[Hypercalcemia and inactive mutation of CYP24A1. Case-study and literature review]

Clinical heterogeneity and therapeutic options for idiopathic infantile hypercalcemia caused by CYP24A1 pathogenic variant

OBJECTIVES

Infantile hypercalcemia-1 (HCINF1) is a rare disease caused by pathogenic variants in the CYP24A1 gene, resulting in the inability to metabolize active vitamin D. This leads to hypercalcemia and severe complications.

CONTENT

On December 8th, 2022, a systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Wanfang, and CNKI using the keywords "hypercalcemia" and "CYP24A1". Data extraction included patient demographics, clinical presentation, treatment medications, and outcomes. The findings were synthesized to identify common patterns and variations among cases and to assess the efficacy of different therapies in reducing serum calcium. Our findings revealed two distinct peaks in the incidence of HCINF1 caused by CYP24A1 pathogenic variant. Kidney stones or renal calcifications were the most common clinical manifestations of the disease, followed by polyuria and developmental delay. Laboratory investigations showed hypercalcemia, elevated vitamin D levels, hypercalciuria, and low parathyroid hormone. Genetic analysis remains the only reliable diagnostic tool. Although there is no definitive cure for HCINF1, multiple drugs, including bisphosphonates, calcitonin, and rifampicin, have been used to control its symptoms. Blocking the production and intake of vitamin D is the preferred treatment option.

SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK

Our review highlights the basic clinical and biochemical features of HCINF1 and suggests that targeted diagnostic and therapeutic strategies are needed to address the clinical heterogeneity of the disease. The insights gained from this study may facilitate the development of innovative treatments for HCINF1.

Simultaneous measurement of 25(OH)-vitamin D and 24,25(OH)2-vitamin D to define cut-offs for CYP24A1 mutation and vitamin D deficiency in a population of 1200 young subjects

Background

Simultaneous measurement of 25(OH)D and 24,25(OH)2D is a new tool for predicting vitamin D deficiency and allows evaluating CYP24A1 lack of function. Interpretation of 24,25(OH)2D should be performed according to 25(OH)D levels and a ratio, called the vitamin D metabolite ratio (VMR) has been proposed for such a purpose. Unfortunately, the VMR can be expressed in different ways and cannot be used if 24,25(OH)2D concentrations are undetectable. Here, we propose evaluating the enzyme activity taking into consideration the probability that a normal population presents undetectable 24,25(OH)2D concentrations according to 25(OH)D levels. We thus retrospectively measured 25(OH)D and 24,25(OH)2D in a population of 1200 young subjects to evaluate the 25(OH)D threshold above which the enzyme was induced.

Methods

Serum samples from 1200 infants, children, adolescent and young adults were used to simultaneously quantify 25(OH)D and 24,25(OH)2D by LCMS/MS.

Results

Median (interquartile range [IQR]) levels were 20.6 (14.4–27.2) ng/mL for 25(OH)D. 172 subjects (14.3%) presented 24,25(OH)2D values below the LOQ. When 25(OH)D values were <11 ng/mL, 63.1% of subjects presented undetectable 24,25(OH)2D concentrations. Percentage decreased with increasing 25(OH)D values to become 19.7% for 25(OH)D comprised between 12 and 15 ng/mL, 5.1% for 25(OH)D between 16 and 20 and 0.7% for 25(OH)D >21 ng/mL.

Conclusions

We suggest using a statistical approach to evaluate CYP24A1 function according to 25(OH)D concentrations. Our results also show that vitamin D deficiency, as defined biochemically, could be around 20 ng/mL in infants, children, adolescent and young adults and that vitamin D deficiency could be evaluated on a more individual basis.

Drug-Induced Kidney Stones and Crystalline Nephropathy: Pathophysiology, Prevention and Treatment

Drug-induced calculi represent 1-2% of all renal calculi. The drugs reported to produce calculi may be divided into two groups. The first one includes poorly soluble drugs with high urine excretion that favour crystallisation in the urine. Among them, drugs used for the treatment of patients with human immunodeficiency, namely atazanavir and other protease inhibitors, and sulphadiazine used for the treatment of cerebral toxoplasmosis, are the most frequent causes. Besides these drugs, about 20 other molecules may induce nephrolithiasis, such as ceftriaxone or ephedrine-containing preparations in subjects receiving high doses or long-term treatment. Calculi analysis by physical methods including infrared spectroscopy or X-ray diffraction is needed to demonstrate the presence of the drug or its metabolites within the calculi. Some drugs may also provoke heavy intra-tubular crystal precipitation causing acute renal failure. Here, the identification of crystalluria or crystals within the kidney tissue in the case of renal biopsy is of major diagnostic value. The second group includes drugs that provoke the formation of urinary calculi as a consequence of their metabolic effects on urinary pH and/or the excretion of calcium, phosphate, oxalate, citrate, uric acid or other purines. Among such metabolically induced calculi are those formed in patients taking uncontrolled calcium/vitamin D supplements, or being treated with carbonic anhydrase inhibitors such as acetazolamide or topiramate. Here, diagnosis relies on a careful clinical inquiry to differentiate between common calculi and metabolically induced calculi, of which the incidence is probably underestimated. Specific patient-dependent risk factors also exist in relation to urine pH, volume of diuresis and other factors, thus providing a basis for preventive or curative measures against stone formation.