Effect of movement rate on corticokinematic coherence

Simultaneous EEG recording of cortical tracking of speech and movement kinematics

RATIONALE

Cortical activity is coupled with streams of sensory stimulation. The coupling with the temporal envelope of heard speech is known as the cortical tracking of speech (CTS), and that with movement kinematics is known as the corticokinematic coupling (CKC). Simultaneous measurement of both couplings is desirable in clinical settings, but it is unknown whether the inherent dual-tasking condition has an impact on CTS or CKC.

AIM

We aim to determine whether and how CTS and CKC levels are affected when recorded simultaneously.

METHODS

Twenty-three healthy young adults underwent 64-channel EEG recordings while listening to stories and while performing repetitive finger-tapping movements in 3 conditions: separately (audio- or tapping-only) or simultaneously (audio-tapping). CTS and CKC values were estimated using coherence analysis between each EEG signal and speech temporal envelope (CTS) or finger acceleration (CKC). CTS was also estimated as the reconstruction accuracy of a decoding model.

RESULTS

Across recordings, CTS assessed with reconstruction accuracy was significant in 85 % of the subjects at phrasal frequency (0.5 Hz) and in 68 % at syllabic frequencies (4-8 Hz), and CKC was significant in over 85 % of the subjects at movement frequency and its first harmonic. Comparing CTS and CKC values evaluated in separate recordings to those in simultaneous recordings revealed no significant difference and moderate-to-high levels of correlation.

CONCLUSION

Despite the subtle behavioral effects, CTS and CKC are not evidently altered by the dual-task setting inherent to recording them simultaneously and can be evaluated simultaneously using EEG in clinical settings.

Proprioceptive response strength in the primary sensorimotor cortex is invariant to the range of finger movement

Proprioception is the sense of body position and movement that relies on afference from the proprioceptors in muscles and joints. Proprioceptive responses in the primary sensorimotor (SM1) cortex can be elicited by stimulating the proprioceptors using evoked (passive) limb movements. In magnetoencephalography (MEG), proprioceptive processing can be quantified by recording the movement evoked fields (MEFs) and movement-induced beta power modulations or by computing corticokinematic coherence (CKC) between the limb kinematics and cortical activity. We examined whether cortical proprioceptive processing quantified with MEF peak strength, relative beta suppression and rebound power and CKC strength is affected by the movement range of the finger. MEG activity was measured from 16 right-handed healthy volunteers while movements were applied to their right-index finger metacarpophalangeal joint with an actuator. Movements were either intermittent, every 3000 ± 250 ms, to estimate MEF or continuous, at 3 Hz, to estimate CKC. In both cases, 4 different ranges of motion of the stimuli were investigated: 15, 18, 22 and 26 mm for MEF and 6, 7, 9 and 13 mm for CKC. MEF amplitude, relative beta suppression and rebound as well as peak CKC strength at the movement frequency were compared between the movement ranges in the source space. Inter-individual variation was also compared between the MEF and CKC strengths. As expected, MEF and CKC responses peaked at the contralateral SM1 cortex. MEF peak, beta suppression and rebound and CKC strengths were similar across all movement ranges. Furthermore, CKC strength showed a lower degree of inter-individual variation compared with MEF strength. Our result of absent modulation by movement range in cortical responses to passive movements of the finger indicates that variability in movement range should not hinder comparability between different studies or participants. Furthermore, our data indicates that CKC is less prone to inter-individual variability than MEFs, and thus more advantageous in what pertains to statistical power.

From thinking fast to moving fast: motor control of fast limb movements in healthy individuals

The ability to produce high movement speeds is a crucial factor in human motor performance, from the skilled athlete to someone avoiding a fall. Despite this relevance, there remains a lack of both an integrative brain-to-behavior analysis of these movements and applied studies linking the known dependence on open-loop, central control mechanisms of these movements to their real-world implications, whether in the sports, performance arts, or occupational setting. In this review, we cover factors associated with the planning and performance of fast limb movements, from the generation of the motor command in the brain to the observed motor output. At each level (supraspinal, peripheral, and motor output), the influencing factors are presented and the changes brought by training and fatigue are discussed. The existing evidence of more applied studies relevant to practical aspects of human performance is also discussed. Inconsistencies in the existing literature both in the definitions and findings are highlighted, along with suggestions for further studies on the topic of fast limb movement control. The current heterogeneity in what is considered a fast movement and in experimental protocols makes it difficult to compare findings in the existing literature. We identified the role of the cerebellum in movement prediction and of surround inhibition in motor slowing, as well as the effects of fatigue and training on central motor control, as possible avenues for further research, especially in performance-driven populations.

More comprehensive proprioceptive stimulation of the hand amplifies its cortical processing

Corticokinematic coherence (CKC) quantifies the phase coupling between limb kinematics and cortical neurophysiological signals reflecting proprioceptive feedback to the primary sensorimotor (SM1) cortex. We studied whether the CKC strength or cortical source location differs between proprioceptive stimulation (i.e., actuator-evoked movements) of right-hand digits (index, middle, ring, and little). Twenty-one volunteers participated in magnetoencephalography measurements during which three conditions were tested: 1) simultaneous stimulation of all four fingers at the same frequency, 2) stimulation of each finger separately at the same frequency, and 3) simultaneous stimulation of the fingers at finger-specific frequencies. CKC was computed between MEG responses and accelerations of the fingers recorded with three-axis accelerometers. CKC was stronger (P < 0.003) for the simultaneous (0.52 ± 0.02) than separate (0.45 ± 0.02) stimulation at the same frequency. Furthermore, CKC was weaker (P < 0.03) for the simultaneous stimulation at the finger-specific frequencies (0.38 ± 0.02) than for the separate stimulation. CKC source locations of the fingers were concentrated in the hand region of the SM1 cortex and did not follow consistent finger-specific somatotopic order. Our results indicate that proprioceptive afference from the fingers is processed in partly overlapping cortical neuronal circuits, which was demonstrated by the modulation of the finger-specific CKC strengths due to proprioceptive afference arising from simultaneous stimulation of the other fingers of the same hand as well as overlapping cortical source locations. Finally, comprehensive simultaneous proprioceptive stimulation of the hand would optimize functional cortical mapping to pinpoint the hand region, e.g., prior brain surgery.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Corticokinematic coherence (CKC) can be used to study cortical proprioceptive processing and localize proprioceptive hand representation. Our results indicate that proprioceptive stimulation delivered simultaneously at the same frequency to fingers (D2-D4) maximizes CKC strength allowing robust and fast localization of the human hand region in the sensorimotor cortex using MEG.

Assessing spino-cortical proprioceptive processing in childhood unilateral cerebral palsy with corticokinematic coherence

OBJECTIVE

To develop an electrophysiological marker of proprioceptive spino-cortical tracts integrity based on corticokinematic coherence (CKC) in young children with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP), in whom behavioral measures are not applicable.

METHODS

Electroencephalography (EEG) signals from 12 children with UCP aged 19 to 57 months were recorded using 128-channel EEG caps while their fingers were moved at 2 Hz by an experimenter, in separate sessions for the affected and non-affected hands. The coherence between movement kinematics and EEG signals (i.e., CKC) was computed at the sensor and source (using a realistic head model) levels. Peaks of CKC obtained for the affected and non-affected hands were compared for location and strength. The relation between CKC strength on the lesion-side, the lesion-type (cortico-subcortical vs. subcortical) and the level of manual ability were studied with 2-way repeated-measures ANOVA.

RESULTS

At the individual level, a significant CKC peak at the central area contralateral to the moved hand was found in all young children with their non-affected hand and in 8 out of 12 children with their affected hand. At the group level, CKC to the affected hand movements was weaker than CKC to the non-affected hand movements. This difference was influenced by the type of lesion, the effect being predominant in the subgroup (n = 5) with cortico-subcortical lesions.

CONCLUSION

CKC is measurable with EEG in young children with UCP and provides electrophysiological evidence for altered proprioceptive spino-cortical tracts on the lesioned brain hemisphere, particularly in children with cortico-subcortical lesions.

Corticokinematic coherence is stronger to regular than irregular proprioceptive stimulation of the hand

Proprioceptive afference can be investigated using corticokinematic coherence (CKC), which indicates coupling between limb kinematics and cortical activity. CKC has been quantified using proprioceptive stimulation (movement actuators) with fixed interstimulus interval (ISI). However, it is unclear how regularity of the stimulus sequence (jitter) affects CKC strength. Eighteen healthy volunteers (16 right-handed, 27.8 ± 5.0 yr, 7 females) participated in magnetoencephalography (MEG) session in which their right index finger was continuously moved at ∼3 Hz with Constant 333 ms ISI or with 20% Jitter (ISI 333 ± 66 ms) using a pneumatic-movement actuator. Three minutes of data per condition were collected. Finger kinematics were recorded with a three-axis accelerometer. CKC strength was defined as the peak coherence value in the Rolandic MEG gradiometer pair contralateral to the movement at 3 Hz. Both conditions resulted in significant coherence peaking in the gradiometers over the primary sensorimotor cortex. Constant stimulation yielded stronger CKC at 3 Hz (0.78 ± 0.11 vs. 0.66 ± 0.13, P < 0.001) and its first harmonic (0.60 ± 0.19 vs. 0.27 ± 0.11, P < 0.001) than irregular stimulation. Similarly, the respective sustained-movement evoked field was also stronger for constant stimulation. The results emphasize the importance of temporal stability of the proprioceptive stimulation sequence when quantifying CKC strength. The weaker CKC during irregular stimulation can be explained with temporal and thus spectral scattering of the paired peripheral and cortical events beyond the mean stimulation frequency. This impairs the signal-to-noise ratio of respective MEG signal and thus CKC strength. When accurately estimating and following changes in CKC strength, we suggest using precise movement actuators with constant stimulation sequence.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Cortical proprioceptive processing can be investigated using corticokinematic coherence (CKC). The findings show that CKC method is sensitive to temporal stability in the stimulation sequence. Although both regular and irregular sequences resulted in robust coherence, the regular stimulation sequence with pneumatic movement actuator is recommended to maximize coherence strength and reproducibility to allow better comparability between groups or populations.

Sensorimotor Mapping With MEG: An Update on the Current State of Clinical Research and Practice With Considerations for Clinical Practice Guidelines

In this article, we present the clinical indications and advances in the use of magnetoencephalography to map the primary sensorimotor (SM1) cortex in neurosurgical patients noninvasively. We emphasize the advantages of magnetoencephalography over sensorimotor mapping using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Recommendations to the referring physicians and the clinical magnetoencephalographers to achieve appropriate sensorimotor cortex mapping using magnetoencephalography are proposed. We finally provide some practical advice for the use of corticomuscular coherence, cortico-kinematic coherence, and mu rhythm suppression in this indication. Magnetoencephalography should now be considered as a method of reference for presurgical functional mapping of the sensorimotor cortex.

Feasibility and reproducibility of electroencephalography-based corticokinematic coherence

The most important message in this report is that the corticokinematic coherence (CKC) method is a feasible and reproducible tool to quantify, map, and follow cortical proprioceptive (“the movement sense”) processing using EEG that is more widely available for CKC recordings than previously used magnetoencephalographic designs, in basic research, but especially in clinical environments. We provide useful recommendations for optimal EEG derivations for cost-effective experimental designs, allowing large sample size studies.

Evidence for genetically determined degeneration of proprioceptive tracts in Friedreich ataxia

OBJECTIVE

To assess with magnetoencephalography the developmental vs progressive character of the impairment of spinocortical proprioceptive pathways in Friedreich ataxia (FRDA).

METHODS

Neuromagnetic signals were recorded from 16 right-handed patients with FRDA (9 female patients, mean age 27 years, mean Scale for the Assessment and Rating Of ataxia [SARA] score 22.25) and matched healthy controls while they performed right finger movements either actively or passively. The coupling between movement kinematics (i.e., acceleration) and neuromagnetic signals was assessed by the use of coherence at sensor and source levels. Such coupling, that is, the corticokinematic coherence (CKC), specifically indexes proprioceptive afferent inputs to the contralateral primary sensorimotor (cSM1) cortex. Nonparametric permutations and Spearman rank correlation test were used for statistics.

RESULTS

In both groups of participants and movement conditions, significant coupling peaked at the cSM1 cortex. Coherence levels were 70% to 75% lower in patients with FRDA than in healthy controls in both movement conditions. In patients with FRDA, coherence levels correlated with genotype alteration (i.e., the size of GAA1 triplet expansion) and the age at symptom onset but not with disease duration or SARA score.

CONCLUSION

This study provides electrophysiologic evidence demonstrating that proprioceptive impairment in FRDA is mostly genetically determined and scarcely progressive after symptom onset. It also positions CKC as a reliable, robust, specific marker of proprioceptive impairment in FRDA.

Neuromagnetic Cerebellar Activity Entrains to the Kinematics of Executed Finger Movements

This magnetoencephalography (MEG) study aims at characterizing the coupling between cerebellar activity and the kinematics of repetitive self-paced finger movements. Neuromagnetic signals were recorded in 11 right-handed healthy adults while they performed repetitive flexion-extensions of right-hand fingers at three different movement rates: slow (~ 1 Hz), medium (~ 2 Hz), and fast (~ 3 Hz). Right index finger acceleration was monitored with an accelerometer. Coherence analysis was used to index the coupling between right index finger acceleration and neuromagnetic signals. Dynamic imaging of coherent sources was used to locate coherent sources. Coupling directionality between primary sensorimotor (SM1), cerebellar, and accelerometer signals was assessed with renormalized partial directed coherence. Permutation-based statistics coupled with maximum statistic over the entire brain volume or restricted to the cerebellum were used. At all movement rates, maximum coherence peaked at SM1 cortex contralateral to finger movements at movement frequency (F0) and its first harmonic (F1). Significant (statistics restricted to the cerebellum) coherence consistently peaked at the right posterior lobe of the cerebellum at F0 with no influence of movement rate. Coupling between Acc and cerebellar signals was significantly stronger in the afferent than in the efferent direction with no effective contribution of cortico-cerebellar or cerebello-cortical pathways. This study demonstrates the existence of significant coupling between finger movement kinematics and neuromagnetic activity at the posterior cerebellar lobe ipsilateral to finger movement at F0. This coupling is mainly driven by spinocerebellar, presumably proprioceptive, afferences.

Movement Kinematics Dynamically Modulates the Rolandic ~ 20-Hz Rhythm During Goal-Directed Executed and Observed Hand Actions

This study investigates whether movement kinematics modulates similarly the rolandic α and β rhythm amplitude during executed and observed goal-directed hand movements. It also assesses if this modulation relates to the corticokinematic coherence (CKC), which is the coupling observed between cortical activity and movement kinematics during such motor actions. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) signals were recorded from 11 right-handed healthy subjects while they performed or observed an actor performing the same repetitive hand pinching action. Subjects' and actor's forefinger movements were monitored with an accelerometer. Coherence was computed between acceleration signals and the amplitude of α (8-12 Hz) or β (15-25 Hz) oscillations. The coherence was also evaluated between source-projected MEG signals and their β amplitude. Coherence was mainly observed between acceleration and the amplitude of β oscillations at movement frequency within bilateral primary sensorimotor (SM1) cortex with no difference between executed and observed movements. Cross-correlation between the amplitude of β oscillations at the SM1 cortex and movement acceleration was maximal when acceleration was delayed by ~ 100 ms, both during movement execution and observation. Coherence between source-projected MEG signals and their β amplitude during movement observation and execution was not significantly different from that during rest. This study shows that observing others' actions engages in the viewer's brain similar dynamic modulations of SM1 cortex β rhythm as during action execution. Results support the view that different neural mechanisms might account for this modulation and CKC. These two kinematic-related phenomena might help humans to understand how observed motor actions are actually performed.