[Renal toxicity of anti-VEGF (corrected) targeted therapies]

[Angiogenesis inhibitors: mechanism of action and nephrotoxicity]

Tumoral angiogenesis is a key mechanism involved in the growth and spread of cancer cells. The development of angiogenesis inhibitors, particularly those targeting the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) pathway, has improved the prognosis and survival of many cancer patients since they were approved in 2005 in France. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor inhibitors have different mechanisms of action, targeting either the ligand (e.g. bevacizumab, anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor monoclonal antibody; aflibercept, recombinant anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor fusion protein), or its receptors such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (e.g. sunitinib or sorafenib). These treatments can be combined with conventional chemotherapy, or other anti-cancer therapies, and are associated with variable tolerance depending on the patient's clinical condition and comorbidities. Additionally, angiogenesis inhibition may be associated with cardiovascular and/or kidney toxicity and therefore special monitoring is needed during the treatment duration. Development of hypertension and proteinuria are the commonest renal side effects; these are generally manageable and reversible when treatment is stopped. However, more severe toxicities have been reported such as acute kidney injury, glomerular and/or vascular insults such as thrombotic microangiopathy, and more rarely tubulointerstitial damage. The prescribing physician should be aware of these potentially serious. This article describes the mechanisms of action of antiangiogenic agents and their potential toxicities, with particular respect to the kidneys.

Effects of sunitinib on endothelial dysfunction, metabolic changes, and cardiovascular risk indices in renal cell carcinoma

Background

Sunitinib is a standard treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Currently, the data available on the effects of sunitinib on endothelial dysfunction, metabolic changes, and cardiovascular (CV) risk factors are limited, and we aimed to evaluate these aspects in patients with RCC after a short period of treatment.

Methods

Patients affected by metastatic RCC were enrolled and evaluated before starting sunitinib (T0) and after 40 days of treatment (T1) by the flow‐mediated dilation (FMD), carotid intima media thickness (IMT), ankle‐brachial pressure index (ABI), and 24‐hour proteinuria. We also assessed serum metabolic and nutritional parameters at T0 and T1.

Results

Twenty patients (7 female), with a mean age of 61.4 ± 12.0 years, were studied. Overtime, we observed a reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (P = .002), FMD (P = .001) and in fasting plasma glucose levels (P = .04), as well as an increase in plasma insulin (P < .001), HOMA‐IR (P < .01), and serum total cholesterol levels (P = .01). Moreover at T1 we found a significant increase in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (P ≤ .001) and 24‐hour proteinuria (P < .001) compared to baseline, whereas no changes in IMT and ABI were detected.

Conclusion

The changes observed overtime after sunitinib treatment in terms of markers of early endothelial dysfunction, blood pressure, as well as in glucose/insulin metabolism and proteinuria may contribute to increase CV risk in RCC patients and suggest a strict follow‐up in this setting. Larger evidences are mandatory to confirm our observations.