Implementing and evaluating reflective practice group sessions

Radiation therapy students' perceptions of peer group supervision: a pilot study

INTRODUCTION

Research indicates radiation therapy students are at risk of burnout. Peer Group Supervision (PGS) is a tool used to help reduce stress, increase reflective practice and help manage professional issues. This pilot study aimed to investigate the third-year New Zealand radiation therapy students' perceptions of participating in PGS.

METHODS

In 2019, all 27 third-year radiation therapy students were introduced to PGS. At the end of the year, the students were invited to fill in a 14-item Clinical Supervision Evaluation Questionnaire (CSEQ), answer an open-ended question and provide demographic data. The CSEQ asks participants to indicate the extent to which they agree with 14 statements related to Purpose, Process and Impact of PGS. The open-ended question asked if there were anything else they would like to say about participating in PGS as a student. The study utilised both qualitative and quantitative methods.

RESULTS

Of the 27 students invited, 22 responded to the questionnaire. Analysis of the CSEQ revealed that eight of the 22 students (36.4%) had a positive impression of PGS, 13 (59.1%) were neither positive nor negative, and one (4.6%) had a negative perception of PGS. The thematic data showed that the students perceived PGS to assist with stress management. They valued having scheduled time out to reflect on practice and appreciated the safety and trust established in the groups.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the radiation therapy students responded positively to PGS. The students felt safe talking about clinical issues in their groups, and they perceive PGS to positively affect their stress management, resulting in new clinical insights and increased self-awareness. Further research is required to examine the long-term effects of PGS on patient care and if PGS can help reduce burnout for student radiation therapists.

Education and training of nurses in the use of advanced medical technologies in home care related to patient safety: A cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND

To use advanced medical technologies (AMTs) correctly and safely requires both specialist knowledge and skills, and an awareness of risks and how those can be minimized. Reporting safety concerns about AMTs in home care can contribute to an improved quality of care. The extent to which a health care organization has integrated the reporting, evaluation and learning from incidents is a key element of that organization's patient safety culture.

OBJECTIVES

To explore nurses' experiences regarding the education followed in the use of AMTs in the home setting, and their organizations' systems of reporting.

DESIGN

Descriptive cross-sectional design.

METHODS

209 home care nurses from across the Netherlands who worked with infusion therapy, parenteral nutrition and/or morphine pumps responded to the online questionnaire between July 2018 and February 2019. The analysis of the data was mainly descriptive.

RESULTS

Educational interventions that are most often used to learn how to use AMTs were, as an average over the three AMTs, instruction by a nurse (71%), practical training in the required skills (71%) and acquiring information to increase theoretical knowledge (69%). Considerable attention is paid to patient safety (88%) and the home setting (89%). However, a substantial proportion of the nurses (up to 29%) use AMTs even though they had not been tested on their skills. 95% of the respondents were well acquainted with the incident reporting protocol of their organization, but only 49% received structural or regular feedback on any actions taken as a result of event reporting.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed aspects of nurses' education that imply risk factors for patient safety. Practical training is not always given, additional or retraining is often voluntary, and the required skills are not always tested. However, the results show that nurses do have a good awareness of patient safety. Incidents are mainly discussed within the team, but less at the organizational level.

Navigating creativity within arts-based pedagogy: Implications of a constructivist grounded theory study

BACKGROUND

Educators implement arts-based pedagogy with the hope that it will foster meaningful learning for students. However, nursing students have varied reactions to artistic assignments, and there is a need to further understand students' learning processes with this novel approach and the factors influencing their learning. This understanding could promote the more effective implementation of arts-based pedagogy into nursing education.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a theoretical understanding of how and when undergraduate nursing students learn through arts-based pedagogy.

DESIGN

Constructivist grounded theory.

SETTINGS

Canadian baccalaureate nursing program.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty third-year undergraduate nursing students and eight of their nursing instructors.

METHODS

Participants who had experienced arts-based assignments were recruited with purposive and then theoretical sampling. We collected four sources of data: a socio-demographic questionnaire, semi-structured interviews, photo/art elicitation, and field notes. The socio-demographic data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and all other data with constructivist grounded theory procedures.

RESULTS

Our findings revealed that students had to navigate a creative process with arts-based assignments, which involved several iterative phases. This type of learning was unique within their program and somewhat constrained by the context of nursing education. There was notable variation in the students' experiences. Although many reported meaningful learning, approximately 20% of the students did not value the assignment. Our findings elucidated multi-level enabling and restraining factors that influenced students' engagement with and learning from this creative process.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings provide insight into modifiable factors that influenced students' engagement and learning, and have important implications for making ABP accessible and meaningful for more students.

Critical thinking evaluation in reflective writing: Development and testing of Carter Assessment of Critical Thinking in Midwifery (Reflection)

OBJECTIVE

develop and test a tool designed for use by academics to evaluate pre-registration midwifery students' critical thinking skills in reflective writing.

DESIGN

a descriptive cohort design was used.

SAMPLE

a random sample (n = 100) of archived student reflective writings based on a clinical event or experience during 2014 and 2015.

METHODS

a staged model for tool development was used to develop a fifteen item scale involving item generation; mapping of draft items to critical thinking concepts and expert review to test content validity; inter-rater reliability testing; pilot testing of the tool on 100 reflective writings; and psychometric testing. Item scores were analysed for mean, range and standard deviation. Internal reliability, content and construct validity were assessed.

FINDINGS

expert review of the tool revealed a high content validity index score of 0.98. Using two independent raters to establish inter-rater reliability, good absolute agreement of 72% was achieved with a Kappa coefficient K = 0.43 (p<0.0001). Construct validity via exploratory factor analysis revealed three factors: analyses context, reasoned inquiry, and self-evaluation. The mean total score for the tool was 50.48 (SD = 12.86). Total and subscale scores correlated significantly. The scale achieved good internal reliability with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of .93.

CONCLUSION

this study establishedthe reliability and validity of the CACTiM (reflection) for use by academics to evaluate midwifery students' critical thinking in reflective writing. Validation with large diverse samples is warranted.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

reflective practice is a key learning and teaching strategy in undergraduate Bachelor of Midwifery programmes and essential for safe, competent practice. There is the potential to enhance critical thinking development by assessingreflective writing with the CACTiM (reflection) tool to provide formative and summative feedback to students and inform teaching strategies.

An evaluation of the appropriateness and effectiveness of structured reflection for midwifery students in Ireland

Midwifery students undertaking the undergraduate midwifery education programme in Ireland participate in facilitated reflective sessions that aim to develop their skills of reflecting on and in clinical practice. This paper presents a qualitative evaluation of the appropriateness and effectiveness of the facilitated reflection sessions for pre and post-registration midwifery students in two large Dublin maternity teaching hospitals. The aim was to evaluate structured reflective practice sessions which sought to assist midwifery students to become competent reflective practitioners. Group reflection sessions were conducted weekly in a clinical practice area at the same time each week over one academic year. After the series of structured reflective sessions, midwifery students and facilitating staff were invited to evaluate the reflective process. This evaluation consisted of a self-completion survey to identify the factors that facilitated and impeded student participation in the sessions. Respondents answered a series of questions about the reflective practice sessions and were also invited to enter qualitative data regarding their subjective experiences of the process in free text boxes. The data were then collated into themes by an independent reviewer. The results of the evaluation clearly indicate that midwifery students and facilitators welcomed the opportunity to engage in group reflection sessions as a form of peer support and as a catalyst for learning from clinical practice. Findings suggest that reflective practice can contribute to the development of skilled, self-aware and engaged practitioners.

Addressing ethical concerns arising in nursing and midwifery students' reflective assignments

BACKGROUND

Written reflections on practice are frequently requirements of nursing curricula. They are widely accepted as necessary for improving critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Faculty, are expected to review reflections and provide feedback that helps professional development and facilitates good practice. It is less clear what the actions of nurse educators should be when ethical infractions are revealed in the narratives.

OBJECTIVES

We had two aims: 1) To combine insights from a literature review of empirical and theoretical research related to responding to ethical issues revealed in student reflections with our experiences reviewing the reflections of undergraduate nursing and midwifery students, and 2) to construct and analyze a hybrid case from these insights in order to develop guidelines for nurse educators.

RESEARCH DESIGN

A literature review was conducted using CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, SocINDEX and ERIC databases and pertinent key words. A hybrid case was constructed of commonly encountered ethical issues using insights from the literature review and the authors' experiences. The case was analyzed by combining Beauchamp and Childress' principlist approach with Campbell and McCarthy's ethical decision-making tool (Table 1). Participants and Research Context: No human participants Findings: A gap in the literature exists related to addressing ethical issues revealed in student practice reflections. However, a combination of insights from the literature and the authors' experiences facilitated the development of a hybrid case. Subsequent case analysis facilitated the development of a series of guidelines that can be utilized to address a range of issues commonly emerging in the reflections of nursing students during practice experiences.

DISCUSSION

A number of recommendations and guidelines are provided to enable the safeguarding of students and staff and support them in practicing ethically.

CONCLUSION

Structured ethical analysis of a constructed hybrid reflection of commonly revealed ethical issues was useful in developing guidelines for educators.

El diario del estudiante de enfermería en la práctica clínica frente a los diarios realizados en otras disciplinas. Una revisión integradora

El presente artículo es una revisión integradora de la literatura cuyo objetivo fue identificar, en revistas nacionales e internacionales indexadas en las bases de datos Isi Web of Knowledge, Eric, PubMed, EbscoHost, Scopus, SciELO, Cuiden, Cuidatge y Scirus, en el periodo comprendido entre 1995 y 2011, datos que contribuyeran a determinar cómo la escritura del diario reflexivo ayuda al estudiante de enfermería durante sus prácticas clínicas, así como a establecer diferencias y similitudes con los diarios realizados por estudiantes de otras disciplinas. Se llevó a cabo una revisión amplia de la cual se seleccionaron 54 artículos científicos con base en criterios de inclusión y exclusión, sin descartar ninguna metodología de investigación e incluyendo aquellos que analizaran el diario del estudiante, fueran o no del ámbito de la enfermería. Se concluye que la escritura del diario reflexivo que realiza el estudiante de enfermería durante sus prácticas clínicas tiene beneficios tales como la mejora de la comunicación con el paciente, fundamental para el cuidado. La escritura del diario debería ser incluida en todos los planes de estudio de grado en el ámbito de las prácticas clínicas.

Reflective practice groups for nurses: a consultation liaison psychiatry nursing initiative: part 2--the evaluation

This paper outlines an evaluation of reflective practice groups (RPG) involving nurses and midwives from three clinical nursing specialties at Redcliffe and Caboolture Hospitals, Queensland, Australia. The groups were facilitated by the consultation liaison psychiatry nurse and author using a process-focused, whole-of-group approach to explore clinical narrative in a supportive group setting. This was a preliminary evaluation utilizing a recently-developed tool, the Clinical Supervision Evaluation Questionnaire, along with externally-facilitated focus groups. Nurses and midwives responded favourably to RPG, reporting a positive impact on clinical practice, self-awareness, and resilience. The majority of participants considered RPG had positive implications for team functioning. The focus groups identified the importance of facilitation style and the need to address aspects of workplace culture to enable group development and enhance the capacity for reflection. Evaluation of the data indicates this style of RPG can improve reflective thinking, promote team cohesion, and provide support for nurses and midwives working in clinical settings. Following on from this study, a second phase of research has commenced, providing more detailed, longitudinal evaluation across a larger, more diverse group of nurses.

Reflective practice groups for nurses: a consultation liaison psychiatry nursing initiative: part 1--The model

In the present study, we outline the evolution of a process-focused reflective practice group (RPG) model for nurses working in clinical settings. The groups were initiated at Redcliffe and Caboolture hospitals by the consultation liaison psychiatry nurse and author. An associated article provides an evaluation of these RPG. The literature review identifies the key themes and theories on which the model is based, and the article outlines the process and practicalities of facilitating RPG in critical care, midwifery, and oncology specialties over a 3-year period. The model proposes that the effectiveness and sustainability of RPG arises from adequate preparation and engagement with prospective participants. Group rules, based on principles of confidentially, supportiveness, and diversity, were collaboratively developed for each group. Facilitation utilized a group-as-a-whole approach to manage process and stimulate reflection. While the purpose of RPG was a reflection on interpersonal aspects of nursing, contextual workplace issues were frequently raised in groups. Acknowledgement and containment of such issues were necessary to maintain clinical focus. The literature highlights facilitator credibility and style as crucial factors in the overall success of RPG, and it is proposed that reflective practice as a process-focused model for groups succeeds when nurse facilitators are trained in group process and receive concurrent supervision.

The concept of reflection in nursing: qualitative findings on student and teacher perspectives

BACKGROUND AND AIM

This study sought to increase the understanding of the concept of reflection within nursing. The research focused on the social construction of reflection through a post-registration, palliative care programme in the United Kingdom (UK).

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

An interpretive ethnographic approach was used to study reflection from the perspective of students and teachers, whilst paying attention to local organisational, contextual and cultural issues.

METHODS

Data collection included: observations of teaching and learning interactions, interviews, extracts from programme documentation and student reflective learning contracts (RLCs).

FINDINGS

Findings identified a learning culture committed to reflection as a valuable way of helping nurses make sense of their practice. Similar to Barnett's (1997) concept of 'critical being', students and teachers described reflection as a way of 'being' rather than simply 'thinking' or 'doing', since reflection intertwined propositional, affective and active elements. This process of reflective 'being' was connected with a humanistic approach to nursing, which emphasises the importance of actively using and expressing oneself in order to care for people.

CONCLUSION

This paper contributes empirical knowledge on the meaning of reflection in nursing regarding: teachers' and students' perspectives, reflection as a way to make sense of practice, and reflection as a way of 'being' and its association with humanistic nursing.

Encouraging reflection: Do professional development workshops increase the skill level and use of reflection in practice?

Reflection is a way of evaluating best practice and challenging existing norms, while at the same time, considering one’s personal values and assumptions in our personal and professional lives. However, many health practitioners may lack the skills to do this effectively. Through participation in a series of three workshops, practitioners in the Radiation Medicine Program at Princess Margaret Hospital have learned and acquired new skills to encourage reflection and reflective practice in themselves, their colleagues as well as with their students. A pre- and post-course survey was used to ascertain their level of knowledge of reflection and reflective practice. An additional survey at 3 months assessed the frequency of use and ongoing comfort level with reflective practice. Results of the evaluation indicate that the participants’ knowledge of reflective practice has improved their understanding of reflection in clincal practice. They recognize the importance of reflection and anticipate increasing their use of reflection in/on practice. As well, participants have been able to sustain the positive momentum 3 months after the course was delivered.

Nurse lecturers' perceptions of what baccalaureate nursing students could gain from clinical group supervision

The extensive amount of studies on clinical supervision during the nursing students' clinical programmes has shown that supervision most often is given on a one-to-one basis, and that many challenges are embedded in this kind of supervision. In some studies group supervision has been used, with mostly successful effects according to the nursing students. At a university in Sweden, a model of group supervision was included in the baccalaureate nursing programme, conducted by nurse lecturers. The purpose of this study was to describe the value of clinical group supervision to nursing students, as perceived by the nurse lecturers. Data consisted of field notes written by the nurse lecturers after 60 supervision sessions, and qualitative content analysis was performed. The findings showed how reflection in a group of equals was considered to give the nursing students opportunities to increase their understanding of themselves and others, prepare them for coming events, increase their personal and professional strengths, and inspire them for further development. On the basis of the findings and previous studies the value of using nurse lecturers as group supervisors was discussed. The impact of a contract to achieve a good learning environment in group supervision was also stressed.

Peer-facilitated virtual action learning: reflecting on critical incidents during a pediatric clerkship

OBJECTIVES

Action learning (AL) facilitates reflection, critical thinking, and learning while solving real-world problems. Virtual AL is an asynchronous collaborative process that encourages students to analyze their critical incidents and learn from these experiences. The researchers sought to: 1) determine whether medical students engaged in peer-facilitated virtual action learning (VAL) demonstrated reflection and critical thinking around complex issues during their pediatric clerkship; and 2) identify challenges students face during their clerkships.

METHODS

Seventy clerkship students were introduced to reflection and participated in VAL by using an electronic discussion board. Each posted 1 critical incident and group members responded with thought-provoking questions and comments to facilitate reflection and analysis. Weekly, students who posted incidents revisited their incidents, pondered the questions posed, and wrote essays summarizing their reflections and insights gained. Data were analyzed using qualitative methods.

RESULTS

Seventy incidents, 210 responses, and 70 revised incidents/essays were analyzed. Outcomes included broadened perspectives (44/70), questioned assumptions (12/70), and reconfirmed thinking (14/70). Content themes included communication, role identification, medical treatment concerns, and limited voice and power.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the students engaged in VAL demonstrated reflection on complex clinical issues. Themes portrayed struggles encountered and exposed issues in the hidden curriculum, suggesting a lack of voice and power that may lead to missed learning opportunities. Discussion threads offered the clerkship director insights into the overall student experience to improve future clerkship experiences.

Introducing guided group reflective practice in an Irish palliative care unit

This paper describes the processes involved over one year in introducing, facilitating and evaluating a project of guided reflective practice for a group of eight palliative care nurses in Milford Care Centre, Republic of Ireland. While literature has tended to concentrate on critical discussion relating to reflection, less attention has been directed towards the organisation and facilitation of reflective processes in practice. In addressing this deficit, a detailed account of the collaborative processes and challenges involved in this project are presented. Group evaluation of the project is discussed under the following themes: understanding the process of reflective practice; the value of keeping a reflective diary; guided group reflection and moving forward. The introduction of guided reflection for palliative care nurses has afforded both the facilitators and the participants an opportunity to meet away from the clinical environment, and to work together, finding fresh insights to inform practice. The valuing and promotion of reflective processes by an organisation arguably provides a fundamental strategy to support nurses in a quality palliative care setting.