Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for craniotomies in the treatment of brain tumors: A systematic review

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Craniotomies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The efficacy of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in neurosurgery has not yet been established. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare the effects of ERAS protocols and conventional perioperative care on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing craniotomy. The primary outcome was postoperative length of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain visual analog pain scores, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), postoperative complications, all-cause reoperation, readmission after discharge, and mortality. A literature search up to August 10, 2023, was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Five studies, including 871 patients, were identified for inclusion in this review. Compared with conventional perioperative care, ERAS protocols reduced the length of postoperative hospital stay (difference of medians, -1.52 days; 95% CI: -2.55 to -0.49); there was high heterogeneity across studies ( I2 , 74%). ERAS protocols were also associated with a lower risk of PONV (relative risk, 0.79; 95% CI: 0.69-0.90; I2 , 99%) and postoperative pain with a visual analog scale score ≥4 at postoperative day 1 (relative risk, 0.37; 95% CI: 0.28-0.49; I2 , 14%). Other outcomes, including postoperative complications, did not differ between ERAS and conventional care groups. ERAS protocols may be superior to conventional perioperative care in craniotomy patients in terms of lower length of hospital stay, lower incidence of PONV, and improved postoperative pain scores. Further randomized trials are required to identify the impact of ERAS protocols on the quality of recovery after craniotomy.

Qualitative Research on the Causes of Kinesiophobia in Postoperative Cerebellar Tumor Patients

OBJECTIVE

To understand the causes of kinesiophobia in postoperative patients with cerebellar tumors, and to provide the basis for early rehabilitation regimen.

METHODS

Using the objective sampling method, 16 postoperative cerebellar tumor patients were extracted for semi-structured interviews. Data was analyzed using the Colaizzi 7-step method, and the theme was refined.

RESULTS

The causes of kinesiophobia in postoperative cerebellar tumor patients were summarized into 4 themes: Excessive vigilance to self-state. Increased pain sensitivity and fear of dizziness were regarded as threat signals, which brought excessive burden on the current therapeutic regimen. Uncertainty of early rehabilitation. Lack of cognition, uncertainty effect of early rehabilitation, and insufficient exercise of self-efficacy. Psychological stress and avoidant emotion. Economic pressure and avoidant emotion ran out of control. Vulnerable support system. Deficient in professional technique, family, and social support.

CONCLUSION

The kinesiophobia in postoperative cerebellar tumor patients is composed of multiple factors. Medical staff are supposed to help patients establish a correct perception of disease status. The information on early rehabilitation needs to be transmitted continually. To promote patients to participate in early rehabilitation activities energetically, it is vital to keep a high level of rehabilitation effect expectation, increased self-exercise efficiency, psychological intervention, and strong multi-party cooperation in an improved social support system.

Designing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols in Neurosurgery: A Contemporary Narrative Review

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have revolutionized the approach to perioperative care in various surgical specialties. They reduce complications, improve patient outcomes, and shorten hospital lengths of stay. Implementation of ERAS protocols for neurosurgical procedures has been relatively underexplored and underutilized due to the unique challenges and complexities of neurosurgery. This narrative review explores the barriers to, and pioneering strategies of, standardized procedure-specific ERAS protocols, and the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration in neurosurgery and neuroanesthsia, patient-centered approaches, and continuous quality improvement initiatives, to achieve better patient outcomes. It also discusses initiatives to guide future clinical practice, research, and guideline creation, to foster the development of tailored ERAS protocols in neurosurgery.

The advantages of general anesthesia subthalamic deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease in the enhanced recovery after surgery: A randomized clinical trial

Background and Aims

With advancements in imaging and microelectrode recording techniques, general anesthesia (GA) has emerged as an alternative option for Parkinson's disease (PD) patients undergoing subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS). In this study, we compared the advantages and disadvantages of using GA and local anesthesia for STN-DBS in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS).

Methods

Surgical outcomes of STN-DBS were evaluated using the unified PD rating scales (UPDRS). CT and magnetic resonance imaging scans are used to evaluate intracranial conditions. State-trait anxiety inventory and hospital anxiety and depression scale are used to evaluate patients' perioperative psychology.

Results

Anesthesia method does not significantly impact the accuracy of microelectrode placement or the improvement of postoperative symptoms. However, the local anesthesia group had a higher incidence of intracranial air, as well as higher rates of postoperative complications such as headache, dizziness, vomiting, and delirium. GA effectively alleviated preoperative anxiety and resulted in lower levels of perioperative anxiety and psychological stress compared to local anesthesia. Additionally, the GA group had shorter surgery duration, earlier ambulation, and a shorter average hospital stay.

Conclusion

DBS under GA is safe and effective. Due to shorter surgical duration, reduced occurrence of perioperative complications, effective reduction of preoperative anxiety, and faster postoperative recovery, DBS under GA is better aligned with the concept of ERAS.

Sixth Annual Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Symposium highlights: work in progress or standard care?

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have demonstrated effectiveness in accelerating patient recovery and improving outcomes. Since the systemwide implementation of ERAS protocols at Baylor Scott & White Health, an annual multidisciplinary conference has provided a review of outcomes and advancements in the ERAS program. This meeting, coined the ERAS symposium, allows providers who utilize recovery protocols to collaborate with national and international leaders in the field to improve the clinical care of patients. The sixth annual ERAS symposium was held on February 10, 2023, and provided key presentations that discussed the latest results from ERAS efforts across multiple surgical specialties along with updates in anesthesia, nursing, and nutrition. A summary of those presentations, which included perioperative glycemic control, misconceptions in pain management, and emerging ERAS protocols in different surgical specialties, is provided to document the system progress.