Molecular mechanisms of Guadecitabine induced FGFR4 down regulation in alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas

Depletion of S-adenosylmethionine induced by arsenic exposure is involved in liver injury of rat through perturbing histone H3K36 trimethylation dependent bile acid metabolism

Long-term exposure to arsenic, a common environmental pollutant, can induce various types of liver injury, but the mechanism and treatment measures remain unclear. This study constructed a rat model of arsenic-induced liver injury, with methyl group donor S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) supplementation and Rosa roxburghii Tratt juice intervention, to explore the epigenetic mechanism and intervention method of arsenic-induced liver injury from the perspective of hepatic bile acid metabolism. The results showed that arsenic exposure induced the accumulation of total bile acids (TBA) in the liver and serum of rats, and the abnormalities in liver function and liver histopathology. Arsenic reduced histone H3K36 trimethylation (H3K36me3) in the liver via consuming methyl group donor SAM. The reduction of H3K36me3 was involved in arsenic-induced bile acid accumulation by inhibiting the transcription of negative feedback regulators Fxr and Fgfr4 for hepatic bile acid synthesis. SAM supplementation reversed arsenic-induced bile acid accumulation and liver injury by reactivating H3k36me3-dependent transcription of Fxr and Fgfr4. Moreover, this study found that Rosa roxburghii Tratt juice could rescue arsenic-induced SAM consumption, recover H3K36me3-dependent negative feedback regulation of hepatic bile acid synthesis, and alleviate arsenic-induced bile acid accumulation and liver injury. In conclusion, arsenic exposure perturbed H3K36me3-dependent hepatic bile acid metabolism via depleting SAM, thereby inducing hepatic bile acid accumulation and liver injury, which was ameliorated by the supporting effect of Rosa roxburghii Tratt juice on SAM. This study contributes to understanding the mechanism of arsenic-induced liver injury from the perspective of SAM-dependent epigenetics, providing new insight into its prevention and treatment.

Super-enhancers complexes zoom in transcription in cancer

Super-enhancers (SEs) consist of multiple typical enhancers enriched at high density with transcription factors, histone-modifying enzymes and cofactors. Oncogenic SEs promote tumorigenesis and malignancy by altering protein-coding gene expression and noncoding regulatory element function. Therefore, they play central roles in the treatment of cancer. Here, we review the structural characteristics, organization, identification, and functions of SEs and the underlying molecular mechanism by which SEs drive oncogenic transcription in tumor cells. We then summarize abnormal SE complexes, SE-driven coding genes, and noncoding RNAs involved in tumor development. In summary, we believe that SEs show great potential as biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

Histone Methylases and Demethylases Regulating Antagonistic Methyl Marks: Changes Occurring in Cancer

Epigenetic regulation of gene expression is crucial to the determination of cell fate in development and differentiation, and the Polycomb (PcG) and Trithorax (TrxG) groups of proteins, acting antagonistically as complexes, play a major role in this regulation. Although originally identified in Drosophila, these complexes are conserved in evolution and the components are well defined in mammals. Each complex contains a protein with methylase activity (KMT), which can add methyl groups to a specific lysine in histone tails, histone 3 lysine 27 (H3K27), by PcG complexes, and H3K4 and H3K36 by TrxG complexes, creating transcriptionally repressive or active marks, respectively. Histone demethylases (KDMs), identified later, added a new dimension to histone methylation, and mutations or changes in levels of expression are seen in both methylases and demethylases and in components of the PcG and TrX complexes across a range of cancers. In this review, we focus on both methylases and demethylases governing the methylation state of the suppressive and active marks and consider their action and interaction in normal tissues and in cancer. A picture is emerging which indicates that the changes which occur in cancer during methylation of histone lysines can lead to repression of genes, including tumour suppressor genes, or to the activation of oncogenes. Methylases or demethylases, which are themselves tumour suppressors, are highly mutated. Novel targets for cancer therapy have been identified and a methylase (KMT6A/EZH2), which produces the repressive H3K27me3 mark, and a demethylase (KDM1A/LSD1), which demethylates the active H3K4me2 mark, are now under clinical evaluation.

Prospects for Epigenetic Targeted Therapies of Bone and Soft-Tissue Sarcomas

Targeted therapies have revolutionized cancer treatment. It is well established that alterations of chromatin configuration and modifications affect tumorigenesis of some, possibly most, bone and soft-tissue sarcomas. As epigenetic regulators play a major role in the development of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas, epigenetic drugs provide a novel potential avenue for rational targeted therapies for these aggressive cancers. The present review summarizes the application of epigenetic drugs for clinical utilization in bone and soft-tissue sarcomas and provides an overview of clinical trials currently evaluating epigenetic therapies in this space.

Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor (FGFR) Signaling in GIST and Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of rare malignancies originating from mesenchymal tissues with limited therapeutic options. Recently, alterations in components of the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) signaling pathway have been identified in a range of different sarcoma subtypes, most notably gastrointestinal stromal tumors, rhabdomyosarcomas, and liposarcomas. These alterations include genetic events such as translocations, mutations, and amplifications as well as transcriptional overexpression. Targeting FGFR has therefore been proposed as a novel potential therapeutic approach, also in light of the clinical activity shown by multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitors in specific subtypes of sarcomas. Despite promising preclinical evidence, thus far, clinical trials have enrolled very few sarcoma patients and the efficacy of selective FGFR inhibitors appears relatively low. Here, we review the known alterations of the FGFR pathway in sarcoma patients as well as the preclinical and clinical evidence for the use of FGFR inhibitors in these diseases. Finally, we discuss the possible reasons behind the current clinical data and highlight the need for biomarker stratification to select patients more likely to benefit from FGFR targeted therapies.