[Sucroferric oxyhydroxide, a novel iron-based phosphate binder. Which current use in dialysis patients?]

Efficacy and safety of sucroferric oxyhydroxide versus sevelamer carbonate: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Phosphate binders are commonly used in patients receiving kidney replacement therapy (KRT), aiming to reduce and maintain serum phosphorus. Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder has been linked to reduced lifespan and worsened quality of life. This study aims to examine the efficacy and safety of sucroferric oxyhydroxide versus sevelamer carbonate in patients receiving KRT.

METHODS

The data sources examined were MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials with a search deadline of October 2023. We examined randomized controlled trials that compared sucroferric oxyhydroxide versus sevelamer carbonate in the adult population receiving KRT. We performed a meta-analysis combining the data from trials, using R-studio.

FINDINGS

Inclusion criteria were met by five randomized trials. There was no statistically significant difference in the reduction of serum phosphorus between the two groups (MD: -0.07 mmol/L, 95% CI-random effects: -0.15 to 0.02). In the same line, a non-statistically significant difference was observed in serum i-PTH reduction between the two drugs (MD = -1.53 mg/dL, 95% CI = (-4.45, 1.4), p = 0.26, random effects model). No statistically significant difference was observed in all adverse events between the two groups (odds ratio: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.65-1.88, random effects model). Further analysis of gastrointestinal adverse events revealed that sevelamer carbonate increases gastrointestinal adverse events by up to 60% (odds ratio: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.31-1.97, common (fixed) effect model).

DISCUSSION

This meta-analysis of randomized trials showed that both drugs, sucroferric oxyhydroxide and sevelamer equally and effectively controlled serum phosphorus levels, whereas sucroferric oxyhydroxide revealed a better profile in terms of gastrointestinal adverse events. Sucroferric oxyhydroxide is a valuable option for patients receiving KRT when sevelamer carbonate is more difficult to tolerate.

[Short-term effects with sucroferric oxyhydroxide in hemodialysis patients: Experience in NephroCare France]

INTRODUCTION

Despite a better management of hyperphosphatemia in haemodialysis patients observed during the past years, most of them remain insufficiently treated and exposed to bone and cardiovascular complications that are associated with this biological abnormality. The availability of calcium-free phosphate binders among therapeutical options is confirmed to significantly reduce serum phosphate levels without the risk of excess exposure to calcium. Currently sucroferric oxyhydroxyde (SO) is the only iron-based phosphate binder available in France.

METHODS

A cohort of patients prescribed OHS has been extracted from the EUCLID 5 database between June 2016 and December 2017. The effects on bone mineral metabolism and ferritin have been retrospectively studied.

RESULTS

Two hundred and sixty-two patients with OHS prescription have been identified. The OHS treatment duration median was 4.3 months (1.84-10.99). The average midweek phosphatemia decreased significantly after OHS prescription (from 1.99 to 1.83 mmol/L ; P<0.0001) with a significant increase of the proportion of patients (12.1 to 25.7% ; P<0.0001) reaching the phosphate target of 1.5 mmol/L, without significant change in calcemia and PTH. Ferritinemia significantly increased from 362 to 427 μg/L in 3 months (P=0.0049). OHS therapy has been stopped and replaced in 18% of the cases.

DISCUSSION

Among the NephroCare cohort, OHS therapy was efficient to decrease phosphatemia and to increase significantly the proportion of patients in target. There were no short term changes in calcemia and PTH. The slight increase in ferritin confirms the findings of the phase III study and its extension. The effects on the pills count and the OHS side-effects are analyzed from literature. The risk of iron overload and the impact on the anemia management including EPO sparing are currently under study.

CONCLUSION

OHS therapy appears to be a new efficient alternative to non-calcium phosphate binders. A better knowledge of its side effects will help the patients and the physician to optimize the phosphate balance management. The slight increase in ferritin can be considered as an epiphenomenon because of the important iron needs and frequent check of this parameter in the anemia management.

Pharmacotherapy in chronic kidney disease hyperphosphatemia – effects on vascular calcification and bone health

Hyperphosphatemia (HP) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) leads to complications such as renal osteodistrophy, cardiovascular calcification and hemodynamic abnormalities, all of them having a serious impact on the survival rate and quality of life. Also, HP is a key pathogenic factor in the development of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in CKD. Having in regard the significance of controlling serum phosphorus levels (Pi), in this paper, the needs and obstacles to successful pharmacological management of HP in CKD are presented, with an overview of major classes of phosphate binders (PBs) and other drugs affecting Pi level, such as active vitamin D sterols and calcimimetics (CMs). In addition, their effects on progression of cardiovascular calcification and bone health are elaborated. In this regard, a PubMed search was carried out to capture all abstracts and articles relevant to the topic of CKD, HP and mineral metabolism, bone disorders and vascular/valvular calcification (VC), published from January 2007 to August 2017. The search was limited to English language, with the search terms including drug name AND hyperphosphatemia or cardiovascular calcification or bone disorder. Comparative studies, clinical studies/trials and meta-analyses related to different classes/representatives of PBs, vitamin D analogues and CMs were reviewed and research data related to their efficacy and safety compared. Keywords: chronic kidney disease, hyperphosphatemia, phosphate binders, active vitamin D sterols, calcimimetics, bone disorders, cardiovascular calcification