Serum and urinary biomarkers in acute kidney transplant rejection

Imaging and monitoring of granzyme B in the immune response

Significant progress has been made in tumor immunotherapy that uses the human immune response to kill and remove tumor cells. However, overreactive immune response could lead to various autoimmune diseases and acute rejection. Accurate and specific monitoring of immune responses in these processes could help select appropriate therapies and regimens for the patient and could reduce the risk of side effects. Granzyme B (GzmB) is an ideal biomarker for immune response, and its peptide substrate could be coupled with fluorescent dyes or contrast agents for the synthesis of imaging probes activated by GzmB. These small molecules and nanoprobes based on PET, bioluminescence imaging, or fluorescence imaging have proved to be highly GzmB specific and accuracy. This review summarizes the design of different GzmB-responsive imaging probes and their applications in monitoring of tumor immunotherapy and overreactive immune response. This article is categorized under: Diagnostic Tools > In Vivo Nanodiagnostics and Imaging.

The Most Promising Biomarkers of Allogeneic Kidney Transplant Rejection

Clinical transplantology is a constantly evolving field of medicine. Kidney transplantation has become standard clinical practice, and it has a significant impact on reducing mortality and improving the quality of life of patients. Allogenic transplantation induces an immune response, which may lead to the rejection of the transplanted organ. The gold standard for evaluating rejection of the transplanted kidney by the recipient's organism is a biopsy of this organ. However, due to the high invasiveness of this procedure, alternative diagnostic methods are being sought. Therefore, the biomarkers may play an essential predictive role in transplant rejection. A review of the most promising biomarkers for early diagnosis and prognosis prediction of allogenic kidney transplant rejection summarizes novel data on neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), C-X-C motif chemokine 10 (CXCL-10), cystatin C (CysC), osteopontin (OPN), and clusterin (CLU) and analyses the dynamics of changes of the biomarkers mentioned above in kidney diseases and the mechanism of rejection of the transplanted kidney.

Kidney transplant monitoring by urinary flow cytometry: Biomarker combination of T cells, renal tubular epithelial cells, and podocalyxin-positive cells detects rejection

Creatinine and proteinuria are used to monitor kidney transplant patients. However, renal biopsies are needed to diagnose renal graft rejection. Here, we assessed whether the quantification of different urinary cells would allow non-invasive detection of rejection. Urinary cell numbers of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells, monocytes/macrophages, tubular epithelial cells (TEC), and podocalyxin(PDX)-positive cells were determined using flow cytometry and were compared to biopsy results. Urine samples of 63 renal transplant patients were analyzed. Patients with transplant rejection had higher amounts of urinary T cells than controls; however, patients who showed worsening graft function without rejection had similar numbers of T cells. T cells correlated with histological findings (interstitial inflammation p = 0.0005, r = 0.70; tubulitis p = 0.006, r = 0.58). Combining the amount of urinary T cells and TEC, or T cells and PDX⁺ cells, yielded a significant segregation of patients with rejection from patients without rejection (all p < 0.01, area under the curve 0.89–0.91). Urinary cell populations analyzed by flow cytometry have the potential to introduce new monitoring methods for kidney transplant patients. The combination of urinary T cells, TEC, and PDX-positive cells may allow non-invasive detection of transplant rejection.

Novel urinary exosomal biomarkers of acute T cell-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Acute rejection is hazardous to graft survival in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). We aimed to identify novel biomarkers for early diagnosis of acute T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) in urinary exosomes of KTRs.

METHODS

Among 458 graft biopsies enrolled in a cross-sectional multicenter study, 22 patients with stable graft function (STA) who had not shown pathologic abnormality and 25 patients who diagnosed biopsy-proven TCMR were analyzed. We performed proteomic analysis using nano-ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (nano-UPLC-MS/MS) to identify candidate biomarkers for early TCMR diagnosis on urinary exosomes. We confirmed the protein levels of each candidate biomarker by western blot analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 169 urinary exosome proteins were identified by nano-UPLC-MS/MS. Forty-six proteins showed increased expression in STA patients, while 17 proteins were increased in TCMR patients. Among them, we selected five proteins as candidate biomarkers for early diagnosis of TCMR according to significance, degree of quantity variance, and information from the ExoCarta database. We confirmed the proteomic expression levels of five candidate biomarkers by western blot analysis in each patient. Of all candidate biomarkers, tetraspanin-1 and hemopexin were significantly higher in TCMR patients (STA:TCMR ratio = 1:1.8, P = 0.009, and 1:3.5, P = 0.046, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Tetraspanin-1 and hemopexin were detected in KTR urine and could act as potential diagnostic proteins for TCMR.

Blood biomarkers of kidney transplant rejection, an endless search?

INTRODUCTION

The tailoring of immunosuppressive treatment is recognized as a promising strategy to improve long-term kidney graft outcome. To guide the standard care of transplant recipients, physicians need objective biomarkers that can identify an ongoing pathology with the graft or low intensity signals that will be later evolved to accelerated transplant rejection. The early identification of 'high-risk /low-risk' patients enables the adjustment of standard of caring, including managing the frequency of clinical visits and the immunosuppression dosing. Given their ease of availability and the compatibility with a large technical array, blood-based biomarkers have been widely scrutinized for use as potential predictive and diagnostic biomarkers. Areas covered: Here, the authors report on non-invasive biomarkers, such as modification of immune cell subsets and mRNA and miRNA profiles, identified in the blood of kidney transplant recipients collected before or after transplantation. Expert commentary: Combined with functional tests, the identification of biomarkers will improve our understanding of pathological processes and will contribute to a global improvement in clinical management.

Diagnostic Performance of Fas Ligand mRNA Expression for Acute Rejection after Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

The value of Fas ligand (FASL) as a diagnostic immune marker for acute renal rejection is controversial; this meta-analysis aimed to clarify the role of FASL in acute renal rejection.

Methods

The relevant literature was included by systematic searching the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. Accuracy data for acute rejection (AR) and potential confounding variables (the year of publication, area, sample source, quantitative techniques, housekeeping genes, fluorescence staining, sample collection time post-renal transplantation, and clinical classification of AR) were extracted after carefully reviewing the studies. Data were analyzed by Meta-DiSc 1.4, RevMan 5.0, and the Midas module in Stata 11.0 software.

Results

Twelve relevant studies involving 496 subjects were included. The overall pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR), negative LR, and diagnostic odds ratio, together with the 95% CI were 0.64 (0.57–0.70), 0.90 (0.85–0.93), 5.66 (3.51–9.11), 0.30 (0.16–0.54), and 30.63 (14.67–63.92), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.9389. Fagan’s nomogram showed that the probability of AR episodes in the kidney transplant recipient increased from 15% to 69% when FASL was positive, and was reduced to 4% when FASL was negative. No threshold effect, sensitivity analyses, meta-regression, and subgroup analyses based on the potential variables had a significant statistical change for heterogeneity.

Conclusions

Current evidence suggests the diagnostic potential for FASL mRNA detection as a reliable immune marker for AR in renal allograft recipients. Further large, multicenter, prospective studies are needed to validate the power of this test marker in the non-invasive diagnosis of AR after renal transplantation.

Non-invasive approaches in the diagnosis of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients, part II: omics analyses of urine and blood samples

Kidney transplantation (KTx) represents the best available treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. Still, the full benefits of KTx are undermined by acute rejection (AR). The diagnosis of AR ultimately relies on transplant needle biopsy. However, such an invasive procedure is associated with a significant risk of complications and is limited by sampling error and interobserver variability. In the present review, we summarize the current literature about non-invasive approaches for the diagnosis of AR in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), including in vivo imaging, gene-expression profiling and omics analyses of blood and urine samples. Most imaging techniques, such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound and magnetic resonance, exploit the fact that blood flow is significantly lowered in case of AR-induced inflammation. In addition, AR-associated recruitment of activated leucocytes may be detectable by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. In parallel, urine biomarkers, including CXCL9/CXCL10 or a three-gene signature of CD3ε, CXCL10 and 18S RNA levels, have been identified. None of these approaches has yet been adopted in the clinical follow-up of KTRs, but standardization of analysis procedures may help assess reproducibility and comparative diagnostic yield in large, prospective, multicentre trials.

A Meta-analysis of the Significance of Granzyme B and Perforin in Noninvasive Diagnosis of Acute Rejection After Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have reported that granzyme B (GZMB) and perforin (PRF) could serve as noninvasive biomarkers in the diagnosis of acute rejection (AR) after kidney transplant. Yet, their noninvasive diagnostic value in clinical practice is still unknown.

METHODS

To assess the noninvasive diagnostic performance of GZMB and PRF for AR, we performed a systematic search. After reviewing published studies in which both GZMB and PRF were detected, data on the diagnostic accuracy of separate and combined evaluation of GZMB and PRF were pooled.

RESULTS

Across 16 studies (680 subjects), summary sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratios, and negative likelihood ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. For overall GZMB analysis, the indices were 0.76 (0.71-0.81), 0.86 (0.82-0.89), 4.58 (3.36-6.25), and 0.32 (0.22-0.47), respectively. For overall PRF analysis, the indices were 0.83 (0.78-0.88), 0.86 (0.82-0.89), 4.82 (3.66-6.35), and 0.26 (0.18-0.37), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed similar results compared to overall study analyses. In analyses of combined evaluation of GZMB and PRF, the above indices were 0.65 (0.53-0.76), 0.96 (0.91-0.98), 12.66 (5.83-27.50), and 0.40 (0.23-0.69), respectively, when both markers were positive. The probability of developing AR in kidney transplant recipients increased from 15% to 73% when both GZMB and PRF tests were positive and was reduced to 2% if that were negative.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, neither GZMB nor PRF, if evaluated alone, could be a convincing noninvasive diagnostic marker for AR in clinical practice. Combined use of PRF and GZMB post-kidney transplant may be a better choice in AR evaluation to direct allograft biopsy execution and earlier therapeutic intervention.

Expression of receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand in leukocytes during acute kidney rejection after transplantation in rats

BACKGROUND

Acute cellular rejection of the transplanted kidney is an important cause of impaired graft function. One of the basic characteristics of acute cellular rejection according to the latest Banff classification of renal allograft pathology is the presence of a large number of T lymphocytes in the allografted tissue. Osteoprotegerin, receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B (RANK) and RANK ligand (RANKL), three relatively novel members of the tumor necrosis factor superfamily, have crucial roles not only in physiologic and pathologic bone metabolism but also in immunologic processes. The aim of our study was to determine the expression of RANKL and RANK by T lymphocytes and macrophages in acute cellular kidney allograft rejection in rats.

METHODS

The study included 15 male Wistar rats of 3 months old and 250-300 g as recipients and 15 male DA rats donors of 3 months old; and weight 250-300 g. When animals were sacrificed at 3 weeks to extract the transplanted kidney for pathohistologic analysis and immunoflorescence. all samples showed acute cellular rejection. Kidney sections were examined by dual-labeled immunofluorescence to detect CD4, CD8, or CD68 (red) and RANK or RANKL (green) with coexpressing cells as orange.

RESULTS

RANKL-positive expression colocalized with CD4(+) and CD8(+) T lymphocytes in acutely rejected kidney tissue. There was no association between CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells with RANK expression, which was evident by infiltrating CD68-positive macrophages in the kidney tissue interstitium.

CONCLUSION

RANK and RANKL were expressed by T lymphocytes and macrophages in acute cellular kidney rejection after transplantation in rats.

Biologics in organ transplantation

The last two decades have witnessed a pandemic in antibody development, with over 600 entering clinical studies and a total of 28 approved by the FDA and European Union. The incorporation of biologics in transplantation has made a significant impact on allograft survival. Herein, we review the armamentarium of clinical and preclinical biologics used for organ transplantation--with the exception of belatacept--from depleting and IL-2R targeting induction agents to costimulation blockade, B-cell therapeutics, BAFF and complement inhibition, anti-adhesion, and anti-cytokine approaches. While individual agents may be insufficient for tolerance induction, they provide possibilities for reduction of steroid or calcineurin inhibitor use, alternatives to rejection episodes refractory to conventional therapies, and specialized immunosuppression for highly sensitized patients.