A method for recording facial motor response over occipitalis muscle

Occipitalis muscle: using for repetitive facial nerve stimulation in myasthenia gravis

Repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) is a highly sensitive electrophysiological test used for diagnosing myasthenia gravis (MG). Here, we evaluated electrodiagnostic value of RNS using facial nerve and occipitalis muscle. Patients with generalized MG were included. Clinical findings were assessed. RNS test was performed on occipitalis, nasalis, trapezius, abductor policis brevis (APB) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles. Twenty-five (78%) patients had relevant decrement during RNS test of at least one muscle. Nasalis muscle had the highest diagnostic potential (68.8%), followed by trapezius (53.3%), occipitalis (50%), APB (30%) and ADM (16.7%) muscles. There was not a significant relationship between clinical symptoms and facial RNS recorded on occipitalis muscle. In conclusion, we suggest that facial RNS recording over occipitalis muscle can be added in electrodiagnosis of MG because of cranial nerve innervation and proximal location. Facial RNS recording over occipitalis muscle provides a good choice under the conditions such as atrophy, cosmetic surgery, or botulinum toxin application in which nasalis muscle is unavailable for use.

Repetitive Facial Nerve Stimulation Using Occipitalis Muscle

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of repetitive nerve stimulation recorded on occipitalis muscle by comparing recordings on nasalis muscle in healthy subjects.

METHODS

A total of 23 healthy subjects (mean age: 44.7 ± 13.8 years) underwent detailed neurological examination and repetitive nerve stimulation using nasalis and occipitalis muscles. Amplitude and area percentage changes of compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) after repetitive nerve stimulation with different frequency were compared between right and left sides and between recordings on nasalis and occipitalis muscles.

RESULTS

Comparisons of percentage amplitude changes of nasalis and occipitalis CMAPs showed no differences (+0.1% ± 3.8% vs. +1.4% ± 3.9%, P = 0.129). Average area percentage change of nasalis CMAPs was 0.3% ± 19.0%, whereas the value of occipitalis CMAP was +2.8% ± 15.2% (P = 0.851). Comparisons of nasalis and occipitalis CMAPs values showed no differences.

CONCLUSIONS

The repetitive nerve stimulation recorded on occipitalis muscle is simple, easy to apply, noninvasive, consistent, and reproducible.

Electrophysiologic Evaluation of the Facial Nerve and Blink Reflex Pathways in Asymptomatic Cochlear Implant Users

Objective

To evaluate the functional integrity of the facial nerve and blink reflex (BR) pathways in asymptomatic patients who underwent cochlear implantation (CI).

Study Design

Case series with planned data collection.

Setting

Tertiary referral center.

Subjects and Methods

Twenty-four deafened patients with unilateral CI who had no complications were enrolled. Bilateral compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) of the facial nerve were recorded over the nasalis and occipitalis muscles, whereas BR responses were recorded over the orbicularis oculi after supraorbital nerve stimulation. All recordings were performed when the external part of the implant was in place (CIp) and after its removal (CIr), except occipitalis recordings, which were performed only after removal. The amplitude and latency of CMAP were measured to evaluate the axonal integrity of the zygomatic and posterior branches of the facial nerve. Latency, amplitude, and duration of the BR were measured to investigate the integrity of trigeminofacial connections.

Results

The amplitude and latency of CMAP over the nasalis muscle were bilaterally normal, and the difference between CIp and CIr was not statistically significant. No CMAP of the occipitalis muscle was recorded in 4 (16.7%) patients, and low-amplitude responses were recorded on the implant side of 20 (83.3%). Amplitudes of the contralateral R2 response were higher in the CIp condition versus the CIr condition ( P = .031). There were no differences among other BR components.

Conclusion

During functioning of the CI system, excitability of the facial circuit may increase either through the facial motor nucleus or through removal of the inhibitory effect of the descending pathway.