Faisabilité de la stratégie d’administration de la darbepoetin alfa tous les 15 jours : expérience 2005–2007 d’un centre de dialyse

[Use of intravenous iron supplementation in chronic kidney disease: Interests, limits, and recommendations for a better practice]

Iron deficiency is an important clinical concern in chronic kidney disease (CKD), giving rise to iron-deficiency anaemia, and various impaired cellular functions. Oral supplementation, in particular with ferrous salts, is associated with a high rate of gastro-intestinal side effects and is poorly absorbed, a problem that is avoided with intravenous (IV) irons. Recently, with the approval of the European Medicines Agency's Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, the French Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé (ANSM) took adequate measures to minimize the risk of allergic reactions, by correction on the summary of intravenous iron products characteristics. All IV iron products should be prescribed, administered and injected, inside public or private hospitals exclusively, and a clinical follow-up after the infusion for at least 30 minutes is mandatory. The most stable intravenous iron complexes (low molecular weight iron dextran, ferric carboxymaltose, and iron isomaltoside 1000 [under agreement]) can be given in higher single doses and more rapidly than less recent preparations such as iron sucrose (originator or similars). Test doses are advisable for conventional low molecular weight iron dextrans, but are no more mandatory. Iron supplementation is recommended for all CKD patients with iron-deficiency anaemia and those who receive erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, whether or not they require dialysis. Intravenous iron is the preferred route of administration in haemodialysis patients, with randomized trials showing a significantly greater increase in haemoglobin levels for intravenous versus oral iron and a low rate of treatment-related adverse events during these trials. According ANSM, physicians should apply the product's label recommendations especially the posology. In the non-dialysis CKD population, the erythropoietic response is also significantly higher using intravenous versus oral iron, and tolerability is at least as good. Moreover in some non-dialysis patients, intravenous iron supplementation might avoid or at least delay the need for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Following the new ANSM's recommendations, we now have the ability to achieve iron stores replenishment correctly and conveniently in dialysis dependent and non-dialysis dependent CKD patients without compromising safety using the various pharmaceutical forms of iron products especially intravenous compounds.

Stable hemoglobin in hemodialysis patients: forest for the trees--a 12-week pilot observational study

Background

Hemoglobin (Hb) variability is a common occurrence in hemodialysis patients treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. High amplitude fluctuations have been associated with greater risk of morbidity and mortality.

Methods

This prospective, single centre pilot observational study was conducted over a 3-month period in daily practice patterns, to assess per-dialysis events and inter-dialysis complications that could interfere with erythropoiesis in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Results

Mean Hb levels remained stable in the 78 evaluable patients, as did darbepoetin alfa (DA) doses, including in patients suffering from diabetes or cardiac affections. In total, an average of 7.7 events / patient / month occurred, but no significant relationship with Hb excursions was shown.

Conclusion

The observation of 7.7 events per patient per month suggests a careful monitoring of Hb and DA dosing every other week, in order to maintain Hb level within the target.

[Intravenous iron during predialysis period improves anemia management and cardiovascular parameters in incident hemodialysis patients]

Individualized use of iron therapy (IT) and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) may effectively correct anemia and its symptoms in CKD patients (Pts). The aim of this retrospective study was to precise the anemia management (AM) in incident HD Pts, and to compare Pts treated by intravenous (i.v.) IT and ESA during predialysis to those treated by oral IT and ESA on AM and cardiovascular parameters during the first year of HD. One hundred and two Pts performed their first dialysis in the unit, mean age 58.5 (15.9) years, 70% males, 27% diabetes. Ninety Pts started with a native arteriovenous fistula. Charlson comorbidity index was 7.3 (3.5). Mortality rate was 3% at one year. Hb level was at start 10.6 (1.7) and at one year 11.7 (1.1) g/dL (P<0.0001). DA injected every 2weeks was at the beginning at 107 (56) μg and then at 61 (46) (P<0.0001). i.v. IT injected every week was at the dosage of 87 (23) mg and then at 57 (40mg) per injection (P<0.001). Out of 102 Pts, 33 received i.v. IT during predialysis. These Pts started dialysis with a better Hb level: 11.1 (1.3) versus 10.4 (1.55) g/dL (P<0.01), had a TSAT at 50.0 (19.2) versus 30.1 (15.2) % (P<0.001), received less ESA 0.58 (0.28) versus 0.82 (0.37) μg/kg per week (P<0.01). More important were the changes on the cardiovascular functions: left ventricular mass at 116 (34) versus 134 (39) g/m(2) (P<0.02), left ventricular ejection fraction at 64.7 (4.4) versus 61.4 (8.7) % (P<0.02) and mean arterial pressure at 104.7 (80) versus 109 (13.2) mmHg (P<0.02). These Pts were also less hospitalized. This study revealed the importance of i.v. IT during predialysis care not only on AM but also on cardiovascular status in HD Pts starting dialysis.