1
|
Monetti A, Donzella A, Ballan M, Centofante L, Corradetti S, Ferrari M, Lilli G, Manzolaro M, Marchi T, Scarpa D, Zangrando L, Zenoni A, Andrighetto A. Study of the radionuclide deposition in the radioactive ion line of the Selective Production of Exotic Species (SPES) facility. Appl Radiat Isot 2024; 204:111121. [PMID: 38016259 DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2023.111121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023]
Abstract
SPES (Selective Production of Exotic Species) is a second generation facility for the production of radioactive ion beams that is going to be commissioned at the Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro of INFN at Legnaro, Padua, Italy. Radioactive neutron-rich isotopes are expected to be produced by nuclear fission induced by a 40 MeV, 200 μA primary proton beam impinging on a 238UCx target. The expected reaction rate is about 1013 fission/s. Radioactive ion beams are produced using the isotope separation on-line technique. The production of such an amount of radioactive species raises radiological issues throughout the life cycle of the facility. A study of the radioactive contamination of the components of the radioactive ion beam line is performed with the FLUKA Monte Carlo simulation code, under realistic hypotheses for the produced isobaric beams. The present results complete previous studies focused on the radiological impact of the production target irradiation, the residual activation of the primary proton beam line and the radioactive contamination of the ion source complex. The overall ambient dose equivalent rate due to the different radiation sources is calculated at several positions inside the production bunker and at different times after a typical one-year operating period of the facility with the 238UCx target at full power. The obtained results and the developed methodology provide the guidelines and the needed tools to plan ordinary and extraordinary interventions as well as final decommissioning of the SPES facility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Monetti
- INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, Viale dell'Università 2, 35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy
| | - A Donzella
- Università degli Studi di Brescia, Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica e Industriale, Via Branze 38, 25123 Brescia, Italy; INFN, Sezione di Pavia, Via A. Bassi 6, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
| | - M Ballan
- INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, Viale dell'Università 2, 35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy
| | - L Centofante
- INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, Viale dell'Università 2, 35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy
| | - S Corradetti
- INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, Viale dell'Università 2, 35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy
| | - M Ferrari
- Université Jean Monnet Saint-Etienne, CNRS, Institut d'Optique Graduate School, Laboratoire Hubert Curien UMR 5516, F-42023, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - G Lilli
- INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, Viale dell'Università 2, 35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy; Università degli Studi di Padova, Dipartimento di Tecnica e Gestione dei sistemi industriali, Stradella S. Nicola 3, 36100 Vicenza, Italy
| | - M Manzolaro
- INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, Viale dell'Università 2, 35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy
| | - T Marchi
- INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, Viale dell'Università 2, 35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy
| | - D Scarpa
- INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, Viale dell'Università 2, 35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy
| | - L Zangrando
- INFN, Sezione di Padova, Via F. Marzolo 8, 35131 Padova, Italy
| | - A Zenoni
- Università degli Studi di Brescia, Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica e Industriale, Via Branze 38, 25123 Brescia, Italy; INFN, Sezione di Pavia, Via A. Bassi 6, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - A Andrighetto
- INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, Viale dell'Università 2, 35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
FMECA Application in Tomotherapy: Comparison between Classic and Fuzzy Methodologies. ENVIRONMENTS 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/environments9040050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Accident analysis in radiotherapy highlighted the need to increase quality assurance (QA) programs by the identification of failures/errors with very low probability (rare event) but very severe consequences. In this field, a Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) technique, used in various industrial processes to rank critical events, has been met with much interest. The literature describes different FMECA methods; however, it is necessary to understand if these tools are incisive and effective in the healthcare sector. In this work, comparisons of FMECA methodologies in the risk assessment of patients undergoing treatments performed with helical tomotherapy are reported. Failure modes identified for the phases “treatment planning” and “treatment execution” are classified using the Risk Priority Number (RPN) index. Differences and similarities in the classification of failures/errors of the examined FMECA approaches are highlighted.
Collapse
|