Validation of time to task performance assessment method in simulation: A comparative design study

Assessment of Clinical Reasoning While Attending Critical Care Postsimulation Reflective Learning Conversation: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

The critical care environment is characterized with a high level of workload, complexity, and risk of committing practice mistakes. To avoid clinical errors, health care professionals should be competent with effective clinical reasoning skills. To develop effective clinical reasoning skills, health care professionals should get the chance to practice and be exposed to different patient experiences. To minimize safety risks to patients and health care professionals, clinical reasoning with a focus on reflective learning conversation opportunities can be practiced in simulated settings.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the most valid and reliable tools to assess clinical reasoning while attending adult critical care-related simulation-based courses in which reflective learning conversations are used.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted following Joanna Briggs Institute and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews Extension for Scoping Reviews. Eight electronic databases were searched, and full-text review was completed for 26 articles.

RESULTS

The search resulted in no studies conducted to measure clinical reasoning while attending adult critical care-related, simulation-based courses in which the reflective learning conversation method was embedded.

DISCUSSION

This highlights the need to evaluate current available clinical reasoning tools or develop new tools within the context of adult critical care simulation where reflective learning forms a key part of the simulation procedures.

Clinical judgment performance of undergraduate Nursing students

Objective:

to evaluate the reported performance regarding clinical judgment by undergraduate Nursing students.

Method:

a cross-sectional study with the application of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric-Brazilian Version in 166 undergraduate Nursing students from a Brazilian public university. The data were analyzed descriptively and analytically (by comparing the level of clinical judgment among students from the initial, intermediate, and concluding groups). The following tests were applied: Chi-square, Fisher’s Exact and Kruskal-Wallis, and a p-value of 0.05 was adopted. The reliability of the global instrument (Cronbach’s alpha) was 0.786.

Results:

of the 166 students, 65.7% evaluated themselves as proficient in relation to the reported performance on clinical judgment. Of the rubric’s 11 dimensions (focused observation, recognizing deviations from expected patterns, information seeking, prioritizing data, making sense of data, calm and confident manner, clear communication, well-planned intervention/flexibility, being skillful, evaluation/self-analysis, and commitment to improvement), only four groups did not present significant differences among them (p<0.05): focused observation, information seeking, prioritizing data, and calm and confident manner.

Conclusion:

the performance on clinical judgment reported as proficient was pointed out by 65.7% of the students and a significant statistical difference was verified in seven dimensions, among beginners, intermediate, and concluding students, compatible with the evolution of learning.

Time-to-Task Validation in Sequential Simulations as a Component of Nursing Student Competency

BACKGROUND

Time goals have not been tested as a component of nursing competence.

METHODS

Using a known-groups approach, a multisite study was performed on prelicensure nursing students (novices) and experienced nurses (experts) who participated in 2 simulations of patient deterioration with time goals. Video capture was achieved with an eye tracker.

RESULTS

While all novices did not achieve the time goals in both simulations, there was a significant improvement between the 2 simulations (P = .04). Experts were more successful in achieving the time-to-task goals in both simulations (44% and 95%, respectively). Statistical significance was found between the novice and expert groups in achieving the time goal for both simulations (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

This study was able to differentiate the expert group as being more proficient in a timed assessment, although the novices showed improvement between 2 simulations. This illustrates an opportunity for skill development among novices in managing patient deterioration amenable to time as an objective assessment.

Situational Awareness in Acute Patient Deterioration: Identifying Student Time to Task

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Prelicensure nursing students lack the situational awareness to promote timely intervention with a patient in septic shock. This study evaluated a multifaceted educational project that determined the impact on nursing students' knowledge retention and time to task (TTT).

METHODS

A quasi-experimental, repeated-measures design was used to evaluate students' knowledge retention and TTT. Eighty-four prelicensure nursing students participated in groups of 4 students to participate in a high-fidelity simulation.

RESULTS

Results show knowledge retention was significant between the pretest scores and 2 repeated assessment scores. The repeated-measures analysis of variance time effect P value was .02. The overall TTT group response suggested most (64/84, 76%) students responded within 5 minutes of patient deterioration.

CONCLUSIONS

A multifaceted approach was effective to influence knowledge of septic shock over time and demonstrate students' ability to intervene with a septic shock patient in a timely manner.