research should reflect the variables influencing clinical judgment and develop an action plan to improve it.

The implementation of Tanner's Clinical Judgment Model and the Indonesian version of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric in the clinical setting

A critical component for nurses to provide safe and quality care with strong patient outcomes is clinical judgment. This study aimed to identify the difference in the clinical judgment score in newly graduated nurses by implementing Tanner's Clinical Judgment Model. This study followed an experimental design with a pretest-posttest and involved thirty-two newly graduated nurses from three private hospitals in Indonesia. The intervention group had a scheduled post-conference with their preceptors using Tanner's Clinical Judgment Model's guidelines with high-level, open-ended questions for two consecutive weeks. Independent samples t-test was used to compare pre-and post-test scores utilizing the valid and reliable Indonesia version of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric. There was no significant difference between the pre-test results of the intervention and control groups, with a significance value of 0.647. The results indicated a significant difference in the mean clinical judgment scores between the intervention and control groups after two weeks of intervention, where the intervention group's scores were higher than the control group's with a significance value of <0.001 with a mean difference of 6.75 and CI of 95 % (4.18-9.31). Tanner's Clinical Judgment Model showed a significant impact in increasing clinical judgment scores. The Indonesia version of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric is a valuable tool for assessing and evaluating the development of clinical judgment and provides detailed targeted areas needing improvement. Preceptors and nursing leaders in the clinical setting should continue to use this model and tools to assist newly graduated nurses in developing clinical judgment skills during their transition period.

Development and Psychometric Testing of the Clinical Reasoning Scale Among Nursing Students Enrolled in Three Types of Programs in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

There is no instrument currently available to assess the essential nursing competency of clinical reasoning (CR).

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to develop and test the psychometric properties of CR assessment instrument appropriate for use with nursing students across different types of programs.

METHODS

H. M. Huang et al.'s (2018) Framework of Competencies of Clinical Reasoning for Nursing Students was used to guide this study. Two rounds of Delphi study and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted to test content and construct validity. Internal consistency was tested for reliability.

RESULTS

The four-domain, 16-item Likert-scale Clinical Reasoning Scale (CRS) was developed. One thousand five hundred four nursing students currently enrolled in three different types of nursing programs completed the CRS. The content validity index was .85-1.0, the CFA indicated goodness of fit, and the Cronbach's α score range was .78-.89.

CONCLUSION

The CRS is a valid and reliable tool for assessing CR in nursing students in different types of nursing program.

Nursing students' clinical judgment skills in simulation and clinical placement: a comparison of student self-assessment and evaluator assessment

BACKGROUND

Clinical judgment is an important and desirable learning outcome in nursing education. Students must be able to self-assess their clinical judgment in both the simulation and clinical settings to identify knowledge gaps and further improve and develop their skills. Further investigation is needed to determine the optimal conditions for and reliability of this self-assessment.

AIMS

This study aimed to compare the same group of students' self-assessment of clinical judgment with an evaluator's assessment in both simulation and clinical settings. The study further aimed to investigate whether the Dunning-Kruger effect is present in nursing students' self-assessment of clinical judgment.

METHODS

The study applied a quantitative comparative design. It was conducted in two learning settings: an academic simulation-based education course, and a clinical placement course in an acute care hospital. The sample consisted of 23 nursing students. The Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric was used to collect data. The scores were compared using a t-test, intraclass correlation coefficient, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman plots. The Dunning-Kruger effect was investigated using linear regression analysis and a scatter plot.

RESULTS

The results showed an inconsistency between student self-assessment and evaluator assessment of clinical judgment in both simulation-based education and clinical placement. Students overestimated their clinical judgment when compared to the more experienced evaluator's assessment. Differences between students' scores and the evaluator's scores were larger when the evaluator's scores were low, indicating the presence of the Dunning-Kruger effect.

CONCLUSION

It is vital to acknowledge that student self-assessment alone may not be a reliable predictor of a student's clinical judgment. Students who had a lower level of clinical judgment were likely to be less aware that this was the case. For future practice and research, we recommend a combination of student self-assessment and evaluator assessment to provide a more realistic view of students' clinical judgment skills.

Development and learning efficacy of a simulation rubric in childhood pneumonia for nursing students: A mixed methods study

BACKGROUND

Nursing students often lack knowledge, skills, and appropriate attitudes toward chest physiotherapy, which affects the quality of care provided to children with pneumonia in clinical practice. Helping students learn about the effectiveness of simulations can improve their nursing ability.

OBJECTIVES

To develop a rubric associated with the simulation of childhood pneumonia and to examine the learning efficacy of students using the rubric to assess the knowledge, skills, and attitudes in the simulation.

DESIGN

A mixed methods study using a post-test survey and a descriptive qualitative analysis of students' reflective journals.

SETTINGS

A paediatric simulation classroom at the University Clinical Skills Centre in Northern Taiwan.

PARTICIPANTS

214 third-year students enrolled in a four-year nursing programme.

METHODS

Quantitative and qualitative data were collected after the course to obtain a comprehensive understanding of its effects. Quantitative data from the questionnaire were analysed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were analysed using content analysis.

RESULTS

The quantitative results showed that mean knowledge and nursing students' attitudes were moderate. Of the six sub-indices, chest percussion technique and communication with family and children had the highest mean with 3.32 ± 0.67 and 3.01 ± 0.68, respectively. The students discovered that they often focused on performing technical steps without pre-analysing patient information. Most students also indicated difficulty showing emotional caring behaviours toward patients. The qualitative results revealed that students reflected on their learning post-self-evaluation of the rubric, particularly regarding knowledge of systemic assessments, patient-centred nursing skills, and caring attitudes.

CONCLUSIONS

The knowledge, skills, and attitude rubric can help students develop their learning process in a more organised manner, promote the development of their caring performances toward children, and assist them in their future clinical care practices.

Transcultural Translation and Validation of Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric©

OBJECTIVES

to translate and cross-culturally validate the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric© (LCJR©) instrument for nursing students.

METHODS

the application of LCJR-PT© was preceded by a linguistic translation into Portuguese, based on the translation-back-translation method. This psychometric study involved 32 nursing students from a program in Portugal. Data were collected through observations of two independent observers during the performance of the practices developed by the students, through the scenarios validated by experts of high and of medium-fidelity simulation.

RESULTS

of the 64 observations obtained from the practices of nursing students, the value of intra-class correlations in the 4 aspects of the instrument exceeded 0.792. There was a global Cronbach's alpha of LCJR-PT© of 0.921 and 0.876 in Observers 1 and 2 respectively, with a statistically significant level of agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

the LCJR-PT© is a valid and reliable instrument, demonstrating a high potential for its use in clinical education and nursing research.

Evaluating the Clinical Reasoning of Student Health Professionals in Placement and Simulation Settings: A Systematic Review

(1) Background: Clinical reasoning is essential to the effective practice of autonomous health professionals and is, therefore, an essential capability to develop as students. This review aimed to systematically identify the tools available to health professional educators to evaluate students' attainment of clinical reasoning capabilities in clinical placement and simulation settings. (2) Methods: A systemic review of seven databases was undertaken. Peer-reviewed, English-language publications reporting studies that developed or tested relevant tools were included. Searches included multiple terms related to clinical reasoning and health disciplines. Data regarding each tool's conceptual basis and evaluated constructs were systematically extracted and analysed. (3) Results: Most of the 61 included papers evaluated students in medical and nursing disciplines, and over half reported on the Script Concordance Test or Lasater Clinical Judgement Rubric. A number of conceptual frameworks were referenced, though many papers did not reference any framework. (4) Conclusions: Overall, key outcomes highlighted an emphasis on diagnostic reasoning, as opposed to management reasoning. Tools were predominantly aligned with individual health disciplines and with limited cross-referencing within the field. Future research into clinical reasoning evaluation tools should build on and refer to existing approaches and consider contributions across professional disciplinary divides.

The validity and reliability of clinical judgement and decision-making skills assessment in nursing: A systematic literature review

OBJECTIVES

To appraise the validity and reliability of approaches to assessing the clinical decision-making skills of nurses, and use findings to inform the assessment of students as they transition to newly qualified nurses.

DESIGN

The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to conduct the review.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, CINAHL and the British Nursing Index were searched from inception to November 2019.

REVIEW METHODS

Studies were grouped according to their assessment approach following a competency framework with findings presented as a narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

38 articles were included in the review which assessed clinical decision-making in a variety of settings; clinical practice, simulation, written examinations and self-assessment. Multi-level rubric and checklist approaches demonstrated good validity and reliability in practice and simulation settings, and the former was effective at differentiating between students at different stages of their training. Written, case study examinations were also effective at assessing clinical decision-making, although an optimum structure for their presentation was not possible to discern. Students tended to score themselves more highly than faculty staff when undertaking rubric-based self-assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest that the best approach to assess clinical decision-making for final year students is to use several low-stakes, snap-shot summative assessments in practice environments, which are marked using a multi-level observational rubric. To assure reliability, it is recommended that a small team of expert practice assessors undergo regular training and peer review, have protected time to complete their assessor role and are appropriately supported.

Clinical judgment performance of undergraduate Nursing students

Objective:

to evaluate the reported performance regarding clinical judgment by undergraduate Nursing students.

Method:

a cross-sectional study with the application of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric-Brazilian Version in 166 undergraduate Nursing students from a Brazilian public university. The data were analyzed descriptively and analytically (by comparing the level of clinical judgment among students from the initial, intermediate, and concluding groups). The following tests were applied: Chi-square, Fisher’s Exact and Kruskal-Wallis, and a p-value of 0.05 was adopted. The reliability of the global instrument (Cronbach’s alpha) was 0.786.

Results:

of the 166 students, 65.7% evaluated themselves as proficient in relation to the reported performance on clinical judgment. Of the rubric’s 11 dimensions (focused observation, recognizing deviations from expected patterns, information seeking, prioritizing data, making sense of data, calm and confident manner, clear communication, well-planned intervention/flexibility, being skillful, evaluation/self-analysis, and commitment to improvement), only four groups did not present significant differences among them (p<0.05): focused observation, information seeking, prioritizing data, and calm and confident manner.

Conclusion:

the performance on clinical judgment reported as proficient was pointed out by 65.7% of the students and a significant statistical difference was verified in seven dimensions, among beginners, intermediate, and concluding students, compatible with the evolution of learning.

Improving clinical judgment by simulation: a randomized trial and validation of the Lasater clinical judgment rubric in Chinese

BACKGROUND

The development and assessment of clinical judgment ability are essential in nursing education. The Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) was shown to be valid in evaluating nursing students' learning outcomes and skills in western cultures but has not been validated in mainland China. This study aimed to compare a simulation-teaching model with a traditional teaching method in enhancing the clinical judgment ability of nursing undergraduate students and to validate the Chinese version of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (C-LCJR).

METHODS

Four classes of nursing students (n = 157) at Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, China, were randomly assigned to two control and two experimental classes. The experimental classes were taught using simulation teaching with standardized patients, while the control classes were taught using traditional teaching methods. At the end of the experiment, students in both kinds of classes evaluated their clinical judgment using the C-LCJR. Teachers also rated the students but without knowing who had received the simulation teaching. Confirmatory factor analysis and a Multiple Indicators Multiple Causes (MIMIC) model with Bayesian estimation was fit to the rating data to investigate measurement properties and experimental effects.

RESULTS

Compared to the control classes, students in the experimental classes performed better in all subdomains of C-LCJR (noticing, interpreting, responding, and reflecting). The measurement properties of the C-LCJR were found to be satisfactory with high factor loadings and reliabilities and no bias from age, gender, and raters.

CONCLUSIONS

The simulation teaching model is more effective than the traditional (non-simulation-based) teaching method in improving clinical judgment of Chinese nursing students. The C-LCJR is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring clinical judgment in nursing students in China.