The use of eportfolios in pre-registration health professional clinical education: An integrative review

Bridging School and Practice? Barriers to the Integration of 'Boundary Objects' for Learning and Assessment in Clinical Nursing Education

Introduction

In clinical health professions education, portfolios, assignments and assessment standards are used to enhance learning. When these tools fulfill a bridging function between school and practice, they can be considered 'boundary objects'. In the clinical setting, these tools may be experienced as time-consuming and lacking value. This study aimed to investigate the barriers to the integration of boundary objects for learning and assessment from a Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) perspective in clinical nursing education.

Methods

Nineteen interviews and five observations were conducted with team leads, clinical educators, supervisors, students, and teachers to obtain insight into intentions and use of boundary objects for learning and assessment. Boundary objects (assessment standards, assignments, feedback/reflection/patient care/development plan templates) were collected. The data collection and thematic analysis were guided by CHAT.

Results

Barriers to the integration of boundary objects included: a) conflicting requirements in clinical competency monitoring and assessment, b) different application of analytical skills, and c) incomplete integration of boundary objects for self-regulated learning into supervision practice. These barriers were amplified by the simultaneous use of boundary objects for learning and assessment. Underlying contradictions included different objectives between school and practice, and tensions between the distribution of labor in the clinical setting and school's rules.

Discussion

School and practice have both convergent and divergent priorities around students' clinical learning. Boundary objects can promote continuity in learning and increase students' understanding of clinical practice. However, effective integration requires for flexible rules that allow for collaborative learning around patient care.

Impact of women's feedback on midwifery student learning: A thematic analysis of students' reflections

PROBLEM

Little is known about the educational impact of providing routine, online feedback from women on midwifery student learning and clinical practice.

BACKGROUND

Feedback on students' clinical performance has historically been provided by lecturers and clinical supervisors. Women's feedback is not routinely collected or evaluated for impact on student learning.

AIM

To evaluate the impact of women's feedback about continuity of care experiences with a midwifery student on learning and practice.

DESIGN

Descriptive, exploratory qualitative study.

METHODS

All second-and third-year Bachelor of Midwifery students undertaking clinical placement between February and June 2022 at one Australian university, submitted formative, guided written reflections on de-identified women's feedback they received through their ePortfolio. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

FINDINGS

Forty-four of the 69 eligible students (64%) submitted reflections on feedback received. Three themes emerged: 1) Confidence boosting, 2) Deeply integrating Midwifery Metavalues, and 3) Enhancing commitment to continuity. Three subthemes: connection, future practice and advocacy were identified. Women's feedback positively impacts student learning and places the woman in the educational feedback loop.

CONCLUSION

This study is an international first evaluating the impact of feedback from women on midwifery students' learning. Students reported greater confidence in their clinical practice, a deeper understanding of their midwifery philosophy, and an intention to advocate for, and work in, midwifery continuity models after graduation. Routine feedback about women's experiences should be embedded into midwifery education programs.