1
|
Jardou M, Brossier C, Marquet P, Picard N, Druilhe A, Lawson R. Solid organ transplantation and gut microbiota: a review of the potential immunomodulatory properties of short-chain fatty acids in graft maintenance. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2024; 14:1342354. [PMID: 38476165 PMCID: PMC10927761 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1342354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Transplantation is the treatment of choice for several end-stage organ defects: it considerably improves patient survival and quality of life. However, post-transplant recipients may experience episodes of rejection that can favor or ultimately lead to graft loss. Graft maintenance requires a complex and life-long immunosuppressive treatment. Different immunosuppressive drugs (i.e., calcineurin inhibitors, glucocorticoids, biological immunosuppressive agents, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, and antiproliferative or antimetabolic agents) are used in combination to mitigate the immune response against the allograft. Unfortunately, the use of these antirejection agents may lead to opportunistic infections, metabolic (e.g., post-transplant diabetes mellitus) or cardiovascular (e.g., arterial hypertension) disorders, cancer (e.g., non-Hodgkin lymphoma) and other adverse effects. Lately, immunosuppressive drugs have also been associated with gut microbiome alterations, known as dysbiosis, and were shown to affect gut microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) production. SCFA play a key immunomodulatory role in physiological conditions, and their impairment in transplant patients could partly counterbalance the effect of immunosuppressive drugs leading to the activation of deleterious pathways and graft rejection. In this review, we will first present an overview of the mechanisms of graft rejection that are prevented by the immunosuppressive protocol. Next, we will explain the dynamic changes of the gut microbiota during transplantation, focusing on SCFA. Finally, we will describe the known functions of SCFA in regulating immune-inflammatory reactions and discuss the impact of SCFA impairment in immunosuppressive drug treated patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Roland Lawson
- National Institute of Health and Medical Research (FRANCE) (INSERM), Univ. Limoges, Pharmacology & Transplantation, U1248, Limoges, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li M, Guo X, Cheng L, Zhang H, Zhou M, Zhang M, Yin Z, Guo T, Zhao L, Liu H, Liang X, Li R. Porcine Kidney Organoids Derived from Naïve-like Embryonic Stem Cells. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:682. [PMID: 38203853 PMCID: PMC10779635 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25010682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
The scarcity of donor kidneys greatly impacts the survival of patients with end-stage renal failure. Pigs are increasingly becoming potential organ donors but are limited by immunological rejection. Based on the human kidney organoid already established with the CHIR99021 and FGF9 induction strategy, we generated porcine kidney organoids from porcine naïve-like ESCs (nESCs). The derived porcine organoids had a tubule-like constructure and matrix components. The porcine organoids expressed renal markers including AQP1 (proximal tubule), WT1 and PODO (podocyte), and CD31 (vascular endothelial cells). These results imply that the organoids had developed the majority of the renal cell types and structures, including glomeruli and proximal tubules. The porcine organoids were also identified to have a dextran absorptive function. Importantly, porcine organoids have a certain abundance of vascular endothelial cells, which are the basis for investigating immune rejection. The derived porcine organoids might serve as materials for immunosuppressor screening for xenotransplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meishuang Li
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Xenotransplantation, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China; (M.L.); (X.G.); (L.C.); (H.Z.); (M.Z.); (M.Z.); (Z.Y.); (T.G.); (L.Z.); (H.L.)
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China
| | - Xiyun Guo
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Xenotransplantation, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China; (M.L.); (X.G.); (L.C.); (H.Z.); (M.Z.); (M.Z.); (Z.Y.); (T.G.); (L.Z.); (H.L.)
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China
| | - Linxin Cheng
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Xenotransplantation, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China; (M.L.); (X.G.); (L.C.); (H.Z.); (M.Z.); (M.Z.); (Z.Y.); (T.G.); (L.Z.); (H.L.)
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China
| | - Hong Zhang
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Xenotransplantation, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China; (M.L.); (X.G.); (L.C.); (H.Z.); (M.Z.); (M.Z.); (Z.Y.); (T.G.); (L.Z.); (H.L.)
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China
| | - Meng Zhou
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Xenotransplantation, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China; (M.L.); (X.G.); (L.C.); (H.Z.); (M.Z.); (M.Z.); (Z.Y.); (T.G.); (L.Z.); (H.L.)
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China
| | - Manling Zhang
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Xenotransplantation, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China; (M.L.); (X.G.); (L.C.); (H.Z.); (M.Z.); (M.Z.); (Z.Y.); (T.G.); (L.Z.); (H.L.)
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China
| | - Zhibao Yin
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Xenotransplantation, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China; (M.L.); (X.G.); (L.C.); (H.Z.); (M.Z.); (M.Z.); (Z.Y.); (T.G.); (L.Z.); (H.L.)
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China
| | - Tianxu Guo
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Xenotransplantation, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China; (M.L.); (X.G.); (L.C.); (H.Z.); (M.Z.); (M.Z.); (Z.Y.); (T.G.); (L.Z.); (H.L.)
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China
| | - Lihua Zhao
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Xenotransplantation, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China; (M.L.); (X.G.); (L.C.); (H.Z.); (M.Z.); (M.Z.); (Z.Y.); (T.G.); (L.Z.); (H.L.)
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China
| | - Han Liu
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Xenotransplantation, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China; (M.L.); (X.G.); (L.C.); (H.Z.); (M.Z.); (M.Z.); (Z.Y.); (T.G.); (L.Z.); (H.L.)
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China
| | - Xiubin Liang
- Department of Pathophysiology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China;
| | - Rongfeng Li
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Xenotransplantation, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China; (M.L.); (X.G.); (L.C.); (H.Z.); (M.Z.); (M.Z.); (Z.Y.); (T.G.); (L.Z.); (H.L.)
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China
- Key Laboratory of Targeted Intervention of Cardiovascular Disease, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cardiovascular Disease Translational Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tiller G, Lammerts RGM, Karijosemito JJ, Alkaff FF, Diepstra A, Pol RA, Meter-Arkema AH, Seelen MA, van den Heuvel MC, Hepkema BG, Daha MR, van den Born J, Berger SP. Weak Expression of Terminal Complement in Active Antibody-Mediated Rejection of the Kidney. Front Immunol 2022; 13:845301. [PMID: 35493506 PMCID: PMC9044906 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.845301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundThe role of the complement system in antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is insufficiently understood. We aimed to investigate the role of local and systemic complement activation in active (aABMR). We quantified complement activation markers, C3, C3d, and C5b-9 in plasma of aABMR, and acute T-cell mediated rejection (aTCMR), and non-rejection kidney transplant recipients. Intra-renal complement markers were analyzed as C4d, C3d, C5b-9, and CD59 deposition. We examined in vitro complement activation and CD59 expression on renal endothelial cells upon incubation with human leukocyte antigen antibodies.MethodsWe included 50 kidney transplant recipients, who we histopathologically classified as aABMR (n=17), aTCMR (n=18), and non-rejection patients (n=15).ResultsComplement activation in plasma did not differ across groups. C3d and C4d deposition were discriminative for aABMR diagnosis. Particularly, C3d deposition was stronger in glomerular (P<0,01), and peritubular capillaries (P<0,05) comparing aABMR to aTCMR rejection and non-rejection biopsies. In contrast to C3d, C5b-9 was only mildly expressed across all groups. For C5b-9, no significant difference between aABMR and non-rejection biopsies regarding peritubular and glomerular C5b-9 deposition was evident. We replicated these findings in vitro using renal endothelial cells and found complement pathway activation with C4d and C3d, but without terminal C5b-9 deposition. Complement regulator CD59 was variably present in biopsies and constitutively expressed on renal endothelial cells in vitro.ConclusionOur results indicate that terminal complement might only play a minor role in late aABMR, possibly indicating the need to re-evaluate the applicability of terminal complement inhibitors as treatment for aABMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gesa Tiller
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Rosa G. M. Lammerts
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Jessy J. Karijosemito
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Firas F. Alkaff
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Division of Pharmacology and Therapy, Department of Anatomy, Histology, and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
| | - Arjan Diepstra
- Division of Pathology, Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Robert A. Pol
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Anita H. Meter-Arkema
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Marc. A. Seelen
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Marius C. van den Heuvel
- Division of Pathology, Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Bouke G. Hepkema
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Mohamed R. Daha
- Department of Nephrology, University of Leiden, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Jacob van den Born
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Stefan P. Berger
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- *Correspondence: Stefan P. Berger,
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Milone G, Bellofiore C, Leotta S, Milone GA, Cupri A, Duminuco A, Garibaldi B, Palumbo G. Endothelial Dysfunction after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Review Based on Physiopathology. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11030623. [PMID: 35160072 PMCID: PMC8837122 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11030623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Endothelial dysfunction (ED) is frequently encountered in transplant medicine. ED is an argument of high complexity, and its understanding requires a wide spectrum of knowledge based on many fields of basic sciences such as molecular biology, immunology, and pathology. After hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), ED participates in the pathogenesis of various complications such as sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease (SOS/VOD), graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA), idiopathic pneumonia syndrome (IPS), capillary leak syndrome (CLS), and engraftment syndrome (ES). In the first part of the present manuscript, we briefly review some biological aspects of factors involved in ED: adhesion molecules, cytokines, Toll-like receptors, complement, angiopoietin-1, angiopoietin-2, thrombomodulin, high-mobility group B-1 protein, nitric oxide, glycocalyx, coagulation cascade. In the second part, we review the abnormalities of these factors found in the ED complications associated with HSCT. In the third part, a review of agents used in the treatment of ED after HSCT is presented.
Collapse
|
5
|
Bery AI, Hachem RR. Antibody-mediated rejection after lung transplantation. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2020; 8:411. [PMID: 32355855 PMCID: PMC7186640 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.11.86] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has been identified as a significant form of acute allograft dysfunction in lung transplantation. The development of consensus diagnostic criteria has created a uniform definition of AMR; however, significant limitations of these criteria have been identified. Treatment modalities for AMR have been adapted from other areas of medicine and data on the effectiveness of these therapies in AMR are limited. AMR is often refractory to these therapies, and graft failure and death are common. AMR is associated with increased rates of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) and poor long-term survival. In this review, we discuss the history of AMR and describe known mechanisms, application of the consensus diagnostic criteria, data for current treatment strategies, and long-term outcomes. In addition, we highlight current gaps in knowledge, ongoing research, and future directions to address these gaps. Promising diagnostic techniques are actively being investigated that may allow for early detection and treatment of AMR. We conclude that further investigation is required to identify and define chronic and subclinical AMR, and head-to-head comparisons of currently used treatment protocols are necessary to identify an optimal treatment approach. Gaps in knowledge regarding the epidemiology, mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment of AMR continue to exist and future research should focus on these aspects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit I Bery
- Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ramsey R Hachem
- Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bullous Pemphigoid: Use of C4d Immunofluorescent Staining in a Case With Repeated Negative Conventional Direct Immunofluorescence Studies. Am J Dermatopathol 2018; 39:932-934. [PMID: 28654468 DOI: 10.1097/dad.0000000000000943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) using frozen section material from a fresh/preserved perilesional biopsy is the gold standard for the immunopathologic diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid (BP). DIF in BP shows linear dermoepidermal junction (DEJ) staining for C3, with or without staining for IgG. In some situations, only a formalin-fixed lesional biopsy is obtained (with no fresh/preserved perilesional biopsy for DIF). In this setting, paraffin section C4d immunohistochemistry has proven to be diagnostically useful, demonstrating linear DEJ positivity for C4d. We present a novel use of C4d staining for the diagnosis of BP, specifically analyzing C4d perilesional frozen section DIF in a case where standard perilesional frozen section DIF for IgG/C3 was available, but was negative. An 80-year-old woman presented with a pruritic bullous lesion on her left upper extremity, clinically thought to represent BP. Lesional histologic findings were typical for BP, but perilesional frozen section DIF staining was negative for IgG and C3. A second set of biopsies processed at a different laboratory yielded the same result. A diagnosis of bullous scabies was considered. Subsequently, perilesional frozen section DIF for C4d was obtained, which showed strong linear DEJ positivity, confirming the diagnosis of BP. DIF for C4d is widely used in transplant pathology, since C4d is persistent in tissue, versus C3. Our case demonstrates that perilesional frozen section DIF staining for C4d may be positive and diagnostic in BP, even when conventional DIF staining for IgG and C3 is negative.
Collapse
|
7
|
Rodríguez Cubillo B, Pérez Flores I, Calvo N, Pascual A, Cortés J, Moreno M, Blanco J, Sánchez Fructuoso A. Antibody-Mediated Acute Vascular Rejection of Kidney Allografts: Fifteen-Year Follow-up. Transplant Proc 2016; 48:2917-2919. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2016] [Revised: 08/20/2016] [Accepted: 09/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|