Long-term outcomes of peritoneal dialysis started in infants below 6 months of age: An experience from two tertiary centres

Risk factors for early dialysate leakage around the exit site after catheter placement in pediatric peritoneal dialysis: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Dialysate leakage, a major complication in peritoneal dialysis (PD), causes difficulty in continuing PD. However, literature evaluating risk factors for leakage in detail and the appropriate break-in period to avoid leakage in pediatric patients is scarce.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on children aged < 20 years who underwent Tenckhoff catheter placement between April 1, 2002, and December 31, 2021, at our institution. We compared clinical factors between patients with and without leakage within 30 days of catheter insertion.

RESULTS

Dialysate leakage occurred in 8 of 102 (7.8%) PD catheters placed in 78 patients. All leaks occurred in children with a break-in period of < 14 days. Leaks were significantly more frequent in patients with low body weight at the catheter insertion, single-cuffed catheter insertion, a break-in period ≤ 7 days, and a long PD treatment time per day. Only one patient who had leakage with a break-in period > 7 days was neonate. PD was suspended in four of the eight patients with leakage and continued in the others. Two of the latter had secondary peritonitis, one of whom required catheter removal, and leakage improved in the remaining patients. Three infants had serious complications from bridge hemodialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

A break-in period of > 7 days and if possible 14 days is recommended to avoid leakage in pediatric patients. Whereas infants with low body weight are at high risk of leakage, their difficulty in inserting double-cuffed catheter, hemodialysis complications, and possible leakage even under long break-in period make prevention of leakage challenging.

Diagnosis and management of mineral and bone disorders in infants with CKD: clinical practice points from the ESPN CKD-MBD and Dialysis working groups and the Pediatric Renal Nutrition Taskforce

BACKGROUND

Infants with chronic kidney disease (CKD) form a vulnerable population who are highly prone to mineral and bone disorders (MBD) including biochemical abnormalities, growth retardation, bone deformities, and fractures. We present a position paper on the diagnosis and management of CKD-MBD in infants based on available evidence and the opinion of experts from the European Society for Paediatric Nephrology (ESPN) CKD-MBD and Dialysis working groups and the Pediatric Renal Nutrition Taskforce.

METHODS

PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes) questions were generated, and relevant literature searches performed covering a population of infants below 2 years of age with CKD stages 2-5 or on dialysis. Clinical practice points (CPPs) were developed and leveled using the American Academy of Pediatrics grading matrix. A Delphi consensus approach was followed.

RESULTS

We present 34 CPPs for diagnosis and management of CKD-MBD in infants, including dietary control of calcium and phosphate, and medications to prevent and treat CKD-MBD (native and active vitamin D, calcium supplementation, phosphate binders).

CONCLUSION

As there are few high-quality studies in this field, the strength of most statements is weak to moderate, and may need to be adapted to individual patient needs by the treating physician. Research recommendations to study key outcome measures in this unique population are suggested. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Treatment of primary hyperoxaluria type 1

Supportive treatment for primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) focuses on high fluid intake and crystallization inhibitors. A subset of patients with specific PH1 genotypes (c.508G>A and c.454T>A) will respond to pyridoxine, defined as a >30% reduction in urinary oxalate excretion. Response to pyridoxine is variable and in some patients, urinary oxalate may normalize. The first focused treatment for PH1 using an RNA interference agent to reduce urinary oxalate was approved in 2020, and such therapies may significantly alter treatment approaches and long-term outcomes in PH1. Currently PH1 often presents with kidney function impairment and frequently results in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). With kidney dysfunction, urinary oxalate clearance decreases and multisystem deposition of oxalate (oxalosis) occurs, commonly in bones, eyes, heart and skin. Once plasma oxalate levels exceed 30 µmol/L, aggressive haemodialysis is indicated to prevent oxalosis, even if the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) remains better than for typical dialysis initiation. Peritoneal dialysis alone does not achieve the needed oxalate clearance. Dialysis is a bridge to future transplantation. Liver transplantation restores hepatic alanine-glyoxylate transaminase enzyme activity, allowing glyoxylate detoxification and preventing further oxalosis. The native liver must be removed as part of this process to avoid ongoing pathologic oxalate production. The timing and type of liver transplantation are dependent on pyridoxine sensitivity, age, weight, residual GFR and evidence of systemic oxalate deposition in extrarenal organs. Liver transplant can be isolated or combined with kidney transplantation in a sequential or simultaneous fashion. Isolated kidney transplantation is generally reserved for pyridoxine-sensitive patients only. Although liver transplantation is curative for PH1 and kidney transplantation treats ESKD, ensuing necessary immunosuppression and potential allograft dysfunction impart significant long-term risks.