Into the black-box of learning in simulation debriefing: A qualitative research study

Factors Affecting Nursing Students' Reflective Thinking During Simulation Debriefing

BACKGROUND

Although reflective thinking is regarded as an important learning aspect of debriefing, the factors that can affect reflective thinking during simulation debriefing remain unclear.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to identify factors affecting reflective thinking during simulation debriefing among nursing students.

METHODS

This study used a cross-sectional descriptive survey design with a convenience sample of 198 Korean nursing students. Participants completed a structured web-based self-administered questionnaire regarding the reflective learning continuum, psychological safety, learner communications skills, and debriefing process design. Multiple regression analyses were used to identify the factors affecting reflective thinking.

RESULTS

Significant factors were debriefing process design, learner communication skills, student-to-student interactions, and instructor-to-student interactions. Psychological safety did not affect the reflective thinking of nursing students.

CONCLUSIONS

Nurse educators should design and implement strategies to maintain effective debriefing processes, improve communication skills, and facilitate student-to-student and instructor-to-student interactions to promote reflective thinking during simulation debriefing.

[Status of the implementation of simulation-based education in Germany: A cross-sectional study]

Status of the implementation of simulation-based education in Germany: A cross-sectional study Abstract. Background: The importance of simulation-based learning in nursing education is growing. Its success depends on the qualification of facilitators and the use of standards. Up to now, there has been a lack of data on the state of implementation of simulation-based learning in nursing education in Germany. Research question: Which qualification level do simulation facilitators show in nursing education in Germany and which concepts and standards are used? Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among simulation facilitators in three different educational areas. The questionnaire included socio-demographic and professional characteristics as well as qualification measures completed, and concepts and standards applied. Data were analysed descriptively by determining arithmetic means plus standard deviation (SD) or absolute and relative frequencies. Results: A total of 156 simulation facilitators (mean age 41.5 (SD 9.8) years, 74.2% female) participated. 95.4% of participants reported being (very) highly motivated for simulation-based learning. Specific simulation pedagogy training was completed by 16.8% of participants. The application of evidence-based concepts is not occurring across the board. Conclusions: Against the background of international standards, qualification needs for simulation facilitators in Germany become apparent. Increased specific, standardized continuing education and training as well as the establishment of evidence-based concepts are important for high quality in simulation facilitation.

Facilitator competency rubric in nursing simulations: transcultural adaptation and validation of the German version

BACKGROUND

Simulations are part of nursing education. To obtain good results, simulation facilitators need to be competent in simulation pedagogy. Part of this study was the transcultural adaptation and validation of the Facilitator Competency Rubric into German (FCR_G) and the evaluation of the factors associated with higher competencies.

METHOD

A written-standardized cross-sectional survey was conducted. N = 100 facilitators (mean age: 41.0 (9.8), female: 75.3%) participated. Test-re-test, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and ANOVAs were conducted to evaluate the reliability and validity of, and the factors associated with, FCR_G. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values > .9 indicate excellent reliability.

RESULTS

The FCR_G achieved good intra-rater reliability (all ICC > .934). A moderate correlation (Spearman-rho .335, p < .001) with motivation indicates convergent validity. The CFA showed sufficient to good model fits (CFI = .983 and SRMR = .016). Basic simulation pedagogy training is associated with higher competencies (p = .036, b = 17.766).

CONCLUSION

The FCR_G is a suitable self-assessment tool for evaluating a facilitator's competence in nursing simulation.

Student-Centered Reflection During Debriefing: A Mixed-Methods Study

BACKGROUND

Guided reflection during a debriefing after the simulation is a critical component of learning and is essential for clinical judgment development. However, the literature describing student-centered reflection during debriefing is only beginning to emerge.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to explore concordance between student-centered reflection concept characteristics and describe students' experiences related to reflection during an optimal simulation debriefing.

METHODS

This was a descriptive, mixed-methods study.

RESULTS

Quantitative responses (N = 175; 67% response rate) confirmed participants' concordance with student-centered reflection concept analysis attributes, antecedents, and consequences. Analysis of open-ended questions highlighted internal and external factors influencing students' reflections. A recurring theme was the importance of faculty and peers in creating a safe, supportive environment for reflections.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings support the concordance of student-centered reflection and provide valuable insights into the internal and external factors influencing this reflection.