Nursing students' and preceptors' experience of assessment during clinical practice: A multilevel repeated-interview study of student-preceptor dyads

Over twenty years of pedagogical research from Nurse Education in Practice: A bibliometric analysis from 2001 to 2023

AIM

To present a bibliometric overview of pedagogical research from Nurse Education in Practice from its inception in 2001 up until 2023.

BACKGROUND

Bibliometric methods are useful in analysing and understanding the characteristics of scientific publications in a particular field and the influence of specific journals. However, no bibliometric analysis of a nurse education journal has been undertaken to date which would highlight important research trends in this area of nursing and midwifery.

METHODS

A total of 2231 publications (articles and reviews only) from Nursing Education in Practice were retrieved from the Scopus database between 2001 and 2023. Several software applications including Microsoft Excel and VOSviewer were used to undertake bibliometric analysis on this dataset. Publication trends such as country analysis, author analysis, keywords analyses (cluster, content and trend analysis) were generated to help understand the volume and scope of pedagogical nursing and midwifery research in this journal.

RESULTS

There has been a steady increase in pedagogical research from Nurse Education in Practice since its launch in 2001 up until 2018, with a dip in publications in 2022 most likely due to the impact of restrictions during the coronavirus pandemic. The most prolific institutions publishing in the journal are mainly from the United Kingdom, Australia and the United States, with over eighty countries represented demonstrating its global reach and impact. Nursing students, nursing education, simulation and learning are some of the most frequent author keywords.

CONCLUSION

The diversity of pedagogies in nursing and midwifery education, clinical learning and supervision in practice environments, and competence and confidence when transitioning to practice are the most popular research areas in Nurse Education in Practice. This study informs nurse and midwife educators and scholars about the volume and scope of pedagogical research in nursing and midwifery. It also makes recommendations on how to improve aspects of scholarship in education and areas for future pedagogical research.

Preceptors' experiences of supervising internationally educated nurses attending a bridging program: An interview study

BACKGROUND

Internationally educated nurses attending a bridging program must demonstrate clinical competence and meet requirements to apply for a nursing license in Sweden.

OBJECTIVES

To describe preceptors' experiences of supervising internationally educated nurses undergoing clinical practice education during a bridging program.

DESIGN

A qualitative descriptive study.

SETTINGS

Two universities offering the 1-year bridging program for nurses with a nursing degree from outside European Union/European Economic Area and Switzerland.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifteen preceptors, all registered nurses, who supervised internationally educated nurses were included.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were performed, and data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

Supervising internationally educated nurses was not the same as supervising nursing students and raised feelings of both joy and frustration. Preceptors had to adapt supervision to the student's nursing knowledge and skills. They had to help students communicate in Swedish and form good relationships with other students, patients, and other professionals. Most preceptors requested more information about the student's nurse education, country of education/cultural background, and previous work experiences. Mixed experiences of support from the university, first-line managers, and colleagues were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Being a preceptor for internationally educated nurses is a challenge, and supervision training is important for managing preceptorship. To supervise students based on their level of knowledge and skills, more information must be shared with the preceptor. Encounters with others are of importance in the training, where teamwork and person-centered care must be in focus, both in prior theoretical education and in clinical practice education.

Academic-Practice Collaboration Using Virtual Telesimulation to Support Students' Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND

Collaboration between academic institutions and clinical practice plays an important role in supporting students' learning in clinical practice. A virtual telesimulation was incorporated to provide academic-practice collaboration between academic educators and nurse preceptors to support students' clinical education.

PURPOSE

The purpose was to evaluate the experiences of nursing students and academic educators on the perceived impact of virtual telesimulation in clinical education.

METHODS

A descriptive qualitative study using focus group discussions was conducted.

RESULTS

Four themes emerged: "coming together to know one another" for rapport building, "learning from different perspectives" to foster clinical learning and practice, "application of learning strategy" to stimulate case-based discussion, and "reaching out to more preceptors" to optimize its impact in clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Academic-practice collaboration using virtual telesimulation enabled students and academic educators to build rapport with clinical preceptors and learn from other practices, which in turn enhanced students' clinical learning experiences.

Exploring the formal assessment discussions in clinical nursing education: An observational study

Introduction

According to EU standards, 50% of the bachelor education program in nursing should take place in clinical learning environments. Consequently, this calls for high quality supervision, where appropriate assessment strategies are vital to optimize students’ learning, growth, and professional development. Despite this, little is known about the formal assessment discussions taking place in clinical nursing education.

Objective

The aim of this study was to explore the characteristics of the formal assessment discussions taking place during first-year students’ clinical education in nursing homes.

Method

An exploratory qualitative study was performed. The data consist of passive participant observations of 24 assessment discussions (12 mid-term and 12 final assessments) with first-year nursing students (n=12), their assigned registered nurse mentors (n=12) and nurse educators (n=5). The study was conducted in three public nursing homes in a single Norwegian municipality. Data were subjected to thematic analysis. The findings were reported using the Standards for Reporting of Qualitative Research.

Results

Three themes were identified regarding the characteristics of the formal assessment discussions: (1) adverse variability in structuring, weighting of theoretical content and pedagogical approach; (2) limited three-part dialogue constrains feedback and reflection; and (3) restricted grounds for assessment leave the nurse educators with a dominant role.

Conclusion

These characteristic signal key areas of attention to improve formal assessment discussions to capitalize on unexploited learning opportunities.

Assessment methods and tools to evaluate postgraduate critical care nursing students' competence in clinical placement. An integrative review

AIM

To provide an overview of assessment methods and tools to evaluate postgraduate critical care nursing students' competence in clinical placement and to identify recommendations for future assessment methods.

BACKGROUND

The purpose of postgraduate critical care nursing education is to educate professional, competent and caring critical care nurses and high-quality assessment strategies in clinical placement are of most importance.

DESIGN

An integrative review following Whittemore and Knafl's framework and Prisma 2020 guidelines for systematic reviews.

METHODS

Systematic searches were performed in June 2020 with an update in April 2021 using the following: Academic Search Premier, British Nursing Index, CINAHL, MEDLINE, SveMed+, Web of Science and the Joanna Briggs Institute databases. The systematic literature search and hand search yielded 380 studies. After screening and checking for eligibility, fifteen studies published between 2005 and 2020 were included in this review. The included studies were critically appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool for empirical studies and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tool for literature reviews.

RESULTS

Four qualitative, six quantitative, three mixed-methods and two literature review studies were included in this review. We identified that competence in postgraduate critical care nursing is a multidimensional concept and it is recommended to use a combination of assessment methods like self-assessment, observation and mentor evaluation. It is necessary to have discussions and reflections between the student, preceptor and lecturer, as well as written self- and mentor evaluation to provide formative and summative feedback to the students. The need to provide consistency and objectivity resulted in the development of competency assessment tools and they were mostly developed and validated as a collaboration between clinical sites and educational institutions. Most of the assessment tools consisted of domains reflecting holistic nursing, including both technical and non-technical skills. Domains reflecting evidence-based nursing practice were less common.

CONCLUSIONS

We need valid and reliable instruments to assess postgraduate critical care nursing student's competence in placement. Innovation and further research regarding effective and accessible assessment methods, such as digital assessment tools, are needed to meet future needs. This may also stimulate collaboration to improve the international inconsistency in critical care nursing educations. We should be working towards common, international educational competence descriptions and assessment tools that are in line with the ever-changing critical care environment, including holistic nursing and continuous learning.

The ubiquity of uncertainty: a scoping review on how undergraduate health professions' students engage with uncertainty

Although the evidence base around uncertainty and education has expanded in recent years, a lack of clarity around conceptual terms and a heterogeneity of study designs means that this landscape remains indistinct. This scoping review explores how undergraduate health professions' students learn to engage with uncertainty related to their academic practice. To our knowledge, this is the first scoping review which examines teaching and learning related to uncertainty across multiple health professions. The scoping review is underpinned by the five-stage framework of (Arksey and O'Malley in Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8(1) 19-32, 2005). We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, ISI Web of Science, and CINAHL and hand-searched selected health professions' education journals. The search strategy yielded a total of 5,017 articles, of which 97 were included in the final review. Four major themes were identified: "Learners' interactions with uncertainty"; "Factors that influence learner experiences"; "Educational outcomes"; and, "Teaching and learning approaches". Our findings highlight that uncertainty is a ubiquitous concern in health professions' education, with students experiencing different forms of uncertainty at many stages of their training. These experiences are influenced by both individual and system-related factors. Formal teaching strategies that directly support learning around uncertainty were infrequent, and included arts-based teaching, and clinical case presentations. Students also met with uncertainty indirectly through problem-based learning, clinical teaching, humanities teaching, simulation, team-based learning, small group learning, tactical games, online discussion of anatomy topics, and virtual patients. Reflection and reflective practice are also mentioned as strategies within the literature.

Interpersonal and communication skills development in nursing preceptorship education and training programmes: a scoping review protocol

The preceptorship model is an education-focused model for teaching and learning within a clinical environment in nursing. It formulates a professional educational relationship between a staff nurse (preceptor) and student nurse and is based on the provision of providing patient care. Preceptorship is widely acknowledged in the literature as a positive pedagogical approach in clinical nursing education in terms of knowledge and skill acquisition, confidence, and professional socialisation of undergraduate nursing students. However, the literature also widely reports negative interpersonal experiences within this professional educational relationship resulting in negative educational experiences and in some cases, negative patient experiences. Therefore, the authors set out to examine what teaching strategies are being implemented by nurse educators to encourage the development of interpersonal and communication skills in facilitating positive interpersonal relationships between the preceptor, nursing student and patient. This paper outlines the protocol for an exploratory scoping review that aims to systematically and comprehensively map out the available published and unpublished literature on the teaching strategies to develop interpersonal and communication skills in preceptorship education and training programmes. To conduct a systematic and comprehensive scoping review, the review will be guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute and Arksey & O' Malley (2005) six-stage iterative framework, as well as PRISMA-ScR framework guidelines, to ensure the quality of the methodological and reporting approaches to the review. It is anticipated that the results of the scoping review will inform nurse educators on the current educational practices for developing interpersonal and communication skills in preceptorship education and training programmes and identify any educational practices that are worthy of further consideration for future research.

Interpersonal and communication skills development in nursing preceptorship education and training programmes: a scoping review protocol

The preceptorship model is an education-focused model for teaching and learning within a clinical environment in nursing. It formulates a professional educational relationship between a staff nurse (preceptor) and student nurse and is based on the provision of providing patient care. Preceptorship is widely acknowledged in the literature as a positive pedagogical approach in clinical nursing education in terms of knowledge and skill acquisition, confidence, and professional socialisation of undergraduate nursing students. However, the literature also widely reports negative interpersonal experiences within this professional educational relationship resulting in negative educational experiences and in some cases, negative patient experiences. Therefore, the authors set out to examine what teaching strategies are being implemented by nurse educators to encourage the development of interpersonal and communication skills in facilitating positive interpersonal relationships between the preceptor, nursing student and patient. This paper outlines the protocol for an exploratory scoping review that aims to systematically and comprehensively map out the available published and unpublished literature on the teaching strategies to develop interpersonal and communication skills in preceptorship education and training programmes. To conduct a systematic and comprehensive scoping review, the review will be guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute and Arksey & O' Malley (2005) six-stage iterative framework, as well as PRISMA-ScR framework guidelines, to ensure the quality of the methodological and reporting approaches to the review. It is anticipated that the results of the scoping review will inform nurse educators on the current educational practices for developing interpersonal and communication skills in preceptorship education and training programmes and identify any educational practices that are worthy of further consideration for future research.

The operating room as a learning arena: Nurse anaesthetist and student nurse anaesthetist perceptions

AIM

To examine which competencies mentors and student nurse anaesthetists perceive as important in a clinical anaesthesia education practice.

BACKGROUND

Mentoring during clinical placement in the operating room can be challenging from the viewpoint of both a nurse anaesthetist and their students. The operating room is a work environment with many restrictions, and the nurse anaesthetist's work requires prompt decisions and actions. Simultaneously, the mentor is tasked with guiding and supporting the student.

METHOD

A qualitative approach including two focus group interviews was used. The analysis was conducted using systematic text condensation. The COREQ checklist for qualitative studies was applied.

RESULT

The analysis yielded two main categories, including two sub-categories for each. The first, "Mentoring in the operating room," contained sub-categories "Application of knowledge and expectations" and "Mentoring experiences," and the second, "Creating a good climate for learning," contained sub-categories "Impact on mentoring: human factors" and "Impact on mentoring: obstacle factors." The mentor's knowledge of human relationships and learning strategies emerged as an important factor with the potential to influence the students' learning and self-confidence. Another valuable consideration was the ability to give constructive feedback, from the perspective of both. However, production pressure was a negative factor for effective knowledge transition.

CONCLUSIONS

The ability to give constructive feedback and having an awareness of one's own attitude-which should ideally be positive and inclusive-are crucial mentoring skills. Mutual expectations must be clearly communicated before the clinical placement period, including learning assumptions, a progression plan and learning outcomes. This will facilitate the planning and help to direct the optimal course of learning.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

This study highlights that an awareness of the student's vulnerability and the mentor's pedagogical competence and learning strategy are crucial factors to take into account.

Clusters of competence: Relationship between self-reported professional competence and achievement on a national examination among graduating nursing students

Aims

To identify clusters based on graduating nursing students’ self‐reported professional competence and their achievement on a national examination. Furthermore, to describe and compare the identified clusters regarding sample characteristics, students’ perceptions of overall quality of the nursing programme, and students’ general self‐efficacy (GSE).

Design

A cross‐sectional study combining survey data and results from a national examination.

Methods

Data were collected at two universities and one university college in Sweden in January 2017, including 179 students in the final term of the nursing programme. The study was based on the Nurse Professional Competence Scale, the GSE scale, and results from the National Clinical Final Examination. A two‐step cluster analysis was used to identify competence profiles, followed by comparative analyses between clusters.

Results

Three clusters were identified illustrating students’ different competence profiles. Students in Clusters 1 and 2 passed the examination, but differed in their self‐assessments of competence, rating themselves under and above the overall median value, respectively. Students in Cluster 3 failed the examination but rated themselves at the overall median level or higher.

Conclusion

The study illustrates how nursing students’ self‐assessed competence might differ from competency assessed by examination, which is challenging for nursing education. Self‐evaluation is a key learning outcome and is, in the long run, essential to patient safety.

Impact

The study has identified clusters of students where some overestimate and others underestimate their competence. Students who assessed their competence low but passed the exam assessed their GSE lower than other students. The findings illuminate the need for student‐centred strategies in nursing education, including elements of self‐assessment in relation to examination to make the students more aware of their clinical competence.

Assessment of nursing students' competence in clinical practice: A systematic review of reviews

BACKGROUND

The assessment of nursing students' nursing competence is a matter of concern worldwide and the complexity of assessing students' clinical competence has challenged educators for decades. It has been recognized that there is inconsistency among assessment methods and tools between countries and institutions.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the current best evidence on the assessment of nursing students' competence in clinical practice.

DESIGN

Systematic review of reviews.

DATA SOURCES

The electronic databases CINAHL, PubMed, Eric, Medic and the JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports were searched in autumn 2018.

REVIEW METHODS

Two researchers independently assessed the eligibility of the studies by title, abstract and full-text, and then assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. Analysis of study findings was conducted using the thematic synthesis approach.

RESULTS

Six reviews were included following critical appraisal. Assessment tools used to assess students' nursing competence commonly focus on the domains of professional attributes, ethical practices, communication and interpersonal relationships, nursing processes, critical thinking and reason. Clinical learning environments and mentoring provide important support structures and guide the learning of students. The availability of assessment tools and criteria along with providing individualized feedback and time for reflection strengthen the objectivity and reliability of assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

There continues to be a need to develop consistent and systematic approaches in assessment, and to use reliable and valid instruments in assessment. Mentors find assessment of students' competence to be particularly challenging and emphasize the importance of clear assessment criteria, support from nurse educators and further education on assessment. Further development in feedback practices and providing students with opportunities for reflection are important in supporting the continuous learning process of students.

European Union directives and clinical practice in nursing education in the Nordic countries

Nursing education in countries belonging to the European Union (EU) must follow EU directive requirements. The aim of this opinion paper is to explore and discuss the challenges presented by EU requirements to clinical practice in nursing education. These requirements prescribe that clinical practice must be carried out in a variety of different and specialized areas that provide care in hospital units. This may offer students only a limited range of experience; thus, they may not be fully prepared to care for patients with common diseases, and only have a restricted knowledge about the ongoing development of caring for patients at home. EU directives require that half of a nursing education course be allocated to clinical practice. This is challenging, since the number of hours is laid down without considering such aspects as the need for pedagogical qualifications for preceptors, which in turn may affect the quality of the clinical practice.

Lecturers' reflection on the three-part assessment discussions with students and preceptors during clinical practice education: A repeated group discussion study

Assessment of students' learning and achievement requires active involvement of participating students, preceptors and lecturers. The lecturers have overall responsibility for both the content of the assessment and students' learning. The aim of the present study was to investigate lecturers' reflections on the mid-course discussion and final assessment that are part of nursing students' clinical practice education. The design was descriptive and had a qualitative approach. Repeated group discussions were undertaken with 14 lecturers at two university campuses in Norway. Five categories were identified: preparing for the three-part discussion, creating a collaborative atmosphere, facilitating student learning, verifying student learning, using the assessment tool to create the assessment discussion; one theme emerged: 'being able to see and justify students' learning processes'. Lecturers' reflections on both assessment discussions and students' learning proceeded from a clear pedagogical viewpoint.