1
|
Rigoard P, Ounajim A, Moens M, Goudman L, Roulaud M, Lorgeoux B, Baron S, Nivole K, Many M, Lampert L, David R, Billot M. Should we Oppose or Combine Waveforms for Spinal Cord Stimulation in PSPS-T2 Patients? A Prospective Randomized Crossover Trial (MULTIWAVE Study). THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2023; 24:2319-2339. [PMID: 37473903 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
Refractory persistent spinal pain syndrome after surgery (PSPS-T2) can be successfully addressed by spinal cord stimulation (SCS). While conventional stimulation generates paresthesia, recent systems enable the delivery of paresthesia-free stimulation. Studies have claimed non-inferiority/superiority of selected paresthesia-free stimulation compared with paresthesia-based stimulation, but the comparative efficacy between different waveforms still needs to be determined in a given patient. We designed a randomized controlled 3-month crossover trial to compare pain relief of paresthesia-based stimulation versus high frequency versus burst in 28 PSPS-T2 patients implanted with multiwave SCS systems. Our secondary objectives were to determine the efficacy of these 3 waveforms on pain surface, quality of life, functional capacity, psychological distress, and validated composite multidimensional clinical response index to provide holistic comparisons at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 15-month post-randomization. The preferred stimulation modality was documented during the follow-up periods. No difference between the waveforms was observed in this study (P = .08). SCS led to significant pain relief, quality of life improvement, improvement of multidimensional clinical response index, and of all other clinical outcomes at all follow-up visits. Forty-four percent of the patients chose to keep the paresthesia-based stimulation modality after the 15-month follow-up period. By giving the possibility to switch and/or to combine several waveforms, the overall rate of SCS responders further increased with 25%. In this study, high frequency or burst do not appear superior to paresthesia-based stimulation, wherefore paresthesia-based stimulation should still be considered as a valid option. However, combining paresthesia-based stimulation with paresthesia-free stimulation, through personalized multiwave therapy, might significantly improve SCS responses. PERSPECTIVE: This article assesses clinical SCS efficacy on pain relief, by comparing paresthesia-based stimulation and paresthesia-free stimulation (including high frequency and burst) modalities in patient presenting with PSPS-T2. Switching and/or combining waveforms contribute to increasing the global SCS responders rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Rigoard
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France; Department of Neuro-Spine & Neuromodulation, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France; Pprime Institute UPR 3346, CNRS, ISAE-ENSMA, University of Poitiers, Chasseneuil-du-Poitou, France
| | - Amine Ounajim
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Maarten Moens
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; STIMULUS research group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Radiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lisa Goudman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; STIMULUS research group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Manuel Roulaud
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Bertille Lorgeoux
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Sandrine Baron
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Kévin Nivole
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Mathilde Many
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Lucie Lampert
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Romain David
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France; Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Unit, Poitiers University Hospital, University of Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Maxime Billot
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schwarm FP, Rehman R, Nagl J, Gött H, Uhl E, Kolodziej MA. Does lumbar spinal decompression or fusion surgery influence outcome parameters in patients with intrathecal morphine treatment for persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2 (PSPS-T2). Scand J Pain 2023; 23:677-686. [PMID: 37667441 DOI: 10.1515/sjpain-2023-0042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Intrathecal morphine pump (ITMP) infusion therapy is efficient in managing chronic pain refractory to standard treatment. This study evaluates pain relief and improvement of quality of life in chronic pain patients after intrathecal morphine pump implantation for treatment of persistent pain after lumbar spinal fusion surgery and lumbar spinal decompression alone. METHODS Forty three chronic pain patients that received an ITMP at our department between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed divided into 2 cohorts (lumbar spinal fusion surgery and lumbar spinal decompression alone). Pain intensity was evaluated using the numeric rating scale (NRS), quality of life was assessed by EQ-5D-3L, mental health was assessed by Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-V), and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Morphine dosage was assessed over time. Data was collected preoperatively, 6 and 24 months postoperatively. Statistical analysis was performed using Friedman's analysis of variance to evaluate the development of NRS, PCS, BDI and EQ-5D-3L over time and Mann-Whitney-U-test for the differences between these parameters in the different cohorts. A two-sided p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS Median age was 64 years (IQR25-75 56-71 years). NRS, EQ-5D-3L, BDI-V, and PCS showed a significant overall improvement after 6 and 24 months compared to baseline data (p<0.001). No statistically significant differences between patients with lumbar spinal fusion surgery and lumbar spinal decompression alone were seen. Furthermore, no statistically significant differences for age and gender were seen. The initially administered median morphine dosage was significantly higher in the fusion group (3.0 mg/day; IQR25-75 1.5-4.2 mg/day) compared to the decompression-alone group (1.5 mg/day; IQR25-75 1.0-2.6 mg/day); (p=0.027). CONCLUSIONS This retrospective study showed that ITMP have a major long-term impact on pain relief, improve the quality of life, psychological distress, as well as pain catastrophizing in patients with chronic pain following lumbar spinal surgery independent of the previous surgical procedure. After ITMP implantation initial median morphine dosage seems to be significantly higher after spinal fusion compared to decompressive surgery alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Raza Rehman
- Department of Neurosurgery Hospital Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Jasmin Nagl
- Department of Neurosurgery, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Hanna Gött
- Department of Neurosurgery, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Eberhard Uhl
- Department of Neurosurgery, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rigoard P, Moens M, Goudman L, Le Tutour T, Rochette M, Dany J, Et Talby M, Roulaud M, Hervochon R, Ounajim A, Nivole K, David R, Billot M. "Neuro-Fiber Mapping": An Original Concept of Spinal Cord Neural Network Spatial Targeting Using Live Electrostimulation Mapping to (Re-)Explore the Conus Medullaris Anatomy. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12051747. [PMID: 36902533 PMCID: PMC10002982 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12051747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Spinal cord (SC) anatomy is often assimilated to a morphologically encapsulated neural entity, but its functional anatomy remains only partially understood. We hypothesized that it could be possible to re-explore SC neural networks by performing live electrostimulation mapping, based on "super-selective" spinal cord stimulation (SCS), originally designed as a therapeutical tool to address chronic refractory pain. As a starting point, we initiated a systematic SCS lead programming approach using live electrostimulation mapping on a chronic refractory perineal pain patient, previously implanted with multicolumn SCS at the level of the conus medullaris (T12-L1). It appeared possible to (re-)explore the classical anatomy of the conus medullaris using statistical correlations of paresthesia coverage mappings, resulting from 165 different electrical configurations tested. We highlighted that sacral dermatomes were not only located more medially but also deeper than lumbar dermatomes at the level of the conus medullaris, in contrast with classical anatomical descriptions of SC somatotopical organization. As we were finally able to find a morphofunctional description of "Philippe-Gombault's triangle" in 19th-century historical textbooks of neuroanatomy, remarkably matching these conclusions, the concept of "neuro-fiber mapping" was introduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Rigoard
- PRISMATICS Laboratory (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86000 Poitiers, France
- Department of Neuro-Spine & Neuromodulation, Poitiers University Hospital, 86000 Poitiers, France
- PPrime Institute UPR 3346, CNRS, ISAE-ENSMA, University of Poitiers, 86000 Poitiers, France
| | - Maarten Moens
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
- STIMULUS Consortium (Research and Teaching Neuromodulation uz Brussel), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Radiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lisa Goudman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
- STIMULUS Consortium (Research and Teaching Neuromodulation uz Brussel), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
- Research Foundation—Flanders (FWO), 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Tom Le Tutour
- PRISMATICS Laboratory (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86000 Poitiers, France
- ANSYS France, 69100 Villeurbanne, France
| | | | - Jonathan Dany
- PRISMATICS Laboratory (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86000 Poitiers, France
- Department of Neuro-Spine & Neuromodulation, Poitiers University Hospital, 86000 Poitiers, France
| | - Mohamed Et Talby
- PRISMATICS Laboratory (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86000 Poitiers, France
- Department of Neuro-Spine & Neuromodulation, Poitiers University Hospital, 86000 Poitiers, France
| | - Manuel Roulaud
- PRISMATICS Laboratory (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86000 Poitiers, France
| | - Rémi Hervochon
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47–83 Boulevard de l’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Amine Ounajim
- PRISMATICS Laboratory (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86000 Poitiers, France
| | - Kévin Nivole
- PRISMATICS Laboratory (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86000 Poitiers, France
| | - Romain David
- PRISMATICS Laboratory (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86000 Poitiers, France
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Poitiers University Hospital, University of Poitiers, 86000 Poitiers, France
| | - Maxime Billot
- PRISMATICS Laboratory (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86000 Poitiers, France
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Factors Determining Plasticity of Responses to Drugs. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23042068. [PMID: 35216184 PMCID: PMC8877660 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23042068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The plasticity of responses to drugs is an ever-present confounding factor for all aspects of pharmacology, influencing drug discovery and development, clinical use and the expectations of the patient. As an introduction to this Special Issue of the journal IJMS on pharmacological plasticity, we address the various levels at which plasticity appears and how such variability can be controlled, describing the ways in which drug responses can be affected with examples. The various levels include the molecular structures of drugs and their receptors, expression of genes for drug receptors and enzymes involved in metabolism, plasticity of cells targeted by drugs, tissues and clinical variables affected by whole body processes, changes in geography and the environment, and the influence of time and duration of changes. The article provides a rarely considered bird’s eye view of the problem and is intended to emphasize the need for increased awareness of pharmacological plasticity and to encourage further debate.
Collapse
|
5
|
Berfelo T, Doll RJ, Krabbenbos IP, Buitenweg JR. Observing Altered Nociceptive Detection Thresholds in Patients With Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type 2 With a Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulator. Neuromodulation 2022; 25:1006-1014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2021.10.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
6
|
Rigoard P, Ounajim A, Goudman L, Bouche B, Roulaud M, Page P, Lorgeoux B, Baron S, Nivole K, Many M, Adjali N, Charrier E, Rannou D, Poupin L, Wood C, David R, Héraud D, Moens M, Billot M. The Added Value of Subcutaneous Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation Combined with SCS, as Salvage Therapy, for Refractory Low Back Pain Component in Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Implanted Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study (CUMPNS Study) Based on 3D-Mapping Composite Pain Assessment. J Clin Med 2021; 10:5094. [PMID: 34768614 PMCID: PMC8584602 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10215094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Revised: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
While Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) provides satisfaction to almost 2/3 of Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome-Type 2 (PSPS-T2) patients implanted for refractory chronic back and/or leg pain, when not adequately addressed the back pain component, leaves patients in a therapeutic cul-de-sac. Peripheral Nerve field Stimulation (PNfS) has shown interesting results addressing back pain in the same population. Far from placing these two techniques in opposition, we suggest that these approaches could be combined to better treat PSPS-T2 patients. We designed a RCT (CUMPNS), with a 12-month follow-up, to assess the potential added value of PNfS, as a salvage therapy, in PSPS-T2 patients experiencing a "Failed SCS Syndrome" in the back pain component. Fourteen patients were included in this study and randomized into 2 groups ("SCS + PNfS" group/n = 6 vs. "SCS only" group/n = 8). The primary objective of the study was to compare the percentage of back pain surface decrease after 3 months, using a computerized interface to obtain quantitative pain mappings, combined with multi-dimensional SCS outcomes. Back pain surface decreased significantly greater for the "SCS + PNfS" group (80.2% ± 21.3%) compared to the "SCS only" group (13.2% ± 94.8%) (p = 0.012), highlighting the clinical interest of SCS + PNfS, in cases where SCS fails to address back pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Rigoard
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France; (A.O.); (B.B.); (M.R.); (B.L.); (S.B.); (K.N.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (C.W.); (R.D.); (D.H.)
- Department of Spine Surgery & Neuromodulation, Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France
- Pprime Institute UPR 3346, CNRS, ISAE-ENSMA, University of Poitiers, 86360 Chasseneuil-du-Poitou, France
| | - Amine Ounajim
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France; (A.O.); (B.B.); (M.R.); (B.L.); (S.B.); (K.N.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (C.W.); (R.D.); (D.H.)
| | - Lisa Goudman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium; (L.G.); (M.M.)
- STIMULUS Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium;
| | - Benedicte Bouche
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France; (A.O.); (B.B.); (M.R.); (B.L.); (S.B.); (K.N.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (C.W.); (R.D.); (D.H.)
| | - Manuel Roulaud
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France; (A.O.); (B.B.); (M.R.); (B.L.); (S.B.); (K.N.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (C.W.); (R.D.); (D.H.)
| | - Philippe Page
- STIMULUS Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium;
| | - Bertille Lorgeoux
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France; (A.O.); (B.B.); (M.R.); (B.L.); (S.B.); (K.N.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (C.W.); (R.D.); (D.H.)
| | - Sandrine Baron
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France; (A.O.); (B.B.); (M.R.); (B.L.); (S.B.); (K.N.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (C.W.); (R.D.); (D.H.)
| | - Kevin Nivole
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France; (A.O.); (B.B.); (M.R.); (B.L.); (S.B.); (K.N.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (C.W.); (R.D.); (D.H.)
| | - Mathilde Many
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France; (A.O.); (B.B.); (M.R.); (B.L.); (S.B.); (K.N.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (C.W.); (R.D.); (D.H.)
| | - Nihel Adjali
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France; (A.O.); (B.B.); (M.R.); (B.L.); (S.B.); (K.N.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (C.W.); (R.D.); (D.H.)
| | - Elodie Charrier
- Pain Evaluation and Treatment Centre, Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France; (E.C.); (D.R.); (L.P.)
| | - Delphine Rannou
- Pain Evaluation and Treatment Centre, Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France; (E.C.); (D.R.); (L.P.)
| | - Laure Poupin
- Pain Evaluation and Treatment Centre, Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France; (E.C.); (D.R.); (L.P.)
| | - Chantal Wood
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France; (A.O.); (B.B.); (M.R.); (B.L.); (S.B.); (K.N.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (C.W.); (R.D.); (D.H.)
| | - Romain David
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France; (A.O.); (B.B.); (M.R.); (B.L.); (S.B.); (K.N.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (C.W.); (R.D.); (D.H.)
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Unit, Poitiers University Hospital, University of Poitiers, 86021 Poitiers, France
| | - Dylan Héraud
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France; (A.O.); (B.B.); (M.R.); (B.L.); (S.B.); (K.N.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (C.W.); (R.D.); (D.H.)
| | - Maartens Moens
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium; (L.G.); (M.M.)
- STIMULUS Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium;
| | - Maxime Billot
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France; (A.O.); (B.B.); (M.R.); (B.L.); (S.B.); (K.N.); (M.M.); (N.A.); (C.W.); (R.D.); (D.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type 2 (PSPS-T2), a Social Pain? Advocacy for a Social Gradient of Health Approach to Chronic Pain. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10132817. [PMID: 34202362 PMCID: PMC8269084 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10132817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Revised: 06/20/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
The Social Gradient of Health (SGH), or position in the social hierarchy, is one of the major determinants of health. It influences the development and evolution of many chronic diseases. Chronic pain dramatically affects individual and social condition. Its medico-economic impact is significant and worldwide. Failed Back Surgery Syndrome or Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome type 2 (PSPS-T2) represents one of its most fascinating and disabling conditions. However, the influence of SGH on PSPS-T2 has been poorly explored. We designed a prospective multicentric study (PREDIBACK study) to assess the SGH prevalence, and to examine its association with medical and psychological variables, in PSPS-T2 patients. This study included 200 patients to determine the SGH association with pain (NPRS), Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), kinesiophobia (FABQ-Work), catastrophism (CSQ), and functional capacity (ODI). Around 85.3% of PSPS-T2 patients in our study had low SGH. Low SGH patients had a higher FABQ-Work and CSQ-Catastrophizing score than high SGH patients (p < 0.05). High SGH patients have a higher ODI score than low SGH patients (p < 0.10). Our results suggest that SGH is a relevant factor to guide prevention, research, and ultimately intervention in PSPS-T2 patients and could be more widely transposed to chronic pain.
Collapse
|
8
|
Du J, Yang J, Yan L, Shan L, Wang W, Fan Y, Hao D, Huang D. Intraoperative anti-inflammatory drugs combined with no drainage after MIS-TLIF in the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation: an RCT. J Orthop Surg Res 2021; 16:20. [PMID: 33413515 PMCID: PMC7791676 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-02155-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Minimally invasive-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (MIS-TLIF), in which the nerve root pain is caused by early postoperative edema reaction, is a common clinical complication. However, there is no effective method to solve this problem. We aimed to use gelatin sponge impregnated with mixed anti-inflammatory drugs combined with no drainage after MIS-TLIF to optimize postoperative effect in the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Methods From June 2018, the middle-aged patients (45–60 years old) with recurrent LDH were recruited. Included patients were treated with MIS-TLIF surgery, and no drainage tube was placed after surgery. All patients were randomly divided into intervention group (gelatin sponge impregnated with mixed anti-inflammatory drugs) and control group (saline was immersed in gelatin sponge as a control). Results The intervention group included 63 cases, and the control group included 65 cases. The length of hospital stays and bedridden period in the intervention group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The VAS score of low back pain in the intervention group was significantly lower than that of the control group at postoperative days 1–6 (P < 0.05, for all). The VAS scores of leg pain in the intervention group at postoperative days 1–9 were statistically lower than the control group (P < 0.05, for all). Conclusions Application of gelatin sponge impregnated with mixed anti-inflammatory drugs combined with no drainage after MIS-TLIF can significantly further optimize the surgical effect of recurrent LDH and shorten the bedridden period and hospital stays, to achieve the purpose of early rehabilitation. Trial registration China Clinical Trial Registration Center, ChiCTR1800016236. Registered on May 21, 2018, http://www.chictr.org.cn/listbycreater.aspx
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinpeng Du
- Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Friendship East Road, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Junsong Yang
- Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Friendship East Road, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Liang Yan
- Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Friendship East Road, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Lequn Shan
- Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Friendship East Road, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Wentao Wang
- Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Friendship East Road, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Yong Fan
- Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Friendship East Road, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Dingjun Hao
- Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Friendship East Road, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Dageng Huang
- Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Friendship East Road, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rigoard P, Billot M, Ingrand P, Durand-Zaleski I, Roulaud M, Peruzzi P, Dam Hieu P, Voirin J, Raoul S, Page P, Djian MC, Fontaine D, Lantéri-Minet M, Blond S, Buisset N, Cuny E, Cadenne M, Caire F, Ranoux D, Mertens P, Naous H, Simon E, Emery E, Béraud G, Debiais F, Durand G, Serrie A, Diallo B, Bulsei J, Ounajim A, Nivole K, Duranton S, Naiditch N, Monlezun O, Bataille B. How Should we Use Multicolumn Spinal Cord Stimulation to Optimize Back Pain Spatial Neural Targeting? A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial (ESTIMET Study). Neuromodulation 2020; 24:86-101. [PMID: 32865344 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Revised: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent studies have highlighted multicolumn spinal cord stimulation (SCS) efficacy, hypothesizing that optimized spatial neural targeting provided by new-generation SCS lead design or its multicolumn programming abilities could represent an opportunity to better address chronic back pain (BP). OBJECTIVE To compare multicolumn vs. monocolumn programming on clinical outcomes of refractory postoperative chronic BP patients implanted with SCS using multicolumn surgical lead. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twelve centers included 115 patients in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. After randomization, leads were programmed using only one or several columns. The primary outcome was change in BP visual analogic scale (VAS) at six months. All patients were then programmed using the full potential of the lead up until 12-months follow-up. RESULTS At six months, there was no significant difference in clinical outcomes whether the SCS was programmed using a mono or a multicolumn program. At 12 months, in all patients having been receiving multicolumn SCS for at least six months (n = 97), VAS decreases were significant for global pain (45.1%), leg pain (55.8%), and BP (41.5%) compared with baseline (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION The ESTIMET study confirms the significant benefit experienced on chronic BP by patients implanted with multicolumn SCS, independently from multicolumn lead programming. These good clinical outcomes might result from the specific architecture of the multicolumn lead, giving the opportunity to select initially the best column on a multicolumn grid and to optimize neural targeting with low-energy requirements. However, involving more columns than one does not appear necessary, once initial spatial targeting of the "sweet spot" has been achieved. Our findings suggest that this spatial concept could also be transposed to cylindrical leads, which have drastically improved their capability to shape the electrical field, and might be combined with temporal resolution using SCS new modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Rigoard
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research In Spine/neurostimulation Management and Thoracic Innovation in Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France.,Department of Neurosurgery, Spine & Neurostimulation Unit, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France.,UPR 3346, CNRS, P' Institute, Futuroscope, Faculty of Sciences, Poitiers, France
| | - Maxime Billot
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research In Spine/neurostimulation Management and Thoracic Innovation in Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Pierre Ingrand
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | | | - Manuel Roulaud
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research In Spine/neurostimulation Management and Thoracic Innovation in Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Philippe Peruzzi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Reims University Hospital, Reims, France
| | - Phong Dam Hieu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France
| | - Jimmy Voirin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Colmar Hospital, Colmar, France
| | - Sylvie Raoul
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Philippe Page
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine & Neurostimulation Unit, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | | | - Denys Fontaine
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Department of Neurosurgery, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.,FHU InovPain, Côte Azur University, Nice, France
| | - Michel Lantéri-Minet
- FHU InovPain, Côte Azur University, Nice, France.,Pain Evaluation and Treatment Centre, Nice University Hospital, Nice, France.,INSERM U1107, Neuro-Dol, Trigeminal Pain and Migraine, Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Serge Blond
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Nadia Buisset
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Emmanuel Cuny
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Myriam Cadenne
- Pain Evaluation and Treatment Centre, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - François Caire
- Department of Neurosurgery, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Danièle Ranoux
- Pain Evaluation and Treatment Centre, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Patrick Mertens
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lyon University Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Hussein Naous
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lyon University Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Emile Simon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lyon University Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Evelyne Emery
- Department of Neurosurgery, Caen University Hospital, Caen, France
| | - Guillaume Béraud
- Internal Medicine/Infectious and Tropical Diseases Department, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Françoise Debiais
- Department of Rheumatology, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Géraldine Durand
- Department of Rheumatology, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Alain Serrie
- Pain Evaluation and Treatment Centre, Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Bakari Diallo
- Pain Evaluation and Treatment Centre, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Julie Bulsei
- Clinical Research Unit in Economics, Hôtel Dieu, Paris, France
| | - Amine Ounajim
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research In Spine/neurostimulation Management and Thoracic Innovation in Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Kevin Nivole
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research In Spine/neurostimulation Management and Thoracic Innovation in Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Sophie Duranton
- Vigilance Department, Clinical Research Direction, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Nicolas Naiditch
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research In Spine/neurostimulation Management and Thoracic Innovation in Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Olivier Monlezun
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research In Spine/neurostimulation Management and Thoracic Innovation in Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Benoit Bataille
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine & Neurostimulation Unit, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Optimizing the Management and Outcomes of Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Proposal of a Standardized Multidisciplinary Team Care Pathway. Pain Res Manag 2019; 2019:8184592. [PMID: 31360272 PMCID: PMC6644221 DOI: 10.1155/2019/8184592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2018] [Revised: 04/29/2019] [Accepted: 06/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is a major, worldwide health problem that generates considerable expense for healthcare systems. A number of controversial issues concerning the management of FBSS are regularly debated, but no clear consensus has been reached. This pitfall is the result of lack of a standardized care pathway due to insufficient characterization of underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, which are essential to identify in order to offer appropriate treatment, and the paucity of evidence of treatment outcomes. In an attempt to address the challenges and barriers in the clinical management of FBSS, an international panel of physicians with a special interest in FBSS established the Chronic Back and Leg Pain (CBLP) Network with the primary intention to provide recommendations through consensus on how to optimize outcomes. In the first of a series of two papers, a definition of FBSS was delineated with specification of criteria for patient assessment and identification of appropriate evaluation tools in order to choose the right treatment options. In this second paper, we present a proposal of a standardized care pathway aiming to guide clinicians in their decision-making on how to optimize their management of FBSS patients. The utilization of a multidisciplinary approach is emphasized to ensure that care is provided in a uniform manner to reduce variation in practice and improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
|
11
|
Rigoard P, Gatzinsky K, Deneuville JP, Duyvendak W, Naiditch N, Van Buyten JP, Eldabe S. Optimizing the Management and Outcomes of Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Consensus Statement on Definition and Outlines for Patient Assessment. Pain Res Manag 2019; 2019:3126464. [PMID: 30911339 PMCID: PMC6398030 DOI: 10.1155/2019/3126464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2018] [Revised: 12/18/2018] [Accepted: 01/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is a controversial term for identifying patients affected by new, recurrent, or persistent pain in the low back and/or legs following spinal surgery. The lack of a comprehensive standardized care pathway compromises the appropriate management of FBSS patients, which is associated with a heavy financial burden. An international panel of spine surgeons, neurosurgeons, and pain specialists with a particular interest in FBSS established the chronic back and leg pain (CBLP) network with the aim of addressing the challenges and barriers in the clinical management of FBSS patients by building a common transdisciplinary vision. Based on literature reviews, additional input from clinical expertise of multiple professional disciplines, and consensus among its members, the network attempted to provide recommendations on the management of patients with FBSS utilizing a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach. The presentation of this work has been divided in two separate parts to enhance its clarity. This first paper, in favour of selecting appropriate validated tools to improve the FBSS patient assessment, focuses on FBSS taxonomy and its clinical implications for evaluation. Concise recommendations for assessment, treatment, and outcome evaluation using a MDT approach would be an important resource for specialists and nonspecialist clinicians who manage patients with FBSS, to improve decision-making, reduce variation in practice, and optimize treatment outcomes in this difficult-to-treat population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Rigoard
- Spine & Neuromodulation Functional Unit, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
- Institut Pprime UPR 3346, CNRS, ISAE-ENSMA, University of Poitiers, Poitiers, France
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Kliment Gatzinsky
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jean-Philippe Deneuville
- Spine & Neuromodulation Functional Unit, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
- Institut Pprime UPR 3346, CNRS, ISAE-ENSMA, University of Poitiers, Poitiers, France
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Wim Duyvendak
- Department of Neurosurgery, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Nicolas Naiditch
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Jean-Pierre Van Buyten
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Hospital AZ Nikolaas, Sint-Niklaas, Belgium
| | - Sam Eldabe
- Department of Pain and Anaesthesia, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
The appropriate management of persisting pain after spine surgery: a European panel study with recommendations based on the RAND/UCLA method. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2018; 28:31-45. [PMID: 30078053 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5711-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2018] [Revised: 06/29/2018] [Accepted: 07/25/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Management of patients with persisting pain after spine surgery (PPSS) shows significant variability, and there is limited evidence from clinical studies to support treatment choice in daily practice. This study aimed to develop patient-specific recommendations on the management of PPSS. METHODS Using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method (RUAM), an international panel of 6 neurosurgeons, 6 pain specialists, and 6 orthopaedic surgeons assessed the appropriateness of 4 treatment options (conservative, minimally invasive, neurostimulation, and re-operation) for 210 clinical scenarios. These scenarios were unique combinations of patient characteristics considered relevant to treatment choice. Appropriateness had to be expressed on a 9-point scale (1 = extremely inappropriate, 9 = extremely appropriate). A treatment was considered appropriate if the median score was ≥ 7 in the absence of disagreement (≥ 1/3 of ratings in each of the opposite sections 1-3 and 7-9). RESULTS Appropriateness outcomes showed clear and specific patterns. In 48% of the scenarios, exclusively one of the 4 treatments was appropriate. Conservative treatment was usually considered appropriate for patients without clear anatomic abnormalities and for those with new pain differing from the original symptoms. Neurostimulation was considered appropriate in the case of (predominant) neuropathic leg pain in the absence of conditions that may require surgical intervention. Re-operation could be considered for patients with recurrent disc, spinal/foraminal stenosis, or spinal instability. CONCLUSIONS Using the RUAM, an international multidisciplinary panel established criteria for appropriate treatment choice in patients with PPSS. These may be helpful to educate physicians and to improve consistency and quality of care. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Collapse
|
13
|
Sorrell RG, Muhlenfeld J, Moffett J, Stevens G, Kesten S. Evaluation of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy for the treatment of chronic postoperative pain following lumbar surgery: a pilot, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial. J Pain Res 2018; 11:1209-1222. [PMID: 29950893 PMCID: PMC6018879 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s164303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The incidence of chronic postoperative pain following lumbar spinal surgery has increased with the overall increase in the prevalence of lumbar surgery. This study was conducted to evaluate the analgesic effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy in subjects with persistent pain following lumbar surgery. Patients and methods A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, multicenter study in 36 subjects with persistent low-back and/or radiating leg pain after lumbar surgery was conducted. Eligible subjects were randomized (1:1:1) to receive one of two doses of therapy (42-μs or 38-μs pulse width) or treatment with a sham device. Subjects self-treated twice daily for 60 days. The primary end point was change in pain intensity (∆PI) using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale between average baseline (Days −5 to −1) and end of treatment (Days 56–60) for lumbar and radiating leg pain. Secondary outcome measures included the Oswestry Disability Index, Beck Depression Inventory-II, Patient Global Impression of Change, and consumption of analgesics. Results Low-back pain scores for the 42-μs group decreased by 40.2% (p = 0.028), compared to 18.6% for the 38-μs pulse width group (p = 0.037) and 25.6% for the sham group (p = 0.013 per protocol population). Average leg pain scores decreased by 45.0% (42 μs, p = 0.009), 17.0% (38 μs, p = 0.293), and 24.5% (sham, p = 0.065). The proportion of subjects responding to therapy, time to 30% reduction in pain scores, and Patient Global Impression of Change were improved with the PEMF 42-μs device over the sham control, although results were associated with p-values >0.05. Conclusion PEMF therapy (42-μs pulse width) was associated with trends for a reduction in pain, compared to sham treatment. Secondary endpoints were consistent with an overall beneficial effect of the PEMF 42-μs pulse width device.
Collapse
|
14
|
Du JP, Fan Y, Hao DJ, Huang YF, Zhang JN, Yuan LH. Application of Gelatin Sponge Impregnated with a Mixture of 3 Drugs to Intraoperative Nerve Root Block to Promote Early Postoperative Recovery of Lumbar Disc Herniation. World Neurosurg 2018; 114:e1168-e1173. [PMID: 29614356 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2018] [Revised: 03/23/2018] [Accepted: 03/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To observe effect of application of gelatin sponge impregnated with a mixture of 3 drugs to intraoperative nerve root block to promote early postoperative recovery of lumbar disc herniation. METHODS Retrospective analysis was performed of 265 patients with single-level lumbar disc herniation from January 2013 to October 2017. Patients were divided into intervention and control groups based on intraoperative application of gelatin sponge impregnated with a mixture of 3 drugs. All patients underwent unilateral minimally invasive surgical transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Clinical data, including bedridden period, postoperative hospital stay, visual analog scale scores for low back pain and leg pain, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, postoperative satisfaction questionnaire results, and therapeutic effect, were collected. RESULTS There were 136 cases in the intervention group and 129 cases in the control group. The intervention group had significantly shorter bedridden period and postoperative hospital stay than control group (P < 0.05). Visual analog scale scores for low back pain and leg pain at postoperative days 1-10 were significantly lower in the intervention group compared with control group (P < 0.05). The Japanese Orthopaedic Association score at postoperative day 6 and satisfaction at 72 hours postoperatively were significantly higher in the intervention group than in control group (P < 0.05). Clinical effect at postoperative day 6 was significantly better in the intervention group than control group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Application of gelatin sponge impregnated with a mixture of 3 drugs to intraoperative nerve root block can significantly promote early postoperative recovery of lumbar disc herniation and has great short-term clinical efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Peng Du
- Department of Spine Surgery, Xi'an Jiao Tong University-affiliated Hong Hui Hospital, Xi'an City, Shaanxi Province, China; Medical College, Yan'an University, Yan'an City, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Yong Fan
- Department of Spine Surgery, Xi'an Jiao Tong University-affiliated Hong Hui Hospital, Xi'an City, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Ding Jun Hao
- Department of Spine Surgery, Xi'an Jiao Tong University-affiliated Hong Hui Hospital, Xi'an City, Shaanxi Province, China; Medical College, Yan'an University, Yan'an City, Shaanxi Province, China.
| | - Yun Fei Huang
- Department of Spine Surgery, Xi'an Jiao Tong University-affiliated Hong Hui Hospital, Xi'an City, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Jia Nan Zhang
- Department of Spine Surgery, Xi'an Jiao Tong University-affiliated Hong Hui Hospital, Xi'an City, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Lei Hong Yuan
- Department of Spine Surgery, Xi'an Jiao Tong University-affiliated Hong Hui Hospital, Xi'an City, Shaanxi Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Low Back Pain. Neuromodulation 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-805353-9.00050-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
16
|
Tousignant-Laflamme Y, Martel MO, Joshi AB, Cook CE. Rehabilitation management of low back pain - it's time to pull it all together! J Pain Res 2017; 10:2373-2385. [PMID: 29042813 PMCID: PMC5633330 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s146485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
In the past, rehabilitation research initiatives for low back pain (LBP) have targeted outcome enhancement through personalized treatment approaches, namely through classification systems (CS). Although the use of CS has enhanced outcomes, common management practices have not changed, the prevalence of LBP is still high, and only selected patients meet the CS profile, namely those with a nociceptive context. Similarly, although practice guidelines propose some level of organization and occasionally a timeline of care provision, each mainly provides best practice for isolated treatment approaches. Moreover, there is no theoretical framework that has been proposed that guides the rehabilitation management process of mechanical LBP. In this commentary, we propose a model constituted of five domains (nociceptive drivers, nervous system dysfunction drivers, comorbidities drivers, cognitive–emotional drivers, and contextual drivers) grounded as mechanisms driving pain and/or disability in LBP. Each domain is linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, where once a patient is deemed suitable for rehabilitation, the clinician assesses elements of each domain in order to identify where the relative treatment efforts should be focused. This theoretical model is designed to provide a more comprehensive management overview, by appreciating the relative contribution of each domain driving pain and disability. Considering that the multiple domains driving pain and disability, and their interaction, requires a model that is comprehensive enough to identify and address each related issue, we consider that the proposed model has several positive implications for rehabilitation of this painful and highly prevalent musculoskeletal disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.,Clinicial Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | | | - Anand B Joshi
- Duke Health, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center
| | - Chad E Cook
- Doctor of Physical Therapy Division, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gudavalli MR, Olding K, Joachim G, Cox JM. Chiropractic Distraction Spinal Manipulation on Postsurgical Continued Low Back and Radicular Pain Patients: A Retrospective Case Series. J Chiropr Med 2016; 15:121-8. [PMID: 27330514 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2015] [Revised: 08/25/2015] [Accepted: 08/25/2015] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this case series is to report on changes in pain levels experienced by 69 postsurgical continued pain patients who received Cox Technic Flexion Distraction (CTFD). METHODS Fifteen doctors of chiropractic collected retrospective data from the records of the postsurgical continued pain patients seen in their clinic from February to July 2012 who were treated with CTFD, which is a type of chiropractic distraction spinal manipulation. Informed consent was obtained from all patients who met the inclusion criteria for this study. Data recorded included subjective patient pain levels at the end of the treatments provided and at 24 months following the last treatment. RESULTS Fifty-four (81%) of the patients showed greater than 50% reduction in pain levels at the end of the last treatment, and 13 (19%) showed less than 50% improvement of pain levels at the end of active care (mean, 49 days and 11 treatments). At 24-month follow-up, of 56 patients available, 44 (78.6%) had continued pain relief of greater than 50% and 10 (18%) reported 50% or less relief. The mean percentage of relief at the end of active care was 71.6 (SD, 23.2) and at 24 months was 70 (SD, 25). At 24 months after active care, 24 patients (43%) had not sought further care, and 32 required further treatment consisting of chiropractic manipulation for 17 (53%), physical therapy, exercise, injections, and medication for 9 (28%), and further surgery for 5 (16%). CONCLUSION Greater than 50% pain relief following CTFD chiropractic distraction spinal manipulation was seen in 81% of postsurgical patients receiving a mean of 11 visits over a 49-day period of active care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maruti R Gudavalli
- Professor, Research Department, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, IA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is a term used to define an unsatisfactory outcome of a patient who underwent spinal surgery, irrespective of type or intervention area, with persistent pain in the lumbosacral region with or without it radiating to the leg. The possible reasons and risk factors that would lead to FBSS can be found in distinct phases: in problems already present in the patient before a surgical approach, such as spinal instability, during surgery (for example, from a mistake by the surgeon), or in the postintervention phase in relation to infections or biomechanical alterations. This article reviews the current literature on FBSS and tries to give a new hypothesis to understand the reasons for this clinical problem. The dysfunction of the diaphragm muscle is a component that is not taken into account when trying to understand the reasons for this syndrome, as there is no existing literature on the subject. The diaphragm is involved in chronic lower back and sacroiliac pain and plays an important role in the management of pain perception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Bordoni
- Department of Cardiology, Foundation Don Carlo Gnocchi, IRCCS, Institute of Hospitalization and Care, S Maria Nascente, Milan, Italy; School CRESO, Osteopathic Centre for Research and Studies, Falconara Marittima, Ancona, Italy
| | - Fabiola Marelli
- School CRESO, Osteopathic Centre for Research and Studies, Falconara Marittima, Ancona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
|
20
|
Hayek SM, Veizi E, Hanes M. Intrathecal Hydromorphone and Bupivacaine Combination Therapy for Post-Laminectomy Syndrome Optimized with Patient-Activated Bolus Device. PAIN MEDICINE 2015; 17:561-571. [PMID: 26814257 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnv021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2015] [Revised: 09/07/2015] [Accepted: 09/12/2015] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intrathecal (IT) pumps have become a valuable tool in managing intractable non-cancer pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of using a rigorous treatment algorithm for trialing and implanting IT pumps with hydromorphone and bupivacaine in managing a more homogeneous population of post-laminectomy syndrome or failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) patients. METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of FBSS patients with chronic intractable back pain implanted with IT pumps delivering hydromorphone and bupivacaine. RESULTS A cohort of 57 (26 males, 31 females) consecutively implanted FBSS patients was analyzed. The average age at implant was 65.4 years. Average pain scores were 8.4 ± 0.2 (pre-implant), 4.9 ± 0.4 (6 months), 5.2 ± 0.5 (12 months), and 4.3 ± 0.5 (24 months). Average oral opioid doses in morphine equivalents were 56 ± 10 mg/day (pre-implant), 12.0 ± 3.5 mg/day (12 months), 15 ± 6 mg/day (24 months). Average IT hydromorphone doses were 79 ± 6.8 mcg/day (at implant), 184 ± 22 mcg/day (6 months), 329 ± 48 mcg/day (12 months), and 487 ± 80 mcg (24 months). IT hydromorphone dose escalation from baseline was 133% (6 months vs baseline), 78% (12 months vs 6 months), and 48% from 12 months to 24 months. Average IT bupivacaine doses were 5.8 ± 0.3 mg/day (implant), 9.5 ± 0.6 mg/day (6 months), 12.2 ± 0.7 mg/day (12 months), and 12.6 ± 0.9 mg/day (24 months). CONCLUSION IT hydromorphone and bupivacaine are effective in treating chronic pain of FBSS, as demonstrated by the reduction of pain intensity and oral opioid consumption. However, an IT dose escalation phenomenon was observed, although at a reduced rate compared with what had been previously reported in the literature. It is possible that the local anesthetic combination delivered via a patient-activaed bolus device is an important factor. Despite demonstrating effectiveness, the clinical utility of myPTM-optimized IT therapy remains limited by a lack of prospective, placebo-controlled trials and comparative effectiveness research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salim M Hayek
- *Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio .,Department of Anesthesiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Elias Veizi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Spine Care, Louis Stokes Veterans Administration Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Michael Hanes
- *Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bakshi R, Berri H, Kalpakjian C, Smuck M. The Effects of Local Anesthesia Administration on Pain Experience During Interventional Spine Procedures: A Prospective Controlled Trial. PAIN MEDICINE 2015; 17:488-493. [PMID: 26814251 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnv015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2015] [Revised: 08/19/2015] [Accepted: 09/06/2015] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE It has been postulated that local anesthetic administration may be the most painful part of interventional spine procedures. Despite this, there is a lack of evidence supporting the commonly used traditional technique of anesthetic delivery as part of these procedures. This study tested three hypotheses: 1) alternative method of local anesthesia injection is superior to the traditional method; 2) using the traditional method of injection is not superior to using no local anesthetic; and 3) treatment needle size, anesthetic injection technique, and sedation are associated with pain experienced during procedures. DESIGN Prospective, multicenter clinical trial of 127 participants who underwent elective bilateral symmetric interventional spine procedures in outpatient spine clinics. METHODS Primary outcomes were pain scores during and after procedures to examine the influence of anesthetic injection method and treatment needle gauge on pain experience using linear mixed model regression analysis. A post-hoc comparison of estimated marginal mean pain scores was completed on both anesthetic injection method and treatment needle gauge. CONCLUSIONS The alternative method was superior (P < 0.05) to the traditional method on post procedural pain scores. Injecting local anesthetic with the traditional or alternative method was not superior to using no local anesthetic. Treatment needle size, pain at one inch of treatment needle insertion, and baseline pain were all significantly (P < 0.05) associated with overall procedural pain. Further studies are needed optimize and justify local anesthetic injections for these procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rishi Bakshi
- *Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Hassen Berri
- *Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
| | - Claire Kalpakjian
- *Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Matthew Smuck
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Stanford University, Redwood City, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
A novel, objective, quantitative method of evaluation of the back pain component using comparative computerized multi-parametric tactile mapping before/after spinal cord stimulation and database analysis: The “Neuro-Pain’t” software. Neurochirurgie 2015; 61 Suppl 1:S99-S108. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2014.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2013] [Revised: 08/20/2014] [Accepted: 09/28/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|